Why do whites always grovel

[klip11]

White people always grovel for "stealing" land from the Indians (feather not dot). Whites constantly apologize for slavery. Why do you YT's do this?

North Africa and the Middle East used to be Christian lands, but it was conquered by the Muslims. Muslims don't grovel to Christians for taking their land. They kept Christians as slaves. They are proud of it. To them, it means that Allah was with them and granted them victory over the infidels.

If blacks kept whites as slaves, do you think blacks would have ever let whites go free willingly? Black people would brag about enslaving whites and be proud of it.

Apologizing and groveling for past deeds really does seem to be a white thing.

 

[Deleted member 17531]

free money for me

 

[Gengar’s Ghost]

Except the Muslims were natives to the land they “took”. Whites aren’t native to America. At least, not the original inhabitants… so bad example.

 

[HarrierDuBois]

I won't apologize for mogging.

 

[klip11]

Except the Muslims were natives to the land they “took”. Whites aren’t native to America. At least, not the original inhabitants… so bad example.

Example still stands. They took many Christians as slaves and forced them to convert. When one Indian tribe went and slaughtered the neighboring tribe and took the young women as slaves, did they apologize constantly or do you think they were proud of their conquest?

 

[Gengar’s Ghost]

Example still stands. They took many Christians as slaves and forced them to convert. When one Indian tribe went and slaughtered the neighboring tribe and took the young women as slaves, did they apologize constantly or do you think they were proud of their conquest?

That’s because again, it’s natives doing their thing against other natives.. different from outsiders doing it.

 

[klip11]

That’s because again, it’s natives doing their thing against other natives.. different from outsiders doing it.

No it's not different. That's just an arbitrary distinction you made. And the Blackfoot tribe are "outsiders" to the Cherokee tribe

 

[Deleted member 17791]

That’s because again, it’s natives doing their thing against other natives.. different from outsiders doing it.

arabs weren't native to north africa.

 

[Gengar’s Ghost]

No it's not different. That's just an arbitrary distinction you made. And the Blackfoot tribe are "outsiders" to the Cherokee tribe

Cope. All feather people are the same.

 

[Gengar’s Ghost]

arabs weren't native to north africa.

And?

 

[latincell95]

White people always grovel for "stealing" land from the Indians (feather not dot). Whites constantly apologize for slavery. Why do you YT's do this?

North Africa and the Middle East used to be Christian lands, but it was conquered by the Muslims. Muslims don't grovel to Christians for taking their land. They kept Christians as slaves. They are proud of it. To them, it means that Allah was with them and granted them victory over the infidels.

If blacks kept whites as slaves, do you think blacks would have ever let whites go free willingly? Black people would brag about enslaving whites and be proud of it.

Apologizing and groveling for past deeds really does seem to be a white thing.

Whites, as a whole, are an "altruistic" race. When the British conquered Africa and Palestine, instead of genociding all the niggers and Jews, getting rid of two of the biggest threats to society, instead they gave them modern medicine, infrastructure, hospitals, shopping malls, modernized cities, etc. Now, how did the Jews and blacks repay whitey for all of this? Well, by flooding their nation with unrelenting third world immigration, and poisoning their white sons/daughters with cultural marxist propaganda (e.g. there are more than two genders, feel free to cut your dick off and become a tranny goy).

 

[Deleted member 17791]

And?

so your argument doesn't apply. It was not natives fighting other natives, they were invaders from another land.

 

[gsizzle]

White people always grovel for "stealing" land from the Indians (feather not dot). Whites constantly apologize for slavery. Why do you YT's do this?

North Africa and the Middle East used to be Christian lands, but it was conquered by the Muslims. Muslims don't grovel to Christians for taking their land. They kept Christians as slaves. They are proud of it. To them, it means that Allah was with them and granted them victory over the infidels.

If blacks kept whites as slaves, do you think blacks would have ever let whites go free willingly? Black people would brag about enslaving whites and be proud of it.

Apologizing and groveling for past deeds really does seem to be a white thing.

Because of propaganda from you know who’s.

 

[RetardSubhuman]

we white people are inherently evil and we must apologize to black and ethnic people who have been oppressed for centuries

 

[Gengar’s Ghost]

so your argument doesn't apply. It was not natives fighting other natives, they were invaders from another land.

No but the natives decided to become Muslims. Yes Arabs settled there as well but it was still the natives themselves who decided to revert…

 

[Jase]

no one "owns" any land.

 

[Beetlejuice]

we white people are inherently evil and we must apologize to black and ethnic people who have been oppressed for centuries

True @Decretum1483

 

[RetardSubhuman]

True @Decretum1483

this nigga roped

 

[Deleted member 17791]

No but the natives decided to become Muslims. Yes Arabs settled there as well but it was still the natives themselves who decided to revert…

muh 'revert' jfl.

 

[Ozsaraal]

Not all whites are apologetic and the whole apologising thing is a new thing the greeks and romans didn't apologise for slautering other Europeans

And the British invading Africa they didn't apologise either, it's just modern retards today who apologise on their behalf

Which is stupid cause the Europeans of the old days if they heard whites today would be like 'fuck off don't apologise on my behalf we did all of that for a reason'

 

[PrinceLuenLeoncur]

Not all whites are apologetic and the whole apologising thing is a new thing the greeks and romans didn't apologise for slautering other Europeans

And the British invading Africa they didn't apologise either, it's just modern retards today who apologise on their behalf

Which is stupid cause the Europeans of the old days if they heard whites today would be like 'fuck off don't apologise on my behalf we did all of that for a reason'

The whites aren’t these Altruistic fucks @latincell95 says they were, they genocided entire races (Abos and natives) enslaved others (BBCs and curries) and forcibly converted the rest of the world to their god. They even became chinas drug dealer forcing them to accept trade in the Opium wars.

It’s just so bloody brutal tbh whites were complete wankers the reason why they never slayed Jews and blacks is because whites are bullies, if they kill all blacks Jews and curries then there is nobody for them to bully, whites got a solid boner when they said “niggers Jews and curries are subhumans” why would any cumskin genocide them when you can keep them alive in squalor to feel better about yourself.

 

[Deleted member 18522]

Example still stands. They took many Christians as slaves and forced them to convert. When one Indian tribe went and slaughtered the neighboring tribe and took the young women as slaves, did they apologize constantly or do you think they were proud of their conquest?

The Christian’s in mena were colonizers to begin with it was always Arab/Jew land

 

[Ozsaraal]

The whites aren’t these Altruistic fucks @latincell95 says they were, they genocided entire races (Abos and natives) enslaved others (BBCs and curries) and forcibly converted the rest of the world to their god. They even became chinas drug dealer forcing them to accept trade in the Opium wars.

It’s just so bloody brutal tbh whites were complete wankers the reason why they never slayed Jews and blacks is because whites are bullies, if they kill all blacks Jews and curries then there is nobody for them to bully, whites got a solid boner when they said “niggers Jews and curries are subhumans” why would any cumskin genocide them when you can keep them alive in squalor to feel better about yourself.

They didn't so much keep them alive for fun,

Genociding in that sense is logistically quite difficult they didn't keep them alive in like a deliberate sense, as weird as this sounds most people survive wars,more die of disease, and wars and conquests kill a lot of people in a brutal way which gives the illusion that everyone's getting slaughtered, whereas in reality that's only happening to a small portion of the invaded population enough so the invader can achieve there strategic aims

Which does not mean killing ever single person, just killing enough in a tactical sense to achieve strategic aims

Also logistically it would be near impossible, imagine if the British or ductch French whatever tried to kill every single bbc in africa, it's a whole continent, it would be next to impossible, plus conquest is more about subjugation than just killing everyone

Trying to kill every bbc would unite them since there high t low inhib low iq many bbc are happy to kill eachover without European help

 

[PrinceLuenLeoncur]

They didn't so much keep them alive for fun,

Genociding in that sense is logistically quite difficult they didn't keep them alive in like a deliberate sense, as weird as this sounds most people survive wars,more die of disease, and wars and conquests kill a lot of people in a brutal way which gives the illusion that everyone's getting slaughtered, whereas in reality that's only happening to a small portion of the invaded population enough so the invader can achieve there strategic aims

Which does not mean killing ever single person, just killing enough in a tactical sense to achieve strategic aims

Also logistically it would be near impossible, imagine if the British or ductch French whatever tried to kill every single bbc in africa, it's a whole continent, it would be next to impossible, plus conquest is more about subjugation than just killing everyone

Trying to kill every bbc would unite them since there high t low inhib low iq many bbc are happy to kill eachover without European help

The Belgium king killed 15 million in his ingonfree state in his 20 or so years there. It’s quite easy to lead to the death of a people hundreds of years behind you militarily and technologically. Infact Africa’s population was and always has been sparse Europeans introduction of medicine is why africa population is big even the rhodesians said when they first went to Zimbabwe there was only 1 million blacks, within 80 years there were 11 thanks to the medicine. Europeans purposely kept them alive to mogg them and as we now know today that backfired. Even if the blacks United they’d lose what can 5k men/cavalry do agaisnt a British army of 100 witb 30 maxin guns and artillery? Jack shit is what they can’t do fuck all

 

[Deleted member 21077]

youre a nigger.

 

[Ozsaraal]

The Belgium king killed 15 million in his ingonfree state in his 20 or so years there. It’s quite easy to lead to the death of a people hundreds of years behind you militarily and technologically. Infact Africa’s population was and always has been sparse Europeans introduction of medicine is why africa population is big even the rhodesians said when they first went to Zimbabwe there was only 1 million blacks, within 80 years there were 11 thanks to the medicine. Europeans purposely kept them alive to mogg them and as we now know today that backfired. Even if the blacks United they’d lose what can 5k men/cavalry do agaisnt a British army of 100 witb 30 maxin guns and artillery? Jack shit is what they can’t do fuck all

I didn't know that about population that's interesting

I guess it did backfire africa could of been a giant second europe,

It's sort of like how the technologically advanced romans bullied and defeated the primitive barbarians but hundreds of years later the barbarians eventually beat the romans

I wonder if not anything soon but in like 200 hundred or 300 or 400 years from now power might shift and africa might one day conquer Europe and the west same with asians

But right now whites and the west still mog everyone but it could change, but Europe might regret keeping them alive for the fun of mogging

But it might backfire cause it's all fun and games until BBC comes around and blacks your women

 

[klip11]

But it might backfire cause it's all fun and games until BBC comes around and blacks your women

Quote of the year

 

[KEy21_]

Reel them back into trusting you

So you can redo said crimes and profit off of them

Extremely dark triad

 

[GuyFromSingapore]

muh 'revert' jfl.

We are all born as Muslims. It's our fitra.

Fitra - Wikipedia

en.m.wikipedia.org

Just kidding.

 

[Deleted member 17791]

We are all born as Muslims. It's our fitra.

Fitra - Wikipedia

en.m.wikipedia.org

Just kidding.

Yeah I now about this. Watched a few youtube islam vids before

 

[GuyFromSingapore]

Yeah I now about this. Watched a few youtube islam vids before

I have an extremely funny video by an Atheist satiring Muzzies.

Wanna watch?

 

[Deleted member 17791]

I have an extremely funny video by an Atheist satiring Muzzies.

Wanna watch?

Not really, You can link if you want

 

[GuyFromSingapore]

Not really, You can link if you want

1:57

 

[Deleted member 17791]

1:57

sheesh