why does everyone think forward growth= attractive

D

Deleted member 16683

Kraken
Joined
Dec 20, 2021
Posts
4,946
Reputation
3,450
whenever i look at trm posts with side profiles a lot of people have average at best faces with good orthodontic profile and it begs the question, is forward growth really correlated that much with beauty?

i have this guy here as an example
 

Attachments

  • 7CEE146E-8A5E-42B3-919F-69CDD63FA3BB.png
    7CEE146E-8A5E-42B3-919F-69CDD63FA3BB.png
    2.1 MB · Views: 0
  • 40F3B89C-DF89-4A36-A50B-986A30601F0D.png
    40F3B89C-DF89-4A36-A50B-986A30601F0D.png
    1.8 MB · Views: 0
  • JFL
  • Ugh..
Reactions: PURE ARYAN GENETICS, Deleted member 25377, Deleted member 8869 and 2 others
females without forward growth are absolutely disgusting looking to me. projected profile=ideal.
 
  • +1
  • Woah
Reactions: berlin.1969, Ukcel1388, MadTwatter and 4 others
That mf is tilt frauding. Not a good side profile
Not horrendous, but not forward grown
IMG 20230126 200215
 
Last edited:
  • +1
  • Love it
Reactions: Deleted member 14392, MadTwatter, Deleted member 20399 and 2 others
..
 
Last edited:
his growth is sloped downwards, forward growth mostly looks good if it's either neutral or upwards.
 
  • +1
Reactions: virren, Deleted member 2268 and Deleted member 24444
whats his chin to philtrum ratio
 
the ideal isn't to have the most of everything/the biggest everything, it's to be next to impossible to define and quantify

most people who have an elite feature or two will look suboptimal (even though still better than the average person, assuming no flaws that neutralize it)
 
mouthbreather.
 
Chad face has forward growth. İts undeniable fact
 
  • +1
Reactions: virren and Deleted member 2268
twink gets anally destroyed by fat redditors
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 25377

Attachments

  • 4B8BC2DA-D8FD-4E7D-A988-B9EEAB79AA02.png
    4B8BC2DA-D8FD-4E7D-A988-B9EEAB79AA02.png
    2.5 MB · Views: 0
  • 8899CDAA-78E3-41AE-B981-31561A938D30.png
    8899CDAA-78E3-41AE-B981-31561A938D30.png
    2.5 MB · Views: 0
  • JFL
Reactions: Deleted member 21044
phineas and ferb
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 25377
females without forward growth are absolutely disgusting looking to me. projected profile=ideal.
I also think so BUT according to traditional beauty standards, less projected face is MORE feminine, surprisingly. Look even at the ancient statues...

Artemis, beautiful goddess of Hunt:
Diana-at-Versailles-YouFine-Sculpture-4.jpg


Aphrodite, Goddess of love, lulz:
Venus-de-Milo-YouFine-Sculpture-2.jpg


All most beautiful females in human history have pancake faces...
 
His nose tip is like mine. Brutally over

And to answer your stance op, no there is a weak correlation at best, so many soft tissues and lateral growth and ratios aren’t present on side profile that are everything for front.
 
JFL you fucking idiot. He's downgrown tiltfrauding mouthbreather.
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 24444 and thereallegend
I also think so BUT according to traditional beauty standards, less projected face is MORE feminine, surprisingly. Look even at the ancient statues...

Artemis, beautiful goddess of Hunt:
Diana-at-Versailles-YouFine-Sculpture-4.jpg


Aphrodite, Goddess of love, lulz:
Venus-de-Milo-YouFine-Sculpture-2.jpg


All most beautiful females in human history have pancake faces...
sculptors were not blackpilled back then
 
because
B2fa8809917c4b9aed5ca18e144e7d70  young  beautiful beautiful boys
 
  • JFL
Reactions: Iblamejordan
JFL you fucking idiot. He's downgrown tiltfrauding mouthbreather.
You do know the majority of people never mouthbreathed, right? Yet side profiles that even approach psl ideals are like 1 in a 100
 
  • +1
  • JFL
Reactions: horizontallytall, It'snotover, Deleted member 25667 and 2 others
You do know the majority of people never mouthbreathed, right? Yet side profiles that even approach psl ideals are like 1 in a 100
Mouthbreather is just a buzzword i use. I mean incorrect oral and cranial posture in general, not necessarily mouthbreathing.
 
JFL you fucking idiot. He's downgrown tiltfrauding mouthbreather.
you call everyone downgrown mouthbreather. i could find plenty of examples of average people with forward grown profiles on truerateme
You do know the majority of people never mouthbreathed, right? Yet side profiles that even approach psl ideals are like 1 in a 100
exactly
 
  • +1
Reactions: horizontallytall
sculptors were not blackpilled back then
Lol, no, They were blackpilled even more than today.

It just shows that beauty is a thing of culture, not objective truth. Just nowadays, forward growth, aka "angel skull" is being pushed a lot in the mass media. Just 40 years ago, all the most beautiful actresses had pancake faces.
 
I also think so BUT according to traditional beauty standards, less projected face is MORE feminine, surprisingly. Look even at the ancient statues...

Artemis, beautiful goddess of Hunt:
Diana-at-Versailles-YouFine-Sculpture-4.jpg


Aphrodite, Goddess of love, lulz:
Venus-de-Milo-YouFine-Sculpture-2.jpg


All most beautiful females in human history have pancake faces...
Those who made these subhuman sculptures should get fired+killed in a painful unforgiving death.
 
  • JFL
Reactions: MSEinvestigator, Lawton88 and Artemis
you call everyone downgrown mouthbreather. i could find plenty of examples of average people with forward grown profiles on truerateme
Go ahead. I'd be surprised tbh.
 
Lol, no, They were blackpilled even more than today.

It just shows that beauty is a thing of culture, not objective truth. Just nowadays, forward growth, aka "angel skull" is being pushed a lot in the mass media. Just 40 years ago, all the most beautiful actresses had pancake faces.
perhaps they just had those sculptures show the average dentofacial growth as a representation of most women
Go ahead. I'd be surprised tbh.
i posted another one above.
 
perhaps they just had those sculptures show the average dentofacial growth as a representation of most women
I don't think so. After all they made those male statues with 1-inch penises. I doubt an average Roman penis was 1 inch. It is just that at that time, big penis was not seen positively - it was a barbarian thing.
 
I don't think so. After all they made those male statues with 1-inch penises. I doubt an average Roman penis was 1 inch. It is just that at that time, big penis was not seen positively - it was a barbarian thing.
but also maybe they never saw truly forward grown beautiful women and if they did it was rare maybe since they didn't have access to social media and such. personally i've always found forward grown side to be beautiful subconsciously.
 
  • +1
Reactions: Artemis
Niggas discussing Roman penises
 
  • JFL
Reactions: Deleted member 25667 and Artemis
but also maybe they never saw truly forward grown beautiful women and if they did it was rare maybe since they didn't have access to social media and such. personally i've always found forward grown side to be beautiful subconsciously.
Me too.
 
His front profile is well above average esp his cheekbone prominence proving forward growth is a crucial part of the equation but he’s cucked by jew nose and low averageness
 
His front profile is well above average esp his cheekbone prominence proving forward growth is a crucial part of the equation but he’s cucked by jew nose and low averageness
not well above average it's average. maybe lense distortion is cucking him but he has bad harmony and his cheekbone prominence/zygos is not impressive either
 
Because it generally does.
 
  • JFL
Reactions: horizontallytall and Deleted member 20370
  • JFL
Reactions: horizontallytall, Deleted member 21532 and Artemis
Ngl you have a valid point, his forward growth is pretty good and his side profile isn't the best.
 
Ngl you have a valid point, his forward growth is pretty good and his side profile isn't the best.
i assume you mean his front profile isn't the best? i mean both are suboptimal but his side profile is pretty decent imo. front looks significantly worse
 
  • +1
Reactions: MSEinvestigator
i assume you mean his front profile isn't the best? i mean both are suboptimal but his side profile is pretty decent imo. front looks significantly worse
Well his side profile isn’t anything i’m impressed by but his forward growth is insanely good.

But yes basically i agree that you can have good forward growth but still look normie af.
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 16683
Well his side profile isn’t anything i’m impressed by but his forward growth is insanely good.

But yes basically i agree that you can have good forward growth but still look normie af.
exactly, which is why i don't agree when mewers and people like dr mew correlate attractiveness with being forward grown. it's really just a small piece of the puzzle. in fact, the majority of good looking people i see aren't even forward grown. they usually aren't recessed at least by a noticeable amount, but not very forward grown either.
 
  • +1
Reactions: MSEinvestigator and Artemis
plenty of people i see on a daily basis with forward growth are pretty average looking
That’s because they(subconsciusly) tilt their head upward due to their forward cranial posture and maybe bad airways too. Forward neck posture + head tilted upward= frauded forward growth and front is looksminned because eyes looks worse if the head is tilted up. I can say that in first person because i ALWAYS thought i was forward grown, until i realised that my neck was too much forward and that head was tilted upward. I fixed my shitty posture months ago and Now i have double chin, if bones won't remodel in 3 years i'll have to get a bsso, brutal.
 
another example here below

not always. actually often there can be some recession. lucky blue smith is recessed i'm pretty sure
@UnluckyRedSmith
 
From the front he looks deformed. His eyes are asymmetrical as hell and his nose is fucking wonky. His features & proportions are just efukt. Maybe he has a better looking brother but it never began for this nigga.

A jew nose & tilt frauding does not = forward growth. When are you femcels gonna understand this??
 
From the front he looks deformed. His eyes are asymmetrical as hell and his nose is fucking wonky. His features & proportions are just efukt. Maybe he has a better looking brother but it never began for this nigga.

A jew nose & tilt frauding does not = forward growth. When are you femcels gonna understand this??
he is not recessed. and like you mentioned be gas asymmetrical prey eyes, huge nose, the list goes on. and these things are not caused by recession, which he does not have anyway
 
whenever i look at trm posts with side profiles a lot of people have average at best faces with good orthodontic profile and it begs the question, is forward growth really correlated that much with beauty?

i have this guy here as an example
The critical part of foreward growth is making sure its NOT DOWNWARD SHIFTED.
If the face is downgrown but projected, the soft tissues being pulled down will negate the foreward growth and become stretched. Thats why for many people if you just pull your skin up, it reveals decent bone structure but gravity pulls it down making you look bone less.

The key is a cranial base that acts as bone support for the actual face.
 
  • +1
Reactions: 5'7 zoomer and AscendingHero
The critical part of foreward growth is making sure its NOT DOWNWARD SHIFTED.
If the face is downgrown but projected, the soft tissues being pulled down will negate the foreward growth and become stretched. Thats why for many people if you just pull your skin up, it reveals decent bone structure but gravity pulls it down making you look bone less.

The key is a cranial base that acts as bone support for the actual face.
so ccw is the key to being hot
 
  • +1
Reactions: 5'7 zoomer and AscendingHero

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top