Why does Nation of Islam (black supremacists) use bell boy outfits?

[Deleted member 5802]

muh back migration
muh Eurasian mixture

We have "Natufian" related ancestry, Natufian related ancestry is in North Africa before Natufians even exist, see Taforalt

It is native to North Africa

There is a preprint timing the formation of "Non African" component to 67-101 kya, which is pre Out of Africa, Eurasian ancestry split off inside Africa so Eurasian related ancestry =/= Eurasian

Also, our close genetic affinity to Eurasians isn't purely explained by Eurasian ancestry, Eurasians are a subset of North East Africans, so of course North East Africans are going to be genetically close to Eurasians, regardless of whether we have admixture or not, why do you think Dinkas pull towards Eurasians relative to West Africans on PCA? Dinkas have no Eurasian whatsover as seen with their lack of Neanderthal but West Africans do, explain this?

The Fulani and Cushitic (an eastern Afroasiatic subfamily) AACs, which likely reflect Saharan African and East African ancestry, respectively, are closest to the non-African AACs, consistent with an East African migration of modern humans out of Africa or a back-migration of non-Africans into Saharan and Eastern Africa.

the "Eurasian" ancestry of North East Africans is largely native, and now, remains have been found to prove this: Al Khiday

Natufians/Neolithic Levantines have been invoked to explain the non-SSA ancestry of Egypt, Nubia and the Horn, but now we have this:

Al Khiday Late Palaeolithic (AKH) is close to Hierakonpolis C-Group (MMD=0.04), Al Khiday Neolithic (0.01), Neolithic Ghaba (0.06), Kerma Ancien/Moyen (0.02), Kerma Classique (0.01), and Napatan Tombos (0.04); these distances do not differ significantly (Supplementary Table S6). Of all samples, Late Palaeolithic Al Khiday is farthest from Final Neolithic Gebel Ramlah (MMD=0.19), Meroitic (0.17), and Gebel Sahaba (0.17).

12th millenium BC Central Sudanese ppl showing affinities to C group, Kerma and Napata, groups that will be rich in "Eurasian related" ancestry, this is too early to be explained with Natufians.

I agree with you some what that most of our “Eurasian” dna is native African dna and those Eurasians likely predate Arabs and Europeans.
You argument could be that east Africans just mixed with Africans who left Africa in due to environmental factors that out of Africa groups developed “Caucasiod” features and came back to Africa and mixed with the East Africans.

I don’t understand why you deny ouadmixture

-But still we genetically cluster with Eurasians
- we have a good amount of Neanderthal dna
- a site found in Kenya had 40 percent Eurasian dna and the genes for blue eyes and lightskin
Why do you think people keep calling East Africans Arabs. Having Eurasian dna doesn’t make us less African than the Bantus

 

[hairyballscel]

I don’t understand why you deny ouadmixture

the study on the right uses druze and sardinians as a proxy for eurasian dna, sardinians are rich in EEF, a population with strong north african ancestry(basal eurasian) which is also present in east africans
the pic on the left is outdated nigga, read the study, they made an error on an ethiopian genome, eurasian ancestry in africa is up to 101,000 YEARS OLD

-But still we genetically cluster with Eurasians

eurasians are subsets of north africans, you can't adress why Dinkas behave they way they do on PCA
yes admixture plays a role, im not denying this

- we have a good amount of Neanderthal dna

The African introgression hypothesis suggests that Late Pleistocene Neanderthal mtDNAs originated through gene flow from an African source8, which we constrain taking place more than ∼270 ka (Table 1). Our analytical calculations (Supplementary Table 8 and Supplementary Note 5) show that this event is plausible even if the introgressing lineage represented a minimal proportion of the initial gene pool.

its not all due to eurasian ancestry

- a site found in Kenya had 40 percent Eurasian dna and the genes for blue eyes and lightskin

i hope your not talking about the pastoral neolithic, because if so your completely wrong on the eye color thing and their "eurasian" ancestry was strongly natufian like with taforalt affinities, what we would expect from native north east africans, so not fully eurasian

 

[Deleted member 5802]

the study on the right uses druze and sardinians as a proxy for eurasian dna, sardinians are rich in EEF, a population with strong north african ancestry(basal eurasian) which is also present in east africans
the pic on the left is outdated nigga, read the study, they made an error on an ethiopian genome, eurasian ancestry in africa is up to 101,000 YEARS OLD

eurasians are subsets of north africans, you can't adress why Dinkas behave they way they do on PCA
yes admixture plays a role, im not denying this

The African introgression hypothesis suggests that Late Pleistocene Neanderthal mtDNAs originated through gene flow from an African source8, which we constrain taking place more than ∼270 ka (Table 1). Our analytical calculations (Supplementary Table 8 and Supplementary Note 5) show that this event is plausible even if the introgressing lineage represented a minimal proportion of the initial gene pool.

its not all due to eurasian ancestry

i hope your not talking about the pastoral neolithic, because if so your completely wrong on the eye color thing and their "eurasian" ancestry was strongly natufian like with taforalt affinities, what we would expect from native north east africans, so not fully eurasian

So basically what you saying is the Eurasian dna within East Africans is basically native North African related dna?

I agree with you on Europeans being an extension of African diversity since many Greeks and Southern Europeans carry African halpagroups it’s why Eurocentrists Wanna claim that halpagroup E is Eurasian in origin.

East Africans most likely got their phenotypes through the environment and admixture with Eurasians. North Africans would never had be black due to the environment in North Africa being radically different to sub Saharan Africa but according to Rock art found in North Africa they would had been darker skinned.

I personally wouldn’t call East African horners black their phenotype is just to radically different to the rest of sub Saharan Africans. I think it’s fair to classify them with the northern Africans. Which is why they were called Caucasiod by Europeans. Even my dad who’s Sudanese has straight hair but in my dna tests I didn’t come up with any Arab related dna it was East African and northern African.