why don't we simply combat global warming by mass turning our air conditioners on?

[Deleted member 287651]

 

[larpslayer1488]

Let's pour ice into oceans to stop ice melting in Antarctica.

 

[Deleted member 287651]

Let's pour ice into oceans to stop ice melting in Antarctica.

you can't "pour" something that's in solid aggregate state

 

[2026ceI]

you can't "pour" something that's in solid aggregate state

yes u can

 

[Deleted member 180145]

I thought you didn't have air conditioning in europe

 

[Deleted member 287651]

yes u can

proof?

 

[larpslayer1488]

you can't "pour" something that's in solid aggregate state

Why It's Grammatically Fine​

• "Pour" means to cause a substance to flow from a container into another in a steady stream.
• Ice cubes can flow in a stream (e.g., from an ice bucket or dispenser), so technically, you can pour them.
• It's similar to how we say "pour cereal" or "pour nuts"—solid items that flow freely.
  
  (And yes, I used ai for this.)

 

[Deleted member 287651]

Why It's Grammatically Fine​

• "Pour" means to cause a substance to flow from a container into another in a steady stream.
• Ice cubes can flow in a stream (e.g., from an ice bucket or dispenser), so technically, you can pour them.
• It's similar to how we say "pour cereal" or "pour nuts"—solid items that flow freely.
  
  (And yes, I used ai for this.)

> talking about a physical process

> why it's "grammatically" fine

and i know you used ai. except it's obvious from the wording, it's also obvious you are too low iq to provide an answer on your own

p. s. not to mention how fucking garbage the "reasoning" above is

 

[2026ceI]

proof?

u can pour sand

 

[larpslayer1488]

> talking about a physical process

> why it's "grammatically" fine

and i know you used ai. except it's obvious from the wording, it's also obvious you are too low iq to provide an answer on your own

p. s. not to mention how fucking garbage the "reasoning" above is

You're retarded, the same way you pour cereal, you can also pour ice. And everything I said is factually true. Also, I didn't want to bother typing out a reply, but here you go. I challenge you to name ONE wrong thing I've said that qualifies me as low IQ or any mistakes I've made.

 

[larpslayer1488]

> talking about a physical process

> why it's "grammatically" fine

and i know you used ai. except it's obvious from the wording, it's also obvious you are too low iq to provide an answer on your own

p. s. not to mention how fucking garbage the "reasoning" above is

View attachment 4495998

The way you just refuted yourself is ironic.