Why face ratings are never accurate

EnglandBadman

EnglandBadman

Ex Drug Dealer
Joined
Aug 19, 2023
Posts
5,731
Reputation
6,672
Face ratings are never truly accurate because:

-Your being rated by males who are not attracted to your gender, therefore they can’t accurately measure attractiveness to the opposite sex. (Leads to men being bias towards male gaze as most attractive)
-Too many mathmatical statistics on facial ratios+features+colouring+development etc (theres too much to analyse in a human face and all of these statistics must be combined), harmony is a very broad and complex measurement that cant be explained by analysis alone. You will know when you see an attractive face immediately, you shouldnt have to analyse feature by feature to determine if someone is attractive, that defeats the purpose. Humans are programmed to analyse attractiveness subconsciously, not through conscious analysis. Attractiveness is a complex interplay of various factors.
-personal bias: links to point 1, no matter what, people will always have some level of bias when rating. Wheat waffles rates gingers higher because he is ginger himself. We also naturally find people who resemble our parents to be more attractive, so this also has an affect on perceptions. People who rate here are usually self taught from the internet alone since they are rotters, this leads to scewed perspectives.
-Changing Trends: Trends in attractiveness evolve over time and can be influenced by societal shifts, fashion trends, and cultural changes. This dynamism makes it challenging to establish a fixed measurement. For example, asians had lower smv before BTS/kpop, and it suddenly sky rocketed. Also there are more diverse populations, e.g more british born ethnics which means the sterotypes of traditional ethnics is less prevalent.

What is the true way of knowing your general rating?

Simple, just look at your interactions with women. How do women respond to you? Do most of them find you attractive? Do some find you extremely attractive but others dont find you attractive at all?(meaning your niche) Do you get a lot of IOIs?

Dont take advice on how to cook great chicken from a vegetarian. Dont take leg workout routines from the guy who only hits chest and back. You wouldn’t take facial hair grooming advice from a woman. A woman wouldn’t take pregnancy/period advice from a man.
 
  • +1
Reactions: Detective, YoYqkim, TechnoBoss and 6 others
F7023FA3 343B 4D8F 94CC 151B6452F088
 
  • JFL
  • +1
  • Ugh..
Reactions: It'snotover, pppokerface, TechnoBoss and 4 others
Face ratings are never truly accurate because:

-Your being rated by males who are not attracted to your gender, therefore they can’t accurately measure attractiveness to the opposite sex. (Leads to men being bias towards male gaze as most attractive)
-Too many mathmatical statistics on facial ratios+features+colouring+development etc (theres too much to analyse in a human face and all of these statistics must be combined), harmony is a very broad and complex measurement that cant be explained by analysis alone. You will know when you see an attractive face immediately, you shouldnt have to analyse feature by feature to determine if someone is attractive, that defeats the purpose. Humans are programmed to analyse attractiveness subconsciously, not through conscious analysis. Attractiveness is a complex interplay of various factors.
-personal bias: links to point 1, no matter what, people will always have some level of bias when rating. Wheat waffles rates gingers higher because he is ginger himself. We also naturally find people who resemble our parents to be more attractive, so this also has an affect on perceptions. People who rate here are usually self taught from the internet alone since they are rotters, this leads to scewed perspectives.
-Changing Trends: Trends in attractiveness evolve over time and can be influenced by societal shifts, fashion trends, and cultural changes. This dynamism makes it challenging to establish a fixed measurement. For example, asians had lower smv before BTS/kpop, and it suddenly sky rocketed. Also there are more diverse populations, e.g more british born ethnics which means the sterotypes of traditional ethnics is less prevalent.

What is the true way of knowing your general rating?

Simple, just look at your interactions with women. How do women respond to you? Do most of them find you attractive? Do some find you extremely attractive but others dont find you attractive at all?(meaning your niche) Do you get a lot of IOIs?

Dont take advice on how to cook great chicken from a vegetarian. Dont take leg workout routines from the guy who only hits chest and back. You wouldn’t take facial hair grooming advice from a woman. A woman wouldn’t take pregnancy/period advice from a man.
agree. to some people you might be a fucking 0 and to some people you might be chadlite. the way you can figure it out yourself is how they treat you.
 
  • +1
Reactions: miles tioki
send your face in pms
 
  • +1
Reactions: hungryplayground175 and ElTruecel
Wow couldn´t have ever thought about that! :oops::oops::oops:
Almost like it ain´t dumb for men to rate themself for women :eek::eek::eek::eek::eek::eek:
 
Face ratings are always accurate if they come from person with: history wizard pfp
1701300037152
 
  • JFL
  • +1
Reactions: pppokerface, CreepyJewel1 and ahdhwu123
psl is the biggest meme and to think i believed in this bs when a year ago fuck angelo
 
  • +1
Reactions: spongebob
Face ratings are never truly accurate because:

-Your being rated by males who are not attracted to your gender, therefore they can’t accurately measure attractiveness to the opposite sex. (Leads to men being bias towards male gaze as most attractive)
-Too many mathmatical statistics on facial ratios+features+colouring+development etc (theres too much to analyse in a human face and all of these statistics must be combined), harmony is a very broad and complex measurement that cant be explained by analysis alone. You will know when you see an attractive face immediately, you shouldnt have to analyse feature by feature to determine if someone is attractive, that defeats the purpose. Humans are programmed to analyse attractiveness subconsciously, not through conscious analysis. Attractiveness is a complex interplay of various factors.
-personal bias: links to point 1, no matter what, people will always have some level of bias when rating. Wheat waffles rates gingers higher because he is ginger himself. We also naturally find people who resemble our parents to be more attractive, so this also has an affect on perceptions. People who rate here are usually self taught from the internet alone since they are rotters, this leads to scewed perspectives.
-Changing Trends: Trends in attractiveness evolve over time and can be influenced by societal shifts, fashion trends, and cultural changes. This dynamism makes it challenging to establish a fixed measurement. For example, asians had lower smv before BTS/kpop, and it suddenly sky rocketed. Also there are more diverse populations, e.g more british born ethnics which means the sterotypes of traditional ethnics is less prevalent.

What is the true way of knowing your general rating?

Simple, just look at your interactions with women. How do women respond to you? Do most of them find you attractive? Do some find you extremely attractive but others dont find you attractive at all?(meaning your niche) Do you get a lot of IOIs?

Dont take advice on how to cook great chicken from a vegetarian. Dont take leg workout routines from the guy who only hits chest and back. You wouldn’t take facial hair grooming advice from a woman. A woman wouldn’t take pregnancy/period advice from a man.

Is this your way of coping with how unattractive you are?
 
  • +1
Reactions: CreepyJewel1
Face ratings are never truly accurate because:

-Your being rated by males who are not attracted to your gender, therefore they can’t accurately measure attractiveness to the opposite sex. (Leads to men being bias towards male gaze as most attractive)
-Too many mathmatical statistics on facial ratios+features+colouring+development etc (theres too much to analyse in a human face and all of these statistics must be combined), harmony is a very broad and complex measurement that cant be explained by analysis alone. You will know when you see an attractive face immediately, you shouldnt have to analyse feature by feature to determine if someone is attractive, that defeats the purpose. Humans are programmed to analyse attractiveness subconsciously, not through conscious analysis. Attractiveness is a complex interplay of various factors.
-personal bias: links to point 1, no matter what, people will always have some level of bias when rating. Wheat waffles rates gingers higher because he is ginger himself. We also naturally find people who resemble our parents to be more attractive, so this also has an affect on perceptions. People who rate here are usually self taught from the internet alone since they are rotters, this leads to scewed perspectives.
-Changing Trends: Trends in attractiveness evolve over time and can be influenced by societal shifts, fashion trends, and cultural changes. This dynamism makes it challenging to establish a fixed measurement. For example, asians had lower smv before BTS/kpop, and it suddenly sky rocketed. Also there are more diverse populations, e.g more british born ethnics which means the sterotypes of traditional ethnics is less prevalent.

What is the true way of knowing your general rating?

Simple, just look at your interactions with women. How do women respond to you? Do most of them find you attractive? Do some find you extremely attractive but others dont find you attractive at all?(meaning your niche) Do you get a lot of IOIs?

Dont take advice on how to cook great chicken from a vegetarian. Dont take leg workout routines from the guy who only hits chest and back. You wouldn’t take facial hair grooming advice from a woman. A woman wouldn’t take pregnancy/period advice from a man.
Bro is onto something
 
Is this your way of coping with how unattractive you are?
Unattractive men can still get sex. Tbh I think dick size matters more if you’re looking purely for sex.
 
  • Hmm...
Reactions: GuyFromSingapore

Similar threads

Piratecel
Replies
29
Views
424
slavicpsycho
slavicpsycho
axeyyek
Replies
40
Views
607
axeyyek
axeyyek
chief detectiveman
Replies
11
Views
1K
Jojobarret
Jojobarret
chief detectiveman
Replies
8
Views
2K
bourgeoizyzz
bourgeoizyzz
G
Replies
19
Views
2K
NitoRump
N

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top