Seth Walsh
Iconoclast
Contributor
- Joined
- Jan 12, 2020
- Posts
- 10,453
- Reputation
- 21,278
Human "Game Theory" evolution updates fast as new technologies and Nash equilibriums emerge.
Why redpill worked before 2010? Literal going to bars and clubs with muscles and a douchebag attitude.
Well it worked because women are always horny and looking for male interest, but don't want to be taken advantage of. The late 2010s hit and women flooded sites like Gawker, some even appearing on shows like Dr Phil to warn about "playboy cassanovas".
The weird thing? It worked. It really did. But then a consensus hit. So pre 2006, women had fun with some guy "running redpill", and felt somewhat used, but not devastated.
What happens next is weird mathematics. If you run this style of game across many men (think, less charming, less facially good looking, less calibrated), in a monte-carlo style simulation; you get too many outlier cases where women feel shame and "use/abuse" privately for it to feel positive EV.
Consensus hits, and the PUA method gets patched. Some of it is human psychology and behaviour updating for long term outcome, and reputation/esteem preservation; some of it is TECHNOLOGY. Information simply travels faster as each year goes on.
PUA became more subtle. Men lying to women about their intentions, using status, money, even looks. Continued in the early 2010s. Chads at raves gave women just enough plausible deniability to not feel "used". And not feel JUDGED by the consensus.
Once a cosensus updates, a method gets PATCHED. It's this simple.
Female gaze maxxing worked in the early 2020s. Using the psycology of Vinnie Hacker and associates as being "soft" "truly caring" and still a man they'd want to fuck them. Women INDIVIDUALLY thought this. There was the upside of fun and excitement, and no real downside. So Chads femalegaze and tiktokkermaxxing DOMINATED 2020-2023. Hard domination. These guys cleaned up all the girls. Proof of this can be found in threads and posts from 2020-2023.
Here's the extremely brutal part. Sub5s and LTNs started wearing chains, getting flufffy hair, skateboards and baggy shirts.
The sub5 femalegazemaxxer projects EXACTLY the following.
“I am going to publicly cast you as the vulnerable woman so I can look like the gentleman.”
Too much ensuant weirdness across the ensemble of women that femalegazemaxxing was "used" on, and the method gets PATCHED.
It's been hard patched now for at least 1-2+ years.
If you want to know when femalegazemaxxing got patched. Do a google trends search and media search for whenabouts "performative males" first started getting popularised and mocked.
What's next?
My most fucked up and bold prediction EVER. Not a crypto prediction. Not practical looksmax advice. None of that.
My prediction is that the next form of running game won't be "looks", won't be "LMS", won't be "redpill", "jestermaxxing" or anything like that.
It will be, REAL CARE without ulterior motive. Guys become so good at faking this, and will literally become the top slayers for a while.
Most likely they will use advanced AI and large language models to completely reverse engineer the psychology and idiosyncracies of the girl they're talking to, down to the exact way she thinks, and exploit that.
Why redpill worked before 2010? Literal going to bars and clubs with muscles and a douchebag attitude.
Well it worked because women are always horny and looking for male interest, but don't want to be taken advantage of. The late 2010s hit and women flooded sites like Gawker, some even appearing on shows like Dr Phil to warn about "playboy cassanovas".
The weird thing? It worked. It really did. But then a consensus hit. So pre 2006, women had fun with some guy "running redpill", and felt somewhat used, but not devastated.
What happens next is weird mathematics. If you run this style of game across many men (think, less charming, less facially good looking, less calibrated), in a monte-carlo style simulation; you get too many outlier cases where women feel shame and "use/abuse" privately for it to feel positive EV.
Consensus hits, and the PUA method gets patched. Some of it is human psychology and behaviour updating for long term outcome, and reputation/esteem preservation; some of it is TECHNOLOGY. Information simply travels faster as each year goes on.
PUA became more subtle. Men lying to women about their intentions, using status, money, even looks. Continued in the early 2010s. Chads at raves gave women just enough plausible deniability to not feel "used". And not feel JUDGED by the consensus.
Once a cosensus updates, a method gets PATCHED. It's this simple.
Female gaze maxxing worked in the early 2020s. Using the psycology of Vinnie Hacker and associates as being "soft" "truly caring" and still a man they'd want to fuck them. Women INDIVIDUALLY thought this. There was the upside of fun and excitement, and no real downside. So Chads femalegaze and tiktokkermaxxing DOMINATED 2020-2023. Hard domination. These guys cleaned up all the girls. Proof of this can be found in threads and posts from 2020-2023.
Here's the extremely brutal part. Sub5s and LTNs started wearing chains, getting flufffy hair, skateboards and baggy shirts.
The sub5 femalegazemaxxer projects EXACTLY the following.
“I am going to publicly cast you as the vulnerable woman so I can look like the gentleman.”
Too much ensuant weirdness across the ensemble of women that femalegazemaxxing was "used" on, and the method gets PATCHED.
It's been hard patched now for at least 1-2+ years.
If you want to know when femalegazemaxxing got patched. Do a google trends search and media search for whenabouts "performative males" first started getting popularised and mocked.
What's next?
My most fucked up and bold prediction EVER. Not a crypto prediction. Not practical looksmax advice. None of that.
My prediction is that the next form of running game won't be "looks", won't be "LMS", won't be "redpill", "jestermaxxing" or anything like that.
It will be, REAL CARE without ulterior motive. Guys become so good at faking this, and will literally become the top slayers for a while.
Most likely they will use advanced AI and large language models to completely reverse engineer the psychology and idiosyncracies of the girl they're talking to, down to the exact way she thinks, and exploit that.
