why foids "iq" mog men and the reasons behind that

[alurmo]

even since i was a kid its been shoved down in goyducation and media that foids are smarter then men
But this goes down to that foid teachers are legit way more then male teachers, so they are naturally biased and poisoned to be inclined towards their own gender, but then college performance also is a factor
even if women are smarter i think there's logical reasons behind why they could have developed better in academic fields which are imo inherintly unmanly and made for domesticated slaves

firstly il start with attacking the idea of even being a scholar and muh study bro!!
its a obedience driven system, the idea of being a student requires incredible obedience, this is why i lowk respect the niggers who were in my school that were dropouts and shit, they see more in life then listening to roasties lecture them on muh this and that
often the foids who excell in school lack original creativeness, this also why niggers are good rappers and artist, no time for school when ur next album requires better and creative lyrics and shieet

secondly why foids could be better then us in scholarlic intelligence, Academic success requires a specific kind of "intelligence", the ability to sit still, follow a sequence, and master a system(in maths, science, business, etc..) foids historically have been socialized towards a more orderly life, historically being forced in strict roles, not saying theres a direct correlation but its a thing ofc
foids also lack more chaotic impulses compared to men, ultimately they dominate academia bc of their inclinations to master order, but again school and college dont include all parts of life, the whole idea of acedemia is towards order and the mastering of what exists, which is not the whole picture of life, also foids physical stature presents a logical reason to go to the iq faculties, they are literally weaker then us, thus perhaps evolution had to designate their strenghts to other outlets, like the brain and whatnot, u cant be weak and stupid, that would be a evolutionary mistake

Third, let me talk abt outliers and why men reach greater peaks then foids, as a nigga who reads alot of philosophy, the fact that men do reach those higher peaks could be a way of them having more power, bc men inherintly have more wills to power then women if we were to talk in philosophical terms, while using nietzsche's terminology

fourth, another criticism of school systems and whatnot, grades are in total a very sheeple type of assessing intelligence, all at the end of the day used to mass assess the goy herd, all the while being words and letters on computers and paper, even tho women likely do exceed in alot of disciplines, Men excel in fields that require a detachment from social harmony(likeliness for the herd sheeple) like Physics, Philosophy and Engineering and bc men are statistically less concerned with agreeableness wiht the sheeple herd, they are often more willing to propose radical or socially disruptive theories which could be the credit of many ideas in science and philosophy, foids basically master whats been laid by men

fifth, education crushes the male soul, we dont want to be domesticated, but since historically women were borderline domesticated it could be they find warmth in educational spaces, but when men do good in school, its either in intellectual isolation(women cant do this bc of their tendency to stay within the warmth of the academic consensus/sheeple), breaking existing systems and theories (women just weave and decorate the existing structures and theories) and Abstract Obsession(men are more AUTYSTIC in their studies, focusing on a non-human objects like machines, math, metaphysics, engineering shit, philosophy, shieet even bp science)

lastly, men prefer higher stake persuits of intelligence, for example napoleon and alexander II, their intelligence obv lying in high stakes strategic winning, this requires alot of ego, which women lack, napoleon or alexander wouldnt have reached their heights without a strong ego, also like i said before in the thread, our scholarly excellence mostly would come from a reckless obsession that ignores health, family, and social standing to solve a single equation or conquer a single field, like newton who was collapsing while writing his Principia Mathematica or spinoza, who lived in total intellectual isolation after being excommunicated by his community, like even recent examples of obessants, not in scholar spaces, could be bobby fischer, his absolute focus on the chessboard made him "unfit" for goyciety, which is why he prob said the joos were evil cus he wasnt a goyim



TLDR- JFL @ SOCIETY AND THEIR FAILURE OF CULTIVATING MEN'S INCLINATIONS

and to add this at the end, all this is just theory, not been proven(even tho it could be easily proven), if u can disagree and challenge what i said then ur welcome

 

[alurmo]

@Aox Ofwar @PrettyboyQ

 

[R3nd4nqzar]

Conditioned to think like that ?

 

[stevielake]

Every man that's walked this earth has one goal: sniff and pound a woman's sweaty holes while huffing the backshot wind.

Are we the NPC gender?

 

[Sceptical]

this black brah unironically has a good point

 

[Jimcel]

What? this is so wrong

 

[Topkra]

I tought this was common sense?
I will never accept this in front of a woman tho

 

[PrettyboyQ]

even since i was a kid its been shoved down in goyducation and media that foids are smarter then men
But this goes down to that foid teachers are legit way more then male teachers, so they are naturally biased and poisoned to be inclined towards their own gender, but then college performance also is a factor
even if women are smarter i think there's logical reasons behind why they could have developed better in academic fields which are imo inherintly unmanly and made for domesticated slaves

firstly il start with attacking the idea of even being a scholar and muh study bro!!
its a obedience driven system, the idea of being a student requires incredible obedience, this is why i lowk respect the niggers who were in my school that were dropouts and shit, they see more in life then listening to roasties lecture them on muh this and that
often the foids who excell in school lack original creativeness, this also why niggers are good rappers and artist, no time for school when ur next album requires better and creative lyrics and shieet

secondly why foids could be better then us in scholarlic intelligence, Academic success requires a specific kind of "intelligence", the ability to sit still, follow a sequence, and master a system(in maths, science, business, etc..) foids historically have been socialized towards a more orderly life, historically being forced in strict roles, not saying theres a direct correlation but its a thing ofc
foids also lack more chaotic impulses compared to men, ultimately they dominate academia bc of their inclinations to master order, but again school and college dont include all parts of life, the whole idea of acedemia is towards order and the mastering of what exists, which is not the whole picture of life, also foids physical stature presents a logical reason to go to the iq faculties, they are literally weaker then us, thus perhaps evolution had to designate their strenghts to other outlets, like the brain and whatnot, u cant be weak and stupid, that would be a evolutionary mistake

Third, let me talk abt outliers and why men reach greater peaks then foids, as a nigga who reads alot of philosophy, the fact that men do reach those higher peaks could be a way of them having more power, bc men inherintly have more wills to power then women if we were to talk in philosophical terms, while using nietzsche's terminology

fourth, another criticism of school systems and whatnot, grades are in total a very sheeple type of assessing intelligence, all at the end of the day used to mass assess the goy herd, all the while being words and letters on computers and paper, even tho women likely do exceed in alot of disciplines, Men excel in fields that require a detachment from social harmony(likeliness for the herd sheeple) like Physics, Philosophy and Engineering and bc men are statistically less concerned with agreeableness wiht the sheeple herd, they are often more willing to propose radical or socially disruptive theories which could be the credit of many ideas in science and philosophy, foids basically master whats been laid by men

fifth, education crushes the male soul, we dont want to be domesticated, but since historically women were borderline domesticated it could be they find warmth in educational spaces, but when men do good in school, its either in intellectual isolation(women cant do this bc of their tendency to stay within the warmth of the academic consensus/sheeple), breaking existing systems and theories (women just weave and decorate the existing structures and theories) and Abstract Obsession(men are more AUTYSTIC in their studies, focusing on a non-human objects like machines, math, metaphysics, engineering shit, philosophy, shieet even bp science)

lastly, men prefer higher stake persuits of intelligence, for example napoleon and alexander II, their intelligence obv lying in high stakes strategic winning, this requires alot of ego, which women lack, napoleon or alexander wouldnt have reached their heights without a strong ego, also like i said before in the thread, our scholarly excellence mostly would come from a reckless obsession that ignores health, family, and social standing to solve a single equation or conquer a single field, like newton who was collapsing while writing his Principia Mathematica or spinoza, who lived in total intellectual isolation after being excommunicated by his community, like even recent examples of obessants, not in scholar spaces, could be bobby fischer, his absolute focus on the chessboard made him "unfit" for goyciety, which is why he prob said the joos were evil cus he wasnt a goyim



TLDR- JFL @ SOCIETY AND THEIR FAILURE OF CULTIVATING MEN'S INCLINATIONS

and to add this at the end, all this is just theory, not been proven(even tho it could be easily proven), if u can disagree and challenge what i said then ur welcome

Wait nigga i just roke up but I promise I’ll read it all inna bit

 

[kdz777]

meet like 2 foids in life more inteligent than me and lots of guys more inteligent than me.

most of them bitches be litr having no thoughts about anything they only care about social life, their academic success is only about learning and forgetting after test most of them do not know shi and have no logic way of thinking.

in school i remember the most, bitch that had really good grades but was so fucking dumb that it was crazy her eyes were empty from no thought formed

 

[alurmo]

What? this is so wrong

disprove every point then nigger

 

[alurmo]

I tought this was common sense?
I will never accept this in front of a woman tho

srs, tbh cant give these bitches free ego

 

[alurmo]

Conditioned to think like that ?

yes, geneolically speaking, ik the post was not properly formatted bc it wasnt intented for a proper thread and whatnot, otherwise i wouldnt have used many incel terms
but foids historically have been in lesser positions then men, this history adds to their modern state

 

[alurmo]

Every man that's walked this earth has one goal: sniff and pound a woman's sweaty holes while huffing the backshot wind.

Are we the NPC gender?

WRONG

 

[Jimcel]

disprove every point then nigger

Calm down brah,

first of all i have never been in an academic environment where females prevail.

You talk about school requiring obedience, but its mostly determination and/ or good memory

Cba with the rest, this is just my take nigga

 

[alurmo]

Calm down brah,

first of all i have never been in an academic environment where females prevail.

You talk about school requiring obedience, but its mostly determination and/ or good memory

Cba with the rest, this is just my take nigga

i have
if u are in a school where there is a even balance between men and women, women cover majority of the "success"
for studying u obv require those orderly drives, but for the conventional school life, its mainly obediance to rules, structure and order, which i said foids are good at

 

[PrettyboyQ]

even since i was a kid its been shoved down in goyducation and media that foids are smarter then men
But this goes down to that foid teachers are legit way more then male teachers, so they are naturally biased and poisoned to be inclined towards their own gender, but then college performance also is a factor
even if women are smarter i think there's logical reasons behind why they could have developed better in academic fields which are imo inherintly unmanly and made for domesticated slaves

firstly il start with attacking the idea of even being a scholar and muh study bro!!
its a obedience driven system, the idea of being a student requires incredible obedience, this is why i lowk respect the niggers who were in my school that were dropouts and shit, they see more in life then listening to roasties lecture them on muh this and that
often the foids who excell in school lack original creativeness, this also why niggers are good rappers and artist, no time for school when ur next album requires better and creative lyrics and shieet

secondly why foids could be better then us in scholarlic intelligence, Academic success requires a specific kind of "intelligence", the ability to sit still, follow a sequence, and master a system(in maths, science, business, etc..) foids historically have been socialized towards a more orderly life, historically being forced in strict roles, not saying theres a direct correlation but its a thing ofc
foids also lack more chaotic impulses compared to men, ultimately they dominate academia bc of their inclinations to master order, but again school and college dont include all parts of life, the whole idea of acedemia is towards order and the mastering of what exists, which is not the whole picture of life, also foids physical stature presents a logical reason to go to the iq faculties, they are literally weaker then us, thus perhaps evolution had to designate their strenghts to other outlets, like the brain and whatnot, u cant be weak and stupid, that would be a evolutionary mistake

Third, let me talk abt outliers and why men reach greater peaks then foids, as a nigga who reads alot of philosophy, the fact that men do reach those higher peaks could be a way of them having more power, bc men inherintly have more wills to power then women if we were to talk in philosophical terms, while using nietzsche's terminology

fourth, another criticism of school systems and whatnot, grades are in total a very sheeple type of assessing intelligence, all at the end of the day used to mass assess the goy herd, all the while being words and letters on computers and paper, even tho women likely do exceed in alot of disciplines, Men excel in fields that require a detachment from social harmony(likeliness for the herd sheeple) like Physics, Philosophy and Engineering and bc men are statistically less concerned with agreeableness wiht the sheeple herd, they are often more willing to propose radical or socially disruptive theories which could be the credit of many ideas in science and philosophy, foids basically master whats been laid by men

fifth, education crushes the male soul, we dont want to be domesticated, but since historically women were borderline domesticated it could be they find warmth in educational spaces, but when men do good in school, its either in intellectual isolation(women cant do this bc of their tendency to stay within the warmth of the academic consensus/sheeple), breaking existing systems and theories (women just weave and decorate the existing structures and theories) and Abstract Obsession(men are more AUTYSTIC in their studies, focusing on a non-human objects like machines, math, metaphysics, engineering shit, philosophy, shieet even bp science)

lastly, men prefer higher stake persuits of intelligence, for example napoleon and alexander II, their intelligence obv lying in high stakes strategic winning, this requires alot of ego, which women lack, napoleon or alexander wouldnt have reached their heights without a strong ego, also like i said before in the thread, our scholarly excellence mostly would come from a reckless obsession that ignores health, family, and social standing to solve a single equation or conquer a single field, like newton who was collapsing while writing his Principia Mathematica or spinoza, who lived in total intellectual isolation after being excommunicated by his community, like even recent examples of obessants, not in scholar spaces, could be bobby fischer, his absolute focus on the chessboard made him "unfit" for goyciety, which is why he prob said the joos were evil cus he wasnt a goyim



TLDR- JFL @ SOCIETY AND THEIR FAILURE OF CULTIVATING MEN'S INCLINATIONS

and to add this at the end, all this is just theory, not been proven(even tho it could be easily proven), if u can disagree and challenge what i said then ur welcome

im reading now

bumpy

 

[PrettyboyQ]

firstly il start with attacking the idea of even being a scholar and muh study bro!!
its a obedience driven system, the idea of being a student requires incredible obedience, this is why i lowk respect the niggers who were in my school that were dropouts and shit, they see more in life then listening to roasties lecture them on muh this and that

Exactly why I dropped out end of sophomore year and went online to still get my high school diploma to please my mom and just incase I unfortunately have to conform to the slavery, 9-5. Right now at 17 I'm making anywhere from 2-7k a month and I'm just getting started so I hope not.

School might've been helpful at one point, but its been so twisted from something that COULDVE been good to something that prepares you to work and be a robot your whole life.

secondly why foids could be better then us in scholarlic intelligence, Academic success requires a specific kind of "intelligence", the ability to sit still, follow a sequence, and master a system(in maths, science, business, etc..) foids historically have been socialized towards a more orderly life, historically being forced in strict roles, not saying theres a direct correlation but its a thing ofc

Literally direct correlation, foids have ALWAYS been forced to listen and do what they're told. But in this way they think its them being "independent" and "strong".

lastly, men prefer higher stake persuits of intelligence, for example napoleon and alexander II, their intelligence obv lying in high stakes strategic winning, this requires alot of ego, which women lack, napoleon or alexander wouldnt have reached their heights without a strong ego, also like i said before in the thread, our scholarly excellence mostly would come from a reckless obsession that ignores health, family, and social standing to solve a single equation or conquer a single field, like newton who was collapsing while writing his Principia Mathematica or spinoza, who lived in total intellectual isolation after being excommunicated by his community, like even recent examples of obessants, not in scholar spaces, could be bobby fischer, his absolute focus on the chessboard made him "unfit" for goyciety, which is why he prob said the joos were evil cus he wasnt a goyim

LOL YOU HAVE NO IDEA HOW MUCH I RELATE TO THIS. It's the reason why I literally cannot get a job, it just so deathly boring. I work when I don't know the next paycheck is coming, but I hustle it works out. I'm not trying to get normie wages, I'm out here striving for MILLIONS.


Good thread bhai, lowk water but you explained it pretty well and went in depth.

 

[PrettyboyQ]

Exactly why I dropped out end of sophomore year and went online to still get my high school diploma to please my mom and just incase I unfortunately have to conform to the slavery, 9-5. Right now at 17 I'm making anywhere from 2-5k a month and I'm just getting started so I hope not.

School might've been helpful at one point, but its been so twisted from something that COULDVE been good to something that prepares you to work and be a robot your whole life.



Literally direct correlation, foids have ALWAYS been forced to listen and do what they're told. But in this way they think its them being "independent" and "strong".



LOL YOU HAVE NO IDEA HOW MUCH I RELATE TO THIS. It's the reason why I literally cannot get a job, it just so deathly boring. I work when I don't know the next paycheck is coming, but I hustle it works out. I'm not trying to get normie wages, I'm out here striving for MILLIONS.


Good thread bhai, lowk water but you explained it pretty well and went in depth.

Also I made this bitch do my WHOLE course of school work online, she did it ALL for me I didn't do shit yet I'll still graduate.

Foids just do what they're told.

bumpy

 

[kdev]

even since i was a kid its been shoved down in goyducation and media that foids are smarter then men
But this goes down to that foid teachers are legit way more then male teachers, so they are naturally biased and poisoned to be inclined towards their own gender, but then college performance also is a factor
even if women are smarter i think there's logical reasons behind why they could have developed better in academic fields which are imo inherintly unmanly and made for domesticated slaves

firstly il start with attacking the idea of even being a scholar and muh study bro!!
its a obedience driven system, the idea of being a student requires incredible obedience, this is why i lowk respect the niggers who were in my school that were dropouts and shit, they see more in life then listening to roasties lecture them on muh this and that
often the foids who excell in school lack original creativeness, this also why niggers are good rappers and artist, no time for school when ur next album requires better and creative lyrics and shieet

secondly why foids could be better then us in scholarlic intelligence, Academic success requires a specific kind of "intelligence", the ability to sit still, follow a sequence, and master a system(in maths, science, business, etc..) foids historically have been socialized towards a more orderly life, historically being forced in strict roles, not saying theres a direct correlation but its a thing ofc
foids also lack more chaotic impulses compared to men, ultimately they dominate academia bc of their inclinations to master order, but again school and college dont include all parts of life, the whole idea of acedemia is towards order and the mastering of what exists, which is not the whole picture of life, also foids physical stature presents a logical reason to go to the iq faculties, they are literally weaker then us, thus perhaps evolution had to designate their strenghts to other outlets, like the brain and whatnot, u cant be weak and stupid, that would be a evolutionary mistake

Third, let me talk abt outliers and why men reach greater peaks then foids, as a nigga who reads alot of philosophy, the fact that men do reach those higher peaks could be a way of them having more power, bc men inherintly have more wills to power then women if we were to talk in philosophical terms, while using nietzsche's terminology

fourth, another criticism of school systems and whatnot, grades are in total a very sheeple type of assessing intelligence, all at the end of the day used to mass assess the goy herd, all the while being words and letters on computers and paper, even tho women likely do exceed in alot of disciplines, Men excel in fields that require a detachment from social harmony(likeliness for the herd sheeple) like Physics, Philosophy and Engineering and bc men are statistically less concerned with agreeableness wiht the sheeple herd, they are often more willing to propose radical or socially disruptive theories which could be the credit of many ideas in science and philosophy, foids basically master whats been laid by men

fifth, education crushes the male soul, we dont want to be domesticated, but since historically women were borderline domesticated it could be they find warmth in educational spaces, but when men do good in school, its either in intellectual isolation(women cant do this bc of their tendency to stay within the warmth of the academic consensus/sheeple), breaking existing systems and theories (women just weave and decorate the existing structures and theories) and Abstract Obsession(men are more AUTYSTIC in their studies, focusing on a non-human objects like machines, math, metaphysics, engineering shit, philosophy, shieet even bp science)

lastly, men prefer higher stake persuits of intelligence, for example napoleon and alexander II, their intelligence obv lying in high stakes strategic winning, this requires alot of ego, which women lack, napoleon or alexander wouldnt have reached their heights without a strong ego, also like i said before in the thread, our scholarly excellence mostly would come from a reckless obsession that ignores health, family, and social standing to solve a single equation or conquer a single field, like newton who was collapsing while writing his Principia Mathematica or spinoza, who lived in total intellectual isolation after being excommunicated by his community, like even recent examples of obessants, not in scholar spaces, could be bobby fischer, his absolute focus on the chessboard made him "unfit" for goyciety, which is why he prob said the joos were evil cus he wasnt a goyim



TLDR- JFL @ SOCIETY AND THEIR FAILURE OF CULTIVATING MEN'S INCLINATIONS

and to add this at the end, all this is just theory, not been proven(even tho it could be easily proven), if u can disagree and challenge what i said then ur welcome

very valid ngl

 

[ilikefish]

even since i was a kid its been shoved down in goyducation and media that foids are smarter then men
But this goes down to that foid teachers are legit way more then male teachers, so they are naturally biased and poisoned to be inclined towards their own gender, but then college performance also is a factor
even if women are smarter i think there's logical reasons behind why they could have developed better in academic fields which are imo inherintly unmanly and made for domesticated slaves

firstly il start with attacking the idea of even being a scholar and muh study bro!!
its a obedience driven system, the idea of being a student requires incredible obedience, this is why i lowk respect the niggers who were in my school that were dropouts and shit, they see more in life then listening to roasties lecture them on muh this and that
often the foids who excell in school lack original creativeness, this also why niggers are good rappers and artist, no time for school when ur next album requires better and creative lyrics and shieet

secondly why foids could be better then us in scholarlic intelligence, Academic success requires a specific kind of "intelligence", the ability to sit still, follow a sequence, and master a system(in maths, science, business, etc..) foids historically have been socialized towards a more orderly life, historically being forced in strict roles, not saying theres a direct correlation but its a thing ofc
foids also lack more chaotic impulses compared to men, ultimately they dominate academia bc of their inclinations to master order, but again school and college dont include all parts of life, the whole idea of acedemia is towards order and the mastering of what exists, which is not the whole picture of life, also foids physical stature presents a logical reason to go to the iq faculties, they are literally weaker then us, thus perhaps evolution had to designate their strenghts to other outlets, like the brain and whatnot, u cant be weak and stupid, that would be a evolutionary mistake

Third, let me talk abt outliers and why men reach greater peaks then foids, as a nigga who reads alot of philosophy, the fact that men do reach those higher peaks could be a way of them having more power, bc men inherintly have more wills to power then women if we were to talk in philosophical terms, while using nietzsche's terminology

fourth, another criticism of school systems and whatnot, grades are in total a very sheeple type of assessing intelligence, all at the end of the day used to mass assess the goy herd, all the while being words and letters on computers and paper, even tho women likely do exceed in alot of disciplines, Men excel in fields that require a detachment from social harmony(likeliness for the herd sheeple) like Physics, Philosophy and Engineering and bc men are statistically less concerned with agreeableness wiht the sheeple herd, they are often more willing to propose radical or socially disruptive theories which could be the credit of many ideas in science and philosophy, foids basically master whats been laid by men

fifth, education crushes the male soul, we dont want to be domesticated, but since historically women were borderline domesticated it could be they find warmth in educational spaces, but when men do good in school, its either in intellectual isolation(women cant do this bc of their tendency to stay within the warmth of the academic consensus/sheeple), breaking existing systems and theories (women just weave and decorate the existing structures and theories) and Abstract Obsession(men are more AUTYSTIC in their studies, focusing on a non-human objects like machines, math, metaphysics, engineering shit, philosophy, shieet even bp science)

lastly, men prefer higher stake persuits of intelligence, for example napoleon and alexander II, their intelligence obv lying in high stakes strategic winning, this requires alot of ego, which women lack, napoleon or alexander wouldnt have reached their heights without a strong ego, also like i said before in the thread, our scholarly excellence mostly would come from a reckless obsession that ignores health, family, and social standing to solve a single equation or conquer a single field, like newton who was collapsing while writing his Principia Mathematica or spinoza, who lived in total intellectual isolation after being excommunicated by his community, like even recent examples of obessants, not in scholar spaces, could be bobby fischer, his absolute focus on the chessboard made him "unfit" for goyciety, which is why he prob said the joos were evil cus he wasnt a goyim



TLDR- JFL @ SOCIETY AND THEIR FAILURE OF CULTIVATING MEN'S INCLINATIONS

and to add this at the end, all this is just theory, not been proven(even tho it could be easily proven), if u can disagree and challenge what i said then ur welcome

Dnr

 

[octoo]

DNR, but foids are emotianal, so no