D
Deleted member 10987
Kraken
- Joined
- Nov 27, 2020
- Posts
- 38,486
- Reputation
- 49,392
Even IRL all the average girls at school have it
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
I don't know about that but neutral canthal tilt with positive tilted eyebrows look the best on males.Because low prenatal t imo I've seen somewhere that males with high prenatal t have nct
This. You can contour your eyes and use eyeliner, etc to have PCT even if you have NCT.I always assumed it to be some kind of fakeup frauding
makeup
This. You can contour your eyes and use eyeliner, etc to have PCT even if you have NCT.
Even whitout makeup they have itI always assumed it to be some kind of fakeup frauding
Even whitout makeup they have it
Even whitout makeup they have it
Some girls at school have no makeup and they seem to have itView attachment 1167720
Don't be fooled by makeup. If a girl has thicker outer eyelashes or an upturned shadow on the lateral canthus, she's frauding PCT.
I have maybe known two girls with nct lmao. It's super common for girls to have it. Feminine feature I suppose.Some girls at school have no makeup and they seem to have it
Pct and long lashesI have maybe known two girls with nct lmao. It's super common for girls to have it. Feminine feature I suppose.
As a female, that's the most important requirement to be adored.
Thats neutralPositive Canthalt Thilt
View attachment 1167731
I thinkDo most males have nct?
afaik female orbital structure allows for higher set outer canthus, so obviously less females are gonna have nct
feminine trait i guessEven IRL all the average girls at school have it
View attachment 1167689
Slight PCT
It's a really common trait among females, I don't know if there's any reason for it though except perhaps sexual selection
That’s exactly why. Medial palpebral ligament and thus medial can thus is attached to the frontal process of the maxilla which is connected to the nasal bridge.Can it be cus females have lower nose bridges than males?
Momoa has PCT eyebrows and NCT eyes making good contrastThat’s exactly why. Medial palpebral ligament and thus medial can thus is attached to the frontal process of the maxilla which is connected to the nasal bridge.
When the nasal bridge grows higher, so does the frontal process of maxilla, and thus the medial can thus is positioned higher.
View attachment 1167824
Only reason some people here think a low medial can thus is masculine is because, when it’s combined with high cheekbones and squinting model shots, they think it makes the eyes look sharper and more angular, which is arbitrarily associated with masculinity.
View attachment 1167892View attachment 1167895
In reality, a low medial can thus looks like this:
View attachment 1167857View attachment 1167856View attachment 1167859
The eyes look larger and more neotonous. Compare that with someone who has a similar hunter eye area but a long nasal bridge:
View attachment 1167863
The eyes look even smaller when a long nasal bridge is paired with high cheekbones.
Part of why Jason Momoa’s eyes look so masculine is his long nasal bridge:
But even natural ones seem to dont have itthey all wear eyeliner tbh
Isn't a positive palpebral slant like Barrett neotenous aswell, it's very uncommon among menThat’s exactly why. Medial palpebral ligament and thus medial can thus is attached to the frontal process of the maxilla which is connected to the nasal bridge.
When the nasal bridge grows higher, so does the frontal process of maxilla, and thus the medial can thus is positioned higher.
View attachment 1167824
Only reason some people here think a low medial can thus is masculine is because, when it’s combined with high cheekbones and squinting model shots, they think it makes the eyes look sharper and more angular, which is arbitrarily associated with masculinity.
View attachment 1167892View attachment 1167895
In reality, a low medial can thus looks like this:
View attachment 1167857View attachment 1167856View attachment 1167859
The eyes look larger and more neotonous. Compare that with someone who has a similar hunter eye area but a long nasal bridge:
View attachment 1167863
The eyes look even smaller when a long nasal bridge is paired with high cheekbones.
Part of why Jason Momoa’s eyes look so masculine is his long nasal bridge:
ExempleIsn't a positive palpebral slant like Barrett neotenous aswell, it's very uncommon among men
When the entire eye looks like its slantedExemple
never noticed that tbh.When the entire eye looks like its slanted
View attachment 1167988View attachment 1167992View attachment 1167993View attachment 1167995
vs neutral slant but still PCT
View attachment 1167994
Only look asian on that horsecelWhen the entire eye looks like its slanted
View attachment 1167988View attachment 1167992View attachment 1167993View attachment 1167995
vs neutral slant but still PCT
View attachment 1167994
Not sure what you mean by “palpebral slant”. The examples you posted are just males with high degrees of PCT. The second one has an epicanthal fold which may exaggerate the PCT.Isn't a positive palpebral slant like Barrett neotenous aswell, it's very uncommon among men
Who has epicanthus fold ?Not sure what you mean by “palpebral slant”. The examples you posted are just males with high degrees of PCT. The second one has an epicanthal fold which may exaggerate the PCT.
O’ Pry’s eyes look less “positively slanted” because his canthal tilt isn’t as positive as the examples you posted. O’ Pry has 4-5 degrees of positive tilt, Eriksen has about 13. The guy you posted with the strong epicanthal fold has 12 degrees of PCT.
With regard to Barrett, I don’t think his eyes look any more positively tilted than O’ Pry’s (they have about the same canthal tilt):
View attachment 1168041View attachment 1168064
In fact, I think O’ Pry’s eyes look more “positively slanted” as his lower lid is a bit lower (droopy) relative to his lateral can thus than Barrett’s. This isn’t feminine or masculine though.
When the entire eye is tilted. Their supraorbital & eyelids are positive rather than parallel to the floor (Like O'pry).Not sure what you mean by “palpebral slant”. The examples you posted are just males with high degrees of PCT. The second one has an epicanthal fold which may exaggerate the PCT.
O’ Pry’s eyes look less “positively slanted” because his canthal tilt isn’t as positive as the examples you posted. O’ Pry has 4-5 degrees of positive tilt, Eriksen has about 13. The guy you posted with the strong epicanthal fold has 12 degrees of PCT.
With regard to Barrett, I don’t think his eyes look any more positively tilted than O’ Pry’s (they have about the same canthal tilt):
View attachment 1168041View attachment 1168064
In fact, I think O’ Pry’s eyes look more “positively slanted” as his lower lid is a bit lower (droopy) relative to his lateral can thus than Barrett’s. This isn’t feminine or masculine though.
There is no such thing as a “positive supraorbital rim”. Only variation in Supra orbital rim morphology is the mass or protrusion.When the entire eye is tilted. Their supraorbital & eyelids are positive rather than parallel to the floor (Like O'pry).
O'Pry doesn't look slanted at all to me, it's just his eyeshape with the lateral canthus higher meanwhile Barretts look like his entire eye is very slighty rotated.
View attachment 1168112View attachment 1168113View attachment 1168114
Yeah could be that he have have a tighter lower eyelid than O'Pry making it less parallel to the floor. Barretts supra or whatever definetly looks more positive than O'Prys though by observation (don't care about the biology)There is no such thing as a “positive supraorbital rim”. Only variation in Supra orbital rim morphology is the mass or protrusion.
O’ Pry’s lateral can thus isn’t higher than Barrett’s (it’s slightly lower, actually). His lower lid is just droopier which makes the lateral can thus look higher (as it is higher relative to the lower lid).
The only reasons I can think of for you thinking Barrett’s eye is more positively tilted are that he has higher, more arched brows and he has a more prominent epicanthal fold than O’ Pry (this typically makes the eye look more upturned).
I’m again guessing you think that because he has higher brows (which is not related to supraorbital rim whatsoever) or epicanthal fold.Yeah could be that he have have a tighter lower eyelid than O'Pry making it less parallel to the floor. Barretts supra or whatever definetly looks more positive than O'Prys though by observation (don't care about the biology)
you sure they're not actually wearing makeup?Some girls at school have no makeup and they seem to have it
whats a pct?Even IRL all the average girls at school have it
View attachment 1167689
Broyou sure they're not actually wearing makeup?
girls make jokes all the time about how guys can't tell
Positive canthalt tiltwhats a pct?
is it public limited company
on a serious note what is it