Why height is more important than face

[ChadL1te]

its a pretty simple reason, the average height is not attractive to women, and many women's standard is 1.5+ standard deviations away from the mean

and height is mostly impossible to change

simply put, the mass majority of men are born into an unchangable range below the cuttoff. Faces are mostly changeable aswell, and in more cases than not a height can make up for face rather than the other way around.

This shouldnt even be a debate

 

[ChadL1te]

@Nectar @Jason Voorhees @kisslessvirgin

 

[AustrianMogger]

its a pretty simple reason, the average height is not attractive to women, and many women's standard is 1.5+ standard deviations away from the mean

and height is mostly impossible to change

simply put, the mass majority of men are born into an unchangable range below the cuttoff. Faces are mostly changeable aswell, and in more cases than not a height can make up for face rather than the other way around.

This shouldnt even be a debate

View attachment 5032991

no

 

[Nectar]

Already made a thread on this I defo agree tho

 

[armemann]

What height is 1.5x stamdard deviations

 

[shandingo]

its a pretty simple reason, the average height is not attractive to women, and many women's standard is 1.5+ standard deviations away from the mean

and height is mostly impossible to change

simply put, the mass majority of men are born into an unchangable range below the cuttoff. Faces are mostly changeable aswell, and in more cases than not a height can make up for face rather than the other way around.

This shouldnt even be a debate

View attachment 5032991

Height matters more in the normie range . I.e going from a 4 to a 5 or a 5 to a 6 will not ascend you as much as going from 5 ft 10 to 6 ft 4. But being a 7+ as long as you are not a child height ( < 5’7 ) you mogg. Also height is disqualifying factor whereas face is qualifying , face can make up for lack of height ( < 6 ft ) but height can not make up for lack of face ( sub-5 ).

 

[NWL]

just find a short girl if ur average height no biggie

 

[silently_said]

Even for foids to notice your face they have to look up

 

[Centurion_Hunter]

its a pretty simple reason, the average height is not attractive to women, and many women's standard is 1.5+ standard deviations away from the mean

and height is mostly impossible to change

simply put, the mass majority of men are born into an unchangable range below the cuttoff. Faces are mostly changeable aswell, and in more cases than not a height can make up for face rather than the other way around.

This shouldnt even be a debate

View attachment 5032991

How dare you not tagg me one of the biggest JBT proponers on here
Anyways heights moggs face and its not close

 

[ChadL1te]

just find a short girl if ur average height no biggie

they want tall men

 

[NWL]

they want tall men

yeah but some girls are desperate too and slaying is the important part so who gaf

 

[Cookie271]

True for sure but water

 

[Hihi21]

Life fuel for me thank u

 

[ChadL1te]

yeah but some girls are desperate too and slaying is the important part so who gaf

cool, has no way to debunk my thread

 

[lemureater]

arent there statistics that prove face matter more than height

and no im not a coping manlet

 

[foidslayer92910]

Height matters more in the normie range . I.e going from a 4 to a 5 or a 5 to a 6 will not ascend you as much as going from 5 ft 10 to 6 ft 4. But being a 7+ as long as you are not a child height ( < 5’7 ) you mogg. Also height is disqualifying factor whereas face is qualifying , face can make up for lack of height ( < 6 ft ) but height can not make up for lack of face ( sub-5 ).

Absolutely agree

 

[NWL]

cool, has no way to debunk my thread

im not trying to debunk ur claim im just talking about experience short guys can still slay even while being mtn and i know it for a fact

 

[Throw_Away]

simply put, the mass majority of men are born into an unchangable range below the cuttoff. Faces are mostly changeable aswell, and in more cases than not a height can make up for face rather than the other way around.

You're confusing importance with ability to change something. Height is important, nobody will date a manlet unless he has a chad face, that much is water, but face itself matters more than height as long as it's above the minimum threshold for women. Would she rather date a 6'1 htn or a 6'6 ltn? The choice is obvious. It's more of a "jack of all trades" thing than a "x is more important than y" thing. Face>Height though in attraction dynamics, unless the dude is a manlet

 

[Shirobon]

its a pretty simple reason, the average height is not attractive to women, and many women's standard is 1.5+ standard deviations away from the mean

and height is mostly impossible to change

simply put, the mass majority of men are born into an unchangable range below the cuttoff. Faces are mostly changeable aswell, and in more cases than not a height can make up for face rather than the other way around.

This shouldnt even be a debate

View attachment 5032991

it definitely important but they go hand in hand tbh without one ur fucked most of the time

 

[DrunkenSailor]

Height matters more in the normie range . I.e going from a 4 to a 5 or a 5 to a 6 will not ascend you as much as going from 5 ft 10 to 6 ft 4.

Going from 5ft10 to 6ft4 is more like going from 4/5 or whatever the average is, to 8/9 which would be a massive ascension.

 

[wingriddenincel]

rambling

 

[freeshavacadoo]

Height is just a multiplier of looks

 

[ChadL1te]

You're confusing importance with ability to change something. Height is important, nobody will date a manlet unless he has a chad face, that much is water, but face itself matters more than height as long as it's above the minimum threshold for women. Would she rather date a 6'1 htn or a 6'6 ltn? The choice is obvious. It's more of a "jack of all trades" thing than a "x is more important than y" thing. Face>Height though in attraction dynamics, unless the dude is a manlet

importance is equated with ability to change

 

[Throw_Away]

importance is equated with ability to change

I can't change the size of my left testicle but that doesn't make it as important as height does it?

 

[ChadL1te]

Height is just a multiplier of looks

no it isnt

 

[ChadL1te]

I can't change the size of my left testicle but that doesn't make it as important as height does it?

your left testicle doesnt impact smv.

 

[halabi]

literally no.
face is everything

 

[ridiculus]

im js gonna pretend like this isnt true

 

[JOTAROSON]

Причина довольно проста: средний рост не привлекателен для женщин, и для многих стандартный женский рост отличается от среднего значения более чем на 1,5 стандартного отклонения.

а рост практически невозможно изменить.

Проще говоря, подавляющее большинство мужчин рождаются с постоянным ростом ниже порогового значения. Лицо тоже в основном изменчиво, и в большинстве случаев рост может компенсировать недостатки лица, а не наоборот.

Это даже не должно быть наблюдением.

View attachment 5032991

No

 

[Sayori]

and many women's standard is 1.5+ standard deviations away from the mean

I don't think you used that right in context boyo

As for height being hardest to change, fuck yes, it is which is why its prob the worst falio to have

 

[ChadL1te]

I don't think you used that right in context boyo

no i didnt

 

[Sayori]

no i didnt

In words explain what u just said

 

[Sayori]

no i didnt

This is how standard deviations look like

 

[6”3neartyronelite]

Being on this forum at 6”4 is jusy mental masturbstion holy

its a pretty simple reason, the average height is not attractive to women, and many women's standard is 1.5+ standard deviations away from the mean

and height is mostly impossible to change

simply put, the mass majority of men are born into an unchangable range below the cuttoff. Faces are mostly changeable aswell, and in more cases than not a height can make up for face rather than the other way around.

This shouldnt even be a debate

View attachment 5032991

 

[tondro]

Pretty original thread. I'm sure this hasn't been posted millionth times before

 

[ChadL1te]

This is how standard deviations look like

View attachment 5034460

im aware. Standard deviations from the mean dont have be whole numbers.

 

[isis_Bleach]

i dont get the obsession with height yea its important but theres many other important factors like frame and d size and ofc face is king so idc. some ltbs called him manlet hes still a rich chad i dont get it

 

[ChadL1te]

Pretty original thread. I'm sure this hasn't been posted millionth times before

every thread on this forum has been recycled

 

[ChadL1te]

theres many other important factors

never said otherwise

 

[jony🇮🇳🖤]

its a pretty simple reason, the average height is not attractive to women, and many women's standard is 1.5+ standard deviations away from the mean

and height is mostly impossible to change

simply put, the mass majority of men are born into an unchangable range below the cuttoff. Faces are mostly changeable aswell, and in more cases than not a height can make up for face rather than the other way around.

This shouldnt even be a debate

View attachment 5032991

It depends on the height to Face Ratio tbh
If u r a Ltn and r 6‘7 tall u arguably mog a 5‘8 htn
But a 5‘7 Chad mogs a 6‘8 Mtn on the other hand
As I Said it depends on the height to face(atractivenes) ratio and how sevearly u r tall/Short or ugly/handsome

 

[ChadL1te]

It depends on the height to Face Ratio tbh
If u r a Ltn and r 6‘7 tall u arguably mog a 5‘8 htn
But a 5‘7 Chad mogs a 6‘8 Mtn on the other hand
As I Said it depends on the height to face(atractivenes) ratio and how sevearly u r tall/Short or ugly/handsome

no part of my thread goes against this

height is just the more limiting factor

 

[kisslessvirgin]

100% agree

height bounds and restricts you a lot more

 

[shandingo]

Going from 5ft10 to 6ft4 is more like going from 4/5 or whatever the average is, to 8/9 which would be a massive ascension.

No not really being sub-5 no matter what height you are is detrimental to your SMV. Foids according to studies prefer 10 inch height gaps so as long as you have that you will not be disqualified. Like I said height is a disqualifying factor , don’t be short , face is qualifying factor , he needs to be good looking.