BrahminBoss
Legend killer
- Joined
- Nov 3, 2022
- Posts
- 63,549
- Reputation
- 88,372
Without delving into antecedent causes and psychoanyltic frameworks to try and trap an observed "Cause and effect" lets leave it at that and explore the condition .
I could suppose being narcy is simply an adaptation to your moral values not having been develped enough (psychopathy/low iq) or a "Nietzschean" overturning of values (cope lol) and becoming completely dark triad dalit beast. Ranierean uk stopped reading at this point u fucking chink (ask why )
Lets presuppose the former and the result is trivial , here narcyness isnt a positive quality (in the positivist sense ie) but rather a framework that never developed enough ( Im SIMPLY not there)
However assuming the more interesting latter case, you can see here Narcyness takes on what a Greek tragic hero would embody by say capturing the Holy Grail, or when Perseus slayed the Gorgon, an apparent transfiguration worthy of note and perhaps lending to a tragic quality.
The hero was someone who had to gird on a suitable framework of armour to continue with his life in unidirectionally or at least confining the chaotic within bounds. In this way he is presented with a dilemma that normal people do not go through. Normies do have something that can grow into what the psychiatric standards would classificy as "narc". Their so called "narcyness" is simply an involuntary reflex of the ego conscious, much like a boner when seeing a cute young lady. It has no tragic quality to it whatsoever, it bears no load, it is simple and free, unconfinede, chaotic, low sentience.
The tragically narcy are those Machiavellians, perhaps Bukowski might fall into this category, and of course der professeur. Aryabhatta, a member of my exact clan was perhaps someone who adopted the dark triad and was not born in it, nor moulded by it.
My narcyness is perhaps simply cope for attention (which I guess is true), but there may perhaps be a deeper element, mayhaps the spinistry of the finest display of narcyness more resembles the Heroes who stood up against the Pantheon, who in the face of infinite power and envy( as the Gods do envy us and lets be honest if I said the things I said here I would be lynched) stood tall and besmirched any criticism/ condementation despite the utilitarian outcome. Maybe the internet provides me with such an Olympic arena where I can recapture this sentiment in my own way. Where physicality does not reach, mentality certainly can (although not sure about the spirituality). After all a House needs to be built..
Perhaps this spinstry depends upon the purgatory, paradiso etc arc after which the Blessing... or perhaps its a Hamlet? Only He knows. And to lend myself pathos, I will become 6 PSL. Maybe lending yourself too easily in "Love" is bad art..
I could suppose being narcy is simply an adaptation to your moral values not having been develped enough (psychopathy/low iq) or a "Nietzschean" overturning of values (cope lol) and becoming completely dark triad dalit beast. Ranierean uk stopped reading at this point u fucking chink (ask why )
Lets presuppose the former and the result is trivial , here narcyness isnt a positive quality (in the positivist sense ie) but rather a framework that never developed enough ( Im SIMPLY not there)
However assuming the more interesting latter case, you can see here Narcyness takes on what a Greek tragic hero would embody by say capturing the Holy Grail, or when Perseus slayed the Gorgon, an apparent transfiguration worthy of note and perhaps lending to a tragic quality.
The hero was someone who had to gird on a suitable framework of armour to continue with his life in unidirectionally or at least confining the chaotic within bounds. In this way he is presented with a dilemma that normal people do not go through. Normies do have something that can grow into what the psychiatric standards would classificy as "narc". Their so called "narcyness" is simply an involuntary reflex of the ego conscious, much like a boner when seeing a cute young lady. It has no tragic quality to it whatsoever, it bears no load, it is simple and free, unconfinede, chaotic, low sentience.
The tragically narcy are those Machiavellians, perhaps Bukowski might fall into this category, and of course der professeur. Aryabhatta, a member of my exact clan was perhaps someone who adopted the dark triad and was not born in it, nor moulded by it.
My narcyness is perhaps simply cope for attention (which I guess is true), but there may perhaps be a deeper element, mayhaps the spinistry of the finest display of narcyness more resembles the Heroes who stood up against the Pantheon, who in the face of infinite power and envy( as the Gods do envy us and lets be honest if I said the things I said here I would be lynched) stood tall and besmirched any criticism/ condementation despite the utilitarian outcome. Maybe the internet provides me with such an Olympic arena where I can recapture this sentiment in my own way. Where physicality does not reach, mentality certainly can (although not sure about the spirituality). After all a House needs to be built..
Perhaps this spinstry depends upon the purgatory, paradiso etc arc after which the Blessing... or perhaps its a Hamlet? Only He knows. And to lend myself pathos, I will become 6 PSL. Maybe lending yourself too easily in "Love" is bad art..
Last edited:
