Why IQ tests don’t really measure Intelligence as a whole and it’s only one aspect of intelligence

[STAMPEDE]

IQ is a broad concept and something as simple as IQ tests don’t measure the whole intelligence of a individual.

 

[chrishell]

Agreed

 

[Wexilarious]

This just needs to be looked at in the natal chart

 

[STAMPEDE]

Agreed

There’s more than one type of Intelligence.

 

[WrothEnd]

I never understood peoples obsession with iq, it clearly doesn't tell the whole story.

 

[chrishell]

View attachment 3476559View attachment 3476560View attachment 3476561View attachment 3476562View attachment 3476563View attachment 3476564View attachment 3476565

There’s more than one type of Intelligence.

Pop off queen

 

[Aladin]

Water.

Niggers are still dumb apes.

 

[JackSmith07]

View attachment 3476548
View attachment 3476549
View attachment 3476550

IQ is a broad concept and something as simple as IQ tests don’t measure the whole intelligence of a individual.

I reckon you're bitter because you didn't score high on the IQ test you've sat.

 

[STAMPEDE]

I reckon you're bitter because you didn't score high on the IQ test you've sat.

I never did an irl IQ test but I actually scored 145 IQ on the mensa online IQ test. It’s bullshit tho

 

[AstroSky]

View attachment 3476548
View attachment 3476549
View attachment 3476550

IQ is a broad concept and something as simple as IQ tests don’t measure the whole intelligence of a individual.

Pretty sure all who's actually intelligent would understand this nuance already.

 

[marshadow]

Thats Alex Periera bro

 

[STAMPEDE]

Pretty sure all who's actually intelligent would understand this nuance already.

You’d surprised to see how many retards cope with “muh IQ test” when it’s a very flawed measurement, and most scientists agree that’s it’s flawed.

 

[Meteor21]

IQ is meant to be linear but it isn't. If you can't lift 200 pounds then you can't lift 205 pounds.

You can score lower on an IQ test than someone else but still get questions right that they got wrong. It's also flawed cause you're likely to get nervous or exhausted after awhile.

 

[AstroSky]

You’d surprised to see how many retards cope with “muh IQ test” when it’s a very flawed measurement, and most scientists agree that’s it’s flawed.

Its always over compensation and people that have to flaunt high IQ that do this. Real Intelligence gets expressed by just DOING IT. I never met a real genius who brags about being a genius. He's out doing genius things.

 

[Aladin]

Its always over compensation and people that have to flaunt high IQ that do this. Real Intelligence gets expressed by just DOING IT. I never met a real genius who brags about being a genius. He's out doing genius things.

AdultSocialSkills.com was by far the most incel-relevant site there was

Too bad the site has been off for some time now. it's still accessible via archive.org, so you should check it out, its straightforward, no bs. Great site. It's quite a long thread so if you have the attention span of a five-year-old stay clear. Some excerpts: Examining the lives of loner...

looksmax.org

 

[Unhuman]

View attachment 3476548
View attachment 3476549
View attachment 3476550

IQ is a broad concept and something as simple as IQ tests don’t measure the whole intelligence of a individual.

I was expected a detail metanalysis on IQ tests but instead you posted ifunny slideshows.

 

[JackSmith07]

I never did an irl IQ test but I actually scored 145 IQ on the mensa online IQ test. It’s bullshit tho

Your IQ isn't above 110. I can tell by the way you type because you place personal feelings and socially engineered narratives above the scientific method.

 

[STAMPEDE]

Your IQ isn't above 110. I can tell by the way you type because you place personal feelings and socially engineered narratives above the scientific method.

I never once put my personal feelings above the “scientific method” ever once in my thread. Seems like you’re just projecting, I simply stated the same thing scientists themselves stated, that IQ tests are flawed and don’t really measure the intelligence of a individual as there are more than one type of intelligence. How hard is this to understand?

 

[JackSmith07]

I never once put my personal feelings above the “scientific method” ever once in my thread. Seems like you’re just projecting, I simply stated the same thing scientists themselves stated, that IQ tests are flawed and don’t really measure the intelligence of a individual as there are more than one type of intelligence. How hard is this to understand?

IQ tests measure more than just one aspect of intelligence, dumbass.The general census in the scientific community is that IQ tests are the closest thing to a valid means of testing intelligence. No one said they're a perfect measure. You don't know shit.

 

[STAMPEDE]

IQ tests measure more than just one aspect of intelligence, dumbass.The general census in the scientific community is that IQ tests are the closest thing to a valid means of testing intelligence. No one said they're a perfect measure. You don't know shit.

 

[JackSmith07]

View attachment 3478971View attachment 3478973

These critics have no valid arguments and neither do you. Like I said, the general census in the scientific community is that IQ is a valid concept with predictive power.

Your IQ is most certainly capped at 110 like I said earlier on.

 

[cooldude1231]

View attachment 3478971View attachment 3478973

They measuee your fluid intelligence and crystalized intelligence

 

[STAMPEDE]

These critics have no valid arguments and neither do you. Like I said, the general census in the scientific community is that IQ is a valid concept with predictive power.

Your IQ is most certainly capped at 110 like I said earlier on.

You’re projecting buddy boyo, you’re saying I have no “valid arguments” when I posted my arguments and scientific truth in my very thread, you simply ignore them because of your ignorance and delusion. IQ is the best measurement there “available” but it doesn’t measure intelligence as a whole at all. You just want to cope with it because you have no other way. I posted many facts and scientific truth supporting my argument, What have you posted besides your baseless ignorant delusional claims with no proof or evidence to support them? Nothing.

 

[STAMPEDE]

They measuee your fluid intelligence and crystalized intelligence

Yes. Only one or two types of intelligence at best. It doesn’t measure the whole intelligence of a individual as I posted in the thread.

 

[STAMPEDE]

You’re projecting buddy boyo, you’re saying I have no “valid arguments” when I posted my arguments and scientific truth in my very thread, you simply ignore them because of your ignorance and delusion. IQ is the best measurement there “available” but it doesn’t measure intelligence as a whole at all. You just want to cope with it because you have no other way. I posted many facts and scientific truth supporting my argument, What have you posted besides your baseless ignorant delusional claims with no proof or evidence to support them? Nothing.

Only on .org you can find retards disagreeing with the same scientists who invent these IQ tests

 

[JackSmith07]

You’re projecting buddy boyo, you’re saying I have no “valid arguments” when I posted my arguments and scientific truth in my very thread, you simply ignore them because of your ignorance and delusion.

Those arguments are pathetic and have no sway on invalidating a solid theory such as (g). Until you and the rest of the clown show actually are able to come up with a superior way of testing intelligence, you have no argument.