Why is it taboo and looked down for ethnics to be white supremacists

[wishIwasSalludon]

caucasians can be dark haired dark eyes

No white person has black hair or eyes unless they have non European ancestry

 

[Niko.]

Buddy ethnics are a plague on white countries. if anything jews are using ethnics against the whites. most crime in white countries are by us ethnics because of GENETICS. we already are dealing with jews anyhow, check out the war.

No, you are admitting that you are working for the Jews If you were against them you would stay in your country and do everything I told you before.

 

[cooldude1231]

yeah u dont ask why they have this. why didnt the other civilizations last and why arent other civilization being built right now? nope all are going to white lands, lol. Gulf States being superior but not wanting anyone in is too funny the country is built off whites desire for oil and not searching elsewhere as it is easier found in Gulf States so they export it for white use

East Asia such as Japan, Korea? they are superior too. but not more than whites for physical reasons

Africans were happy living naturally
White people build big industrial shitholes and swear theyre geniuses (even though they themselves havent invented anything important)

 

[Bug]

Lebanon is white

its mixed now just because it has some caucasian dna doesnt make it white. those who are latins arent often white either

 

[wishIwasSalludon]

Lebanon is white

Most look pretty mena

 

[gookcelriceR]

You know exactly why it's looked down and taboo. If you're not a white person saying it, you just seem like an ass-kisser, no, people don't care enough to hear you say that you're not just worshipping whites.

 

[Bug]

Africans were happy living naturally
White people build big industrial shitholes and swear theyre geniuses (even though they themselves havent invented anything important)

ye nothing important at all buddy. just span across your room or even look directly at what you are using jfl. big industrial shitholes is not a good point considering white countries were extremely prosperous and safe to live in and when it was only white

 

[Angutoid]

The thing is that the characteristics we see as mogger traits arent always optimal from a primal biological view
Like shorter men having advantage in nature back then etc so i dont think a races superiority should be based on what a foid finds attractive right now

 

[Bug]

No white person has black hair or eyes unless they have non European ancestry

white = caucasian that is a moot point on what is politically white

 

[yeeyeeslayer]

just basic sentience and observation will prove to you that immigrants move for a better life. where is that better life? and how did that better life happen to be? did the so called equals manage to perform the other equals by pure LUCK. did all the inventions and modern civilization happen to be pure coincidence.

The progress of humanity is an ongoing journey, not a finished race. Just because one group is currently leading in terms of technological advancements, innovation, and global influence doesn’t mean it has always been that way—or that it will stay that way indefinitely. History shows us that the dominant civilization changes over time. For example, ancient Mesopotamia, in what is now Iraq, was once the cradle of civilization, unmatched in its contributions to humanity. At that time, one could have argued that Mesopotamians were the "master race" by virtue of their achievements.

Similarly, the current dominance of the West doesn’t guarantee a perpetual lead. For example China's advancing at an unprecedented rate esp in technology. If this trajectory continues they're projected to surpass the West in key areas.

The balance of influence and innovation is always shifting, and history reminds us that no group remains at the top forever

 

[Bug]

You know exactly why it's looked down and taboo. If you're not a white person saying it, you just seem like an ass-kisser, no, people don't care enough to hear you say that you're not just worshipping whites.

i like discussing these type of things as someone who has no ego and doesnt care about anything seeing people scramble to defend is fun

 

[wishIwasSalludon]

white = caucasian that is a moot point on what is politically white

Are Somalis white then?

 

[wishIwasSalludon]

The progress of humanity is an ongoing journey, not a finished race. Just because one group is currently leading in terms of technological advancements, innovation, and global influence doesn’t mean it has always been that way—or that it will stay that way indefinitely. History shows us that the dominant civilization changes over time. For example, ancient Mesopotamia, in what is now Iraq, was once the cradle of civilization, unmatched in its contributions to humanity. At that time, one could have argued that Mesopotamians were the "master race" by virtue of their achievements.

Similarly, the current dominance of the West doesn’t guarantee a perpetual lead. For example China's advancing at an unprecedented rate esp in technology. If this trajectory continues they're projected to surpass the West in key areas.

The balance of influence and innovation is always shifting, and history reminds us that no group remains at the top forever

He can’t comprehend this idea

 

[yeeyeeslayer]

He can’t comprehend this idea

he's too cucked

 

[Bug]

The progress of humanity is an ongoing journey, not a finished race. Just because one group is currently leading in terms of technological advancements, innovation, and global influence doesn’t mean it has always been that way—or that it will stay that way indefinitely. History shows us that the dominant civilization changes over time. For example, ancient Mesopotamia, in what is now Iraq, was once the cradle of civilization, unmatched in its contributions to humanity. At that time, one could have argued that Mesopotamians were the "master race" by virtue of their achievements.

Similarly, the current dominance of the West doesn’t guarantee a perpetual lead. For example China's advancing at an unprecedented rate esp in technology. If this trajectory continues they're projected to surpass the West in key areas.

The balance of influence and innovation is always shifting, and history reminds us that no group remains at the top forever

Mesopotamia were caucasian, white

Chinese merely use white inventions and create their own spin on it. the only reason you are saying China can advance past the west is because western countries are degrading because of immigration and the jewish cancer. if it was all white and free from jews u would never say that.

 

[yeeyeeslayer]

He can’t comprehend this idea

but hey if he wants to bootlick Neo nazis hat will never accept him that's him lol who am I to judge

dignity isn't for everyone

 

[Bug]

but hey if he wants to bootlick Neo nazis hat will never accept him that's him lol who am I to judge

dignity isn't for everyone

another ego fueled claim

 

[Bug]

cucked, low t, submissive. all ego on a anonymous forum

 

[yeeyeeslayer]

Mesopotamia were caucasian, white

Mesopotamian populations like Sumerians, Akkadians, Babylonians are ancestors of Iraqis lol.

Genetic studies show that the inhabitants of Mesopotamia are genetically distinct from European populations, also theyre a Semitic speaking people theyre not indoeuropeans

 

[Bug]

Mesopotamian populations like Sumerians, Akkadians, Babylonians are ancestors of Iraqis lol.

Genetic studies show that the inhabitants of Mesopotamia are genetically distinct from European populations, also theyre a Semitic speaking people theyre not indoeuropeans

migration and mixing are part of history. they were white but not anymore

 

[yeeyeeslayer]

Chinese merely use white inventions and create their own spin on it. the only reason you are saying China can advance past the west is because western countries are degrading because of immigration and the jewish cancer. if it was all white and free from jews u would never say that.

The claim that "China just uses white inventions and puts their own spin on it" is BS. China has made a lot of groundbreaking contributions to the world on its own like paper, printing, gunpowder, and the compass.

Without Chinese paper and printing, the spread of knowledge in Europe during the Renaissance might’ve been way slower. Gunpowder revolutionized warfare globally. And the compass? That made ocean exploration possible which led to Europe’s Age of Exploration.

I can spin your logic on its head and say that at one point Europe owed its advancedment to china.

also Europe and the West haven’t made everything from scratch either. A lot of Western advancements came from ideas and technologies developed in non-Western civilizations. For example, during the Middle Ages Europe borrowed heavily from the Islamic world. Algebra (the word itself is Arabic lol), advanced medical knowledge, and even the concept of a hospital all came through interactions with the Islamic Golden Age.

oh yeah Arabic numerals—what we use for math today—that weren’t "white" inventions but came from Indian mathematics and were passed on by the Islamic world

debunks all ur crap

 

[yeeyeeslayer]

Mesopotamia were caucasian, white

Chinese merely use white inventions and create their own spin on it. the only reason you are saying China can advance past the west is because western countries are degrading because of immigration and the jewish cancer. if it was all white and free from jews u would never say that.

The point is, no one group has a monopoly on human progress. History involves a mix of borrowing, adapting, and innovating across cultures and civilisations, people taking what one civilisation did and building on it.

 

[zub111]

Cause whites have stable societies that are open to immigration

A lot of ethnics might move to gulf states or East Asia but those countries aren’t open to immigration

Even ignoring this all this means is now whites have the best countries

But this doesn’t prove their superior if you think it does you’re a low iq chimp who never studied history

According to your logic a 6000 BC Iraqi saying he’s superior to a German because they had civilization while Germans were in huts

@Carbine

low iq user detected

 

[yeeyeeslayer]

migration and mixing are part of history. they were white but not anymore

show historical evidence cuck,

The civilizations of Mesopotamia, including the Sumerians, Akkadians, Babylonians, and Assyrians, were primarily Semitic-speaking peoples indigenous to the Near East. Modern genetic studies indicate that these populations were genetically distinct from European groups and while being closer to other Near Eastern populations

 

[wishIwasSalludon]

low iq user detected

Youre either a coping SFcel or a self hating cuck in either case

Nothing abt what you consider “low iq” matters

 

[Bug]

The claim that "China just uses white inventions and puts their own spin on it" is BS. China has made a lot of groundbreaking contributions to the world on its own like paper, printing, gunpowder, and the compass.

Without Chinese paper and printing, the spread of knowledge in Europe during the Renaissance might’ve been way slower. Gunpowder revolutionized warfare globally. And the compass? That made ocean exploration possible which led to Europe’s Age of Exploration.

I can spin your logic on its head and say that at one point Europe owed its advancedment to china.

also Europe and the West haven’t made everything from scratch either. A lot of Western advancements came from ideas and technologies developed in non-Western civilizations. For example, during the Middle Ages Europe borrowed heavily from the Islamic world. Algebra (the word itself is Arabic lol), advanced medical knowledge, and even the concept of a hospital all came through interactions with the Islamic Golden Age.

oh yeah Arabic numerals—what we use for math today—that weren’t "white" inventions but came from Indian mathematics and were passed on by the Islamic world

debunks all ur crap

there were methods prior to write things down, to fire projectiles and navigate areas. it is about who did more with what. the world was colonized and explored by caucasians. the world as we know now is created by caucasians. u trying to give micro achievements in the grand scheme of things to each group of people doesnt prove anything, lol. i never said that all other races are useless I said that Whites are superior, they are. if they were not the world wouldnt be how it is now and others would have a bigger part in creating it

 

[Bug]

show historical evidence cuck,

The civilizations of Mesopotamia, including the Sumerians, Akkadians, Babylonians, and Assyrians, were primarily Semitic-speaking peoples indigenous to the Near East. Modern genetic studies indicate that these populations were genetically distinct from European groups and while being closer to other Near Eastern populations

i just gave u a video on how migration works and worked. i am not going out of my way to write entire essays just for u to deny reality because "you are not cucked". they had R1B haplogroup buddy. where is that found today

 

[yeeyeeslayer]

migration and mixing are part of history. they were white but not anymore

what about the ancient Egyptians

the ancient egyptians were one of the most advanced civilizations in history, achieving amazing feats in architecture, medicine, engineering, and governance long before many other cultures.

their innovations like the construction of the pyramids and development of sophisticated irrigation systems, influenced societies across the mediterranean and beyond. despite their undeniable impact, they weren't "white" by modern racial definitions.

their prominence as a global leader at innovation during their time shows that the capacity for greatness is not tied to race, there goes ur white supremacist narrative that whites r superior cuz muh inventions

 

[Bug]

The point is, no one group has a monopoly on human progress. History involves a mix of borrowing, adapting, and innovating across cultures and civilisations, people taking what one civilisation did and building on it.

ye thats great but in the grand scheme of things what race has done more with what they have. whites? they are superior then

 

[Bug]

what about the ancient Egyptians

the ancient egyptians were one of the most advanced civilizations in history, achieving amazing feats in architecture, medicine, engineering, and governance long before many other cultures.

their innovations like the construction of the pyramids and development of sophisticated irrigation systems, influenced societies across the mediterranean and beyond. despite their undeniable impact, they weren't "white" by modern racial definitions.

their prominence as a global leader at innovation during their time shows that the capacity for greatness is not tied to race, there goes ur white supremacist narrative that whites r superior cuz muh inventions

modern racial definitions are political. they have r1b haplogroup and were white. its why native north africans "amazighs" look completely different to arabs that now inhabit the land. Arabs = mixed group of people. the natives to those lands were caucasians

 

[yeeyeeslayer]

i just gave u a video on how migration works and worked. i am not going out of my way to write entire essays just for u to deny reality because "you are not cucked". they had R1B haplogroup buddy. where is that found today

your argument about the R1B haplogroup oversimplifies the complexity of genetics and history, R1B is found in parts of europe today, it's also present in the middle east and north africa, means its not a uniquely "white" marker. ancient mesopotamians were genetically and culturally tied to the near east, sharing more in common with populations in iraq, syria, and iran than with europeans. claiming they were "white" based on a single haplogroup ignores the broader genetic evidence, which places them firmly within the indigenous populations of the region. modern racial categories like "white" didn't exist at the time and can’t be retroactively applied to ancient civilizations without distorting history

 

[Bug]

Youre either a coping SFcel or a self hating cuck in either case

Nothing abt what you consider “low iq” matters

u have too much ego. nothing is cucked unless u believe it to be. i am saying whites as a whole are superior historically and genetically than ethnics. I dont even think most whites are superior to me I am 6ft6 North African. u think I am bowing down to a white clowns. we have too much nuance now u can be black and mog all fucking whites. but with that being said whites are on average mogging blacks

 

[zub111]

Youre either a coping SFcel or a self hating cuck in either case

Nothing abt what you consider “low iq” matters

you clearly aren’t truly black pilled, truth is objective no matter your standpoint . if someone says something factually true but it goes against your moral code, it doesn’t make what they say any less true , i can tell ur muslim

 

[yeeyeeslayer]

modern racial definitions are political. they have r1b haplogroup and were white. its why native north africans "amazighs" look completely different to arabs that now inhabit the land. Arabs = mixed group of people. the natives to those lands were caucasians

for ancient egyptians, genetic studies from mummies show a blend of sub-saharan african and near eastern influences, reflecting egypt's position as a crossroads between continents, not a singular "caucasian" identity.

 

[wishIwasSalludon]

you clearly aren’t truly black pilled

Nothing in the blackpill says I have to believe whites are superior

 

[Bug]

your argument about the R1B haplogroup oversimplifies the complexity of genetics and history, R1B is found in parts of europe today, it's also present in the middle east and north africa, means its not a uniquely "white" marker. ancient mesopotamians were genetically and culturally tied to the near east, sharing more in common with populations in iraq, syria, and iran than with europeans. claiming they were "white" based on a single haplogroup ignores the broader genetic evidence, which places them firmly within the indigenous populations of the region. modern racial categories like "white" didn't exist at the time and can’t be retroactively applied to ancient civilizations without distorting history

I just told u that middle east and north africa were white and lost because of racemixing so yes of course they have traces of r1b, they were caucasians.

 

[wishIwasSalludon]

if someone says something factually true but it goes against your moral code

Yes and whites being superior is factually incorrect

 

[Bug]

for ancient egyptians, genetic studies from mummies show a blend of sub-saharan african and near eastern influences, reflecting egypt's position as a crossroads between continents, not a singular "caucasian" identity.

yes, thats why the nation fell, mixing of people and no identity. but the people who built Egypt historically were caucasian. Just because blacks were used as slaves doesnt mean they built anything or were the thinking power behind it all

 

[wishIwasSalludon]

u have too much ego. nothing is cucked unless u believe it to be. i am saying whites as a whole are superior historically and genetically than ethnics. I dont even think most whites are superior to me I am 6ft6 North African. u think I am bowing down to a white clowns. we have too much nuance now u can be black and mog all fucking whites. but with that being said whites are on average mogging blacks

Are you morrocan?

 

[wishIwasSalludon]

Just because blacks were used as slaves doesnt mean they built anything or were the thinking power behind it all

There was a Sudanese dynasty in egypt

 

[Bug]

Are you morrocan?

ye my blood is but I never lived there my parents came to canada (white country) for a better life

 

[wishIwasSalludon]

ye my blood is but I never lived there my parents came to canada (white country) for a better life

Why is it that everytime a North African says shit like this it’s always a morrocan

 

[yeeyeeslayer]

I just told u that middle east and north africa were white and lost because of racemixing so yes of course they have traces of r1b, they were caucasians.

lol Arab DNA from the conquests is small in North Africa and Egypt, too small to explain that the amount of them that are now brown.

many native North Africans are brown

 

[Bug]

lol Arab DNA from the conquests is small in North Africa, too small to explain that the fact that theyre now shitskins is attributed to much Arab conquest

many native North Africans are brown

bullshit. native north africans are caucasian people

North africans at this very moment in time, 100% caucasian even when north africa is heavily mixed with arab and nubian blood.

NATIVE NORTH AFRICAN GIRL (TODAY, EVEN WITH RACE MIXING)

Its why you see blue eyes and blonde hair in Afghanistan (pashtun) even though its 100% a shitskin arab country.

They were caucasian before

Ethiopia = to be burnt in the face, thats the definition of the word. Even parts outside of North Africa were WHITE. Only caucasians can burn in the face. but race mixing and invasion destroyed these things.

 

[yeeyeeslayer]

bullshit. native north africans are caucasian people

View attachment 3305220View attachment 3305221

North africans at this very moment in time, 100% caucasian even when north africa is heavily mixed with arab and nubian blood.

NATIVE NORTH AFRICAN GIRL (TODAY, EVEN WITH RACE MIXING)

View attachment 3305224


Its why you see blue eyes and blonde hair in Afghanistan (pashtun) even though its 100% a shitskin arab country.

They were caucasian before

Ethiopia = to be burnt in the face, thats the definition of the word. Even parts outside of North Africa were WHITE. Only caucasians can burn in the face. but race mixing and invasion destroyed these things.

lol these are a small minority, Arab DNA from the conquest in North Africa and Egypt is like 10% at best, meaning 90% of the DNA present today in those regions is indigenous,

so if that's the case why do the vast majority of them look like stereotypical MENAs and not like the cherrypicked ones you put here

 

[yeeyeeslayer]

bullshit. native north africans are caucasian people

View attachment 3305220View attachment 3305221

North africans at this very moment in time, 100% caucasian even when north africa is heavily mixed with arab and nubian blood.

NATIVE NORTH AFRICAN GIRL (TODAY, EVEN WITH RACE MIXING)

View attachment 3305224


Its why you see blue eyes and blonde hair in Afghanistan (pashtun) even though its 100% a shitskin arab country.

They were caucasian before

Ethiopia = to be burnt in the face, thats the definition of the word. Even parts outside of North Africa were WHITE. Only caucasians can burn in the face. but race mixing and invasion destroyed these things.

@wishIwasSalludon we wuz caucasian saar

 

[Bug]

lol these are a small minority, Arab DNA from the conquest in North Africa and Egypt is like 10% at best, meaning 90% of the DNA present today in those regions is indigenous,

so if that's the case why do the vast majority of them look like stereotypical sandniggers and not like the cherrypicked ones you put here

View attachment 3305230

its not then we wouldnt have two seperate terms to describe two seperate people (Amazighs Native North Africans) and Arabs (Modern North Africans). Two different people with two different cultures. the amazighs are native and are much lighter

 

[yeeyeeslayer]

and Arabs (Modern North Africans).

Arab DNA there is wayyyy too small for you to make this assertion

 

[Bug]

Arab DNA there is wayyyy too small for you to make this assertion

obviously not then there wouldnt be such a large contrast in looks between the native population and the population that is now

 

[Deleted member 30959]

Nothing in the blackpill says I have to believe whites are superior

Every chad is white