Why is it when white people do bad stuff their whole race isn't blamed for it?

[Deleted member 27511]

Literally the opposite jfl

The only people who think that are delusional whites its like when foids say dating is easy for men because dating is easy for them, foids are just completely ignorant to reality. Whites are the same way completely ignorant to reality.

 

[sub6manletnozygos]

I never mentioned the Japanese and Mongolians because I didn’t think they served a point in this discussion considering we both come to the agreement that humans are evil pieces of shit just that whites have done the most evil shit out of a species of cunts.

Whites have not done "the most evil shit" any more than other racies. That is the most of our disagreement, here. And I used Japan, Mongolia, China, and Vietnam and their history over 1000+ years of intra-Asian, systematic slaughter to evidence this, not only from a expansionist perspective but an internal perspective. It is relevant, because it evidence brutal oppressions by others (not whites).

The Japanese empire ironically only existed due to European and American encroachment into Asia it was pure fear that spurred Japan into action though the Japanese have always been militant pricks and have attempted their own genocides against Koreans and Jomon peoples in the past.

Japanese independence existed far before, Anglo (or Chinese) involvement, and any nationalist, Japanese man will attest to this and insult you if you don't agree with him. I don't want to enter this discussion because it is besides the brunt of the discussion which is you thinking that whites are a most ebil while I think this misrepresents other races/religions expansionist and non-expansionist, inter and intra state violence, if not in the immediate short term, then definitely over the past 1000+ years (evidenced by all those expansionist expires listed above - you don't have an empire without destruction).

Mongols didn’t commit genocide unless you refused to capitulate to them and you can blame the Turks Iranians and Arabs and even to an extent the Chinese for pissing them off by killing their envoys.

That just isn't true. I can't tell if you are practicing willful blindness or if you are genuinely in denial. Although poorly documented, the destruction reaped was enormous, to the degree that there are absence of certain Chinese literature over 100s of years.

Destruction under the Mongol Empire - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org

Still they were cunts but even they didn’t cause the same widespread panic as the Iberian empires


Expansionist and genociding other groups stealing land off them putting them into chattel slavery and making them a 3rd class citizen (Cumskins didn’t even consider non Whites humans JFL) are not the same thing. When did the Rashudin or any Islamic caliphate. I’m not genocide on people to the degree of Europeans?

Mamluk Sultanate of Egypt (1250-1517 CE). Massacre of Mongols and Christians (1260 CE): After the Battle of Ain Jalut, the Mamluks conducted a massacre of Mongols and Christians in the city of Damascus.

Abbasid Caliphate (750-1258 CE): Persecution of non-Muslims:

Ottoman Empire (1299-1922 CE):
Armenian Genocide (1915-1923): Under the rule of the Young Turks, who were part of the Ottoman Empire, an estimated 1.5 million Armenians were killed and many more displaced or subjected to forced labor and other atrocities.
Persecution of non-Muslim minorities:

Umayyad Caliphate (661-750 CE):
Massacre of Jews in Jerusalem (70 CE): The Umayyad forces, led by General Maslama, massacred a large number of Jews and destroyed their synagogues in Jerusalem during their conquest of the city. Persecution of non-Arab Muslims: The Umayyads, who were predominantly Arab, favored Arab Muslims over non-Arab Muslims and imposed discriminatory policies, leading to marginalization and persecution of non-Arab Muslims.

As for the Rashidun Caliphate, I'm not a historian but "the primary focus was on spreading Islam and establishing political control over newly conquered territories? Military campaigns were carried out against neighboring empires and regions, such as the Byzantine Empire and the Sassanian Empire." It seems more peaceful than the others.

However, you can also cherry pick and pinpoint other anglo saxon societies or other majority white countries which didn't commit acts of atrocities for periods of time. The point is unless you have the time and resources to go through EVERY SINGLE EMPIRE, and then evaluate EVERY SINGLE ACT of aggression, you cannot reasonably determine that wyte pepo, is bader than the others, especially when you have the acts by Asian countries, Latin American, African countries against others in the form of slave trades, expansionism, genocides occurring by internally and externally.

Even the Islamic form of slavery was far more tame compared to the one practaced in the new world, a black slave in the Islamic caliphate could rise to high positions even the Mamelukes had a black sultan at one point.

Sorry but Cumskins did what eveybody else did but took it one notch up that’s WHAT SEPERATES whites disputable actions from others. But at least modern whites are trying to make amends which is why I prefer whites over ethnics

Read the list of genocides, very below. Definitely not wholly white. Regardless, I'm too lazy at this point to find further evidence and don't think its necessary given the historical foreign policy of so many other countries, described above, both internally and externally, over the past 1000 years.

Also these Wiki links also ignore the inherent political bias bound in them, and any agenda monopolizing moderator have if they seek to spread an agenda.

It's interesting that they don't note Islamic, Latin American or Asian genocide and destruction, historically or contemporaneously, described above or even the more recent Paki v Indus conflicts For example, "During the nine-month-long Bangladesh War for Liberation, members of the Pakistani military and supporting pro Pakistani Islamist militias from Jamaat-e-Islami party killed between 200,000 and 3,000,000 people and raped between 200,000 and 400,000 Bengali women, according to Bangladeshi and Indian sources, in a systematic campaign of genocidal rape".

Persecution of Hindus - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org

Persecution of Christians - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org

Persecution of Buddhists - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org

Persecution of Muslims - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org

Persecution of Jews - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org

Persecution of pagans in the late Roman Empire - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org

List of genocides - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org

In contemporary terms, whites are one of the only few nations to actually BAN slavery. Further, tell me who runs the slave trade out of Libya and greater middle east now and which countries have indentured servitude in the form of forced labor? At least white pepo countries have some semblance of labor laws compared to the others.

 

[Guba]

I love how these non-whites want to live with whites in WHITE NATIONS yet they bitch about them all the same. How about you stay the fuck away from white nations? Trust me, whites would be more than happy about NOT thinking about you and what you do in your own countries. You would never even cross our minds. Thank you very much. The inferiority complex is palpable.

 

[forevermirin]

Used to think this guy was high iq

Which guy are u talking about? The one u replied to or op?

 

[autistic_tendencies]

Which guy are u talking about? The one u replied to or op?

O pee