Why is there debate about what it means to be white but not what it means to be black, asian, etc?

[Meteor21]

People unironically arguing white skinned Europeans aren't white.

Nobody says only the Japanese are asian, not Koreans, Chinese, or Taiwanese.

Nobody argues light skinned blacks aren't black. But people on org will argue you're not white if you have a slight tan.

 

[2025cel]

cuz they think being white is cool and honorable.

I don't get it really, what's the point of looking like this?

 

[looks maximum]

 

[courtcase75]

There's a debate because some ethnics with low self-esteem that have people in them who resemble whites want to increase their status by including themselves in the white category, because we all know that means European these days. Why would anyone fight to be called black or south Asian?

 

[Meteor21]

Bump tf

 

[Archimedes]

Ethnic divisions are the easiest way to conquer a population. That's why "being white is a social construct" and you should "be proud of being English, Irish, or Italian but not white" or why "only Germanics are white."

The European race is a global minority already, so anyone trying to divide Europeans can be assumed to be a useful idiot to the powers that be.

 

[Proex]

inb4 someone says slavs aren't white

 

[buddhistking]

There is definitely a debate on what it means to be black with these african american monkeys saying that Africans and Caribbeans arent black all day long 24/7 on twitter

 

[saggyballsackcel]

inb4 someone says slavs aren't white

The Slavs aren’t white is just a mockery of their behavior. Slavs are often aggressive and rude, unlike most whites. Not necessarily uncivilized though not to the ranks of Germans and the like.
They also pull shit like this, which is why Russian has all right to subsidizes
JUdekraine