Why isn't IQ the most attractive trait in humans?

TsarTsar444

TsarTsar444

Asexual peaceful balkan monk
Joined
May 5, 2019
Posts
41,639
Reputation
106,254
Isn't it bizarre how humans are literally the master in the world nit cause of brute strength but because we are the most high iq beings yet things like eyes, jaw and maxila are much more important then iq. Infact iq is almost completely unimportant jfl. Almost any animal on this planet can easily rip us apart yet they are the ones in cages simply cause we iq mog them to suicide.
And we used our iq to our benefits for thousands of years know. Jfl humans are pathetic
 
  • +1
  • Woah
Reactions: Deleted member 13787, Jamal2222, Deleted member 2597 and 1 other person
You can't see IQ
Also most people don't like to feel inferior intellectually even tho they know they are🤷‍♂️
 
  • +1
Reactions: goat2x, AlwaysHaveQuestions and TsarTsar444
evolution jfl
It makes perfect sense why IQ isn't the primary mating criteria. Imagine a bunch of 150 IQ autists trying to survive the harsh wilderness and competing with high T barbarians.
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 5145, Ocelot, sytyl and 2 others
Bluepilled. Looks are the only thing that matters.
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 6402
we are mammals too lets not forget

basically advanced animals
 
She’s waiting for you.
6775B7BD 950E 4381 9C1B E3F16DB7D84E
 
  • JFL
Reactions: Deleted member 6305, MusicMaxxingMidget and AlwaysHaveQuestions
Isn't it bizarre how humans are literally the master in the world nit cause of brute strength but because we are the most high iq beings yet things like eyes, jaw and maxila are much more important then iq. Infact iq is almost completely unimportant jfl. Almost any animal on this planet can easily rip us apart yet they are the ones in cages simply cause we iq mog them to suicide.
And we used our iq to our benefits for thousands of years know. Jfl humans are pathetic
 
Isn't it bizarre how humans are literally the master in the world nit cause of brute strength but because we are the most high iq beings yet things like eyes, jaw and maxila are much more important then iq. Infact iq is almost completely unimportant jfl. Almost any animal on this planet can easily rip us apart yet they are the ones in cages simply cause we iq mog them to suicide.
And we used our iq to our benefits for thousands of years know. Jfl humans are pathetic
Iq is important it’s proven GL ppl have higher iq due to better development.
 
  • +1
Reactions: TsarTsar444 and Copeful
evolution jfl
It makes perfect sense why IQ isn't the primary mating criteria. Imagine a bunch of 150 IQ autists trying to survive the harsh wilderness and competing with high T barbarians.
But the high iq autists would invent advanced weapons and shelters much more effective then just raw muscles to survive the harsh cold, your argument is shit
 
  • Woah
  • Hmm...
  • JFL
Reactions: Deleted member 13787, Copeful and Danish_Retard
society and technology has advanced faster than evolutionary instinct
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 9819, AlwaysHaveQuestions and Copeful
society and technology has advanced faster than evolutionary instinct
lmao but our iq has driven us to the beings we are today since we started walking on two legs million of years ago
 
  • +1
  • Woah
Reactions: Deleted member 13787 and sytyl
lmao but our iq has driven us to the beings we are today since we started walking on two legs million of years ago
Humans are something like 200-300k years old and have only been "civilized" for ~5000 years. 5000 years of civilization doesn't beat out 295k years of evolution/primal instinct.
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 6403
But the high iq autists would invent advanced weapons and shelters much more effective then just raw muscles to survive the harsh cold, your argument is shit
COPE
200.gif
 
Aren't symmetry and good facial features indicators of high IQ? PSL is cope. Just harmonize your features and be high class.
 
Humans are something like 200-300k years old and have only been "civilized" for ~5000 years. 5000 years of civilization doesn't beat out 295k years of evolution/primal instinct.
but humans have been using their iq to survive since 100k years ago at least, Homo Erectus have outbred the mogger neanderthals literally because our ancestors were higher iq with stockpiling food and hunting
 
  • +1
  • Woah
Reactions: Deleted member 13787 and sytyl
We're not the apex predators of the earth necessarily because of our IQ, but because of our skill to communicate. Due to that we can organize in large groups. Even though alone a human is weak compared to most of animalia, but as a group, we are very dangerous.
If other animals, like apes knew how to talk, they could've wiped us out with ease thousands of years ago.
Methodology Technology, IQ, and Koko the Gorilla. - ppt download
 
  • +1
  • Love it
Reactions: Deleted member 2597, TsarTsar444 and Danish_Retard
tens of thousands of years ago, when evolution was still taking place, facial development was a way better predictor of the individuals chances of survival and al that stuff. also i imagine it's pretty hard to "create" some sort of an accurate biological detector of intelligence, even for nature (meaning that it would take a lot of time, not saying it's impossible).
 
  • +1
Reactions: TsarTsar444
hi tser me exhousted bit tbh ngl u gunne go to bed @ 8-9 em.? mirin ngltbhngl
 
  • +1
Reactions: TsarTsar444
We're not the apex predators of the earth necessarily because of our IQ, but because of our skill to communicate. Due to that we can organize in large groups. Even though alone a human is weak compared to most of animalia, but as a group, we are very dangerous.
If other animals, like apes knew how to talk, they could've wiped us out with ease thousands of years ago.
Methodology Technology, IQ, and Koko the Gorilla. - ppt download
but this just proves the NTness and high iq would be more important for us humans then looks, so my post is still right that looks are the least important in humans
 
  • Woah
Reactions: Deleted member 13787
cope, all famous scientists are incels
Chad could become a scientist if he dedicated himself but unlike the incel virgin that’s forced into it Chad can be a football player, singer, nascar driver, actor, boxer, president etc his development makes it highly unlikely for him to do incel roles like that
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 2597
tser hi brolossus

1600810322566
xd
 
  • Love it
Reactions: TsarTsar444
Chad could become a scientist if he dedicated himself but unlike the incel virgin that’s forced into it Chad can be a football player, singer, nascar driver, actor, boxer, president etc his development makes it highly unlikely for him to do incel roles like that
kinda cope tbh, 100 years ago and more there was non of these activities and all scientista were ugly. But your logic Very gl models would be geniuses even tho they are not
 
  • Woah
Reactions: Deleted member 13787
kinda cope tbh, 100 years ago and more there was non of these activities and all scientista were ugly. But your logic Very gl models would be geniuses even tho they are not
Environment and development determines our roles in life I could give you examples of GL men who are chemistry teachers, scientists just like you could give examples of incels who fit the same roles. It’s logical to think a popular Chad isn’t gonna spend his time doing support roles when people will push him to do more of a main character job this applies to any era.
 
  • +1
  • Woah
Reactions: Deleted member 13787 and Tony
Environment and development determines our roles in life I could give you examples of GL men who are chemistry teachers, scientists just like you could give examples of incels who fit the same roles. It’s logical to think a popular Chad isn’t gonna spend his time doing support roles when people will push him to do more of a main character job this applies to any era.
again you are incorect, high iq is not correlated to being gl. Literally all of the most famous scientists were average at best. And even nobility and Kings were incels, chad has no main role
 
  • +1
  • Woah
Reactions: Deleted member 13787 and Deleted member 2597
again you are incorect, high iq is not correlated to being gl. Literally all of the most famous scientists were average at best. And even nobility and Kings were incels, chad has no main role
Jfl science literally says gl people are smarter on average
16068877 D19B 4497 B045 BBB742BD0AF4
Muh chad/Stacy is dumb is a huge cope.
 
  • JFL
Reactions: TsarTsar444
Jfl science literally says gl people are smarter on average View attachment 686705Muh chad/Stacy is dumb is a huge cope.
you do realise what these bluepiled retards consider attractive isn't what actually attractive is right? they have different criteria like symmetry even tho all psl icons are assymetric. I didn't say chads are dumb i just meant how iq isn't related to how gl you are, every single high iq kid in my school was an incel literally and the chads i know are working construction jobs
 
  • Woah
Reactions: Deleted member 13787

Similar threads

ØUROBOROS
Replies
10
Views
52
zennn
zennn
JohnnyRamone
Replies
14
Views
77
JohnnyRamone
JohnnyRamone
khazarianmafia73
Replies
3
Views
35
khazarianmafia73
khazarianmafia73
prolarper
Replies
30
Views
128
fraudster#1
fraudster#1

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top