Why isn't ugliness considered a condition???

[Deleted member 18086]

I deserve allowances for having this subhuman face. I'm literally handicapped as I cannot use my cock, no matter how much I maxx, it won't matter. But Ik why society doesnt give a fuck; it's because being disfigured is a disability dangerous for human gene pool more so than being blind or missing a limb, they want to DESTROY bottom % men which is why they don't give us allowances. Fuck this society, it needs to die for being a shallow and materialistic piece of shit.

 

[Deleted member 15674]

I deserve allowances for having this subhuman face. I'm literally handicapped as I cannot use my cock, no matter how much I maxx, it won't matter. But Ik why society doesnt give a fuck; it's because being disfigured is a disability dangerous for human gene pool more so than being blind or missing a limb, they want to DESTROY bottom % men which is why they don't give us allowances. Fuck this society, it needs to die for being a shallow and materialistic piece of shit.

why don't you just become gay

 

[Deleted member 18086]

why don't you just become gay

I'm not flexible man

 

[AlexBrown84]

Give it all to God and let Jesus reimburse you

How I’m 42 and you got a curfew

We walk in God’s spiritual ordinance

 

[thecel]

Why isn't ugliness considered a condition???

Because this:

Fuck this society, it needs to die for being a shallow and materialistic piece of shit.

Conditions must be bad intrinsically if they’re to count as disabilities. Ugliness can’t be proven to be intrinsically bad. If a condition results in worsened life for no other reason than that society treats one poorly for having it, it isn’t a disability. Ugliness is as bad as disabilities are bad only because humanity is shallow and lookist.

Aesthetic faces don’t have functional advantages over unaesthetic faces. Ugliness hurts people in sexual selection but not natural selection; real disabilities hurt people in natural selection.

Disabilities such as blindness are about things (e.g. seeing) that people are absolutely unable to do, period. But an inability to attract mates depends on other people’s actions.

 

[Deleted member 18086]

Ugliness hurts people in sexual selection but not natural selection; real disabilities hurt people in natural selection.

but sexual selection is what matters in the long run

 

[thecel]

but sexual selection is what matters in the long run

Yes it is. Ugly people deserve compensation.

But it is a disability? Not really. Though a giga-recessed jaw to the point that it impacts one’s chewing ability may meet the criteria for disability status, just lookin ugly doesn’t. It’s like learning disabilities—being “just stupid” doesn’t count as one.

 

[Deleted member 18086]

Yes it is. Ugly people deserve compensation.

But it is a disability? Not really. Though a giga-recessed jaw to the point that it impacts one’s chewing ability may meet the criteria for disability status, just lookin ugly doesn’t. It’s like learning disabilities—being “just stupid” doesn’t count as one.

fuck this world then

 

[Deleted member 17578]

But an inability to attract mates depends on other people’s actions.

It doesn't make much sense to me what you are writing.

Natural selection, survival, also depends on other people's actions. The willingness to cooperate with you, share resources and knowledge with you, and so on.

Your arguments seem to only make sense if everyone lived as a lone hunter gatherer without any society or social interaction affecting their ability to get ahead in life and survive. Which is not the case.