D
Diremeyer
Bronze
- Joined
- Apr 26, 2020
- Posts
- 453
- Reputation
- 359
Looks. Sure! A guy with no money, no status, but who's ridiculously good looking would slay easily. No doubt!
Money. Nope! Say a janitor won the lottery, or a geeky kid bought bitcoin early. Money doesn't make you slay if you lack in looks, lack in status.
Status. Sure! A guy with Mick Jagger status would slay easily, even if he blew all his cash and lacked in looks.
So, wealth beyond the dreams of avarice can make women think it's sensible to LTR you, but the said janitor or geek wouldn't get women chasing them for one night stands. Whereas a much less wealthy lawyer or surgeon, who has status, but lack in looks, would be more attractive. No doubt. Money isn't that important. Money is rather a subsidiary to status.
Money shouldn't be part of the trinity LMS. Money is only important to the extent it gives you status. Status gets you ONS, not money.
Rather, M should be masculinity. An aged John Wayne in a saloon would get one night stands more easily than a wealthy geek or janitor. Mike Tyson before fame would get one night stands. They both get immediate status as they've got commanding presences. Women like men with "good personalities", it's true, but good means dark triad types. Being ruthless and non-agreeable is better than being a pushover. Masculinity alone, as in muscles and a masculine personality, is way better than money for making women lust for you.
M should be masculinity, not money. Change my mind.
Money. Nope! Say a janitor won the lottery, or a geeky kid bought bitcoin early. Money doesn't make you slay if you lack in looks, lack in status.
Status. Sure! A guy with Mick Jagger status would slay easily, even if he blew all his cash and lacked in looks.
So, wealth beyond the dreams of avarice can make women think it's sensible to LTR you, but the said janitor or geek wouldn't get women chasing them for one night stands. Whereas a much less wealthy lawyer or surgeon, who has status, but lack in looks, would be more attractive. No doubt. Money isn't that important. Money is rather a subsidiary to status.
Money shouldn't be part of the trinity LMS. Money is only important to the extent it gives you status. Status gets you ONS, not money.
Rather, M should be masculinity. An aged John Wayne in a saloon would get one night stands more easily than a wealthy geek or janitor. Mike Tyson before fame would get one night stands. They both get immediate status as they've got commanding presences. Women like men with "good personalities", it's true, but good means dark triad types. Being ruthless and non-agreeable is better than being a pushover. Masculinity alone, as in muscles and a masculine personality, is way better than money for making women lust for you.
M should be masculinity, not money. Change my mind.
Last edited: