why lookism is/was the better forum

H

Harold O'brien

Luminary
Joined
Dec 3, 2021
Posts
5,413
Reputation
7,137
1. more interesting users/characters. majority of users here just blur together (the better ones tend to be ex lookism users)

2. the looksmax 80:20 rule. 80% of the activity on this site goes to the top 20% most dogshit threads. like the most recently bumped threads are always super mundane and groan worthy, while genuinely interesting ones get ignored. the lookism collective consciousness was just better at thread selection
 
  • +1
  • Woah
  • JFL
Reactions: incel194012940, thecel, BearBoy and 14 others
1. more interesting users/characters. majority of users here just blur together (the better ones tend to be ex lookism users)

2. the looksmax 80:20 rule. 80% of the activity on this site goes to the top 20% most dogshit threads. like the most recently bumped threads are always super mundane and groan worthy, while genuinely interesting ones get ignored. the lookism collective consciousness was just better at thread selection
it is what it is
 
  • +1
Reactions: Stopping@Nothing19
dn rd + dn care + dn ask + ur welcome to leave anytime u feel to do so
 
  • +1
  • JFL
Reactions: Effortless, ALP, vaninskybird and 17 others
cringe
 
  • +1
Reactions: Toth's thot, ALP, datboijj and 1 other person
3. they still think didn't read is funny
 
  • JFL
  • +1
  • Ugh..
Reactions: Anomaly, Deleted member 4946, BigJimsWornOutTires and 21 others
1639616400756
 
  • +1
Reactions: Anomaly and datboijj
Why the fuck dont u cucks move on to reddit then

swear to god i read the exact same autistic moaning every single hour
 
  • +1
  • JFL
  • Love it
Reactions: BigJimsWornOutTires, Effortless, ALP and 13 others
It was the same but less serious discussion and lower quality threads
 
  • +1
Reactions: Anomaly and datboijj
No alts = no fun.

You could escape to an alt if you posted something embarrassing/got banned on your main, weave complex larps together by responding to your own threads from an alt, create novelty accounts for the sole purpose of bullying, etc. The restrictiveness regarding this activity on here means you have to actually put thought into your posts to maintain your forum presence.
 
  • JFL
  • +1
Reactions: EasternRightWinger15, never_lucky, AscendingHero and 8 others
Lookism posters were genuinely stupid and that goes here too but there are more gems
compared to users like rl, karlsplatz and dimez everyone here is retarded
 
  • +1
  • Ugh..
Reactions: BearBoy and darkness97
users here seem to be a standard deviation lower on average. not to mention the site itself is inferior in every way
 
  • Ugh..
  • +1
  • Woah
Reactions: thecel, ALP, datboijj and 2 others
compared to users like rl, karlsplatz and dimez everyone here is retarded
Ok
No alts = no fun.

You could escape to an alt if you posted something embarrassing/got banned on your main, weave complex larps together by responding to your own threads from an alt, create novelty accounts for the sole purpose of bullying, etc. The restrictiveness regarding this activity on here means you have to actually put thought into your posts to maintain your forum presence.
Good
 
2. the looksmax 80:20 rule. 80% of the activity on this site goes to the top 20% most dogshit threads. like the most recently bumped threads are always super mundane and groan worthy, while genuinely interesting ones get ignored. the lookism collective consciousness was just better at thread selection

Intelligence and perma-rot.
 
I will take over this forum and convert to lookism once my ascension is complete inshallah. @Alexanderr 's days are numbered
 
  • JFL
  • WTF
  • +1
Reactions: Anomaly, ALP, Deleted member 14917 and 5 others
pros of looksmax:

1. meta discussion is allowed
2. no insufferable moderators
3. wow react is better
 
  • Woah
  • +1
  • JFL
Reactions: never_lucky, Inhale, datboijj and 1 other person
looksthe0ry.org is a proper successor waiting to be revived
 
From what I’ve seen lookism users are more autistic than looksmax users
Both are dogshit sites, entertaining though
 
  • +1
Reactions: ALP, never_lucky, datboijj and 1 other person
From what I’ve seen lookism users are more autistic than looksmax users
Both are dogshit sites, entertaining though
 
  • +1
Reactions: datboijj and loksr
Lookism users was more recognizable, guys on here I dont really know who I'm talking too. But lookism wasn't all that like people try to make it. I do agree good content like mine gets ignored but it did on lookism too.
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 2381 and Harold O'brien
Lookism users was more recognizable, guys on here I dont really know who I'm talking too. But lookism wasn't all that like people try to make it. I do agree good content like mine gets ignored but it did on lookism too.
dog shit threads get ignored no matter the website
 
  • +1
Reactions: ALP
1000%

My threads have been carrying the site this week

Lookism was the shit
 
  • JFL
  • Ugh..
Reactions: ALP and datboijj
users here seem to be a standard deviation lower on average. not to mention the site itself is inferior in every way

In IQ? 100%
 
  • +1
  • Ugh..
Reactions: ALP, patrician and cmfanel
No alts = no fun.

You could escape to an alt if you posted something embarrassing/got banned on your main, weave complex larps together by responding to your own threads from an alt, create novelty accounts for the sole purpose of bullying, etc. The restrictiveness regarding this activity on here means you have to actually put thought into your posts to maintain your forum presence.
which should in theory contribute to higher quality threads, but the brain dead userbase here cant even manage to do that
 
  • +1
Reactions: MakinItHappenReturn
which should in theory contribute to higher quality threads, but the brain dead userbase here cant even manage to do that

It's the age bracket

I have said this many times. Zoomers are not critical thinkers, they lack personality and they only care about how they APPEAR to others. Being NT is survival for a Zoomer and if they can't be that they gotta look like Chad. It's really very sad. Their brains are underdeveloped.

I read a study recently which said that now a days the average person remains a TEENAGER until the age of 24. When I read that I instantly thought, fuck me, yeah, that really is accurate when you weigh it all up. You've got 22 year olds running around with 16 year old mentality. Man children everywhere.
 
  • +1
  • Ugh..
  • So Sad
Reactions: Deleted member 4946, ALP, never_lucky and 3 others
I will take over this forum and convert to lookism once my ascension is complete inshallah. @Alexanderr 's days are numbered
Cope
This forum is tiktok pilled
 
  • Ugh..
Reactions: Deleted member 14160 and patrician
  • WTF
  • JFL
  • +1
Reactions: ALP, Bassem and Deleted member 7580
4. This, I could never react with this, it's dreadful

How else will the world know I find something funny?
Screenshot 179
 
  • +1
Reactions: Bassem, Harold O'brien and patrician
  • +1
  • Ugh..
Reactions: Deleted member 2381, Bassem, datboijj and 2 others
It's the age bracket

I have said this many times. Zoomers are not critical thinkers, they lack personality and they only care about how they APPEAR to others. Being NT is survival for a Zoomer and if they can't be that they gotta look like Chad. It's really very sad. Their brains are underdeveloped.

I read a study recently which said that now a days the average person remains a TEENAGER until the age of 24. When I read that I instantly thought, fuck me, yeah, that really is accurate when you weigh it all up. You've got 22 year olds running around with 16 year old mentality. Man children everywhere.
Accurate asf, zoomers are bunch of motherfuckers that deserve the nuck, fuck all of them, i don't pity them anymore lol
 
  • +1
Reactions: MakinItHappenReturn and Deleted member 2130
Anyoe here remembering throatkicker?:lul::lul::lul::lul:
 
Why the fuck dont u cucks move on to reddit then

swear to god i read the exact same autistic moaning every single hour
Do you really think it's the same you spastic
 
1. more interesting users/characters. majority of users here just blur together (the better ones tend to be ex lookism users)

2. the looksmax 80:20 rule. 80% of the activity on this site goes to the top 20% most dogshit threads. like the most recently bumped threads are always super mundane and groan worthy, while genuinely interesting ones get ignored. the lookism collective consciousness was just better at thread selection
@Harold O'brien Harold The Soy.
This Is You:
o-RINO-EATING-FOOD-YOUTUBE-facebook.jpg
 
  • +1
  • JFL
Reactions: metagross and Deleted member 16820
Ok now I've had it. When the fuck is lookism coming back

:steaming:

Also caged hard at this comment on a popular delon yt video

8iKoBRf.png
 
  • JFL
  • +1
Reactions: Inhale, darkness97 and Harold O'brien
Lookism was very good before 2018. After that retards like undisputed, armadylbrah and BBCTakeover ruined the site.
 
Lookism was very good before 2018. After that retards like undisputed, armadylbrah and BBCTakeover ruined the site.
Keep coping you utter subhuman, undisputed was peak lookism. Anything was better than this shithole of a site anyway.
 
users here seem to be a standard deviation lower on average. not to mention the site itself is inferior in every way
This metric is obviously stupid. I could make high-iq threads and discussions, but it would be pointless because no one is interested in, say, the differences in cognitive ability of Africanized bees and European honeybees
 
  • +1
Reactions: ALP
Harold.. Who was in your last avi
 
This metric is obviously stupid. I could make high-iq threads and discussions, but it would be pointless because no one is interested in, say, the differences in cognitive ability of Africanized bees and European honeybees
nope everything good correlates with iq including taste
 
  • Ugh..
Reactions: ALP
nope everything good correlates with iq including taste
Relationship becomes negative at outlier-high IQs.
Usually, IQ correlates with social skills aswell, but this goes away for very high IQs and becomes negative (like, say, autists).
 
All I axed Santa for Christmas is for lookism to return
:cryingman:

No one talks about any current events here. If I were to post a thread about the guy being a whatabe Rich Piana ,in Denver that killed 5 people the only reply it would get would be a "didn't read"
iu
 
Last edited:
  • Love it
Reactions: Harold O'brien
Keep coping you utter subhuman, undisputed was peak lookism. Anything was better than this shithole of a site anyway.
Lookism contained a lot of useful information about looksmaxxing methods, looks theory and the blackpill. I learned a lot from that site.
If you think that a mentally disturbed 80 IQ having Moroccan incel faggot zoomer was "peak lookism", then you are just as retarded as him. Just end it then, you useless cunt.
 
Lookism contained a lot of useful information about looksmaxxing methods, looks theory and the blackpill. I learned a lot from that site.
If you think that a mentally disturbed 80 IQ having Moroccan incel faggot zoomer was "peak lookism", then you are just as retarded as him. Just end it then, you useless cunt.
Muh looksmaxxing
Muh lookstheory

It's very simple: if you were born ugly, you can cope with looksmaxxing as much as you want, you'll still be a repulsive subhuman.

Now keep barking for me
 

Similar threads

lifeless
Replies
7
Views
143
True truecel
True truecel
Asiangymmax
Discussion My confession
2
Replies
52
Views
996
willgotogandyheaven
willgotogandyheaven
kisuke
Replies
21
Views
1K
javier-varela
javier-varela
True truecel
Replies
111
Views
6K
jaaba
jaaba

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top