Aryan Incel
Kraken
- Joined
- Apr 30, 2025
- Posts
- 3,960
- Reputation
- 5,827
It’s a well known fact that almost all normies when you ask them ‘how do I get laid’ or ‘how do I get a girlfriend’ they will say ‘just be confident bro’ or ‘have a good personality’ but how true is this really? and does this saying actually hold any weight in the real world?
What I would define as personality is probably not how normies would define it. I’d say there are 2 main parts
Now let’s start with neurotypicality I would define this as how autistic you act/ are perceived. This is influenced by many factors but mostly by brain chemistry and social interactions. Generally speaking almost everyone in this site are on the spectrum or somewhat neurodivergent.
The worst thing about neurotypicality is it’s almost impossible to change, even with drugs. This is because as stated earlier it’s influenced by social factors and people like you and me probably didn’t socialize enough to be neurotypical and are left somewhat socially underdeveloped.
Now why should this concern you?
Well Neurotypicality is as much of a dating indicator as attractiveness and height!
Even in your personal life I think you can think of a lot of examples of ugly people slaying due to just being ‘popular’ even though you mog them.
Now as for statistics at the age of 38, 44.6% of autistic men were virgins as opposed to 0% of NT men.
Now you may say that this was a self report and holds no truth. Even if you were somewhat right it’s too much of a percentage difference to really have any effect on the general results (for example the real numbers might be closer to a 30% difference but even still it’s a huge difference)
To reinforce my point in another study it shows that 60% of autistic people had no form of sexual experience compared to only 18% of NT people. Obviously both these studies are slightly worse case of neurodivergence than people here but they still have a lot of merit.
Now compared to height which shows a far smaller difference of sexual success between heights. Again you can argue that they could have lied etc. But the difference is so large it wouldn’t really change this theory
In addition the correlation of sexual partners and attractiveness is very closely related however it seems that neurotypicality is even more of a correlation.
However due to how the attractiveness studies are done (eg that won’t accurately rate people and someone who might be called ‘attractive’ is a 4.5 psl but someone in the same category as ‘attractive’ is a 5.5 psl if you get what I mean). I would conclude that neurotypicality would hold a similar weight in terms of dating to attractiveness and maybe more for LTR (and probably attractiveness holding more weight for ONS)
Now Inhibition.
Inhibition generally refers to your anxiety levels or how extroverted and introverted you are. Low inhibition means you are extroverted and reckless, and high inhibition means you’re introverted and timid. Though there is some hope for high inhibcels as drugs are a very effective remedy to this problem as inhibition is more due to brain chemistry rather than social interaction (even though it does have a small effect).
Now why should this concern you?
A study shows a key correlation between introversion and lower sexual partners and higher extroversion having higher amount of sexual partners.
However these correlations aren’t to the same extent as something like attractiveness but more comparable to height
In addition higher risk taking and lower inhibition results in more sexual partners. This backs up the prior claim showing that risk taking/ inhibition will have a similar effect to sexual partners as height but not quite to the same effect as looks and neurotypicality
As said before inhibition can be easily fixed with certain drugs however how worth it would it be for someone with high inhibition and high levels of neurodivergence to take them?
Well the lower your inhibition the more apparent your autism will be due to the fact you’ll probably talk a lot about non socially acceptable topics. So this needs to be thought about before taking drugs that will lower your inhibition, whether it would be worth the failo of being seen as more neurodivergent for the halo of being more low inhib. Obviously it goes without saying if you are NT and high inhib you should 100% take drugs to lower your inhibition.
Now I will talk about a couple of anecdotes/ anecdotal evidence to prove just how important neurotypicality and inhibition are.
i think it’s quite common knowledge here that David Gandy was a virgin until 21 due to being as he puts it ‘a social loner’. Even though he is a 6’3 giga Chad he was still a virgin due to being ND (tbf he has stated he has said that he was fat for most of his childhood so that could be a factor)
Another example is Sean O’pry who has stated he was a virgin until 24 and was rejected to prom. And didn’t even go to parties until he was 18.
He is another example of a giga Chad that loses out to the NT pill.
An example closer to .org is @Clavicular . People here used to clown him for dating a below average foid who he obviously facially mogs by quite a large margin (even if you don’t like him you have to admit this to be true).
However unknown to the average low iq greycel here there were actually looksmatched due to the fact that she wasn’t an autist and clav (and you and I) are. And to add fuel to the fire she breaks up with him. Years of looksmaxxing and you still won’t be able to beat the NT pill. It truly shows the true brutality of the NTpill.
Conclusion
Personality (in terms of inhibition and neurotypicality) is as important as looks and height. And probably significantly more important for LTR. This thread shows that foids are even more hypergamous than you thought. They don’t just want a tall and attractive guy. But a tall, jacked, neurotypical, extroverted, popular and attractive guy.
They don’t want
They do want
What I would define as personality is probably not how normies would define it. I’d say there are 2 main parts
- neurotypicality
- Inhibition
Now let’s start with neurotypicality I would define this as how autistic you act/ are perceived. This is influenced by many factors but mostly by brain chemistry and social interactions. Generally speaking almost everyone in this site are on the spectrum or somewhat neurodivergent.
The worst thing about neurotypicality is it’s almost impossible to change, even with drugs. This is because as stated earlier it’s influenced by social factors and people like you and me probably didn’t socialize enough to be neurotypical and are left somewhat socially underdeveloped.
Now why should this concern you?
Well Neurotypicality is as much of a dating indicator as attractiveness and height!
Even in your personal life I think you can think of a lot of examples of ugly people slaying due to just being ‘popular’ even though you mog them.
Now as for statistics at the age of 38, 44.6% of autistic men were virgins as opposed to 0% of NT men.
Now you may say that this was a self report and holds no truth. Even if you were somewhat right it’s too much of a percentage difference to really have any effect on the general results (for example the real numbers might be closer to a 30% difference but even still it’s a huge difference)
To reinforce my point in another study it shows that 60% of autistic people had no form of sexual experience compared to only 18% of NT people. Obviously both these studies are slightly worse case of neurodivergence than people here but they still have a lot of merit.
Now compared to height which shows a far smaller difference of sexual success between heights. Again you can argue that they could have lied etc. But the difference is so large it wouldn’t really change this theory
In addition the correlation of sexual partners and attractiveness is very closely related however it seems that neurotypicality is even more of a correlation.
However due to how the attractiveness studies are done (eg that won’t accurately rate people and someone who might be called ‘attractive’ is a 4.5 psl but someone in the same category as ‘attractive’ is a 5.5 psl if you get what I mean). I would conclude that neurotypicality would hold a similar weight in terms of dating to attractiveness and maybe more for LTR (and probably attractiveness holding more weight for ONS)
Now Inhibition.
Inhibition generally refers to your anxiety levels or how extroverted and introverted you are. Low inhibition means you are extroverted and reckless, and high inhibition means you’re introverted and timid. Though there is some hope for high inhibcels as drugs are a very effective remedy to this problem as inhibition is more due to brain chemistry rather than social interaction (even though it does have a small effect).
Now why should this concern you?
A study shows a key correlation between introversion and lower sexual partners and higher extroversion having higher amount of sexual partners.
However these correlations aren’t to the same extent as something like attractiveness but more comparable to height
In addition higher risk taking and lower inhibition results in more sexual partners. This backs up the prior claim showing that risk taking/ inhibition will have a similar effect to sexual partners as height but not quite to the same effect as looks and neurotypicality
As said before inhibition can be easily fixed with certain drugs however how worth it would it be for someone with high inhibition and high levels of neurodivergence to take them?
Well the lower your inhibition the more apparent your autism will be due to the fact you’ll probably talk a lot about non socially acceptable topics. So this needs to be thought about before taking drugs that will lower your inhibition, whether it would be worth the failo of being seen as more neurodivergent for the halo of being more low inhib. Obviously it goes without saying if you are NT and high inhib you should 100% take drugs to lower your inhibition.
Now I will talk about a couple of anecdotes/ anecdotal evidence to prove just how important neurotypicality and inhibition are.
i think it’s quite common knowledge here that David Gandy was a virgin until 21 due to being as he puts it ‘a social loner’. Even though he is a 6’3 giga Chad he was still a virgin due to being ND (tbf he has stated he has said that he was fat for most of his childhood so that could be a factor)
Another example is Sean O’pry who has stated he was a virgin until 24 and was rejected to prom. And didn’t even go to parties until he was 18.
He is another example of a giga Chad that loses out to the NT pill.
An example closer to .org is @Clavicular . People here used to clown him for dating a below average foid who he obviously facially mogs by quite a large margin (even if you don’t like him you have to admit this to be true).
However unknown to the average low iq greycel here there were actually looksmatched due to the fact that she wasn’t an autist and clav (and you and I) are. And to add fuel to the fire she breaks up with him. Years of looksmaxxing and you still won’t be able to beat the NT pill. It truly shows the true brutality of the NTpill.
Conclusion
Personality (in terms of inhibition and neurotypicality) is as important as looks and height. And probably significantly more important for LTR. This thread shows that foids are even more hypergamous than you thought. They don’t just want a tall and attractive guy. But a tall, jacked, neurotypical, extroverted, popular and attractive guy.
They don’t want
They do want
@HighIQ ubermensch @unon @MaracasMogs @Orc
