Why tf height is so important to women?

Slavurik

Slavurik

Gigachad
Joined
Aug 27, 2026
Posts
1,497
Reputation
1,442
Like I understand when they do not want to date someone who is shorter than them, bcs it just will be weird and shit, but when I see 5'3 gals talking fr abt "I will not date someone below 6'1" I just cannot understand the logic, like ur a fucking gnome, why tf do u need someone who is twice ur size? Why won't u go for a handsome nigger but that is 5'8 or smth, it would look a lot more appropriate than some big tall guy walking with a fucking gnome, it looks like a child and some predator walking together on a date fr
 
Last edited:
  • +1
  • JFL
Reactions: Bipolar2Cel, SkinjobCatastrophe, americanpakitruvcel and 5 others
it’s natural and is a signal of good genes
 
  • +1
Reactions: Underwear Remover, Psl King, BeanletMogger and 1 other person
it’s natural and is a signal of good genes
I mean, good face proportions or a clear skin also a signal of good genes, but I never seen girls sayin' "if his face isn't clear I would not date him", the height shit is exaggerated asf for no reason
 
  • +1
Reactions: gandylite.
IMG 0921

they wanna feel like this ^
 
  • +1
  • JFL
Reactions: Guccileopard, Bipolar2Cel, LequeSs and 5 others
I mean, good face proportions or a clear skin also a signal of good genes, but I never seen girls sayin' "if his face isn't clear I would not date him", the height shit is exaggerated asf for no reason
because height in nature is a more important trait and shows a woman that he can protect her
 
  • +1
Reactions: BeanletMogger and raeeeeeeeeeeeee
Like I understand when they do not want date someone who is shorter than them, bcs it just will be weird and shit, but when I see 5'3 gals talking fr abt "I will not date someone below 6'1" I just cannot understand the logic, like ur a fucking gnome, why tf do u need someone who is twice ur size? Why won't u go for a handsome nigger but that is 5'8 or smth, it would look a lot more appropriate than some big tall guy walking with a fucking gnome, it looks like a child and some predator walking together on a date fr
It's not important to them. They just want losers to believe it is.
 
  • +1
Reactions: Guccileopard and Slavurik
Literally a child and predator going on a date, it fucking looks inappropriate asf
a tall bf is like a trophy to them, they like how their bf towers over the average male and their foids friends bfs, like a competition
 
  • +1
Reactions: Bipolar2Cel, Slavurik and BeanletMogger
One of the top dimorphism traits along with deep voice, thick neck, wide frame, and facial hair
 
  • +1
Reactions: sonic55555
It’s social contagion, height has always mattered but not to the degree it does now.
 
  • +1
Reactions: sonic55555 and SkinjobCatastrophe
I mean, good face proportions or a clear skin also a signal of good genes, but I never seen girls sayin' "if his face isn't clear I would not date him", the height shit is exaggerated asf for no reason
They do think this they don't say it

And clear skin specifically has almost 0 effect on your appearance anyway

Lots of girls literally fetishize acne
 
Never heard of that before
Fetishize is too strong of a word actually

But lots like it

Acne ridden skin to clear glass skin is equal to like an inch of height
 
Fetishize is too strong of a word actually

But lots like it

Acne ridden skin to clear glass skin is equal to like an inch of height
I am aware of that not being so important, my point was that there are a lot of things that signal about good genes besides height, yet everyone focus so much attention exactly on it.
Why not physique, or hair or any other shit being cultivated like that?
 
I am aware of that not being so important, my point was that there are a lot of things that signal about good genes besides height, yet everyone focus so much attention exactly on it.
Why not physique, or hair or any other shit being cultivated like that?
Cuz you sound like a nigger goofball saying it about anything else
 
I am aware of that not being so important, my point was that there are a lot of things that signal about good genes besides height, yet everyone focus so much attention exactly on it.
Why not physique, or hair or any other shit being cultivated like that?
Also height itself is equally as important as face as a whole

So height will literally be more important than face to half of women even tho they want you to think it's face to virtue signal better
 
  • Woah
Reactions: Slavurik
Also height itself is equally as important as face as a whole

So height will literally be more important than face to half of women even tho they want you to think it's face to virtue signal better
That does not make sense to me tbh, I mean if I was a woman I would rather pick someone gl but avg height than someone avg but tall
 
  • JFL
Reactions: WonkyChin186
Also height itself is equally as important as face as a whole

So height will literally be more important than face to half of women even tho they want you to think it's face to virtue signal better
I mean it is wild that they would prefer someone very tall and with avg face than some nigga that looks very good but 5'9 for example
 
That does not make sense to me tbh, I mean if I was a woman I would rather pick someone gl but avg height than someone avg but tall
Are you a woman mate

And you retards always do the shittest comparisons, "gl" is obviously better than a regular tallfag

Think top25% height avg face vs top25% face avg height

Top10% height and above provides no benefit too but face gets exponentially more and more important

It's the other direction where heightpill is murdering

5'5 vs the facial equivalent of life quality loss
5'5 much more common
 
  • +1
Reactions: Slavurik
I mean it is wild that they would prefer someone very tall and with avg face than some nigga that looks very good but 5'9 for example
They wouldn't

Shit comparison again

If you looked at it properly it would make complete sense
 
Are you a woman mate

And you retards always do the shittest comparisons, "gl" is obviously better than a regular tallfag

Think top25% height avg face vs top25% face avg height

Top10% height and above provides no benefit too but face gets exponentially more and more important

It's the other direction where heightpill is murdering

5'5 vs the facial equivalent of life quality loss
5'5 much more common
What face (in terms of PSL) do u consider as equivalent to 5'5? Because for men in Western countries 5'5 height is very rare tbf
 
What face (in terms of PSL) do u consider as equivalent to 5'5? Because for men in Western countries 5'5 height is very rare tbf
Face is more important than Height slightly it's an exaggeration to get the point across

90% as important, and thats only because of the heightpill providing no extra benefits past top10% unlike face

Below that they're equal for their percentile

I'll use 5'7 since it's easier to visualize, 5'11 average zoomer height morning

Bottom10% face(strong subhuman-lltn) at 5'11 vs 5'7 hltn

Equal life quality
 
  • +1
Reactions: Bipolar2Cel and Slavurik
Face is more important than Height slightly it's an exaggeration to get the point across

90% as important, and thats only because of the heightpill providing no extra benefits past top10% unlike face

Below that they're equal for their percentile

I'll use 5'7 since it's easier to visualize, 5'11 average zoomer height morning

Bottom10% face(strong subhuman-lltn) at 5'11 vs 5'7 hltn

Equal life quality
From what I know the avg face is hltn, ok then, basically ur saying bottom face with 5'11 and 5'7 avg face are equal, that makes sense.
But if we for example take 5'9 HMTN-LHTN (clearly abv avg face) and some 6'3 hltn, they probably will still pick the first guy, although the height difference is even bigger.
 
We are all aware of the obvious stuff, but I think a very poorly understood aspect is how women identify and search for desirable traits. A woman's desires are based totally on instinctual feeling and vulgar perception. A man, though he might say he wants a tall or short woman, is not really that concerned with any individual traits like that. He will desire a tall or short woman if she possesses beauty, which is not based on simple traits but something more complex. A woman will select a tall man because she simply desires height. If the man is 6 feet tall that is good, if he is 6 feet 6 inches that is even better, if he is 7 feet tall, even better. If he has a square jaw, blue eyes, even better. As women perceive sharply what is very obvious, but don't understand much beyond that, traits like height, hair, eye color, receive special attention. A subtle shape or ratio that would appeal to a man is of no importance to a woman. The most obvious and glaring physical traits are the priority, height is somewhere at the top of the list in this respect
 
  • +1
Reactions: Slavurik
From what I know the avg face is hltn, ok then, basically ur saying bottom face with 5'11 and 5'7 avg face are equal, that makes sense.
But if we for example take 5'9 HMTN-LHTN (clearly abv avg face) and some 6'3 hltn, they probably will still pick the first guy, although the height difference is even bigger.
If you mean top10% face for hmtn-lhtn no

A regular hmtn-lhtn on .org yes no shit
 
We are all aware of the obvious stuff, but I think a very poorly understood aspect is how women identify and search for desirable traits. A woman's desires are based totally on instinctual feeling and vulgar perception. A man, though he might say he wants a tall or short woman, is not really that concerned with any individual traits like that. He will desire a tall or short woman if she possesses beauty, which is not based on simple traits but something more complex. A woman will select a tall man because she simply desires height. If the man is 6 feet tall that is good, if he is 6 feet 6 inches that is even better, if he is 7 feet tall, even better. If he has a square jaw, blue eyes, even better. As women perceive sharply what is very obvious, but don't understand much beyond that, traits like height, hair, eye color, receive special attention. A subtle shape or ratio that would appeal to a man is of no importance to a woman. The most obvious and glaring physical traits are the priority, height is somewhere at the top of the list in this respect
What are the top physiqcal traits? Like height, frame, facial masulinity and sharpness or what? I always thought for each woman it is smth individual, also very dependant on the country and culture
 
  • +1
Reactions: SkinjobCatastrophe
We are all aware of the obvious stuff, but I think a very poorly understood aspect is how women identify and search for desirable traits. A woman's desires are based totally on instinctual feeling and vulgar perception. A man, though he might say he wants a tall or short woman, is not really that concerned with any individual traits like that. He will desire a tall or short woman if she possesses beauty, which is not based on simple traits but something more complex. A woman will select a tall man because she simply desires height. If the man is 6 feet tall that is good, if he is 6 feet 6 inches that is even better, if he is 7 feet tall, even better. If he has a square jaw, blue eyes, even better. As women perceive sharply what is very obvious, but don't understand much beyond that, traits like height, hair, eye color, receive special attention. A subtle shape or ratio that would appeal to a man is of no importance to a woman. The most obvious and glaring physical traits are the priority, height is somewhere at the top of the list in this respect
Women are absolutely aroused by certain ratios. What are you on about???


Generally, everything else you said, I agree with, but you're way off on that.
 
  • +1
Reactions: SkinjobCatastrophe
What are the top physiqcal traits? Like height, frame, facial masulinity and sharpness or what? I always thought for each woman it is smth individual, also very dependant on the country and culture
I think it's very homogenous all over the world. Women from peru, china, france, all want the same thing. The tallest, most square jawed, wide shouldered guy, not necessarily the most masculine, but possessing the most obvious handsome physical traits like height and blue eyes and prominent cheek bones etc. Usually the most masculine men are not very successful. There are definitely different standards in different countries for social effect and status and public image perception, but for women's true physical attraction and desire, I think it is very homogenous
 
  • +1
Reactions: Slavurik
Women are absolutely aroused by certain ratios. What are you on about???


Generally, everything else you said, I agree with, but you're way off on that.
These extreme ratios are important, but the subtle and delicate ratios that men desire are not important to women. A 4 foot woman with a 4:1 hip to waist ratio is too extreme for a man, but a woman desires a man who is 7 feet tall with a 4:1 shoulder to hip ratio
 
  • +1
Reactions: CollioureViews
These extreme ratios are important, but the subtle and delicate ratios that men desire are not important to women. A 4 foot woman with a 4:1 hip to waist ratio is too extreme for a man, but a woman desires a man who is 7 feet tall with a 4:1 shoulder to hip ratio
Well tbf 7 feet men are also an exaggeration, if ur above 6'5 then it starts to be even less attractive, bcs u can't stand straight at this height, u lack of proportions, look very skinny, and generally anything above 6'5 is a very unattractive thing.
 
  • +1
Reactions: CollioureViews
Like I understand when they do not want to date someone who is shorter than them, bcs it just will be weird and shit, but when I see 5'3 gals talking fr abt "I will not date someone below 6'1" I just cannot understand the logic, like ur a fucking gnome, why tf do u need someone who is twice ur size? Why won't u go for a handsome nigger but that is 5'8 or smth, it would look a lot more appropriate than some big tall guy walking with a fucking gnome, it looks like a child and some predator walking together on a date fr
Survival indicator
 
Like I understand when they do not want to date someone who is shorter than them, bcs it just will be weird and shit, but when I see 5'3 gals talking fr abt "I will not date someone below 6'1" I just cannot understand the logic, like ur a fucking gnome, why tf do u need someone who is twice ur size? Why won't u go for a handsome nigger but that is 5'8 or smth, it would look a lot more appropriate than some big tall guy walking with a fucking gnome, it looks like a child and some predator walking together on a date fr
i think this dude is 5'9 idk he only posts this every day
 

Similar threads

Slavurik
Replies
2
Views
20
Slavurik
Slavurik
pardonriki
Replies
10
Views
81
africel
africel
D
Replies
2
Views
26
dickcelsunite
D
BraveCake
Replies
3
Views
37
Lefty Rankin
Lefty Rankin
surgerymaxxed1
Replies
3
Views
38
Turkic Albanian
Turkic Albanian

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top