M
Mansur
Iron
- Joined
- Jul 21, 2024
- Posts
- 7
- Reputation
- 0
So basically one of the aspects to rate your attractiveness is your so called harmony score ( initially made by CreatingAttractive )
However his harmony system isnt accurate at all because there are some issues
1.
How his harmony system works is that there is a total of 306 points ( lets take the front profile )
lets take an ideal range for facial measurements like the IPD ( 44.3% - 47.7% is the ideal according to CA).
Each measurement has a value, IPD is the most important one valued at 35 points on his scale.
Basically if you fall outside of that range, each range after that you fall into the score decreases by astonishing half the points. As an example lets say your IPD is 44.2% literally almost ideal but you will still be deducted by 17.5 points which is unfair and inaccurate. And because of this if your IPD would be 43.5% and the next range ends at 42.5% your score would be deducted by only a few points even though thats a huge difference.
Instead of that It should work the exact opposite way where slightly unideal ratios should be deducted by way less points and increase as the ratio gets worse
2.
Another point is that his ideal ranges are fairly inaccurate ( at least some of them ). Lets take Facial thirds as an example, according to CA each gender has to have balanced facial thirds. It should apply for women but definitely not for men. Men on average tend to have larger lower thirds, because thats a dimorphic trait. Literally almost every slayer you know has unideal facial thirds because of their large jaws. Even if we wouldnt consider that there are other point for example men tend to have lower set brows on average which would make their midface region shorter. If the midface region is short then your jaw should be very small to balance it out and you would just simply look like a cuck but thats a preference thing. Not only would that ruin your dimorphism but with that short of thirds your face would be very squished because of the small head and your midface. People with equal facial thirds are either people with high set brows and small jaws because thats the only way to balance it out or people with long faces.
There are also different ratios that are inaccurate but I will only give you a few examples. Lets take the IPD now. Men tend to have closer IPDs relative to women because of their protrusive large cheekbones not necessarily because of their actual eye spacing. However its almost impossible to have an ideal IPD with large cheekbones unless your eyes are wide set. you can take some Chads for comparison like Hernan Drago Jordan Barrett Vasiliy Stepanov and so on all of them have unideal IPDs because of their large cheekbones. According to CA 47.7% is still in the ideal range which I find wrong 47.7% is too wide set for a male. You can take Marlon the Streamer as an example. We can all agree on that his eyes are slightly too far apart. Also which contributes in having a feminine look. In my opinion those ratios should be changed like for example the ideal IPD should be about 43.5-47% and you will now say that its too close set but I will show you now why thats not the case
Guess his IPD, 46%? Well no its 43.5% According to CA it would be a tier 3 flaw and he would be deducted by 26.25 points for that. You wont find a single person that would say that his eyes are even slightly too close set and there are plenty of other examples
Zayn Maliks eye spacing is 42% for example looks like 45% and yet noone ever said that his eyes are that close apart. ( His eyes would deduct points from the total score its that bad according to the scale )
If you are wondering why Im talking about IPD and facial thirds so much, well because those are the 2 most important measurements ( valued at 35 and 30 points ) and because of that can make your face from 65% harmony to 80+ by slight unnoticeable changes.
There are plenty of other measurements that are wrong but I addressed these 2 for now.
The point of this thread is that if your harmony score is low, its wrong.
Ian Somerhalder has 59% front harmony which would indicate that his potential would be around a high MTN which obviously isnt true
However his harmony system isnt accurate at all because there are some issues
1.
How his harmony system works is that there is a total of 306 points ( lets take the front profile )
lets take an ideal range for facial measurements like the IPD ( 44.3% - 47.7% is the ideal according to CA).
Each measurement has a value, IPD is the most important one valued at 35 points on his scale.
Basically if you fall outside of that range, each range after that you fall into the score decreases by astonishing half the points. As an example lets say your IPD is 44.2% literally almost ideal but you will still be deducted by 17.5 points which is unfair and inaccurate. And because of this if your IPD would be 43.5% and the next range ends at 42.5% your score would be deducted by only a few points even though thats a huge difference.
Instead of that It should work the exact opposite way where slightly unideal ratios should be deducted by way less points and increase as the ratio gets worse
2.
Another point is that his ideal ranges are fairly inaccurate ( at least some of them ). Lets take Facial thirds as an example, according to CA each gender has to have balanced facial thirds. It should apply for women but definitely not for men. Men on average tend to have larger lower thirds, because thats a dimorphic trait. Literally almost every slayer you know has unideal facial thirds because of their large jaws. Even if we wouldnt consider that there are other point for example men tend to have lower set brows on average which would make their midface region shorter. If the midface region is short then your jaw should be very small to balance it out and you would just simply look like a cuck but thats a preference thing. Not only would that ruin your dimorphism but with that short of thirds your face would be very squished because of the small head and your midface. People with equal facial thirds are either people with high set brows and small jaws because thats the only way to balance it out or people with long faces.
There are also different ratios that are inaccurate but I will only give you a few examples. Lets take the IPD now. Men tend to have closer IPDs relative to women because of their protrusive large cheekbones not necessarily because of their actual eye spacing. However its almost impossible to have an ideal IPD with large cheekbones unless your eyes are wide set. you can take some Chads for comparison like Hernan Drago Jordan Barrett Vasiliy Stepanov and so on all of them have unideal IPDs because of their large cheekbones. According to CA 47.7% is still in the ideal range which I find wrong 47.7% is too wide set for a male. You can take Marlon the Streamer as an example. We can all agree on that his eyes are slightly too far apart. Also which contributes in having a feminine look. In my opinion those ratios should be changed like for example the ideal IPD should be about 43.5-47% and you will now say that its too close set but I will show you now why thats not the case
If you are wondering why Im talking about IPD and facial thirds so much, well because those are the 2 most important measurements ( valued at 35 and 30 points ) and because of that can make your face from 65% harmony to 80+ by slight unnoticeable changes.
There are plenty of other measurements that are wrong but I addressed these 2 for now.
The point of this thread is that if your harmony score is low, its wrong.
Ian Somerhalder has 59% front harmony which would indicate that his potential would be around a high MTN which obviously isnt true
