WHY the PSL scale out of 8 is COMPLETELY useless

No bcs 9s are still a thing, they are just never have been humanly achieved outside of morphs.

But in that case the average turns out to be 5. Because we're only excluding 0s and 10s, in which case the values we're considering are 1 through 9, where the average is 5.
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 6401
But in that case the average turns out to be 5. Because we're only excluding 0s and 10s, in which case the values we're considering are 1 through 9, where the average is 5.
Well, there is a possibility someone might be a 0, but that means they are so deformed to a degree that they wont be seen as a the same species. Which is also insanely rare and not see before. Even the ugliest person has atleast 1 person in the 7 billion that would like him. But in theory there could be 0 in 7 billion that would like someone.
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 6401
Well, there is a possibility someone might be a 0, but that means they are so deformed to a degree that they wont be seen as a the same species. Which is also insanely rare and not see before. Even the ugliest person has atleast 1 person in the 7 billion that would like him. But in theory there could be 0 in 7 billion that would like someone.

I think that an OBJECTIVE 0/10 doesn't exist just like an OBJECTIVE 10/10 doesn't exist. Perhaps an objective 1/10 exists and perhaps an objective 9/10 exists out of the nearly 8 billion people worldwide. Assuming, then, a scale from 1 to 9 the average turns out to be 5. If, for whatever reason, we assume a scale from 0 to 9 then the average still doesn't turn out to be 4. In that case it turns out to be 4.5. But like I said it doesn't make sense to use a scale from 0 to 9 because if we're excluding 10s we ought to exclude 0s too. That leaves us with theoretically achievable values 1 through 9, where the average is 5.
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 6401
The PSL Scale is basically just the LIKERT SCALE
1= very unattractive ( disfigured, obese)
2 = unattractive ( st blackops2cel, st bagelcel)
3 = below average ( @faceandlms, @ArabIncel )
4 = average ( me, @Yoyome99 , @Lorsss)
5 = above average ( @TsarTsar444
6 = attractive ( @Amnesia , orb, @Salludon, cavill)
7 = very attractive ( chico, maher, prime gandy)
8 is perfection but doesnt exist
 
Last edited:
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 6401
The PSL Scale is basically just the LIKERT SCALE
1= very unattractive ( disfigured, obese)
2 = unattractive ( st blackops2cel)
3 = below average
4 = average
5 = above average
6 = attractive ( orb, salludon, cavill)
7 = very attractive ( chico, maher, prime gandy)
8 is perfection but doesnt exist

If you assume 8 is perfection and so in that case an 8/8 doesn't exist then 0/8 doesn't exist either. So then the only values we're considering are 1 through 7. The average there is 4.5, not 4.
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 6401
I think that an OBJECTIVE 0/10 doesn't exist just like an OBJECTIVE 10/10 doesn't exist. Perhaps an objective 1/10 exists and perhaps an objective 9/10 exists out of the nearly 8 billion people worldwide. Assuming, then, a scale from 1 to 9 the average turns out to be 5. If, for whatever reason, we assume a scale from 0 to 9 then the average still doesn't turn out to be 4. In that case it turns out to be 4.5. But like I said it doesn't make sense to use a scale from 0 to 9 because if we're excluding 10s we ought to exclude 0s too. That leaves us with theoretically achievable values 1 through 9, where the average is 5.
Objectively a 0/10 can exist in theory, it just means he isnt attractive to anyone. Like i explained before.
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 6401
Objectively a 0/10 can exist in theory, it just means he isnt attractive to anyone. Like i explained before.

Right but then objectively a 9/10 can exist in theory too. Only a 10/10 wouldn't exist in theory. But if a 0/10 can exist in theory and a 9/10 can exist in theory then the values we're considering are 0 through 9. The average still doesn't turn out to be 4. It turns out to be 4.5 in this case.
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 6401 and PubertyMaxxer
If you assume 8 is perfection and so in that case an 8/8 doesn't exist then 0/8 doesn't exist either. So then the only values we're considering are 1 through 7. The average there is 4.5, not 4.
No the average of a 1-7 scale is 4
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 6401
No the average of a 1-7 scale is 4

Either you're trolling or you're mentally retarded. Can you explain to me how on earth you got the "average" to be 4 on a scale that starts at 1 and ends at 7?
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 6401
Right but then objectively a 9/10 can exist in theory too. Only a 10/10 wouldn't exist in theory. But if a 0/10 can exist in theory and a 9/10 can exist in theory then the values we're considering are 0 through 9. The average still doesn't turn out to be 4. It turns out to be 4.5 in this case.
An average isn't always the middle of a rating, it is in consideration with the worldwide population.

Most people are a 4 on the PSL scale worldwide, in typical average Indian is like a 3 PSL and places like the Netherlands it is 4.5 - 5 PSL. So yes ¨officially¨ the average number is 4.5 but IRL the average person isn't a 4.5. The higher you go on the scale the crazier the looks level
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 6401 and ArabIncel
Either you're trolling or you're mentally retarded. Can you explain to me how on earth you got the "average" to be 4 on a scale that starts at 1 and ends at 7?
Nobody says youre 4.89 or 4.13

1
2
3

4 average

5
6
7
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 6401
Nobody says youre 4.89 or 4.13

1
2
3

4 average

5
6
7

I had a lapse in judgement there. I was thinking of the scale as 1 through 8 hence I ended up taking 4.5 as the average. But, yes, taking it 1 through 7, you're right, the average is 4.
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 6401 and PubertyMaxxer
Didn't read but psl autists want to feel special and different so they made it out of 8 instead of 10. I know because I feel special when telling newbies we rate of 8 as opposed to 10.
 
  • JFL
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 6401, Aesthetics_III and Deleted member 2227
I had a lapse in judgement there. I was thinking of the scale as 1 through 8 hence I ended up taking 4.5 as the average. But, yes, taking it 1 through 7, you're right, the average is 4.
The 1-7 scale is much better than the 1-10 scale bc its easier to rate you see thats why the psl scale isnt retarded

Yiu can instantly rate a person with it but 1-10 is weird bc for example maher is a 7/10 and chico a 9/10 but it doesnt matter bc theyre both gigaslayers so it makes more sense to put them as 7 - very attractive
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 6401
PSL is rating of what autistic retards think good looking is. It has no real life implications. It could have been 47.9857 out of 45995.84 whatever. Who cares? Autism spectrum is pretty broad too.
cope
you say that because youre ugly and cant come to terms with the fact that you wont look like the psl gods
just from looking at your avi i can already tell that lol
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 6401 and PubertyMaxxer
cope
you say that because youre ugly and cant come to terms with the fact that you wont look like the psl gods
just from looking at your avi i can already tell that lol
cope at least its mine. ur stealing someone u can never be. copemaxx And u mad coz u r one of those autistic rat faced incels who promote psl shit.
 
Last edited:
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 6401
cope at least its mine. ur stealing someone u can never be. copemaxx
Looks are highly subjective in the normies area
Reminder that like 60% of males are psl4 so ofcourse there will be subjectivity
But it makes no sense to judge the average guys against each other bc most are almost the same: boneless normies, so its hard to rate normies

Also its over for average men either

Life begins at psl5 - above average which is like 80th - > 95th percentile

Actual chads are psl6 which is top 5%

Psl7 gigachads like chico are extremely rare less than 1% of actual western men


Also these are just generalisations

Some foids would prefer Alex from Target over o pry or barret

Butvagain alex is psl5+
 
Last edited:
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 6401 and Vidyacoper
Looks are highly subjective in the normies area
Reminder that like 60% of males are psl4 so ofcourse there will be subjectivity
But it makes no sense to judge the average guys against each other bc most are almost the same: boneless normies, so its hard to rate normies

Also its over for average men either

Life begins at psl5 - above average which is like 80th - > 95th percentile

Actual chads are psl6 which is top 5%

Psl7 gigachads like chico are extremely rare less than 1% of actual western men
exactly, perfect explanation
cope at least its mine. ur stealing someone u can never be. copemaxx And u mad coz u r one of those autistic rat faced incels who promote psl shit.
still ugly
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 6401
The PSL Scale is basically just the LIKERT SCALE
1= very unattractive ( disfigured, obese)
2 = unattractive ( st blackops2cel, st bagelcel)
3 = below average ( @faceandlms, @ArabIncel )
4 = average ( me, @Yoyome99 , @Lorsss)
5 = above average ( @TsarTsar444
6 = attractive ( @Amnesia , orb, @Salludon, cavill)
7 = very attractive ( chico, maher, prime gandy)
8 is perfection but doesnt exist
please stop spouting your garbage itt
 
  • Ugh..
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 6401 and PubertyMaxxer
BIG cope dose @ " perfect explanation" Also.. still better looking.
no, i mog you to the next dimension
lol looks like my comment made u hurt, u decided to change your avi
this photo shows off how u look bad

u mention having a girlfriend, is she a single mom by any chance?
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 6401
Looks are highly subjective in the normies area
Reminder that like 60% of males are psl4 so ofcourse there will be subjectivity
But it makes no sense to judge the average guys against each other bc most are almost the same: boneless normies, so its hard to rate normies

Also its over for average men either

Life begins at psl5 - above average which is like 80th - > 95th percentile

Actual chads are psl6 which is top 5%

Psl7 gigachads like chico are extremely rare less than 1% of actual western men


Also these are just generalisations

Some foids would prefer Alex from Target over o pry or barret

Butvagain alex is psl5+
Dude... lmao .
no, i mog you to the next dimension
lol looks like my comment made u hurt, u decided to change your avi
this photo shows off how u look bad

u mention having a girlfriend, is she a single mom by any chance?
lol keep dreaming bro. I gave you too much attention now just keep coping in your lil basement.
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 6401
Dude... lmao .

lol keep dreaming bro. I gave you too much attention now just keep coping in your lil basement.
lol you even changed it back LMAO
was i right about the single mom thing bro
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 6401
I rate u 9/11
 
  • JFL
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 6401 and dogeatsgrass
I rate u 9/11
Tumblr p58d3weICp1vtafopo2 500
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 6401
Didn't read but you are right, PSL scale sucks cock.
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 6401
it should be binary scale invisible to women/visible to women
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 6401 and PubertyMaxxer
The PSL Scale is basically just the LIKERT SCALE
1= very unattractive ( disfigured, obese)
2 = unattractive ( st blackops2cel, st bagelcel)
3 = below average ( @faceandlms, @ArabIncel )
4 = average ( me, @Yoyome99 , @Lorsss)
5 = above average ( @TsarTsar444
6 = attractive ( @Amnesia , orb, @Salludon, cavill)
7 = very attractive ( chico, maher, prime gandy)
8 is perfection but doesnt exist



I don't see orb's appeal he's got good eye the rest is shit quite literally he lacks a mid mandible mainly
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 6401 and PubertyMaxxer

Similar threads

danil97c
Replies
6
Views
468
basedpheno88
basedpheno88
pandamonium
Replies
9
Views
962
juanson
juanson
MogsMost
Replies
12
Views
346
IWantToMax
IWantToMax
larox.psl
Replies
26
Views
593
MentalistKebab
M
M
Replies
2
Views
311
charliewillascend
charliewillascend

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top