Why "too much height" is a thing and exists in real life

[NitoRump]

Listen here kids, who view sexual dynamics in skewed perceptions of reality and in terms of retarded ratios in online forums.

Ideal height, combining all realms of physicality including proportions, aesthetics, and sufficient dimorphism is 6'0 - 6'1 (183 - 185 cm) barefoot evening height.

"MUH 6'5 IS IDEAL HEIGHT"
You have absolutely no idea what a real 6'5 unfrauded barefoot man looks like in real life. Especially at the extremely low bf percentage you jerk off over here. It looks so lanky its comical.
No amount of gymmaxxing will save you, you absolutely need to roidmax to look proportionate + have good genetics , and good luck with roidmaxxing and aging 15 years in 3.

Height matters because its highly dimorphic and primal, but what is also extremely important in terms of being APPEALING in real life is being PROPORTIONATE.

The most balanced proportions in terms of torso, legs, head size, frame etc. occur at 5'10 - 5'11 in males.
Of course there can be people with shit proportions and frame at that height, but its rare. Your chances of being disproportionate and a framecel expontentially increase each inch after 5'11.

6'0 to 6'1 UNFRAUDED evening barefoot, with a natty muscular physique is the perfect balance of maximum aesthetics and enough height for good dimorphism. A 6'2+ barefoot person will always look lanky at low bf, even with muscle mass on the frame. Actual 6'2+ steroidmaxxed people look better in camera/on screen, but in real life they would just look too big for ideal aesthetics.

Coincidentally, or really NOT coincidentally at all, modelling companies for years now require models to be between 6'0 - 6'2. The reason 6'2 is the cap is because models and actors larp about their height by at least an inch on average.

Oh but no, literal modelling companies are all wrong, and all the little 15 year olds gathered on incel forums are right.

Too much height (6'2+), is not a bad thing nessecarily, and it can actually benefit you if you are below average looking. However, if you are above average looking facially, it does nothing for you. All what being that tall gets you is more attention from people, and that is just because of normal human behaviour, a bigger object gets more attention in our minds. It is not an indicator of sexual attention.
Before tiktokcels come with some stupid video of women claiming to want 6'4+, I will tell you this: WOMEN HAVE NO IDEA WHAT CERTAIN HEIGHTS LOOK LIKE. Actually not even women, but people in general have shit understanding of heights because everybody rounds up and larps.

People here overfantasize so much about homoerotic ratios that they forget the appeal body has. It is absolutely essential for the full package effect (height + face + muscles). Only people who have the full package will know the difference is night and day.

Post I came across that pretty much explained exactly what I had been thinking all this time and motivated me to do this post: https://looksmax.org/threads/my-view-on-what-the-ideal-height-is.411862/

 

[Thinking_CEL]

Tbh I don’t agree with anything here except that it would be brutal to gain muscle as a 6’5 guy I wouldn’t have enough motivation to stay lean and muscular since u need to have the same muscle mass that makes a 5’8 nigga look like the Incredible Hulk just so u can look athletic

 

[HostSamurai]

DNR.

 

[kitten]

5’10 to 6’4 is ideal you fucking retard. this thread is shit i barely bothered reading

 

[kitten]

DNR.

exactly

 

[LookingForAdvice]

ngl all 6'5+ ppl i see irl are lanklets

 

[RomanianZaddy]

Honestly legit thread but most .org users are too brainrotted to realize it at this point. Ideal height is 6 feet to 6.4 unfrauded, anything more and it's brutal to gain muscle and the risk of having a horse face or being a framecel increases a lot.

 

[HostSamurai]

I just wish I was 6 foot.

 

[20/04/2008]

Listen here kids, who view sexual dynamics in skewed perceptions of reality and in terms of retarded ratios in online forums.

Ideal height, combining all realms of physicality including proportions, aesthetics, and sufficient dimorphism is 6'0 - 6'1 (183 - 185 cm) barefoot evening height.

"MUH 6'5 IS IDEAL HEIGHT"
You have absolutely no idea what a real 6'5 unfrauded barefoot man looks like in real life. Especially at the extremely low bf percentage you jerk off over here. It looks so lanky its comical.
No amount of gymmaxxing will save you, you absolutely need to roidmax to look proportionate + have good genetics , and good luck with roidmaxxing and aging 15 years in 3.

Height matters because its highly dimorphic and primal, but what is also extremely important in terms of being APPEALING in real life is being PROPORTIONATE.

The most balanced proportions in terms of torso, legs, head size, frame etc. occur at 5'10 - 5'11 in males.
Of course there can be people with shit proportions and frame at that height, but its rare. Your chances of being disproportionate and a framecel expontentially increase each inch after 5'11.

6'0 to 6'1 UNFRAUDED evening barefoot, with a natty muscular physique is the perfect balance of maximum aesthetics and enough height for good dimorphism. A 6'2+ barefoot person will always look lanky at low bf, even with muscle mass on the frame. Actual 6'2+ steroidmaxxed people look better in camera/on screen, but in real life they would just look too big for ideal aesthetics.

Coincidentally, or really NOT coincidentally at all, modelling companies for years now require models to be between 6'0 - 6'2. The reason 6'2 is the cap is because models and actors larp about their height by at least an inch on average.

Oh but no, literal modelling companies are all wrong, and all the little 15 year olds gathered on incel forums are right.

Too much height (6'2+), is not a bad thing nessecarily, and it can actually benefit you if you are below average looking. However, if you are above average looking facially, it does nothing for you. All what being that tall gets you is more attention from people, and that is just because of normal human behaviour, a bigger object gets more attention in our minds. It is not an indicator of sexual attention.
Before tiktokcels come with some stupid video of women claiming to want 6'4+, I will tell you this: WOMEN HAVE NO IDEA WHAT CERTAIN HEIGHTS LOOK LIKE. Actually not even women, but people in general have shit understanding of heights because everybody rounds up and larps.

People here overfantasize so much about homoerotic ratios that they forget the appeal body has. It is absolutely essential for the full package effect (height + face + muscles). Only people who have the full package will know the difference is night and day.

Post I came across that pretty much explained exactly what I had been thinking all this time and motivated me to do this post: https://looksmax.org/threads/my-view-on-what-the-ideal-height-is.411862/

So 6ft2-3 is ideal ???
Just be 6ft2-3
And tell women your 6ft4-5
One thing i learnt aboyt women is they are very bad at measuring things you could hvae an 8 inches unfrauded bonepressed cocck and latp as 10 inches and tgey woukd probably believe you because their pervious boyfriend was 5.5 inches andd he said he was 6-7
Same thibg with height their previous boyffriend was 5ft9 and said he was 5ft10-6ft so if you are 6ft2 you could larp as 6ft3-4 and women would probably believe you

 

[Cyrus]

look at these copign niggercucks @recai iskender

 

[NitoRump]

So 6ft2-3 is ideal ???
Just be 6ft2-3
And tell women your 6ft4-5
One thing i learnt aboyt women is they are very bad at measuring things you could hvae an 8 inches unfrauded bonepressed cocck and latp as 10 inches and tgey woukd probably believe you because their pervious boyfriend was 5.5 inches andd he said he was 6-7
Same thibg with height their previous boyffriend was 5ft9 and said he was 5ft10-6ft so if you are 6ft2 you could larp as 6ft3-4 and women would probably believe you

the thing is, the number you tell them makes zero difference. The first second they see you they put you into a tall or not tall category in their head.
Height does not impact sexual appeal after 6ft barefoot is met, like I explained. What DOES impact sex appeal is frame and proportions, which have exponentially higher chances of being shitty every inch. Ideal height is 6ft - 6'1 unfrauded evening

 

[kana]

when i don’t wear large soled shoes at the exact height of 5’11 3/4 barefoot i look a lot wider and fuller as opposed to if i wear say boots, makes me 6’2 but looks awkward and skinny

 

[NitoRump]

when i don’t wear large soled shoes at the exact height of 5’11 3/4 barefoot i look a lot wider and fuller as opposed to if i wear say boots, makes me 6’2 but looks awkward and skinny

exactly what I mean. Height is important but only coupled with proportionality. I can immediately spot someone wearing lifts because of how unproportionate their body looks.

 

[Alex_notmogging]

Dnr + cope . 6'3-6'4 is ideal height for female gaze

 

[20/04/2008]

the thing is, the number you tell them makes zero difference. The first second they see you they put you into a tall or not tall category in their head.
Height does not impact sexual appeal after 6ft barefoot is met, like I explained. What DOES impact sex appeal is frame and proportions, which have exponentially higher chances of being shitty every inch. Ideal height is 6ft - 6'1 unfrauded evening

What if your 6ft2 ???
I mean girls on social media always says 6ft4-6

 

[LilJojo]

Listen here kids, who view sexual dynamics in skewed perceptions of reality and in terms of retarded ratios in online forums.

Ideal height, combining all realms of physicality including proportions, aesthetics, and sufficient dimorphism is 6'0 - 6'1 (183 - 185 cm) barefoot evening height.

"MUH 6'5 IS IDEAL HEIGHT"
You have absolutely no idea what a real 6'5 unfrauded barefoot man looks like in real life. Especially at the extremely low bf percentage you jerk off over here. It looks so lanky its comical.
No amount of gymmaxxing will save you, you absolutely need to roidmax to look proportionate + have good genetics , and good luck with roidmaxxing and aging 15 years in 3.

Height matters because its highly dimorphic and primal, but what is also extremely important in terms of being APPEALING in real life is being PROPORTIONATE.

The most balanced proportions in terms of torso, legs, head size, frame etc. occur at 5'10 - 5'11 in males.
Of course there can be people with shit proportions and frame at that height, but its rare. Your chances of being disproportionate and a framecel expontentially increase each inch after 5'11.

6'0 to 6'1 UNFRAUDED evening barefoot, with a natty muscular physique is the perfect balance of maximum aesthetics and enough height for good dimorphism. A 6'2+ barefoot person will always look lanky at low bf, even with muscle mass on the frame. Actual 6'2+ steroidmaxxed people look better in camera/on screen, but in real life they would just look too big for ideal aesthetics.

Coincidentally, or really NOT coincidentally at all, modelling companies for years now require models to be between 6'0 - 6'2. The reason 6'2 is the cap is because models and actors larp about their height by at least an inch on average.

Oh but no, literal modelling companies are all wrong, and all the little 15 year olds gathered on incel forums are right.

Too much height (6'2+), is not a bad thing nessecarily, and it can actually benefit you if you are below average looking. However, if you are above average looking facially, it does nothing for you. All what being that tall gets you is more attention from people, and that is just because of normal human behaviour, a bigger object gets more attention in our minds. It is not an indicator of sexual attention.
Before tiktokcels come with some stupid video of women claiming to want 6'4+, I will tell you this: WOMEN HAVE NO IDEA WHAT CERTAIN HEIGHTS LOOK LIKE. Actually not even women, but people in general have shit understanding of heights because everybody rounds up and larps.

People here overfantasize so much about homoerotic ratios that they forget the appeal body has. It is absolutely essential for the full package effect (height + face + muscles). Only people who have the full package will know the difference is night and day.

Post I came across that pretty much explained exactly what I had been thinking all this time and motivated me to do this post: https://looksmax.org/threads/my-view-on-what-the-ideal-height-is.411862/

Would you say this if you were 6 foot 5? NO.

 

[kana]

exactly what I mean. Height is important but only coupled with proportionality. I can immediately spot someone wearing lifts because of how unproportionate their body looks.

i would say so, but for those under 5’5-5’6 they still look proportional with lifts ngl because it’s hard for your shoulders to look narrow at such a short height

 

[5aesar]

girls genuinely do not know height irl like anything after 5”11 barefoot n ur tall that’s the only category that your put in so after thag it’s a guessing game of how tall u r

 

[soggra]

Listen here kids, who view sexual dynamics in skewed perceptions of reality and in terms of retarded ratios in online forums.

Ideal height, combining all realms of physicality including proportions, aesthetics, and sufficient dimorphism is 6'0 - 6'1 (183 - 185 cm) barefoot evening height.

"MUH 6'5 IS IDEAL HEIGHT"
You have absolutely no idea what a real 6'5 unfrauded barefoot man looks like in real life. Especially at the extremely low bf percentage you jerk off over here. It looks so lanky its comical.
No amount of gymmaxxing will save you, you absolutely need to roidmax to look proportionate + have good genetics , and good luck with roidmaxxing and aging 15 years in 3.

Height matters because its highly dimorphic and primal, but what is also extremely important in terms of being APPEALING in real life is being PROPORTIONATE.

The most balanced proportions in terms of torso, legs, head size, frame etc. occur at 5'10 - 5'11 in males.
Of course there can be people with shit proportions and frame at that height, but its rare. Your chances of being disproportionate and a framecel expontentially increase each inch after 5'11.

6'0 to 6'1 UNFRAUDED evening barefoot, with a natty muscular physique is the perfect balance of maximum aesthetics and enough height for good dimorphism. A 6'2+ barefoot person will always look lanky at low bf, even with muscle mass on the frame. Actual 6'2+ steroidmaxxed people look better in camera/on screen, but in real life they would just look too big for ideal aesthetics.

Coincidentally, or really NOT coincidentally at all, modelling companies for years now require models to be between 6'0 - 6'2. The reason 6'2 is the cap is because models and actors larp about their height by at least an inch on average.

Oh but no, literal modelling companies are all wrong, and all the little 15 year olds gathered on incel forums are right.

Too much height (6'2+), is not a bad thing nessecarily, and it can actually benefit you if you are below average looking. However, if you are above average looking facially, it does nothing for you. All what being that tall gets you is more attention from people, and that is just because of normal human behaviour, a bigger object gets more attention in our minds. It is not an indicator of sexual attention.
Before tiktokcels come with some stupid video of women claiming to want 6'4+, I will tell you this: WOMEN HAVE NO IDEA WHAT CERTAIN HEIGHTS LOOK LIKE. Actually not even women, but people in general have shit understanding of heights because everybody rounds up and larps.

People here overfantasize so much about homoerotic ratios that they forget the appeal body has. It is absolutely essential for the full package effect (height + face + muscles). Only people who have the full package will know the difference is night and day.

Post I came across that pretty much explained exactly what I had been thinking all this time and motivated me to do this post: https://looksmax.org/threads/my-view-on-what-the-ideal-height-is.411862/

6’6+ is ideal tbh bc certain height obsessed foids would be really obsessed over you just because of your height while I can never imagine a single foid will ever worship let’s say a 6ft just for his height alone

 

[NitoRump]

Would you say this if you were 6 foot 5? NO.

absolutely nothing to do with it. This is an observation after seeing and analysing many many people IRL. People on this forum are too brainrotted with random numbers that they think thats what matters. Reality is different

 

[tnvrencind]

Listen here kids, who view sexual dynamics in skewed perceptions of reality and in terms of retarded ratios in online forums.

Ideal height, combining all realms of physicality including proportions, aesthetics, and sufficient dimorphism is 6'0 - 6'1 (183 - 185 cm) barefoot evening height.

"MUH 6'5 IS IDEAL HEIGHT"
You have absolutely no idea what a real 6'5 unfrauded barefoot man looks like in real life. Especially at the extremely low bf percentage you jerk off over here. It looks so lanky its comical.
No amount of gymmaxxing will save you, you absolutely need to roidmax to look proportionate + have good genetics , and good luck with roidmaxxing and aging 15 years in 3.

Height matters because its highly dimorphic and primal, but what is also extremely important in terms of being APPEALING in real life is being PROPORTIONATE.

The most balanced proportions in terms of torso, legs, head size, frame etc. occur at 5'10 - 5'11 in males.
Of course there can be people with shit proportions and frame at that height, but its rare. Your chances of being disproportionate and a framecel expontentially increase each inch after 5'11.

6'0 to 6'1 UNFRAUDED evening barefoot, with a natty muscular physique is the perfect balance of maximum aesthetics and enough height for good dimorphism. A 6'2+ barefoot person will always look lanky at low bf, even with muscle mass on the frame. Actual 6'2+ steroidmaxxed people look better in camera/on screen, but in real life they would just look too big for ideal aesthetics.

Coincidentally, or really NOT coincidentally at all, modelling companies for years now require models to be between 6'0 - 6'2. The reason 6'2 is the cap is because models and actors larp about their height by at least an inch on average.

Oh but no, literal modelling companies are all wrong, and all the little 15 year olds gathered on incel forums are right.

Too much height (6'2+), is not a bad thing nessecarily, and it can actually benefit you if you are below average looking. However, if you are above average looking facially, it does nothing for you. All what being that tall gets you is more attention from people, and that is just because of normal human behaviour, a bigger object gets more attention in our minds. It is not an indicator of sexual attention.
Before tiktokcels come with some stupid video of women claiming to want 6'4+, I will tell you this: WOMEN HAVE NO IDEA WHAT CERTAIN HEIGHTS LOOK LIKE. Actually not even women, but people in general have shit understanding of heights because everybody rounds up and larps.

People here overfantasize so much about homoerotic ratios that they forget the appeal body has. It is absolutely essential for the full package effect (height + face + muscles). Only people who have the full package will know the difference is night and day.

Post I came across that pretty much explained exactly what I had been thinking all this time and motivated me to do this post: https://looksmax.org/threads/my-view-on-what-the-ideal-height-is.411862/

actually spitting facts here

 

[NitoRump]

6’6+ is ideal tbh bc certain height obsessed foids would be really obsessed over you just because of your height while I can never imagine a single foid will ever worship let’s say a 6ft just for his height alone

lol you got a small point but what you're describing is niche appeal. We are talking mass appeal here. Sure getting tatted head to toe will make some specific woman go crazy for you, but the rest will find you weird

 

[soggra]

lol you got a small point but what you're describing is niche appeal. We are talking mass appeal here. Sure getting tatted head to toe will make some specific woman go crazy for you, but the rest will find you weird

I would rather get obsessed over a lot by only a couple of girls than to barely be obsessed over but still liked by most girls

 

[Latinus]

Users that think being giga tall is ideal are disconected from reality, when you reach a "super human height", not only it won't be necessarily benefical relationship wise, but it will also negativaly impact you in others fields of your life, like having to bend down in public transports, only buying clothes specifically made for your body size, always standing out in a crowd (you will be easily spotted if you're being followed)...

 

[britshcel]

Keeping it real. 5 ft 11 evening is absolute minimum to not worry about height if at least HTN. Zoomer women are definitely much taller than the older generation even in the UK. I'm the kind of guy that believes 5 ft 8, 5 ft 9 are brutal heights for a man and even 5 ft 10 evening is stretching it but 5 ft 11 barely makes the cut. Like barely.

 

[Gaygymmaxx]

I keep seeing these 7ft zoomers at my gym fucking over for me at 5"6

 

[Sicilian Cyclops]

cope faggot 7'2" 30 inch bideltoid 9x6 cock chad is ideal and women will magnetize to his cock like iron to magnetite

 

[LilJojo]

absolutely nothing to do with it. This is an observation after seeing and analysing many many people IRL. People on this forum are too brainrotted with random numbers that they think thats what matters. Reality is different

Im 6 foot 3 with shoes and lifts on and I still get height mogged. Doesn’t matter. 6 foot 5 is the best height for PSL.

 

[NitoRump]

Im 6 foot 3 with shoes and lifts on and I still get height mogged. Doesn’t matter. 6 foot 5 is the best height for PSL.

heightmog does not mean lower SMV. As I said, after six foot barefoot is met, more height does not equate to more femals appeal. People here are obsessed with mogging/feeling superior to other men, rather than being appealing to females

 

[smartstyle]

heightmog does not mean lower SMV. As I said, after six foot barefoot is met, more height does not equate to more femals appeal. People here are obsessed with mogging/feeling superior to other men, rather than being appealing to females

i am 5'10.5 asian(179 cm jfl) unfrauded, and 21 bidelt is it good for smv or bad. i have big head but that's mongolic feature so idk.

 

[smartstyle]

brad pitt is 5'10-5'11 unfrauded and looks amazing in movies with his prooportions, most movie start are also in this category(pattinson, gyllenhall, clouney, di caprio, macconaughey, charley hannam, hugh grant collin farrel and fuckton of others), i may be coping but i dont fucking care

 

[ricecelcurse4]

nah i still think the cap is 6'4 not 6'2

 

[NitoRump]

brad pitt is 5'10-5'11 unfrauded and looks amazing in movies with his prooportions, most movie start are also in this category(pattinson, gyllenhall, clouney, di caprio, macconaughey, charley hannam, hugh grant collin farrel and fuckton of others), i may be coping but i dont fucking care

they look great no doubt, but compared to guy like Jason Momoa who is 6'4 and roidmaxxed, they look less impressive

 

[UWILLNEVERKNOW8]

Listen here kids, who view sexual dynamics in skewed perceptions of reality and in terms of retarded ratios in online forums.

Ideal height, combining all realms of physicality including proportions, aesthetics, and sufficient dimorphism is 6'0 - 6'1 (183 - 185 cm) barefoot evening height.

"MUH 6'5 IS IDEAL HEIGHT"
You have absolutely no idea what a real 6'5 unfrauded barefoot man looks like in real life. Especially at the extremely low bf percentage you jerk off over here. It looks so lanky its comical.
No amount of gymmaxxing will save you, you absolutely need to roidmax to look proportionate + have good genetics , and good luck with roidmaxxing and aging 15 years in 3.

Height matters because its highly dimorphic and primal, but what is also extremely important in terms of being APPEALING in real life is being PROPORTIONATE.

The most balanced proportions in terms of torso, legs, head size, frame etc. occur at 5'10 - 5'11 in males.
Of course there can be people with shit proportions and frame at that height, but its rare. Your chances of being disproportionate and a framecel expontentially increase each inch after 5'11.

6'0 to 6'1 UNFRAUDED evening barefoot, with a natty muscular physique is the perfect balance of maximum aesthetics and enough height for good dimorphism. A 6'2+ barefoot person will always look lanky at low bf, even with muscle mass on the frame. Actual 6'2+ steroidmaxxed people look better in camera/on screen, but in real life they would just look too big for ideal aesthetics.

Coincidentally, or really NOT coincidentally at all, modelling companies for years now require models to be between 6'0 - 6'2. The reason 6'2 is the cap is because models and actors larp about their height by at least an inch on average.

Oh but no, literal modelling companies are all wrong, and all the little 15 year olds gathered on incel forums are right.

Too much height (6'2+), is not a bad thing nessecarily, and it can actually benefit you if you are below average looking. However, if you are above average looking facially, it does nothing for you. All what being that tall gets you is more attention from people, and that is just because of normal human behaviour, a bigger object gets more attention in our minds. It is not an indicator of sexual attention.
Before tiktokcels come with some stupid video of women claiming to want 6'4+, I will tell you this: WOMEN HAVE NO IDEA WHAT CERTAIN HEIGHTS LOOK LIKE. Actually not even women, but people in general have shit understanding of heights because everybody rounds up and larps.

People here overfantasize so much about homoerotic ratios that they forget the appeal body has. It is absolutely essential for the full package effect (height + face + muscles). Only people who have the full package will know the difference is night and day.

Post I came across that pretty much explained exactly what I had been thinking all this time and motivated me to do this post: https://looksmax.org/threads/my-view-on-what-the-ideal-height-is.411862/

bro probably 6 foot

 

[smartstyle]

they look great no doubt, but compared to guy like Jason Momoa who is 6'4 and roidmaxxed, they look less impressive

momoa is actually 6'3 unfrauded morning height, but ok

Jason Momoa Height Comparison

Discover how tall Jason Momoa is, with Celebheights Height Comparison photos and Vote on how tall you think any Celebrity is!

www.celebheights.com

 

[NitoRump]

momoa is actually 6'3 unfrauded morning height, but ok

Jason Momoa Height Comparison

Discover how tall Jason Momoa is, with Celebheights Height Comparison photos and Vote on how tall you think any Celebrity is!

www.celebheights.com

the link you posted literally says 6'4, and its celebheights, their autism for height is crazy

 

[LilJojo]

heightmog does not mean lower SMV. As I said, after six foot barefoot is met, more height does not equate to more femals appeal. People here are obsessed with mogging/feeling superior to other men, rather than being appealing to females

6 feet is normal. You’re not going to heightmog. Height absolutely matters above 6 foot, have you ever had any experience with women? I don’t think so. The more is better and that’s what they say.

 

[NitoRump]

6 feet is normal. You’re not going to heightmog. Height absolutely matters above 6 foot, have you ever had any experience with women? I don’t think so. The more is better and that’s what they say.

Buddy. Im 23 years old. I have had more experiences with women than you can dream of. Pm me if you need proof. Im practically here to school you little geeks here on real life sex appeal. Women have no idea what heights look like, they just spew buzzword number like hive minded creatures. You again display the need to "heightmog", because all you care is feeling superior and validated by other men.

 

[LilJojo]

Buddy. Im 23 years old. I have had more experiences with women than you can dream of. Pm me if you need proof. Im practically here to school you little geeks here on real life sex appeal. Women have no idea what heights look like, they just spew buzzword number like hive minded creatures. You again display the need to "heightmog", because all you care is feeling superior and validated by other men.

I have made out with dozens of girls and had women begging me to tie them up because it was their fetish. I am 18 currently. Yes women do not care about the number but the taller the better. Of course if you look like a stick at 6 foot 4 it would be better to be jacked at 6 foot 1.

 

[Bruc3]

nice post

 

[HostSamurai]

Height is everything in life. Suicide if you are under 6 foot.

 

[yannis]

A 6'2+ barefoot person will always look lanky at low bf, even with muscle mass on the frame.

I don’t.

 

[DaddyLongLegs]

“A 6'2+ barefoot person will always look lanky at low bf, even with muscle mass on the frame.”

Not every 6’2”-6’5” guy has a narrow/small body frame. Seems like you hyperfocus on lanklet guys in this height range

 

[NitoRump]

“A 6'2+ barefoot person will always look lanky at low bf, even with muscle mass on the frame.”

Not every 6’2”-6’5” guy has a narrow/small body frame. Seems like you hyperfocus on lanklet guys in this height range

show me a person in that range who is natural and 10% bodyfat and is not a lanklet. Its not even only about frame, its about the fact that 20 pounds of muscle on a 6'4 person looks very very lanky and unimpressive compared to a 6 foot flat person lets say

 

[NitoRump]

I don’t.

pm me proof and I will explain why you're wrong

 

[DaddyLongLegs]

Dnr + cope . 6'3-6'4 is ideal height for female gaze

Imo I’d extend that range down and say a non-frauded 6’2-6’4” is ideal in the USA.

Previous thread I made of women’s fantasies

Video information is from

Spoilers:
In context of online dating 6’3” & 6’4” performs best. Neither performing better than the other (3:30-3:45)

In context of speed dating it’s not as straight forward but optimal was 6’4” but the advantage over 6’2-6’3” appears marginal (4:51-5:56)

In context of female fantasy/romance novels the average height among male love interests is 6’3” but the most frequently occurring (popular) height for a male romance novel lead is 6’2” (6:16-7:17). The mode is lower than the average because 6’4” was also a common enough height that it pulled the average up to 6’3” away from the mode of 6’4”.


So it’s 6’2”-6’4” unfrauded if we’re splitting hairs.
Once again I’m talking about Americans. I know it’s gonna be different if you live in Japan, Italy, Netherlands, Dinaric Alps etc

 

[DaddyLongLegs]

show me a person in that range who is natural and 10% bodyfat and is not a lanklet. Its not even only about frame, its about the fact that 20 pounds of muscle on a 6'4 person looks very very lanky and unimpressive compared to a 6 foot flat person lets say

8%-10% body is totally male gaze

 

[TrveShortcel]

shortcel cope

DNR

 

[NitoRump]

8%-10% body is totally male gaze

I agree below 10%, however 10%-12% is ideal. Being lean is a hugely androgenic and dimorphic trait, and is non negotiable in terms of sex appeal. Everyone I know that is 6'3+ that is not lanky is at the very least 15%, and those are gymcels too. Everyday people at that height walk around at 20%+ bf just to be proportionate

 

[NitoRump]

Imo I’d extend that range down and say a non-frauded 6’2-6’4” is ideal in the USA.

Previous thread I made of women’s fantasies

Video information is from

Spoilers:
In context of online dating 6’3” & 6’4” performs best. Neither performing better than the other (3:30-3:45)

In context of speed dating it’s not as straight forward but optimal was 6’4” but the advantage over 6’2-6’3” appears marginal (4:51-5:56)

In context of female fantasy/romance novels the average height among male love interests is 6’3” but the most frequently occurring (popular) height for a male romance novel lead is 6’2” (6:16-7:17). The mode is lower than the average because 6’4” was also a common enough height that it pulled the average up to 6’3” away from the mode of 6’4”.


So it’s 6’2”-6’4” unfrauded if we’re splitting hairs.
Once again I’m talking about Americans. I know it’s gonna be different if you live in Japan, Italy, Netherlands, Dinaric Alps etc

what you're saying sounds good on paper but it doesnt translate well in real life. Numbers you find on romance novels are just because women have no idea what certain heights look like. 6'2 - 6'4 is just way too tall in real life https://looksmax.org/threads/my-view-on-what-the-ideal-height-is.411862/