Why "too much height" is a thing and exists in real life

[UnknownSlayerr]

Listen to this shortcel cope, who even bothers reading this shit

 

[NoaA99]

Excessive height offers no survival advantage and your ideal range strikes a good balance, when it comes to athleticism/ agility, strength and energy efficiency.
However, in today’s relatively safe world, height is more celebrated and sought after than ever, as survivability is guaranteed for most.
It has become a status symbol and the most objective metric of physical attractiveness.
So, the fact that an additional increase in height provides disproportionate yet valuable attractiveness gains is primarily driven by social factors.
Still, guys who are 6‘0+ (morning height) and still complain about their height, are just ugly.

 

[DaddyLongLegs]

what you're saying sounds good on paper but it doesnt translate well in real life. Numbers you find on romance novels are just because women have no idea what certain heights look like. 6'2 - 6'4 is just way too tall in real life https://looksmax.org/threads/my-view-on-what-the-ideal-height-is.411862/

if anything they’ll guess a 6’2” guy is 6’3”+ and find that desirable. And the speed dating studies found that 6’2”-6’4” men did the best. You’re desperately hanging on to your cope so hard

 

[NitoRump]

if anything they’ll guess a 6’2” guy is 6’3”+ and find that desirable. And the speed dating studies found that 6’2”-6’4” men did the best. You’re desperately hanging on to your cope so hard

its you who are coping for the fact that you will never achieve the ideal male physique at what I suppose height. "studies studies studies" Im not a little jewish prick, studies dont matter. I look at real life. Studies say women crash less cars but I wouldnt trust a woman driver with my life.
There is no SMV boost after 6 foot. However there is a HUGE SMV boost by having an lean muscular and proportionate physique along with sufficient height.

 

[yannis]

pm me proof and I will explain why you're wrong

Of full body? I don’t have full body pictures right now.

 

[TwoFace]

Listen here kids, who view sexual dynamics in skewed perceptions of reality and in terms of retarded ratios in online forums.

Ideal height, combining all realms of physicality including proportions, aesthetics, and sufficient dimorphism is 6'0 - 6'1 (183 - 185 cm) barefoot evening height.

"MUH 6'5 IS IDEAL HEIGHT"
You have absolutely no idea what a real 6'5 unfrauded barefoot man looks like in real life. Especially at the extremely low bf percentage you jerk off over here. It looks so lanky its comical.
No amount of gymmaxxing will save you, you absolutely need to roidmax to look proportionate + have good genetics , and good luck with roidmaxxing and aging 15 years in 3.

Height matters because its highly dimorphic and primal, but what is also extremely important in terms of being APPEALING in real life is being PROPORTIONATE.

The most balanced proportions in terms of torso, legs, head size, frame etc. occur at 5'10 - 5'11 in males.
Of course there can be people with shit proportions and frame at that height, but its rare. Your chances of being disproportionate and a framecel expontentially increase each inch after 5'11.

6'0 to 6'1 UNFRAUDED evening barefoot, with a natty muscular physique is the perfect balance of maximum aesthetics and enough height for good dimorphism. A 6'2+ barefoot person will always look lanky at low bf, even with muscle mass on the frame. Actual 6'2+ steroidmaxxed people look better in camera/on screen, but in real life they would just look too big for ideal aesthetics.

Coincidentally, or really NOT coincidentally at all, modelling companies for years now require models to be between 6'0 - 6'2. The reason 6'2 is the cap is because models and actors larp about their height by at least an inch on average.

Oh but no, literal modelling companies are all wrong, and all the little 15 year olds gathered on incel forums are right.

Too much height (6'2+), is not a bad thing nessecarily, and it can actually benefit you if you are below average looking. However, if you are above average looking facially, it does nothing for you. All what being that tall gets you is more attention from people, and that is just because of normal human behaviour, a bigger object gets more attention in our minds. It is not an indicator of sexual attention.
Before tiktokcels come with some stupid video of women claiming to want 6'4+, I will tell you this: WOMEN HAVE NO IDEA WHAT CERTAIN HEIGHTS LOOK LIKE. Actually not even women, but people in general have shit understanding of heights because everybody rounds up and larps.

People here overfantasize so much about homoerotic ratios that they forget the appeal body has. It is absolutely essential for the full package effect (height + face + muscles). Only people who have the full package will know the difference is night and day.

Post I came across that pretty much explained exactly what I had been thinking all this time and motivated me to do this post: https://looksmax.org/threads/my-view-on-what-the-ideal-height-is.411862/

im sorry but the cope is crazy
my dad is genuine unfrauded 6'6 evening height barefoot and everyone looks at him like a god (helps that he has a viking maxxed beard and full head of hair) as long as your frame is huge and proportionate to your size (not skinny rodent looking) anything below 6'10 is a halo
my half brother is 6'8 and he gets about the same looks as my dad heightmaxxing seems to be beneficial up around the 6'5 mark then it tapers down

 

[bracemaxxer]

tales from the trenches of new delhi

 

[Johanjohan]

Listen here kids, who view sexual dynamics in skewed perceptions of reality and in terms of retarded ratios in online forums.

Ideal height, combining all realms of physicality including proportions, aesthetics, and sufficient dimorphism is 6'0 - 6'1 (183 - 185 cm) barefoot evening height.

"MUH 6'5 IS IDEAL HEIGHT"
You have absolutely no idea what a real 6'5 unfrauded barefoot man looks like in real life. Especially at the extremely low bf percentage you jerk off over here. It looks so lanky its comical.
No amount of gymmaxxing will save you, you absolutely need to roidmax to look proportionate + have good genetics , and good luck with roidmaxxing and aging 15 years in 3.

Height matters because its highly dimorphic and primal, but what is also extremely important in terms of being APPEALING in real life is being PROPORTIONATE.

The most balanced proportions in terms of torso, legs, head size, frame etc. occur at 5'10 - 5'11 in males.
Of course there can be people with shit proportions and frame at that height, but its rare. Your chances of being disproportionate and a framecel expontentially increase each inch after 5'11.

6'0 to 6'1 UNFRAUDED evening barefoot, with a natty muscular physique is the perfect balance of maximum aesthetics and enough height for good dimorphism. A 6'2+ barefoot person will always look lanky at low bf, even with muscle mass on the frame. Actual 6'2+ steroidmaxxed people look better in camera/on screen, but in real life they would just look too big for ideal aesthetics.

Coincidentally, or really NOT coincidentally at all, modelling companies for years now require models to be between 6'0 - 6'2. The reason 6'2 is the cap is because models and actors larp about their height by at least an inch on average.

Oh but no, literal modelling companies are all wrong, and all the little 15 year olds gathered on incel forums are right.

Too much height (6'2+), is not a bad thing nessecarily, and it can actually benefit you if you are below average looking. However, if you are above average looking facially, it does nothing for you. All what being that tall gets you is more attention from people, and that is just because of normal human behaviour, a bigger object gets more attention in our minds. It is not an indicator of sexual attention.
Before tiktokcels come with some stupid video of women claiming to want 6'4+, I will tell you this: WOMEN HAVE NO IDEA WHAT CERTAIN HEIGHTS LOOK LIKE. Actually not even women, but people in general have shit understanding of heights because everybody rounds up and larps.

People here overfantasize so much about homoerotic ratios that they forget the appeal body has. It is absolutely essential for the full package effect (height + face + muscles). Only people who have the full package will know the difference is night and day.

Post I came across that pretty much explained exactly what I had been thinking all this time and motivated me to do this post: https://looksmax.org/threads/my-view-on-what-the-ideal-height-is.411862/

Nice cope u manlet

 

[formergameraddict]

im sorry but the cope is crazy
my dad is genuine unfrauded 6'6 evening height barefoot and everyone looks at him like a god (helps that he has a viking maxxed beard and full head of hair) as long as your frame is huge and proportionate to your size (not skinny rodent looking) anything below 6'10 is a halo
my half brother is 6'8 and he gets about the same looks as my dad heightmaxxing seems to be beneficial up around the 6'5 mark then it tapers down

im sorry but the cope is crazy
my dad is genuine unfrauded 6'6 evening height barefoot and everyone looks at him like a god (helps that he has a viking maxxed beard and full head of hair) as long as your frame is huge and proportionate to your siznot skinny rodent looking) anything below 6'10 is a halo
my half brother is 6'8 and he gets about the same looks as my dad heightmaxxing seems to be beneficial up around the 6'5 mark then it tapers down

How tall are u and ur mom

 

[Alex_notmogging]

Imo I’d extend that range down and say a non-frauded 6’2-6’4” is ideal in the USA.

Previous thread I made of women’s fantasies

Video information is from

Spoilers:
In context of online dating 6’3” & 6’4” performs best. Neither performing better than the other (3:30-3:45)

In context of speed dating it’s not as straight forward but optimal was 6’4” but the advantage over 6’2-6’3” appears marginal (4:51-5:56)

In context of female fantasy/romance novels the average height among male love interests is 6’3” but the most frequently occurring (popular) height for a male romance novel lead is 6’2” (6:16-7:17). The mode is lower than the average because 6’4” was also a common enough height that it pulled the average up to 6’3” away from the mode of 6’4”.


So it’s 6’2”-6’4” unfrauded if we’re splitting hairs.
Once again I’m talking about Americans. I know it’s gonna be different if you live in Japan, Italy, Netherlands, Dinaric Alps etc

6'2 also works fine . Pretty good height everywhere on the world . Also pretty good height for everthing. But brah chill you wouldnt had to write allat just for onr single inch

 

[NitoRump]

my dad is genuine unfrauded 6'6 evening height barefoot and everyone looks at him like a god (helps that he has a viking maxxed beard and full head of hair)

Too much height (6'2+), is not a bad thing nessecarily, and it can actually benefit you if you are below average looking. However, if you are above average looking facially, it does nothing for you. All what being that tall gets you is more attention from people, and that is just because of normal human behaviour, a bigger object gets more attention in our minds. It is not an indicator of sexual attention.

 

[DieVoGel6949]

Listen here kids, who view sexual dynamics in skewed perceptions of reality and in terms of retarded ratios in online forums.

Ideal height, combining all realms of physicality including proportions, aesthetics, and sufficient dimorphism is 6'0 - 6'1 (183 - 185 cm) barefoot evening height.

"MUH 6'5 IS IDEAL HEIGHT"
You have absolutely no idea what a real 6'5 unfrauded barefoot man looks like in real life. Especially at the extremely low bf percentage you jerk off over here. It looks so lanky its comical.
No amount of gymmaxxing will save you, you absolutely need to roidmax to look proportionate + have good genetics , and good luck with roidmaxxing and aging 15 years in 3.

Height matters because its highly dimorphic and primal, but what is also extremely important in terms of being APPEALING in real life is being PROPORTIONATE.

The most balanced proportions in terms of torso, legs, head size, frame etc. occur at 5'10 - 5'11 in males.
Of course there can be people with shit proportions and frame at that height, but its rare. Your chances of being disproportionate and a framecel expontentially increase each inch after 5'11.

6'0 to 6'1 UNFRAUDED evening barefoot, with a natty muscular physique is the perfect balance of maximum aesthetics and enough height for good dimorphism. A 6'2+ barefoot person will always look lanky at low bf, even with muscle mass on the frame. Actual 6'2+ steroidmaxxed people look better in camera/on screen, but in real life they would just look too big for ideal aesthetics.

Coincidentally, or really NOT coincidentally at all, modelling companies for years now require models to be between 6'0 - 6'2. The reason 6'2 is the cap is because models and actors larp about their height by at least an inch on average.

Oh but no, literal modelling companies are all wrong, and all the little 15 year olds gathered on incel forums are right.

Too much height (6'2+), is not a bad thing nessecarily, and it can actually benefit you if you are below average looking. However, if you are above average looking facially, it does nothing for you. All what being that tall gets you is more attention from people, and that is just because of normal human behaviour, a bigger object gets more attention in our minds. It is not an indicator of sexual attention.
Before tiktokcels come with some stupid video of women claiming to want 6'4+, I will tell you this: WOMEN HAVE NO IDEA WHAT CERTAIN HEIGHTS LOOK LIKE. Actually not even women, but people in general have shit understanding of heights because everybody rounds up and larps.

People here overfantasize so much about homoerotic ratios that they forget the appeal body has. It is absolutely essential for the full package effect (height + face + muscles). Only people who have the full package will know the difference is night and day.

Post I came across that pretty much explained exactly what I had been thinking all this time and motivated me to do this post: https://looksmax.org/threads/my-view-on-what-the-ideal-height-is.411862/

This is true tbh and it makes me happy about my height. Almost everyone taller than me is an insane lanklet. However I do wish to be a 6'8-6'10 absolute jacked up terrachad. That's the only way my autistic ass could get laid.

 

[NitoRump]

This is true tbh and it makes me happy about my height. Almost everyone taller than me is an insane lanklet. However I do wish to be a 6'8-6'10 absolute jacked up terrachad. That's the only way my autistic ass could get laid.

how tall are you? barefoot evening height

 

[DieVoGel6949]

how tall are you? barefoot evening height

Barefoot evening I'm 182cm so 6ft kinda creeping down to 5'11.

 

[NitoRump]

Barefoot evening I'm 182cm so 6ft kinda creeping down to 5'11.

Ideally height for perfect proportions, gymmax for a year or two and you will look great in real life (body wise)

 

[They_are_all_whores]

D

Listen here kids, who view sexual dynamics in skewed perceptions of reality and in terms of retarded ratios in online forums.

Ideal height, combining all realms of physicality including proportions, aesthetics, and sufficient dimorphism is 6'0 - 6'1 (183 - 185 cm) barefoot evening height.

"MUH 6'5 IS IDEAL HEIGHT"
You have absolutely no idea what a real 6'5 unfrauded barefoot man looks like in real life. Especially at the extremely low bf percentage you jerk off over here. It looks so lanky its comical.
No amount of gymmaxxing will save you, you absolutely need to roidmax to look proportionate + have good genetics , and good luck with roidmaxxing and aging 15 years in 3.

Height matters because its highly dimorphic and primal, but what is also extremely important in terms of being APPEALING in real life is being PROPORTIONATE.

The most balanced proportions in terms of torso, legs, head size, frame etc. occur at 5'10 - 5'11 in males.
Of course there can be people with shit proportions and frame at that height, but its rare. Your chances of being disproportionate and a framecel expontentially increase each inch after 5'11.

6'0 to 6'1 UNFRAUDED evening barefoot, with a natty muscular physique is the perfect balance of maximum aesthetics and enough height for good dimorphism. A 6'2+ barefoot person will always look lanky at low bf, even with muscle mass on the frame. Actual 6'2+ steroidmaxxed people look better in camera/on screen, but in real life they would just look too big for ideal aesthetics.

Coincidentally, or really NOT coincidentally at all, modelling companies for years now require models to be between 6'0 - 6'2. The reason 6'2 is the cap is because models and actors larp about their height by at least an inch on average.

Oh but no, literal modelling companies are all wrong, and all the little 15 year olds gathered on incel forums are right.

Too much height (6'2+), is not a bad thing nessecarily, and it can actually benefit you if you are below average looking. However, if you are above average looking facially, it does nothing for you. All what being that tall gets you is more attention from people, and that is just because of normal human behaviour, a bigger object gets more attention in our minds. It is not an indicator of sexual attention.
Before tiktokcels come with some stupid video of women claiming to want 6'4+, I will tell you this: WOMEN HAVE NO IDEA WHAT CERTAIN HEIGHTS LOOK LIKE. Actually not even women, but people in general have shit understanding of heights because everybody rounds up and larps.

People here overfantasize so much about homoerotic ratios that they forget the appeal body has. It is absolutely essential for the full package effect (height + face + muscles). Only people who have the full package will know the difference is night and day.

Post I came across that pretty much explained exactly what I had been thinking all this time and motivated me to do this post: https://looksmax.org/threads/my-view-on-what-the-ideal-height-is.411862/

Dnr 200 cm is the most ideal

 

[They_are_all_whores]

Ideally height for perfect proportions, gymmax for a year or two and you will look great in real life (body wise)

183 is manlet nowadays

 

[NitoRump]

183 is manlet nowadays

in your view maybe. I have come to find out that people who say that cope by relying on their height to save their SMV. Most celebrities and male models fall between the 180-188cm category (reported height, its not unusual for them to larp 1-2 cm). If you read my post you will find out that is because ideal body and head proportions with sufficient height occur at that range

 

[They_are_all_whores]

in your view maybe. I have come to find out that people who say that cope by relying on their height to save their SMV. Most celebrities and male models fall between the 180-188cm category (reported height, its not unusual for them to larp 1-2 cm). If you read my post you will find out that is because ideal body and head proportions with sufficient height occur at that range

Dnr shit thread 197-205 is ideal

 

[Zone7411]

6’6+ is ideal tbh bc certain height obsessed foids would be really obsessed over you just because of your height while I can never imagine a single foid will ever worship let’s say a 6ft just for his height alone

stupid way to think. by that logic if a 6'10 nigga ever pulls up and shows her attention she will cheat on you with him just because he's taller and muh height fetish. making height ur entire personality is retarded, you must have everything, not just height.

trust me u do not want to attract height fetishizers because that is the only thing they will be able to like about you and thats not ideal.

also height obsessed foids are always short, short foids are subhuman and not breeding material. ive never seen a tall girl care so much about height like femlets do

 

[HostSamurai]

stupid way to think. by that logic if a 6'10 nigga ever pulls up and shows her attention she will cheat on you with him just because he's taller and muh height fetish. making height ur entire personality is retarded, you must have everything, not just height.

trust me u do not want to attract height fetishizers because that is the only thing they will be able to like about you and thats not ideal.

also height obsessed foids are always short, short foids are subhuman and not breeding material. ive never seen a tall girl care so much about height like femlets do

This.

 

[soggra]

stupid way to think. by that logic if a 6'10 nigga ever pulls up and shows her attention she will cheat on you with him just because he's taller and muh height fetish. making height ur entire personality is retarded, you must have everything, not just height.

trust me u do not want to attract height fetishizers because that is the only thing they will be able to like about you and thats not ideal.

also height obsessed foids are always short, short foids are subhuman and not breeding material. ive never seen a tall girl care so much about height like femlets do

The idea that a woman would leave for someone taller just because of ‘muh height fetish’ is a strawman. The reality is that being exceptionally tall (6’6+ range) gives you a unique advantage in attraction that more average tall guys (like 6’0-6’2) simply don’t benefit from in the same way. There are women who are genuinely obsessed with extreme height, and to them, a 6’6+ guy is in a different category compared to a 6’0 guy. That’s the point.

Also, the claim that height-obsessed foids are ‘always short’ is just an assumption. Plenty of tall women still prefer men much taller than them.

At the end of the day, extreme height is a cheat code in dating. The same way being rich can make women overlook other flaws, being 6’6+ can make some women idolize you off rip. It’s not about making ‘height your entire personality’; it’s about acknowledging that certain biological and social factors make extreme height an easy attraction trigger for some women, in a way that simply being 6’0-6’2 does not.

 

[soggra]

im sorry but the cope is crazy
my dad is genuine unfrauded 6'6 evening height barefoot and everyone looks at him like a god (helps that he has a viking maxxed beard and full head of hair) as long as your frame is huge and proportionate to your size (not skinny rodent looking) anything below 6'10 is a halo
my half brother is 6'8 and he gets about the same looks as my dad heightmaxxing seems to be beneficial up around the 6'5 mark then it tapers down

This

 

[11OUTTA10]

The reason 6'2 is the cap is because models and actors larp about their height by at least an inch on average.

My dad is 6'8" and he's pretty buff idk ¯\_(ツ)_/¯

 

[afkaik]

Listen here kids, who view sexual dynamics in skewed perceptions of reality and in terms of retarded ratios in online forums.

Ideal height, combining all realms of physicality including proportions, aesthetics, and sufficient dimorphism is 6'0 - 6'1 (183 - 185 cm) barefoot evening height.

"MUH 6'5 IS IDEAL HEIGHT"
You have absolutely no idea what a real 6'5 unfrauded barefoot man looks like in real life. Especially at the extremely low bf percentage you jerk off over here. It looks so lanky its comical.
No amount of gymmaxxing will save you, you absolutely need to roidmax to look proportionate + have good genetics , and good luck with roidmaxxing and aging 15 years in 3.

Height matters because its highly dimorphic and primal, but what is also extremely important in terms of being APPEALING in real life is being PROPORTIONATE.

The most balanced proportions in terms of torso, legs, head size, frame etc. occur at 5'10 - 5'11 in males.
Of course there can be people with shit proportions and frame at that height, but its rare. Your chances of being disproportionate and a framecel expontentially increase each inch after 5'11.

6'0 to 6'1 UNFRAUDED evening barefoot, with a natty muscular physique is the perfect balance of maximum aesthetics and enough height for good dimorphism. A 6'2+ barefoot person will always look lanky at low bf, even with muscle mass on the frame. Actual 6'2+ steroidmaxxed people look better in camera/on screen, but in real life they would just look too big for ideal aesthetics.

Coincidentally, or really NOT coincidentally at all, modelling companies for years now require models to be between 6'0 - 6'2. The reason 6'2 is the cap is because models and actors larp about their height by at least an inch on average.

Oh but no, literal modelling companies are all wrong, and all the little 15 year olds gathered on incel forums are right.

Too much height (6'2+), is not a bad thing nessecarily, and it can actually benefit you if you are below average looking. However, if you are above average looking facially, it does nothing for you. All what being that tall gets you is more attention from people, and that is just because of normal human behaviour, a bigger object gets more attention in our minds. It is not an indicator of sexual attention.
Before tiktokcels come with some stupid video of women claiming to want 6'4+, I will tell you this: WOMEN HAVE NO IDEA WHAT CERTAIN HEIGHTS LOOK LIKE. Actually not even women, but people in general have shit understanding of heights because everybody rounds up and larps.

People here overfantasize so much about homoerotic ratios that they forget the appeal body has. It is absolutely essential for the full package effect (height + face + muscles). Only people who have the full package will know the difference is night and day.

Post I came across that pretty much explained exactly what I had been thinking all this time and motivated me to do this post: https://looksmax.org/threads/my-view-on-what-the-ideal-height-is.411862/

jfl at looksmaxxing for girls and not for the divine

 

[NitoRump]

jfl at looksmaxxing for girls and not for the divine

its not even just for girls but also life quality peaks at that height. You lose so much agility, athleticism and flexibility after 6'2, no leg room in planes, cant fit into some cars, clothes are not made with your proportions in mind etc

 

[afkaik]

its not even just for girls but also life quality peaks at that height. You lose so much agility, athleticism and flexibility after 6'2, no leg room in planes, cant fit into some cars, clothes are not made with your proportions in mind etc

That is quite true. However, money solves most of these problems. You exchange long term strength, agility and athletic potential over short term gains in muscular variation. 6'5 is peak male height, if you ask me. You probably will take much longer to build muscle, but you every inch after that makes muscle gain almost impossible to notice. See Austin Wayne

 

[NitoRump]

That is quite true. However, money solves most of these problems. You exchange long term strength, agility and athletic potential over short term gains in muscular variation. 6'5 is peak male height, if you ask me. You probably will take much longer to build muscle, but you every inch after that makes muscle gain almost impossible to notice. See Austin Wayne

Austin Wayne is 6'2, max 6'2.5 barefoot. Look at these pictures next to actual 6'1 Connor Murphy, he also has higher footwear than Connor. All these guys larp their heights crazily online, which I talk about as well.
This is why I talk about a true unfrauded evening height of 6 foot. That is essentially 6'3 height in terms of todays modern larping world.
A true 6'5 guy will be so lanky its comical. Needs at least 20% bf to look proportionate.

 

[Zone7411]

Austin Wayne is 6'2, max 6'2.5 barefoot. Look at these pictures next to actual 6'1 Connor Murphy, he also has higher footwear than Connor. All these guys larp their heights crazily online, which I talk about as well.
This is why I talk about a true unfrauded evening height of 6 foot. That is essentially 6'3 height in terms of todays modern larping world.
A true 6'5 guy will be so lanky its comical. Needs at least 20% bf to look proportionate.

I feel he's actually 6'3-6'3.5 or 191-192cm, he's also slouching his neck in that pic so I doubt that's just 6'2.

 

[NitoRump]

I feel he's actually 6'3-6'3.5 or 191-192cm, he's also slouching his neck in that pic so I doubt that's just 6'2.

maximum 6'3/190cm not more than that. claims 6'5 which is comical. physique looks good, but also roidmaxxed. You can see he has not great muscle building genetics, gets terramogged by Connor Murphy.

 

[11OUTTA10]

So we listening to midget ragebait now okay

 

[britshcel]

Ideal is 6 ft 6 to 6 ft 8. Only above 6 ft 9 is where things get bad.

 

[afkaik]

maximum 6'3/190cm not more than that. claims 6'5 which is comical. physique looks good, but also roidmaxxed. You can see he has not great muscle building genetics, gets terramogged by Connor Murphy.

he claims 6'6 and he got measured by a tape, it could still be fraud, sure, but he's not shorter than 6'4.

 

[thegiganigga]

Buddy. Im 23 years old. I have had more experiences with women than you can dream of. Pm me if you need proof. Im practically here to school you little geeks here on real life sex appeal. Women have no idea what heights look like, they just spew buzzword number like hive minded creatures. You again display the need to "heightmog", because all you care is feeling superior and validated by other men.

can I pm you ?

 

[NitoRump]

can I pm you ?

sure

 

[Lawton88]

Seen too many 6'3 and 6'4 guys with HTN faces getting a lot of attention from females. The 6 foot, 6'1 guy doesn't get the same attention with a HTN face.

 

[klamus]

Listen here kids, who view sexual dynamics in skewed perceptions of reality and in terms of retarded ratios in online forums.

Ideal height, combining all realms of physicality including proportions, aesthetics, and sufficient dimorphism is 6'0 - 6'1 (183 - 185 cm) barefoot evening height.

"MUH 6'5 IS IDEAL HEIGHT"
You have absolutely no idea what a real 6'5 unfrauded barefoot man looks like in real life. Especially at the extremely low bf percentage you jerk off over here. It looks so lanky its comical.
No amount of gymmaxxing will save you, you absolutely need to roidmax to look proportionate + have good genetics , and good luck with roidmaxxing and aging 15 years in 3.

Height matters because its highly dimorphic and primal, but what is also extremely important in terms of being APPEALING in real life is being PROPORTIONATE.

The most balanced proportions in terms of torso, legs, head size, frame etc. occur at 5'10 - 5'11 in males.
Of course there can be people with shit proportions and frame at that height, but its rare. Your chances of being disproportionate and a framecel expontentially increase each inch after 5'11.

6'0 to 6'1 UNFRAUDED evening barefoot, with a natty muscular physique is the perfect balance of maximum aesthetics and enough height for good dimorphism. A 6'2+ barefoot person will always look lanky at low bf, even with muscle mass on the frame. Actual 6'2+ steroidmaxxed people look better in camera/on screen, but in real life they would just look too big for ideal aesthetics.

Coincidentally, or really NOT coincidentally at all, modelling companies for years now require models to be between 6'0 - 6'2. The reason 6'2 is the cap is because models and actors larp about their height by at least an inch on average.

Oh but no, literal modelling companies are all wrong, and all the little 15 year olds gathered on incel forums are right.

Too much height (6'2+), is not a bad thing nessecarily, and it can actually benefit you if you are below average looking. However, if you are above average looking facially, it does nothing for you. All what being that tall gets you is more attention from people, and that is just because of normal human behaviour, a bigger object gets more attention in our minds. It is not an indicator of sexual attention.
Before tiktokcels come with some stupid video of women claiming to want 6'4+, I will tell you this: WOMEN HAVE NO IDEA WHAT CERTAIN HEIGHTS LOOK LIKE. Actually not even women, but people in general have shit understanding of heights because everybody rounds up and larps.

People here overfantasize so much about homoerotic ratios that they forget the appeal body has. It is absolutely essential for the full package effect (height + face + muscles). Only people who have the full package will know the difference is night and day.

Post I came across that pretty much explained exactly what I had been thinking all this time and motivated me to do this post: https://looksmax.org/threads/my-view-on-what-the-ideal-height-is.411862/

Cope. 7ft May Be too tall but you dont need to Be gymmaxxed to mog at 6'5. As long as you are not underweight skelly you Will mog every normie

 

[NitoRump]

Cope. 7ft May Be too tall but you dont need to Be gymmaxxed to mog at 6'5. As long as you are not underweight skelly you Will mog every normie

not really, a 6'5 dude draws more attention at first glance, but a true physique and proportionally maxxed 6'1 will always be more aesthetic and sexually appealing in other scenarios

 

[klamus]

not really, a 6'5 dude draws more attention at first glance, but a true physique and proportionally maxxed 6'1 will always be more aesthetic and sexually appealing in other scenarios

Invisible with clothes on. People dont Even know you lift

 

[NitoRump]

Invisible with clothes on. People dont Even know you lift

no. Even in winter weather, a nice fitted jacket will make you look jacked, if you actually are. In summer physique mogs height badly if 6ft+

 

[JohnnyRamone]

Listen here kids, who view sexual dynamics in skewed perceptions of reality and in terms of retarded ratios in online forums.

Ideal height, combining all realms of physicality including proportions, aesthetics, and sufficient dimorphism is 6'0 - 6'1 (183 - 185 cm) barefoot evening height.

"MUH 6'5 IS IDEAL HEIGHT"
You have absolutely no idea what a real 6'5 unfrauded barefoot man looks like in real life. Especially at the extremely low bf percentage you jerk off over here. It looks so lanky its comical.
No amount of gymmaxxing will save you, you absolutely need to roidmax to look proportionate + have good genetics , and good luck with roidmaxxing and aging 15 years in 3.

Height matters because its highly dimorphic and primal, but what is also extremely important in terms of being APPEALING in real life is being PROPORTIONATE.

The most balanced proportions in terms of torso, legs, head size, frame etc. occur at 5'10 - 5'11 in males.
Of course there can be people with shit proportions and frame at that height, but its rare. Your chances of being disproportionate and a framecel expontentially increase each inch after 5'11.

6'0 to 6'1 UNFRAUDED evening barefoot, with a natty muscular physique is the perfect balance of maximum aesthetics and enough height for good dimorphism. A 6'2+ barefoot person will always look lanky at low bf, even with muscle mass on the frame. Actual 6'2+ steroidmaxxed people look better in camera/on screen, but in real life they would just look too big for ideal aesthetics.

Coincidentally, or really NOT coincidentally at all, modelling companies for years now require models to be between 6'0 - 6'2. The reason 6'2 is the cap is because models and actors larp about their height by at least an inch on average.

Oh but no, literal modelling companies are all wrong, and all the little 15 year olds gathered on incel forums are right.

Too much height (6'2+), is not a bad thing nessecarily, and it can actually benefit you if you are below average looking. However, if you are above average looking facially, it does nothing for you. All what being that tall gets you is more attention from people, and that is just because of normal human behaviour, a bigger object gets more attention in our minds. It is not an indicator of sexual attention.
Before tiktokcels come with some stupid video of women claiming to want 6'4+, I will tell you this: WOMEN HAVE NO IDEA WHAT CERTAIN HEIGHTS LOOK LIKE. Actually not even women, but people in general have shit understanding of heights because everybody rounds up and larps.

People here overfantasize so much about homoerotic ratios that they forget the appeal body has. It is absolutely essential for the full package effect (height + face + muscles). Only people who have the full package will know the difference is night and day.

Post I came across that pretty much explained exactly what I had been thinking all this time and motivated me to do this post: https://looksmax.org/threads/my-view-on-what-the-ideal-height-is.411862/

I’m about 6’5/6’6 and this is manlet cope. I can’t count the number of times women have approached me based on my height. There are drawbacks to being tall, but Tom Brady/Michael Jordan height isn’t it.

Most men my height aren’t walking around like this.

 

[klamus]

no. Even in winter weather, a nice fitted jacket will make you look jacked, if you actually are. In summer physique mogs height badly if 6ft+

Absolute cope

 

[tt6567]

Listen here kids, who view sexual dynamics in skewed perceptions of reality and in terms of retarded ratios in online forums.

Ideal height, combining all realms of physicality including proportions, aesthetics, and sufficient dimorphism is 6'0 - 6'1 (183 - 185 cm) barefoot evening height.

"MUH 6'5 IS IDEAL HEIGHT"
You have absolutely no idea what a real 6'5 unfrauded barefoot man looks like in real life. Especially at the extremely low bf percentage you jerk off over here. It looks so lanky its comical.
No amount of gymmaxxing will save you, you absolutely need to roidmax to look proportionate + have good genetics , and good luck with roidmaxxing and aging 15 years in 3.

Height matters because its highly dimorphic and primal, but what is also extremely important in terms of being APPEALING in real life is being PROPORTIONATE.

The most balanced proportions in terms of torso, legs, head size, frame etc. occur at 5'10 - 5'11 in males.
Of course there can be people with shit proportions and frame at that height, but its rare. Your chances of being disproportionate and a framecel expontentially increase each inch after 5'11.

6'0 to 6'1 UNFRAUDED evening barefoot, with a natty muscular physique is the perfect balance of maximum aesthetics and enough height for good dimorphism. A 6'2+ barefoot person will always look lanky at low bf, even with muscle mass on the frame. Actual 6'2+ steroidmaxxed people look better in camera/on screen, but in real life they would just look too big for ideal aesthetics.

Coincidentally, or really NOT coincidentally at all, modelling companies for years now require models to be between 6'0 - 6'2. The reason 6'2 is the cap is because models and actors larp about their height by at least an inch on average.

Oh but no, literal modelling companies are all wrong, and all the little 15 year olds gathered on incel forums are right.

Too much height (6'2+), is not a bad thing nessecarily, and it can actually benefit you if you are below average looking. However, if you are above average looking facially, it does nothing for you. All what being that tall gets you is more attention from people, and that is just because of normal human behaviour, a bigger object gets more attention in our minds. It is not an indicator of sexual attention.
Before tiktokcels come with some stupid video of women claiming to want 6'4+, I will tell you this: WOMEN HAVE NO IDEA WHAT CERTAIN HEIGHTS LOOK LIKE. Actually not even women, but people in general have shit understanding of heights because everybody rounds up and larps.

People here overfantasize so much about homoerotic ratios that they forget the appeal body has. It is absolutely essential for the full package effect (height + face + muscles). Only people who have the full package will know the difference is night and day.

Post I came across that pretty much explained exactly what I had been thinking all this time and motivated me to do this post: https://looksmax.org/threads/my-view-on-what-the-ideal-height-is.411862/

id argue that 6'2 or 188cm is the perfect height

 

[King_Schnitzel]

Listen here kids, who view sexual dynamics in skewed perceptions of reality and in terms of retarded ratios in online forums.

Ideal height, combining all realms of physicality including proportions, aesthetics, and sufficient dimorphism is 6'0 - 6'1 (183 - 185 cm) barefoot evening height.

"MUH 6'5 IS IDEAL HEIGHT"
You have absolutely no idea what a real 6'5 unfrauded barefoot man looks like in real life. Especially at the extremely low bf percentage you jerk off over here. It looks so lanky its comical.
No amount of gymmaxxing will save you, you absolutely need to roidmax to look proportionate + have good genetics , and good luck with roidmaxxing and aging 15 years in 3.

Height matters because its highly dimorphic and primal, but what is also extremely important in terms of being APPEALING in real life is being PROPORTIONATE.

The most balanced proportions in terms of torso, legs, head size, frame etc. occur at 5'10 - 5'11 in males.
Of course there can be people with shit proportions and frame at that height, but its rare. Your chances of being disproportionate and a framecel expontentially increase each inch after 5'11.

6'0 to 6'1 UNFRAUDED evening barefoot, with a natty muscular physique is the perfect balance of maximum aesthetics and enough height for good dimorphism. A 6'2+ barefoot person will always look lanky at low bf, even with muscle mass on the frame. Actual 6'2+ steroidmaxxed people look better in camera/on screen, but in real life they would just look too big for ideal aesthetics.

Coincidentally, or really NOT coincidentally at all, modelling companies for years now require models to be between 6'0 - 6'2. The reason 6'2 is the cap is because models and actors larp about their height by at least an inch on average.

Oh but no, literal modelling companies are all wrong, and all the little 15 year olds gathered on incel forums are right.

Too much height (6'2+), is not a bad thing nessecarily, and it can actually benefit you if you are below average looking. However, if you are above average looking facially, it does nothing for you. All what being that tall gets you is more attention from people, and that is just because of normal human behaviour, a bigger object gets more attention in our minds. It is not an indicator of sexual attention.
Before tiktokcels come with some stupid video of women claiming to want 6'4+, I will tell you this: WOMEN HAVE NO IDEA WHAT CERTAIN HEIGHTS LOOK LIKE. Actually not even women, but people in general have shit understanding of heights because everybody rounds up and larps.

People here overfantasize so much about homoerotic ratios that they forget the appeal body has. It is absolutely essential for the full package effect (height + face + muscles). Only people who have the full package will know the difference is night and day.

Post I came across that pretty much explained exactly what I had been thinking all this time and motivated me to do this post: https://looksmax.org/threads/my-view-on-what-the-ideal-height-is.411862/

I'm 1,76m, this thread absolutely does not help me. It just adds to my pain.