FailedNormieManlet
NTmaxxed pajeet
- Joined
- Oct 10, 2021
- Posts
- 22,228
- Reputation
- 40,037
I finished my work for today and so I've decided to dedicate some time to making a decent thread
Women aren't attracted to men, but simply attracted to how a man makes them feel. A chad for example will make a woman feel lustful and high value, she loves those feelings of validation. She doesn't love chad, but simply how chad makes her feel. These statements are all water, and obviously some nigga here is going to try say I'm wrong and say some shit like "well why won't stacy go for @Zer0/∞ then?" Because ugly guys don't evoke lust. PERIOD.
Ugly men aren't evoking feelings of lust. But a relationship just isn't about lust, it's a lot more than that. Women like feeling a spectrum of emotions, emotions like jealousy, happiness, sadness, the entire rainbow. Now the reason why women take pleasure in negative emotions is due to human tendency towards masochism (read on the bad conscious if interested). But to get back onto the topic at hand here, ugly men are evoking feelings of COMFORT.
Women aren't feeling like shit when they're with some normie/oofy doofy guy. They feel comfortable, they can enjoy things like sex without being insecure, they can feel like they can be honest/upfront about their emotions with some oofy doofy cuck. That's why they even like those guys, with chad none of this happens. The woman is constantly on the backfoot and always looking up to the male, whereas with the normie/cuck she at least gets to stand as an equal and get some level of emotional comfort.
Not all women are like this obviously, some crave the drama and excitement from chad, others want the comfort. But such a thing isn't due to western/jewish propaganda, this phenomenon makes complete sense from an evolutionary point of view. Things like "cute men" being attractive to women is a mating strategy. The theory behind that is, is cute men are less likely to be the victims of violence/war --> more likely to therefore be alive and produce offspring. Hence why some women will opt for this strategy instead of the typical "fuck chad/brute male".
So we've covered two aspects now
I was reading something about "social currency" (basically the normie term for SMV). But the idea that social currency can be made in multiple ways, looks, status/money, vibe, friends, etc. It's how people value you, people who are equal in social currency/have the same perception of their value are more likely to be in longer lasting relationships.
What this means is that say we have a HTB. She could probably have some crippling insecurities or some shit and actually think of herself as a LTB --> due to her perception of herself as LTB, she is more likely to date a LTN.
"BUT ALL GIRLS WANT CHAD BRO! LTBS THINK THEY ARE ENTITLED TO CHAD!"
Yeah that's because they believe they possess the same social currency as a fucking chad LOL. In reality if a LTB thinks she's a LTB, she won't go out with a chad because she will feel insecure as fuck and the relationship will crumble as a result.
Anyways my little thread done, that's just my explanation for the phenomenon of normies dating gl girls
Women aren't attracted to men, but simply attracted to how a man makes them feel. A chad for example will make a woman feel lustful and high value, she loves those feelings of validation. She doesn't love chad, but simply how chad makes her feel. These statements are all water, and obviously some nigga here is going to try say I'm wrong and say some shit like "well why won't stacy go for @Zer0/∞ then?" Because ugly guys don't evoke lust. PERIOD.
Ugly men aren't evoking feelings of lust. But a relationship just isn't about lust, it's a lot more than that. Women like feeling a spectrum of emotions, emotions like jealousy, happiness, sadness, the entire rainbow. Now the reason why women take pleasure in negative emotions is due to human tendency towards masochism (read on the bad conscious if interested). But to get back onto the topic at hand here, ugly men are evoking feelings of COMFORT.
Women aren't feeling like shit when they're with some normie/oofy doofy guy. They feel comfortable, they can enjoy things like sex without being insecure, they can feel like they can be honest/upfront about their emotions with some oofy doofy cuck. That's why they even like those guys, with chad none of this happens. The woman is constantly on the backfoot and always looking up to the male, whereas with the normie/cuck she at least gets to stand as an equal and get some level of emotional comfort.
Not all women are like this obviously, some crave the drama and excitement from chad, others want the comfort. But such a thing isn't due to western/jewish propaganda, this phenomenon makes complete sense from an evolutionary point of view. Things like "cute men" being attractive to women is a mating strategy. The theory behind that is, is cute men are less likely to be the victims of violence/war --> more likely to therefore be alive and produce offspring. Hence why some women will opt for this strategy instead of the typical "fuck chad/brute male".
So we've covered two aspects now
- There are women who GENIUNELY prefer more cute looking men due to the advantages being cute provides
- Normies/oofy doofies provide women with stability/less insecurity --> feelings of comfort
I was reading something about "social currency" (basically the normie term for SMV). But the idea that social currency can be made in multiple ways, looks, status/money, vibe, friends, etc. It's how people value you, people who are equal in social currency/have the same perception of their value are more likely to be in longer lasting relationships.
What this means is that say we have a HTB. She could probably have some crippling insecurities or some shit and actually think of herself as a LTB --> due to her perception of herself as LTB, she is more likely to date a LTN.
"BUT ALL GIRLS WANT CHAD BRO! LTBS THINK THEY ARE ENTITLED TO CHAD!"
Yeah that's because they believe they possess the same social currency as a fucking chad LOL. In reality if a LTB thinks she's a LTB, she won't go out with a chad because she will feel insecure as fuck and the relationship will crumble as a result.
Anyways my little thread done, that's just my explanation for the phenomenon of normies dating gl girls
