Why will normies claim its wrong to be attracted to females aged 16-17 but fine to want to punch someone in the face if not acted upon?

Aladin

Aladin

Fuchsia
Joined
Jul 20, 2022
Posts
11,742
Reputation
13,701
If I claim it’s normal to be attracted to females in that age range, normies will claim attempting to normalize that attraction is wrong, however being atttracted to something and acting upon such attraction are different things.

If I claim it’s normal to be pissed and want to punch someone in the face, but wrong to act upon such anger, that’s fine. So why can normies accept feelings of anger and desire to punch someone in the face, but the desire to bang a 17 year old female as an adult is unacceptable, even if the desire isn’t acted upon?
 
  • +1
  • JFL
Reactions: ltncurry, SilverStCloud, MiserableMan and 3 others
Necrophilia iz wong! 💀😹
 
  • +1
Reactions: choppedshyt
why dont we just rape these JBs
 
  • Woah
  • JFL
  • Hmm...
Reactions: widdi, MiserableMan, Paul7 and 1 other person
That doesn’t provide me the answer.
Y4?
Thinking pile of poo
 
Becuase the latter involves foids so its a more sensitve topic in normies mind
 
Jew media propaganda. I've seen one cuck who was calling a 21 year old guy weird for dating a 19 year old girl.
 
  • +1
Reactions: R@m@ and klip11
Jew media propaganda. I've seen one cuck who was calling a 21 year old guy weird for dating a 19 year old girl.
fax normies still feel the need to defend foids even though foids lifemog them to obilivion in todays society
 
How is it defending foids?
Its probably just normies see JB's as innocent so if you claim your attracted to them it looks like your taking advantage of them. Kinda like if a baby spat on you and you show it anger normies will think your psycho.
 
Its probably just normies see JB's as innocent so if you claim your attracted to them it looks like your taking advantage of them. Kinda like if a baby spat on you and you show it anger normies will think your psycho.
That doesn’t make sense. Attraction is not action.
 
That doesn’t make sense. Attraction is not action.
its just all fking nonsense brainwash. Its like fat shaming even though fat people didnt exist in nature same as liking JBs even though JBs are most fertile in nature.
 
its just all fking nonsense brainwash. It’s like fat shaming even though fat people didnt exist in nature same as liking JBs even though JBs are most fertile in nature.
Normies make no sense.
 
  • +1
Reactions: JoshGiddey
Normies make no sense.
fk normies wish i was chad so i could say shit like this irl without consequence whilst mogging them
 
  • +1
Reactions: Aladin
Well yea it is wrong

Matter of fact there’s a lot of things in life that feel natural but are ethically wrong

It’s completely natural in nature to rape females, and obviously that’s wrong.
 
  • Hmm...
Reactions: Aladin
Because they don't have a moral compass
 
Because normies in america have been told since their birth that everyone under 18 is a child and that the manmade age of consent law is divine. I find it funny because theirs states where the age is 16
 
  • +1
Reactions: klip11
Well yea it is wrong

Matter of fact there’s a lot of things in life that feel natural but are ethically wrong

It’s completely natural in nature to rape females, and obviously that’s wrong.
Rape is an action that one chooses.

Attraction is an involuntary response to visual stimuli.
 
Rape is an action that one chooses.

Attraction is an involuntary response to visual stimuli.
🤔

well technically then yes no one can theoretically stop you from having any kind of thoughts you wanted to have - pedophilia, domestic terrorism, mass killing etc

but i guess any outward expression of those thoughts is wrong
 
🤔

well technically then yes no one can theoretically stop you from having any kind of thoughts you wanted to have - pedophilia, domestic terrorism, mass killing etc
“Wanted to have”

Attraction to 17 year olds is involuntary while planning mass murder takes careful planning, bad comparison.
but i guess any outward expression of those thoughts is wrong
People aren’t shaming you for openly expressing these thoughts, the shame is directed towards even having these thoughts.
 
“Wanted to have”

Attraction to 17 year olds is involuntary while planning mass murder takes careful planning, bad comparison.
im not talking about the planning phase of mass murder, im talking about the instant the thought enters your head

the best way i can explain human thoughts is how they go through the process of appearing in our heads and then how we "entertain" them, and then consciously control them

Trigger (we all know what this means) ->

Thought (at this point you can decide on whether you want to entertain the thought or let it pass. There's nothing wrong in having involuntary thoughts at this phase, since its not controllable. If you wish not to have involuntary thoughts because they make you uncomfortable, you can get psychological and psychiatric help with this.) ->

Entertainment (this is where you've already committed a moral mistake, if it's a ethically wrong thought. You are consciously developing a fantasy in your brain and injecting your own thoughts into the mix) ->

Planning (you begin to plan an action to "act" on your desires. If the thought is ethically wrong, then the "planning" phase is also ethically wrong.) ->

Action (you follow through on the action. This is still ethically wrong, obviously, and arguably "more" ethically wrong than the previous 2 phases. Even if your action fails, its still ethically wrong)

Obviously there's a lot of nuance here but that 5 phase process is the basic chart of how thoughts flow.
 
im not talking about the planning phase of mass murder, im talking about the instant the thought enters your head

the best way i can explain human thoughts is how they go through the process of appearing in our heads and then how we "entertain" them, and then consciously control them

Trigger (we all know what this means) ->

Thought (at this point you can decide on whether you want to entertain the thought or let it pass. There's nothing wrong in having involuntary thoughts at this phase, since its not controllable. If you wish not to have involuntary thoughts because they make you uncomfortable, you can get psychological and psychiatric help with this.) ->

Entertainment (this is where you've already committed a moral mistake, if it's a ethically wrong thought. You are consciously developing a fantasy in your brain and injecting your own thoughts into the mix) ->

Planning (you begin to plan an action to "act" on your desires. If the thought is ethically wrong, then the "planning" phase is also ethically wrong.) ->

Action (you follow through on the action. This is still ethically wrong, obviously, and arguably "more" ethically wrong than the previous 2 phases. Even if your action fails, its still ethically wrong)

Obviously there's a lot of nuance here but that 5 phase process is the basic chart of how thoughts flow.
That doesn’t address the following:
People aren’t shaming you for openly expressing these thoughts, the shame is directed towards even having these thoughts.
People think that being attracted to 17 is wrong.
 
Sour grapes, that's all
If a normie have Leonardo's face they wouldn't said that
 
If I claim it’s normal to be attracted to females in that age range, normies will claim attempting to normalize that attraction is wrong, however being atttracted to something and acting upon such attraction are different things.

If I claim it’s normal to be pissed and want to punch someone in the face, but wrong to act upon such anger, that’s fine. So why can normies accept feelings of anger and desire to punch someone in the face, but the desire to bang a 17 year old female as an adult is unacceptable, even if the desire isn’t acted upon?
20890.jpg


:hnghn:
 
If I claim it’s normal to be attracted to females in that age range, normies will claim attempting to normalize that attraction is wrong, however being atttracted to something and acting upon such attraction are different things.

If I claim it’s normal to be pissed and want to punch someone in the face, but wrong to act upon such anger, that’s fine. So why can normies accept feelings of anger and desire to punch someone in the face, but the desire to bang a 17 year old female as an adult is unacceptable, even if the desire isn’t acted upon?
Normies gonna normie
 
If you're gonna do it then do it, if not then simply don't
 
That doesn’t address the following:

People think that being attracted to 17 is wrong.
if you look at a girl and are involuntarily attracted to her there’s nothing you can do about that

So it’s not wrong

Ping the ppl who think it’s wrong I’ll debate them

It’s wrong when you entertain the thought, plan the action, and then do the action, of course

That being said - you technically “shouldn’t” be having those kinds of thoughts anyway. Like the only part of a female you should be attracted to should be the sexually dimprphic traits if you know what I mean.

If you are attracted to kid bodies then your Brain is absolutely fucked, but I guess, technically, you didn’t do anything “wrong”. You just need psychological help immediately.
 
Last edited:
if you look at a girl and are involuntarily attracted to her there’s nothing you can do about that

So it’s not wrong

Ping the ppl who think it’s wrong I’ll debate them

It’s wrong when you entertain the thought, plan the action, and then do the action, of course
There are people who think attraction to teenage women is wrong. On this forum it’s rare but outside it’s common
That being said - you technically “shouldn’t” be having those kinds of thoughts anyway. Like the only part of a female you should be attracted to should be the sexually dimprphic traits if you know what I mean.

If you are attracted to kid bodies then your Brain is absolutely fucked, but I guess, technically, you didn’t do anything “wrong”. You just need psychological help immediately.
this thread isn’t about kid bodies but teenage women.
 
  • +1
Reactions: True truecel
for many oldcel men its a coping mechanism bc they know theyre not desired by young foids
so they lie to themselves about not being attracted to them
For oldcel foids, its jealousy. They wish they were young
And generally speaking its virtue signaling
 
for many oldcel men its a coping mechanism bc they know theyre not desired by young foids
so they lie to themselves about not being attracted to them
For oldcel foids, its jealousy. They wish they were young
And generally speaking its virtue signaling
i don’t think it’s virtue signaling people genuinely believe someone is mentally ill if they feel attraction to teens.
 
i don’t think it’s virtue signaling people genuinely believe someone is mentally ill if they feel attraction to teens.
well Id have to ask those people a few questions to understand their minds but im not sure
To me a guy who doesnt wanna fuck tight wet 16 yo pussy is a weird faggot thats all im gonna say
 
well Id have to ask those people a few questions to understand their minds but im not sure
To me a guy who doesnt wanna fuck tight wet 16 yo pussy is a weird faggot thats all im gonna say
This thread a while ago covered this issue:
 
  • +1
Reactions: Chicofuckedmywife

Similar threads

got.daim
Replies
47
Views
2K
messi1
messi1
D
Replies
72
Views
16K
BonesmashFinalBoss
BonesmashFinalBoss
MaghrebGator
Replies
118
Views
8K
GuyFromSingapore
G

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top