Why would a leaner build be more attractive to women in a biological standpoint?

[Deleted member 21182]

Most things makes sense like we know height means higher likelihood of protection, stronger facial features can take more blows, wide frame makes u more intimidating to potential opponents, hunter eyes protects eyes from blows etc

And ofc a female is looking for protection

But sub 15% bf would just make u weaker?

Ideally wouldn’t a woman evolve to want a 20%+ fuller buff strong fatty?

Makes no sense when some girls like guys who are so starved they would fall to wind

 

[Psychophilly]

muscles means more agile and good hunters while fat is being slow

 

[Deleted member 32410]

Angles are pretty. They stand out. It’s about novelty and unique design. Barely any guy has hollow cheeks. The pronounced bone structure is literally a fundamentally attractive feature. It defines the face further separating it from some round bulbous blob. Probably associated with greater dominance then just by facial impression.

 

[Deleted member 21182]

muscles means more agile and good hunters while fat is being slow

Yeah makes sense to be fair most women don’t want starving men but a balance of 13-15%

 

[Deleted member 21182]

Angles are pretty. They stand out. It’s about novelty and unique design. Barely any guy has hollow cheeks. The pronounced bone structure is literally a fundamentally attractive feature. It defines the face further separating it from some round bulbous blob.

Not really about standing out is it? I agree with what @Psychophilly said tho

If standing out and having what bearly any guys have was a halo any deformed person or giga framecel would be attractive

Most attractive features to women and men come from biological reasons

 

[GuyFromSingapore]

There needs to be no biological basis for liking lean men. But a lean man is mobile and has high speed in sprinting.

 

[Deleted member 28927]

m

 

[kanderior]

Certain aspects of female sexual behavior are biological and hardwired, like the stuff you mentioned, but their sexuality can also be more fluid and culturally influenceable. It's what society pushes as the ideal male look nowadays, if you look at the top Chads from the past they had higher body fat.

 

[Deleted member 14693]

It isn't more attractive

 

[Deleted member 21182]

There needs to be no biological basis for liking lean men. But a lean man is mobile and has high speed in sprinting.

I didn’t think about it but I assume it comes from hunting

I mean humans in general aren’t meant to be these huge muscular or fat strongmen since they’d die in a prehistoric era

Leaner agile men with stamina and enough muscle to also defend himself and his offspring is ideal to women that’s why women don’t like these huge dudes

 

[Deleted member 21182]

It isn't more attractive

Well yeah genius but why?

Technically nothing is supposed to be attractive it’s about evolution

We don’t look at frogs and say hmm this one makes me horny

If aliens came to earth they wouldn’t know the difference between a chad and a incel in terms of attraction unless they did research

It’s about evolutionary reasons and the first comment explained

 

[Cheek0]

Interesting yeah

 

[GuyFromSingapore]

I didn’t think about it but I assume it comes from hunting

I mean humans in general aren’t meant to be these huge muscular or fat strongmen since they’d die in a prehistoric era

Leaner agile men with stamina and enough muscle to also defend himself and his offspring is ideal to women that’s why women don’t like these huge dudes

The most successful warriors in neolithic and medieval times were lean. They could use weapons with dexterity and speed.

 

[Deleted member 21182]

Interesting yeah

Ig it makes sense that in a hunter gatherer standpoint a buff guy with higher weight would be stronger than most other humans but wouldn’t really be a good hunter innit

Humans can’t really use strength to fight bigger mammals anyway so speed and agility would be much more useful than a big guy

 

[Cheek0]

Ig it makes sense that in a hunter gatherer standpoint a buff guy with higher weight would be stronger than most other humans but wouldn’t really be a good hunter innit

Humans can’t really use strength to fight bigger mammals anyway so speed and agility would be much more useful than a big guy

But if you have more fat you can travel for long distances without starving especially in cold climates

 

[Deleted member 15606]

You can have a chiseled face while having high body fat, it's all about bone mass.
Low body fat is essentially a way to fraud lack of bone.

That's your answer

 

[Deleted member 21182]

The most successful warriors in neolithic and medieval times were lean. They could use weapons with dexterity and speed.

Humans way of finding a partner is still from pre civilisation times so we basically are attracted to the same thing caveman liked

Tho even then bigger ppl would have advantage with heavy weapons not really a comparison

 

[Deleted member 21182]

But if you have more fat you can travel for long distances without starving especially in cold climates

But as known humans were more of a stay in one cave go out hunting when the food was done and come back to hide sort of ppl

That’s what we did for ages and women still are attracted to men the same way they were then even tho most of these things are useless nowadays

 

[Enfant terrible]

Most things makes sense like we know height means higher likelihood of protection, stronger facial features can take more blows, wide frame makes u more intimidating to potential opponents, hunter eyes protects eyes from blows etc

And ofc a female is looking for protection

But sub 15% bf would just make u weaker?

Ideally wouldn’t a woman evolve to want a 20%+ fuller buff strong fatty?

Makes no sense when some girls like guys who are so starved they would fall to wind

most danger in the past came from predators not other humans
a tiger just kills you doesnt give a fuck about your frame

 

[Deleted member 21182]

most danger in the past came from predators not other humans
a tiger just kills you doesnt give a fuck about your frame

Yea it makes sense to be balanced

Ofc other humans would still be a danger to the female if her man was weak so that’s why they want a tall wide framed descenty muscular man

Tho when it comes to such animals they wouldn’t really care about much of that so being agile is optimal

 

[DR. NICKGA]

Most things makes sense like we know height means higher likelihood of protection, stronger facial features can take more blows, wide frame makes u more intimidating to potential opponents, hunter eyes protects eyes from blows etc

And ofc a female is looking for protection

But sub 15% bf would just make u weaker?

Ideally wouldn’t a woman evolve to want a 20%+ fuller buff strong fatty?

Makes no sense when some girls like guys who are so starved they would fall to wind

sub 15 = faster and look more atractrive then 20%

We are hardwired to use weapons against animals, hunt the animal with man made weapons, live in a tribe (with a group)

(The first two things you need speed and more....)

We are not hardwrited to fight a bear with sub 20%
No?? We use man made weapons with 11 niggas to kill thaat nigga bear

 

[Deleted member 21182]

sub 15 = faster and look more atractrive then 20%

We are hardwired to use weapons against animals, hunt the animal with man made weapons, live in a tribe (with a group)

(The first two things you need speed and more....)

We are not hardwrited to fight a bear with sub 20%
No?? We use man made weapons with 11 niggas to kill thaat nigga bear

Yes but Yk the reason sun 15 looks more attractive is evolutionary right?

If an alien or an animal sees a 3/10 subhuman and a 10/10
Gigachad they will honestly think both are just as attractive unless they do research

 

[DR. NICKGA]

Yes but Yk the reason sun 15 looks more attractive is evolutionary right?

If an alien or an animal sees a 3/10 subhuman and a 10/10
Gigachad they will honestly think both are just as attractive unless they do research

well yes and no, probably yes

 

[Orc]

humans are evolutionarily stamina hunters and being heavy makes you shit at this.

 

[Deleted member 14699]

Certain aspects of female sexual behavior are biological and hardwired, like the stuff you mentioned, but their sexuality can also be more fluid and culturally influenceable. It's what society pushes as the ideal male look nowadays, if you look at the top Chads from the past they had higher body fat.

Put an example of top Chad from the past

 

[halfbloodaryanmaxxe]

more agility to catch that fucking deer

 

[Deleted member 33826]

Same reason why we are more attracted to slim women rather than chubby/fat ones

 

[kanderior]

Put an example of top Chad from the past

 

[Deleted member 14699]

View attachment 2571060View attachment 2571061View attachment 2571062

More masculine than nowadays chads