Why would "low T" mean you can be attracted to less developed women?

[Deleted member 4612]

Let's say you got a 14yo foid and and 17yo foid . the 14yo is 70% through puberty while the 17yo is done. now you have two dudes, the one dude is attracted to both chicks, while the other dude can only find the 17yo hot.

more T = higher sex drive. Also, if you are able to get aroused by less stimuli, its because you have a higher sex drive, while a lower sex drive would require more stimuli, no? So who has the higher T? I've seen people argue that any attraction to a female who is not fully developed is "low T". but why?

why would lower T cause you to become more aroused by less stimuli? i dont see how this correlates

@rightfulcel @Proex @Syobevoli @ImprovLoser @Lmao @fonzee98

 

[Deleted member 2597]

Idk less ass or tits or some shit.

 

[Deleted member 4612]

Idk less ass or tits or some shit.

nigga that doesn't explain shit

 

[Deleted member 2597]

nigga that doesn't explain shit

Yeah idk I was guessing it doesent make sense to me as well.

 

[Deleted member 6723]

Idk less ass or tits or some shit.

does that mean im low t bro big ass big tits defined hourglass, all those features make me think of fat old people

 

[Deleted member 2597]

does that mean im low t bro big ass big tits defined hourglass, all those features make me think of fat old people

Yes.

 

[Deleted member 4464]

imo if you are high t you will get aroused even by not so developed girls with smaller ass or breasts meanwhile probably even low t guys would get erect looking at women like that

 

[Deleted member 4612]

imo if you are high t you will get aroused even by not so developed girls with smaller ass or breasts meanwhile probably even low t guys would get erect looking at women like that

yes exactly. higher t means a higher capacity to get aroused by less stimuli, lower t needs full development

 

[DharkDC]

The person who said it's low T to be attracted to less developed bodies

 

[Deleted member 275]

You are attracted to immature 14 year olds because you are an immature basement dwelling loser that can't get women his own age. Instead relying on manipulating teenagers without experience.

 

[Deleted member 275]

Is what the avg normie would prob say/think. Which makes no sense, but it sounds edgy I suppose.

 

[Deleted member 4612]

You are attracted to immature 14 year olds because you are an immature basement dwelling loser that can't get women his own age. Instead relying on manipulating teenagers without experience.

i dont want women my age they have blown out pussies

 

[Deleted member 275]

i dont want women my age they have blown out pussies

I dont want women my age because I am inexperienced and want a girl I can vibe with in terms of that.

current 22yo fwb I have has n-count in the dozens, she's at a completely different level in terms of sexual experience and what she wants out of a guy/relationship.

Can't relate to that shit at all. But perhaps I can't relate to women at all since they live their lives as godesses while I lived life as a slave peasant.

 

[antiantifa]

Let's say you got a 14yo foid and and 17yo foid . the 14yo is 70% through puberty while the 17yo is done. now you have two dudes, the one dude is attracted to both chicks, while the other dude can only find the 17yo hot.

more T = higher sex drive. Also, if you are able to get aroused by less stimuli, its because you have a higher sex drive, while a lower sex drive would require more stimuli, no? So who has the higher T? I've seen people argue that any attraction to a female who is not fully developed is "low T". but why?

why would lower T cause you to become more aroused by less stimuli? i dont see how this correlates

@rightfulcel @Proex @Syobevoli @ImprovLoser @Lmao @fonzee98

more like one dude is attracted to both, but more to the 17yo with wider hips and tits, while the other is mostly attracted to less developed girl. So he's low T. You're basically a low T cuck, man, deal with it.

 

[Deleted member 4612]

more like one dude is attracted to both, but more to the 17yo with wider hips and tits, while the other is mostly attracted to less developed girl. So he's low T. You're basically a low T cuck, man, deal with it.

once again its the greycels spouting bullshit

you didn't even address my argument, you actually had to change the scenario, and then when you did change the scenario, you didn't give any reasoning behind it

 

[antiantifa]

once again its the greycels spouting bullshit

you didn't even address my argument, you actually had to change the scenario, and then when you did change the scenario, you didn't give any reasoning behind it

The more you are attracted to female development features(wide hips, round face, big breasts, narrow waist) the more T you have it's that simple.

 

[Deleted member 4612]

The more you are attracted to female development features(wide hips, round face, big breasts, narrow waist) the more T you have it's that simple.

you didnt give an exact reason for that.

also what about height? is there a factor in height when it comes to T? or no?

 

[antiantifa]

you didnt give an exact reason for that.

also what about height? is there a factor in height when it comes to T? or no?

Look, in females elevated E predicts attractiveness to elevated T men, in men it's reverse. Elevated E = shorter height. So shorter girls, but not too short are high E.

Too short = malnutrition, low E.
Too tall = low E.

So females in the normal range of height are typically most attractive, while males in the highest range of height are most attractive.

 

[Deleted member 4612]

Look, in females elevated E predicts attractiveness to elevated T men, in men it's reverse. Elevated E = shorter height. So shorter girls, but not too short are high E.

Too short = malnutrition, low E.
Too tall = low E.

So females in the normal range of height are typically most attractive, while males in the highest range of height are most attractive.

yeah i kinda like short girls too but not midgets. 5'1-5'5 is a good range (I'm just under 6 foot)

 

[antiantifa]

yeah i kinda like short girls too but not midgets. 5'1-5'5 is a good range (I'm just under 6 foot)

Same, this is the range I find most attractive. 5'2-5'6.

On picture taller models are always more attractive to me, but IRL shorter girls always have my eye's attention more so than taller girls. I've also noticed that taller girls are typically more shy, seem to have less experience overall, I believe less males hit on them overall.

 

[Deleted member 2403]

I get called low T for my avi and sig just cause they have different taste to me. They’re the low T ones tbh if they don’t get aroused by neoteny and femininity.

 

[Deleted member 6512]

yes exactly. higher t means a higher capacity to get aroused by less stimuli, lower t needs full development

So if we inject women with T will they become aroused by looking at less attractive men?

 

[Deleted member 4612]

So if we inject women with T will they become aroused by looking at less attractive men?

perhaps

 

[Deleted member 6512]

perhaps

So we should try to find a way to invent a non adrogenic testosterone that only affects women libido. Btw there was a pill who did that but despite the drooling women still said that it didn't work.