Why you shouldn't rely on .org for research.

[menas]

Why you shouldn't rely on .org for research:




Introduction:

First of all i would like to mention: .ORG is a great community to discuss & share ideas, but honestly? why would you rely on it?
it has some value yeah, but there is more bullshit than you could think of.

First of all, most of the userbase consists of greycels & people who don't do their own research.

also let's have a look at the "Looksmaxxing" section:

Did you notice something specific about these threads? Yeah almost all of them were made by greycels.
finding a good thread among these is like searching for a needle in a haystack.


"But menas!! but what about BOTB?":

Botb has always been seen as a holy place througout the history of .org, but i do NOT agree with it, hence:
you all probably know about the "The Realitypill" thread i made, like a month ago i've asked for it's removal from BOTB since my opinions have changed on various topics. but you know what? the admins rejected it, they said they wouldn't remove it.

aside of that there are a few great threads in BOTB, like the threads of @chadisbeingmade, @Jonasㅤㅤ @Zagro .
But you know what? most of them are WATER yeah you heard me, as much as the threads contain valuable information, most of them have already been discussed before, hence my take, you should not rely on Looksmax.org for RESEARCH.

also most of the older threads are total garbage.
(there are some valuable ones tho)


My final take:
my take is that, you shouldn't rely on this site for research, you should only use it to discuss the research
you made with other users and as a community, + never trust someone blindly as misinformation spreads faster than you think.

ALWAYS DO YOUR OWN RESEARCH.


"How can i research effectively?":

i will list some effective tools for you to make your own research:

PUBMED:
https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/

this site is kind of water but contains great information in it.


PERPLEXITY AI:
https://www.perplexity.ai/

as much as you shouldn't rely on artificial intelligence,
this model is great to gather information since it was specifically made for research.

THE LENS:
https://www.lens.org/

A large aggregator that includes data from PubMed, Crossref, OpenAlex, patent offices, and others,
making it a comprehensive research tool beyond PubMed's scope.

GOOGLE SCHOLAR:
https://scholar.google.com/

it includes a broad range of scientific and medical literature, offers citation tracking, and can locate grey literature and free full-text papers.
Studies suggest it retrieves more relevant articles than PubMed in some clinical contexts.




TL;DR:
DO YOUR OWN RESEARCH!!


@emeraldglass @Randomized Shame
​

 

[chadisbeingmade]

I’ve seen people read studies and conclude the opposite of what the study showed JFL.

But I agree.

 

[Shrek2OnDvD]

Preach!

 

[fashioncel]

FUCK YOU lil slut,

Y0Ü put this in serious (which means i can't DNR you)

 

[Abra]

I’ve seen people read studies and conclude the opposite of what the study showed JFL.

But I agree.

JFL someone needs to do a study of the iq here

 

[333SchizoEthnic666]

pub med is the most reliable sources i ever research on

 

[menas]

I’ve seen people read studies and conclude the opposite of what the study showed JFL.

But I agree.

i've seen that aswell, those niggas just look at the title and paste the URL without reading it jfl

@Jason Voorhees @ReadBooksEveryday @maarda @enchanted_elixir @imontheloose gtfih boyos

 

[Popstar867]

This applies to the rating section aswell

 

[medialcanthus]

Why you shouldn't rely on .org for research:




Introduction:

First of all i would like to mention: .ORG is a great community to discuss & share ideas, but honestly? why would you rely on it?
it has some value yeah, but there is more bullshit than you could think of.

First of all, most of the userbase consists of greycels & people who don't do their own research.

also let's have a look at the "Looksmaxxing" section:
View attachment 4004177
Did you notice something specific about these threads? Yeah almost all of them were made by greycels.
finding a good thread among these is like searching for a needle in a haystack.


"But menas!! but what about BOTB?":

Botb has always been seen as a holy place througout the history of .org, but i do NOT agree with it, hence:
you all probably know about the "The Realitypill" thread i made, like a month ago i've asked for it's removal from BOTB since my opinions have changed on various topics. but you know what? the admins rejected it, they said they wouldn't remove it.

aside of that there are a few great threads in BOTB, like the threads of @chadisbeingmade, @Jonasㅤㅤ @Zagro .
But you know what? most of them are WATER yeah you heard me, as much as the threads contain valuable information, most of them have already been discussed before, hence my take, you should not rely on Looksmax.org for RESEARCH.

also most of the older threads are total garbage.
(there are some valuable ones tho)


My final take:
my take is that, you shouldn't rely on this site for research, you should only use it to discuss the research
you made with other users and as a community, + never trust someone blindly as misinformation spreads faster than you think.

ALWAYS DO YOUR OWN RESEARCH.


"How can i research effectively?":

i will list some effective tools for you to make your own research:

PUBMED:
https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/

this site is kind of water but contains great information in it.


PERPLEXITY AI:
https://www.perplexity.ai/

as much as you shouldn't rely on artificial intelligence,
this model is great to gather information since it was specifically made for research.

THE LENS:
https://www.lens.org/

A large aggregator that includes data from PubMed, Crossref, OpenAlex, patent offices, and others,
making it a comprehensive research tool beyond PubMed's scope.

GOOGLE SCHOLAR:
https://scholar.google.com/

it includes a broad range of scientific and medical literature, offers citation tracking, and can locate grey literature and free full-text papers.
Studies suggest it retrieves more relevant articles than PubMed in some clinical contexts.




TL;DR:
DO YOUR OWN RESEARCH!!


@emeraldglass @Randomized Shame
​

mirin gackt vocals

 

[iblamexyz]

Why you shouldn't rely on .org for research:




Introduction:

First of all i would like to mention: .ORG is a great community to discuss & share ideas, but honestly? why would you rely on it?
it has some value yeah, but there is more bullshit than you could think of.

First of all, most of the userbase consists of greycels & people who don't do their own research.

also let's have a look at the "Looksmaxxing" section:
View attachment 4004177
Did you notice something specific about these threads? Yeah almost all of them were made by greycels.
finding a good thread among these is like searching for a needle in a haystack.


"But menas!! but what about BOTB?":

Botb has always been seen as a holy place througout the history of .org, but i do NOT agree with it, hence:
you all probably know about the "The Realitypill" thread i made, like a month ago i've asked for it's removal from BOTB since my opinions have changed on various topics. but you know what? the admins rejected it, they said they wouldn't remove it.

aside of that there are a few great threads in BOTB, like the threads of @chadisbeingmade, @Jonasㅤㅤ @Zagro .
But you know what? most of them are WATER yeah you heard me, as much as the threads contain valuable information, most of them have already been discussed before, hence my take, you should not rely on Looksmax.org for RESEARCH.

also most of the older threads are total garbage.
(there are some valuable ones tho)


My final take:
my take is that, you shouldn't rely on this site for research, you should only use it to discuss the research
you made with other users and as a community, + never trust someone blindly as misinformation spreads faster than you think.

ALWAYS DO YOUR OWN RESEARCH.


"How can i research effectively?":

i will list some effective tools for you to make your own research:

PUBMED:
https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/

this site is kind of water but contains great information in it.


PERPLEXITY AI:
https://www.perplexity.ai/

as much as you shouldn't rely on artificial intelligence,
this model is great to gather information since it was specifically made for research.

THE LENS:
https://www.lens.org/

A large aggregator that includes data from PubMed, Crossref, OpenAlex, patent offices, and others,
making it a comprehensive research tool beyond PubMed's scope.

GOOGLE SCHOLAR:
https://scholar.google.com/

it includes a broad range of scientific and medical literature, offers citation tracking, and can locate grey literature and free full-text papers.
Studies suggest it retrieves more relevant articles than PubMed in some clinical contexts.




TL;DR:
DO YOUR OWN RESEARCH!!


@emeraldglass @Randomized Shame
​

JFL, put this shit into BOTB

 

[pajjeetslayer]

Why you shouldn't rely on .org for research:




Introduction:

First of all i would like to mention: .ORG is a great community to discuss & share ideas, but honestly? why would you rely on it?
it has some value yeah, but there is more bullshit than you could think of.

First of all, most of the userbase consists of greycels & people who don't do their own research.

also let's have a look at the "Looksmaxxing" section:
View attachment 4004177
Did you notice something specific about these threads? Yeah almost all of them were made by greycels.
finding a good thread among these is like searching for a needle in a haystack.


"But menas!! but what about BOTB?":

Botb has always been seen as a holy place througout the history of .org, but i do NOT agree with it, hence:
you all probably know about the "The Realitypill" thread i made, like a month ago i've asked for it's removal from BOTB since my opinions have changed on various topics. but you know what? the admins rejected it, they said they wouldn't remove it.

aside of that there are a few great threads in BOTB, like the threads of @chadisbeingmade, @Jonasㅤㅤ @Zagro .
But you know what? most of them are WATER yeah you heard me, as much as the threads contain valuable information, most of them have already been discussed before, hence my take, you should not rely on Looksmax.org for RESEARCH.

also most of the older threads are total garbage.
(there are some valuable ones tho)


My final take:
my take is that, you shouldn't rely on this site for research, you should only use it to discuss the research
you made with other users and as a community, + never trust someone blindly as misinformation spreads faster than you think.

ALWAYS DO YOUR OWN RESEARCH.


"How can i research effectively?":

i will list some effective tools for you to make your own research:

PUBMED:
https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/

this site is kind of water but contains great information in it.


PERPLEXITY AI:
https://www.perplexity.ai/

as much as you shouldn't rely on artificial intelligence,
this model is great to gather information since it was specifically made for research.

THE LENS:
https://www.lens.org/

A large aggregator that includes data from PubMed, Crossref, OpenAlex, patent offices, and others,
making it a comprehensive research tool beyond PubMed's scope.

GOOGLE SCHOLAR:
https://scholar.google.com/

it includes a broad range of scientific and medical literature, offers citation tracking, and can locate grey literature and free full-text papers.
Studies suggest it retrieves more relevant articles than PubMed in some clinical contexts.




TL;DR:
DO YOUR OWN RESEARCH!!


@emeraldglass @Randomized Shame
​

nigga the greycels might read this and wont inject cjc + ipo now with mk fuck you

 

[Rxna]

Why you shouldn't rely on .org for research:




Introduction:

First of all i would like to mention: .ORG is a great community to discuss & share ideas, but honestly? why would you rely on it?
it has some value yeah, but there is more bullshit than you could think of.

First of all, most of the userbase consists of greycels & people who don't do their own research.

also let's have a look at the "Looksmaxxing" section:
View attachment 4004177
Did you notice something specific about these threads? Yeah almost all of them were made by greycels.
finding a good thread among these is like searching for a needle in a haystack.


"But menas!! but what about BOTB?":

Botb has always been seen as a holy place througout the history of .org, but i do NOT agree with it, hence:
you all probably know about the "The Realitypill" thread i made, like a month ago i've asked for it's removal from BOTB since my opinions have changed on various topics. but you know what? the admins rejected it, they said they wouldn't remove it.

aside of that there are a few great threads in BOTB, like the threads of @chadisbeingmade, @Jonasㅤㅤ @Zagro .
But you know what? most of them are WATER yeah you heard me, as much as the threads contain valuable information, most of them have already been discussed before, hence my take, you should not rely on Looksmax.org for RESEARCH.

also most of the older threads are total garbage.
(there are some valuable ones tho)


My final take:
my take is that, you shouldn't rely on this site for research, you should only use it to discuss the research
you made with other users and as a community, + never trust someone blindly as misinformation spreads faster than you think.

ALWAYS DO YOUR OWN RESEARCH.


"How can i research effectively?":

i will list some effective tools for you to make your own research:

PUBMED:
https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/

this site is kind of water but contains great information in it.


PERPLEXITY AI:
https://www.perplexity.ai/

as much as you shouldn't rely on artificial intelligence,
this model is great to gather information since it was specifically made for research.

THE LENS:
https://www.lens.org/

A large aggregator that includes data from PubMed, Crossref, OpenAlex, patent offices, and others,
making it a comprehensive research tool beyond PubMed's scope.

GOOGLE SCHOLAR:
https://scholar.google.com/

it includes a broad range of scientific and medical literature, offers citation tracking, and can locate grey literature and free full-text papers.
Studies suggest it retrieves more relevant articles than PubMed in some clinical contexts.




TL;DR:
DO YOUR OWN RESEARCH!!


@emeraldglass @Randomized Shame
​

hiii menas, love you bro

 

[CorinthianLOX]

Water

 

[Franco.]

yeah people also rely too much on others responses lol, like in the rating sections or looksmaxing questions
its always the most water question ever yet they find the need to ask others

 

[Wexilarious]

 

[menas]

bump

@Randomized Shame @emeraldglass @Gargantuan @Gengar sticky??

 

[Greypiller]

Why you shouldn't rely on .org for research:




Introduction:

First of all i would like to mention: .ORG is a great community to discuss & share ideas, but honestly? why would you rely on it?
it has some value yeah, but there is more bullshit than you could think of.

First of all, most of the userbase consists of greycels & people who don't do their own research.

also let's have a look at the "Looksmaxxing" section:
View attachment 4004177
Did you notice something specific about these threads? Yeah almost all of them were made by greycels.
finding a good thread among these is like searching for a needle in a haystack.


"But menas!! but what about BOTB?":

Botb has always been seen as a holy place througout the history of .org, but i do NOT agree with it, hence:
you all probably know about the "The Realitypill" thread i made, like a month ago i've asked for it's removal from BOTB since my opinions have changed on various topics. but you know what? the admins rejected it, they said they wouldn't remove it.

aside of that there are a few great threads in BOTB, like the threads of @chadisbeingmade, @Jonasㅤㅤ @Zagro .
But you know what? most of them are WATER yeah you heard me, as much as the threads contain valuable information, most of them have already been discussed before, hence my take, you should not rely on Looksmax.org for RESEARCH.

also most of the older threads are total garbage.
(there are some valuable ones tho)


My final take:
my take is that, you shouldn't rely on this site for research, you should only use it to discuss the research
you made with other users and as a community, + never trust someone blindly as misinformation spreads faster than you think.

ALWAYS DO YOUR OWN RESEARCH.


"How can i research effectively?":

i will list some effective tools for you to make your own research:

PUBMED:
https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/

this site is kind of water but contains great information in it.


PERPLEXITY AI:
https://www.perplexity.ai/

as much as you shouldn't rely on artificial intelligence,
this model is great to gather information since it was specifically made for research.

THE LENS:
https://www.lens.org/

A large aggregator that includes data from PubMed, Crossref, OpenAlex, patent offices, and others,
making it a comprehensive research tool beyond PubMed's scope.

GOOGLE SCHOLAR:
https://scholar.google.com/

it includes a broad range of scientific and medical literature, offers citation tracking, and can locate grey literature and free full-text papers.
Studies suggest it retrieves more relevant articles than PubMed in some clinical contexts.




TL;DR:
DO YOUR OWN RESEARCH!!


@emeraldglass @Randomized Shame
​

You know people here are retarded when they promote dnp (shit used to make bombs btw)

 

[Randomized Shame]

One thing I love about .org is I learned about new drugs/peptides/hormones I was not previously familiar with, markets I wouldn't of known about, and other looksmaxxing stuff; but I've never once thought about depending on looksmaxxing sites as the primary source of info. They're great to introduce you to something for the first time if you would not of had exposure to it otherwise, but most of the actual content on here is not great.

I wish people focused more on sharing testimonies about their experiences with certain methods rather than make 'guides' for stuff they've never done before, but such is life.

 

[Zagro]

Bump

 

[laworg]

Why you shouldn't rely on .org for research:




Introduction:

First of all i would like to mention: .ORG is a great community to discuss & share ideas, but honestly? why would you rely on it?
it has some value yeah, but there is more bullshit than you could think of.

First of all, most of the userbase consists of greycels & people who don't do their own research.

also let's have a look at the "Looksmaxxing" section:
View attachment 4004177
Did you notice something specific about these threads? Yeah almost all of them were made by greycels.
finding a good thread among these is like searching for a needle in a haystack.


"But menas!! but what about BOTB?":

Botb has always been seen as a holy place througout the history of .org, but i do NOT agree with it, hence:
you all probably know about the "The Realitypill" thread i made, like a month ago i've asked for it's removal from BOTB since my opinions have changed on various topics. but you know what? the admins rejected it, they said they wouldn't remove it.

aside of that there are a few great threads in BOTB, like the threads of @chadisbeingmade, @Jonasㅤㅤ @Zagro .
But you know what? most of them are WATER yeah you heard me, as much as the threads contain valuable information, most of them have already been discussed before, hence my take, you should not rely on Looksmax.org for RESEARCH.

also most of the older threads are total garbage.
(there are some valuable ones tho)


My final take:
my take is that, you shouldn't rely on this site for research, you should only use it to discuss the research
you made with other users and as a community, + never trust someone blindly as misinformation spreads faster than you think.

ALWAYS DO YOUR OWN RESEARCH.


"How can i research effectively?":

i will list some effective tools for you to make your own research:

PUBMED:
https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/

this site is kind of water but contains great information in it.


PERPLEXITY AI:
https://www.perplexity.ai/

as much as you shouldn't rely on artificial intelligence,
this model is great to gather information since it was specifically made for research.

THE LENS:
https://www.lens.org/

A large aggregator that includes data from PubMed, Crossref, OpenAlex, patent offices, and others,
making it a comprehensive research tool beyond PubMed's scope.

GOOGLE SCHOLAR:
https://scholar.google.com/

it includes a broad range of scientific and medical literature, offers citation tracking, and can locate grey literature and free full-text papers.
Studies suggest it retrieves more relevant articles than PubMed in some clinical contexts.




TL;DR:
DO YOUR OWN RESEARCH!!


@emeraldglass @Randomized Shame
​

Just think if someone would have the anwser ur looking for where did they get that info from not this site

 

[ReadBooksEveryday]

What happens when you rely on .Org for information

You end up being a 36yo 5'6 manlet getting mogged by your bathroom mirror

 

[Proex]

stickying this but not my megathrerads is crazy work

 

[2414763h]

Why you shouldn't rely on .org for research:




Introduction:

First of all i would like to mention: .ORG is a great community to discuss & share ideas, but honestly? why would you rely on it?
it has some value yeah, but there is more bullshit than you could think of.

First of all, most of the userbase consists of greycels & people who don't do their own research.

also let's have a look at the "Looksmaxxing" section:
View attachment 4004177
Did you notice something specific about these threads? Yeah almost all of them were made by greycels.
finding a good thread among these is like searching for a needle in a haystack.


"But menas!! but what about BOTB?":

Botb has always been seen as a holy place througout the history of .org, but i do NOT agree with it, hence:
you all probably know about the "The Realitypill" thread i made, like a month ago i've asked for it's removal from BOTB since my opinions have changed on various topics. but you know what? the admins rejected it, they said they wouldn't remove it.

aside of that there are a few great threads in BOTB, like the threads of @chadisbeingmade, @Jonasㅤㅤ @Zagro .
But you know what? most of them are WATER yeah you heard me, as much as the threads contain valuable information, most of them have already been discussed before, hence my take, you should not rely on Looksmax.org for RESEARCH.

also most of the older threads are total garbage.
(there are some valuable ones tho)


My final take:
my take is that, you shouldn't rely on this site for research, you should only use it to discuss the research
you made with other users and as a community, + never trust someone blindly as misinformation spreads faster than you think.

ALWAYS DO YOUR OWN RESEARCH.


"How can i research effectively?":

i will list some effective tools for you to make your own research:

PUBMED:
https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/

this site is kind of water but contains great information in it.


PERPLEXITY AI:
https://www.perplexity.ai/

as much as you shouldn't rely on artificial intelligence,
this model is great to gather information since it was specifically made for research.

THE LENS:
https://www.lens.org/

A large aggregator that includes data from PubMed, Crossref, OpenAlex, patent offices, and others,
making it a comprehensive research tool beyond PubMed's scope.

GOOGLE SCHOLAR:
https://scholar.google.com/

it includes a broad range of scientific and medical literature, offers citation tracking, and can locate grey literature and free full-text papers.
Studies suggest it retrieves more relevant articles than PubMed in some clinical contexts.




TL;DR:
DO YOUR OWN RESEARCH!!


@emeraldglass @Randomized Shame
​

Interesting though I suppose that is true. I just need a bit of research honestly to fix some major stuff first.

 

[Franco.]

stickying this but not my megathrerads is crazy work

ngl this is something a foid would say

 

[Proex]

Interesting though I suppose that is true. I just need a bit of research honestly to fix some major stuff first.

your a low iq subhuman with no father and no money, you won't improve anything by reaserching

 

[2414763h]

also most of the older threads are total garbage.
(there are some valuable ones tho)

I like some of them

your a low iq subhuman with no father and no money, you won't improve anything by reaserching

Well by doing only researching yeah but I can implement changing my sleep and food as well bro.
Also Low IQ makes no sense. You literally like underage girls I don’t want to hear it from you bitch ass nigga

 

[Proex]

I like some of them

Well by doing only researching yeah but I can implement changing my sleep and food as well bro.
Also Low IQ makes no sense. You literally like underage girls I don’t want to hear it from you bitch ass nigga

shut up and go bump the gooner megathread you slut

ngl this is something a foid would say

cope

 

[2414763h]

shut up and go bump the gooner megathread you slut


cope

Suck my dick lame ass nigga

 

[Gus17]

Yea I’ve seen BOTB threads literally be copy pasted from a scam website trying to sell a product.

 

[Gus17]

You know people here are retarded when they promote dnp (shit used to make bombs btw)

Low IQ. Base chemicals are used in lots of things. DNP being used to make an explosive doesn’t mean you’re gonna explode or something JFL. Metal is used in bombs and all kinds of weapons are you gonna claim iron pills for iron deficiency are bad now?

 

[LTNUser]

Yea I’ve seen BOTB threads literally be copy pasted from a scam website trying to sell a product.

@Chadeep has seen worse
He told me about an Indian Youtuber who got over thousands of views by making a video on some maxilla or looksmaxing shit but he actually copied it from BOTB threads

 

[Vantablack]

One thing I love about .org is I learned about new drugs/peptides/hormones I was not previously familiar with, markets I wouldn't of known about, and other looksmaxxing stuff; but I've never once thought about depending on looksmaxxing sites as the primary source of info. They're great to introduce you to something for the first time if you would not of had exposure to it otherwise, but most of the actual content on here is not great.

I wish people focused more on sharing testimonies about their experiences with certain methods rather than make 'guides' for stuff they've never done before, but such is life.

I agree with you, back in the day we had field reports and progress reports. nowdays niggas just suggest a bunch of shit with iffy research and no experiences, which is what makes trusting these so precarious.

imo there should be a push from the mod team to encourage field reports, such as stickying compound use before/afters for a while over completely new guides etc

 

[Vantablack]

@Chadeep has seen worse
He told me about an Indian Youtuber who got over thousands of views by making a video on some maxilla or looksmaxing shit but he actually copied it from BOTB threads

this is literally what all the big looksmaxxing youtubers do including that faggot kareem shami

 

[Gus17]

@Chadeep has seen worse
He told me about an Indian Youtuber who got over thousands of views by making a video on some maxilla or looksmaxing shit but he actually copied it from BOTB threads

I meant the opposite lol. Like the thread was written and copyied from a website the guy found. I think it’s one of the voice maxing threads.

 

[emeraldglass]

Why you shouldn't rely on .org for research:




Introduction:

First of all i would like to mention: .ORG is a great community to discuss & share ideas, but honestly? why would you rely on it?
it has some value yeah, but there is more bullshit than you could think of.

First of all, most of the userbase consists of greycels & people who don't do their own research.

also let's have a look at the "Looksmaxxing" section:
View attachment 4004177
Did you notice something specific about these threads? Yeah almost all of them were made by greycels.
finding a good thread among these is like searching for a needle in a haystack.


"But menas!! but what about BOTB?":

Botb has always been seen as a holy place througout the history of .org, but i do NOT agree with it, hence:
you all probably know about the "The Realitypill" thread i made, like a month ago i've asked for it's removal from BOTB since my opinions have changed on various topics. but you know what? the admins rejected it, they said they wouldn't remove it.

aside of that there are a few great threads in BOTB, like the threads of @chadisbeingmade, @Jonasㅤㅤ @Zagro .
But you know what? most of them are WATER yeah you heard me, as much as the threads contain valuable information, most of them have already been discussed before, hence my take, you should not rely on Looksmax.org for RESEARCH.

also most of the older threads are total garbage.
(there are some valuable ones tho)


My final take:
my take is that, you shouldn't rely on this site for research, you should only use it to discuss the research
you made with other users and as a community, + never trust someone blindly as misinformation spreads faster than you think.

ALWAYS DO YOUR OWN RESEARCH.


"How can i research effectively?":

i will list some effective tools for you to make your own research:

PUBMED:
https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/

this site is kind of water but contains great information in it.


PERPLEXITY AI:
https://www.perplexity.ai/

as much as you shouldn't rely on artificial intelligence,
this model is great to gather information since it was specifically made for research.

THE LENS:
https://www.lens.org/

A large aggregator that includes data from PubMed, Crossref, OpenAlex, patent offices, and others,
making it a comprehensive research tool beyond PubMed's scope.

GOOGLE SCHOLAR:
https://scholar.google.com/

it includes a broad range of scientific and medical literature, offers citation tracking, and can locate grey literature and free full-text papers.
Studies suggest it retrieves more relevant articles than PubMed in some clinical contexts.




TL;DR:
DO YOUR OWN RESEARCH!!


@emeraldglass @Randomized Shame
​

I agree, but this forum is good for users being lab rats and taking the risk we don’t want too.

 

[2414763h]

I mean I’m sure you’re supposed to take everything with a grain of salt and then study it for yourself like all socials.

 

[waelwaywayola]

Why you shouldn't rely on .org for research:




Introduction:

First of all i would like to mention: .ORG is a great community to discuss & share ideas, but honestly? why would you rely on it?
it has some value yeah, but there is more bullshit than you could think of.

First of all, most of the userbase consists of greycels & people who don't do their own research.

also let's have a look at the "Looksmaxxing" section:
View attachment 4004177
Did you notice something specific about these threads? Yeah almost all of them were made by greycels.
finding a good thread among these is like searching for a needle in a haystack.


"But menas!! but what about BOTB?":

Botb has always been seen as a holy place througout the history of .org, but i do NOT agree with it, hence:
you all probably know about the "The Realitypill" thread i made, like a month ago i've asked for it's removal from BOTB since my opinions have changed on various topics. but you know what? the admins rejected it, they said they wouldn't remove it.

aside of that there are a few great threads in BOTB, like the threads of @chadisbeingmade, @Jonasㅤㅤ @Zagro .
But you know what? most of them are WATER yeah you heard me, as much as the threads contain valuable information, most of them have already been discussed before, hence my take, you should not rely on Looksmax.org for RESEARCH.

also most of the older threads are total garbage.
(there are some valuable ones tho)


My final take:
my take is that, you shouldn't rely on this site for research, you should only use it to discuss the research
you made with other users and as a community, + never trust someone blindly as misinformation spreads faster than you think.

ALWAYS DO YOUR OWN RESEARCH.


"How can i research effectively?":

i will list some effective tools for you to make your own research:

PUBMED:
https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/

this site is kind of water but contains great information in it.


PERPLEXITY AI:
https://www.perplexity.ai/

as much as you shouldn't rely on artificial intelligence,
this model is great to gather information since it was specifically made for research.

THE LENS:
https://www.lens.org/

A large aggregator that includes data from PubMed, Crossref, OpenAlex, patent offices, and others,
making it a comprehensive research tool beyond PubMed's scope.

GOOGLE SCHOLAR:
https://scholar.google.com/

it includes a broad range of scientific and medical literature, offers citation tracking, and can locate grey literature and free full-text papers.
Studies suggest it retrieves more relevant articles than PubMed in some clinical contexts.




TL;DR:
DO YOUR OWN RESEARCH!!


@emeraldglass @Randomized Shame
​

Will do .org is shit

 

[CorinthianLOX]

yeah people also rely too much on others responses lol, like in the rating sections or looksmaxing questions
its always the most water question ever yet they find the need to ask others

I think it’s also because most people here lack confidence and they need reassurance

 

[ReadBooksEveryday]

Also the person providing you the 'research' (AI slop)

 

[menas]

Also the person providing you the 'research' (AI slop)

View attachment 4005344

@enchanted_elixir you got anything to say bro?

 

[chinkcel]

Over for people who dont do futher research on topics and take peoples on .orgs word for it

 

[The Night Stroker]

Why you shouldn't rely on .org for research:




Introduction:

First of all i would like to mention: .ORG is a great community to discuss & share ideas, but honestly? why would you rely on it?
it has some value yeah, but there is more bullshit than you could think of.

First of all, most of the userbase consists of greycels & people who don't do their own research.

also let's have a look at the "Looksmaxxing" section:
View attachment 4004177
Did you notice something specific about these threads? Yeah almost all of them were made by greycels.
finding a good thread among these is like searching for a needle in a haystack.


"But menas!! but what about BOTB?":

Botb has always been seen as a holy place througout the history of .org, but i do NOT agree with it, hence:
you all probably know about the "The Realitypill" thread i made, like a month ago i've asked for it's removal from BOTB since my opinions have changed on various topics. but you know what? the admins rejected it, they said they wouldn't remove it.

aside of that there are a few great threads in BOTB, like the threads of @chadisbeingmade, @Jonasㅤㅤ @Zagro .
But you know what? most of them are WATER yeah you heard me, as much as the threads contain valuable information, most of them have already been discussed before, hence my take, you should not rely on Looksmax.org for RESEARCH.

also most of the older threads are total garbage.
(there are some valuable ones tho)


My final take:
my take is that, you shouldn't rely on this site for research, you should only use it to discuss the research
you made with other users and as a community, + never trust someone blindly as misinformation spreads faster than you think.

ALWAYS DO YOUR OWN RESEARCH.


"How can i research effectively?":

i will list some effective tools for you to make your own research:

PUBMED:
https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/

this site is kind of water but contains great information in it.


PERPLEXITY AI:
https://www.perplexity.ai/

as much as you shouldn't rely on artificial intelligence,
this model is great to gather information since it was specifically made for research.

THE LENS:
https://www.lens.org/

A large aggregator that includes data from PubMed, Crossref, OpenAlex, patent offices, and others,
making it a comprehensive research tool beyond PubMed's scope.

GOOGLE SCHOLAR:
https://scholar.google.com/

it includes a broad range of scientific and medical literature, offers citation tracking, and can locate grey literature and free full-text papers.
Studies suggest it retrieves more relevant articles than PubMed in some clinical contexts.




TL;DR:
DO YOUR OWN RESEARCH!!


@emeraldglass @Randomized Shame
​

most of the org researches i've made are similar if not exactly the same to the actual researches and studies

 

[flippasav]

Jfl at believing every shit people say on here some even troll like telling young teenagers to hop on roids because it’s good for their hormonal profile lol

 

[Randomized Shame]

I agree with you, back in the day we had field reports and progress reports. nowdays niggas just suggest a bunch of shit with iffy research and no experiences, which is what makes trusting these so precarious.

imo there should be a push from the mod team to encourage field reports, such as stickying compound use before/afters for a while over completely new guides etc

I'm not sure how we could encourage them. If you guys have any suggestions I'm always open to hearing them.

 

[thales20]

this model is great to gather information since it was specifically made for research.

It also has a MCP adapter just for web research so its really great on finding things.

 

[lifeless]

who’s first thought for advice is “yeah lemme go on looksmax to get advice from retarded indian incels”

 

[hax]

OMG MALICE MIZER MENTIONED

 

[diditeverbegin]

@Chadeep has seen worse
He told me about an Indian Youtuber who got over thousands of views by making a video on some maxilla or looksmaxing shit but he actually copied it from BOTB threads

this is literally what all the big looksmaxxing youtubers do including that faggot kareem shami

Are you guys talking about Nero Angelo
@Chadeep

 

[Devon]

Bros talking about all this as if he didn’t make a botb thread that contained misinformation as ludicrous as claiming obo can advance the orbits forward and change the orbital height

 

[Devon]

@menas why tf are you jfling do you dead ass think that’s an accurate statement or are you just trolling all of the org niggas by spreading misinformation?