Pendejo
Kraken
- Joined
- Apr 15, 2019
- Posts
- 18,569
- Reputation
- 28,995
How is it low you retard? His IPD is 65mm, that’s average.Numerically yeah. Though he looks good, and his ESR looks fine.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
How is it low you retard? His IPD is 65mm, that’s average.Numerically yeah. Though he looks good, and his ESR looks fine.
how soHe looks deformed in the 1st pic.
How is it low you retard? His IPD is 65mm, that’s average.
The guy in the after looks much worse jfl, his fwhr was MUCH better before now he looks boneless. He just needed jaw angle implants and cantho to ascend. And also his eyes looked narrower before. The foid's face was fat and her cheekbones are too low in both casesThese people got reductions I thought it was a good trait.
I thought ideal is 0.45 to 0.47 , the competition is getting harder and harder by the year, soon it will be 0.50 to 0.52On a numerical level, not on a harmony level, his IPD is too short for his bizygo because his ESR is 0.44 (0.46 to 0.48 is the range of ideal).
Ok, I thought by numerically you meant the absolute measurement.On a numerical level, not on a harmony level, his IPD is too short for his bizygo because his ESR is 0.44 (0.46 to 0.48 is the range of ideal).
I thought ideal is 0.45 to 0.47 , the competition is getting harder and harder by the year, soon it will be 0.50 to 0.52
I thought ideal is 0.45 to 0.47 , the competition is getting harder and harder by the year, soon it will be 0.50 to 0.52
Measured Ana Taylor-Joy's at 0.54Yeah I sneakily raised it by 0.01 to try and slowly ease people into my wide-IPD ideology. I actually think the ideal male range is 0.48 to 0.52 and the ideal female range is 0.5 to 0.55.
Just measured again on paint, 65 pixels IPD and 131 pixels bizygotic distance, thats 0.496 ESRYeah I sneakily raised it by 0.01 to try and slowly ease people into my wide-IPD ideology. I actually think the ideal male range is 0.48 to 0.52 and the ideal female range is 0.51 to 0.55.
Is that your ESR?Just measured again on paint, 65 pixels IPD and 131 pixels bizygotic distance, thats 0.496 ESR
Yes 0.496 ESRIs that your ESR?
Very similar to mine, my ESR was 0.493 in a recent pic.Yes 0.496 ESR
Very similar to mine, my ESR was 0.493 in a recent pic.
A psl 4 who considers himself PSL 5.5, and who compares his facial ratios to O'pry's face. I am on these forums since 2014, do you really think that you can fool me?Just measured again on paint, 65 pixels IPD and 131 pixels bizygotic distance, thats 0.496 ESR
He isnt chadarvid is the only legit chad on this forum. get the fuck out of this place already buddy
With ur eyes i would b modellingView attachment 1791556
It's 0.483 on this one, i think its more accurate
If only they were light colouredWith ur eyes i would b modelling
Is this you?View attachment 1791556
It's 0.483 on this one, i think its more accurate
If only they were light coloured
YeIs this you?
They are sadly not enoughIf only they were light coloured
Yours or mine?They are sadly not enough
Just shine a stadium light on your eyes theorem.View attachment 1791581
They are in natural light, the pic was taken with no light, even blue eyes would look very dark
Thats how we need to cope my sweet south european brocelJust shine a stadium light on your eyes theorem.
Tbh your eyes are lighter than mine, I checked the other day 9mmsfx page to see if they had light brown contacts but they don’t, and the hazel ones are too fucking darkThats how we need to cope my sweet south european brocel
It's giga easy to fraud hazel eyes if you have brown eyes without being noticed tbhTbh your eyes are lighter than mine, I checked the other day 9mmsfx page to see if they had light brown contacts but they don’t, and the hazel ones are too fucking dark
Tbh your eyes are lighter than mine, I checked the other day 9mmsfx page to see if they had light brown contacts but they don’t, and the hazel ones are too fucking dark
Yours. Mine shine : PYours or mine?
Why @GypsyEyes said it was not realistic ? I can’t make my mind on it tbhTbh your eyes are lighter than mine, I checked the other day 9mmsfx page to see if they had light brown contacts but they don’t, and the hazel ones are too fucking dark
You mean w contacts? Are mine realistic?It's giga easy to fraud hazel eyes if you have brown eyes without being noticed tbh
What's really important is having an intermolar width that forms upper and lower jaw wideness that are average in relation to cephalometry. Then having zygos about 11% wider than the gonions and preferably higher set, will create the best aesthetic.Bizygomatic width is a halo. Only aliens like Barrett need to cover
That's the ES (IPD/Bizygo width) ratioI thought ideal is 0.45 to 0.47 , the competition is getting harder and harder by the year, soon it will be 0.50 to 0.52
Based af man you earned a follow. You should make this a post as well.What's really important is having an intermolar width that forms upper and lower jaw wideness that are average in relation to cephalometry. Then having zygos about 11% wider than the gonions and preferably higher set, will create the best aesthetic.
A huge misconception with zygos and gonions is our perception on increased wideness creating a better look. This couldn't be any further from the truth. The 1: 0.9 bizygo/bigonion ratio is what makes the aesthetic. Some facial measurements are ideal within a range of koinophilia rather than being strikingly beyond the "average" range.
Other things like how forward grown the jaws are or the sagittalness of them are more idealised when the growth exceeds the average.
I also noticed recently how important new standards are such as the facial thirds and fifths. Another old PSL misconception was that a wide and tall chin and tall lower third is more aesthetic when really jaw wideness and height don't matter too much unless they fall out of the cephalometric average range. Harmony and ratios are what really matter there. That's why Chico looks worse when people try to "masculinise" him or make his lower bigger from a front view
Then how do you measure esrThat's the ES (IPD/Bizygo width) ratio
divide your interpupillary distance by your bizyogmatic widthThen how do you measure esr
Well thats what i did, and got 0.48divide your interpupillary distance by your bizyogmatic width
The most average IPD in millimetres is 66.3mm but obviously lengths mean nothing compared to ratios because everything else would have to be in perfect harmony; PFL, inter/outercanthal widths etc. That's why ratios are what matter when looking at non sagittal facial features for the most part.Well thats what i did, and got 0.48
how tf do i become high IQ like uOn a numerical level, not on a harmony level, his IPD is too short for his bizygo because his ESR is 0.44 (0.46 to 0.48 is the range of ideal).
Legit af. @thecel is the only true sage of looksmax. May his supreme knowledge ever shine forth unto usDumb shit. The difference in the photos is due to perspective distortion and not hair frauding. He’s far from the camera in the 1st pic and close to the camera in the 2nd pic. His facial defect is close-set eyes (short IPD & low ES ratio) and not broad cheekbones.