Wide IPD > Narrow

[MisterMercedes]

Reminder that wide set eyes are dimorphic and an ES ratio above .47 is not a death sentence. Wide IPD allows for a “compact” midface and long PFL. If you have a small IPD and long PFL, it will most likely look shit.

 

[Entschuldigung]

normal ipd >

 

[MisterMercedes]

normal ipd >

Not in every case. With slayer eyes, above .47 is usually better. David Gandy is a great example.

Regular David Gandy has a .51 ES ratio.

Looks good though because he has a long PFL.

This is David Gandy with an “ideal” .47 ES ratio:

 

[Entschuldigung]

Not in every case. With slayer eyes, above .47 is usually better. David Gandy is a great example.

Regular David Gandy has a .51 ES ratio.

View attachment 505403

Looks good though because he has a long PFL.

This is David Gandy with an “ideal” .47 ES ratio:

View attachment 505405

he has a good nose bridge that's why he looks better with wider ipd

 

[MisterMercedes]

he has a good nose bridge that's why he looks better with wider ipd

His nose bridge isn’t wide. He looks good because he has a long PFL/medial canthus.

Here’s Jordan Barrett with his normal .49 ES:

Him with a .45:

 

[Entschuldigung]

His nose bridge isn’t wide. He looks good because he has a long PFL/medial canthus.

Here’s Jordan Barrett with his normal .49 ES:

View attachment 505418

Him with a .45:

View attachment 505419

I didn't say his nose is wide, his nose bridge is quite wide and prominent

 

[MisterMercedes]

I didn't say his nose is wide, his nose bridge is quite wide and prominent

I said nose bridge...

Taking nose out of the equation:

Are you going to ignore Barrett?

 

[godlikesz]

its basically identical , same psl in both photo

 

[Deleted]

Pitt has the lower End of ideal esr and so does almost all the 90s pretty boys

 

[MisterMercedes]

its basically identical , same psl in both photo

Definitely not. Barrett difference isn’t as big. Gandy’s knocks him down at least a point.

Even if it didn’t, you’d agree that the .51 ES Gandy looks better than .47. Same with .49 Barrett compared to .45.

 

[MisterMercedes]

O’ Pry at .49:

O’ Pry at .46:

 

[MisterMercedes]

Pitt has the lower End of ideal esr and so does almost all the 90s pretty boys

Gandy at .45, low end of “ideal”:

 

[Subhuman trash]

Reminder that wide set eyes are dimorphic and an ES ratio above .47 is not a death sentence. Wide IPD allows for a “compact” midface and long PFL. If you have a small IPD and long PFL, it will most likely look shit.

yes @thecel

 

[thecel]

yes @thecel

I’m mogging with a 0.39 ES ratio jfl

 

[Deleted]

Gandy at .45, low end of “ideal”:

View attachment 505465

Idk why his eyes looks so narrow tbh tbh

 

[MisterMercedes]

Idk why his eyes looks so narrow tbh tbh View attachment 505636

He has a long PFL/medial canthus, key traits of a slayer eye area. That’s why a wider than .47 ES is often ideal. Same with O’ Pry and Barrett.

 

[Deleted]

He has a long PFL/medial canthus, key traits of a slayer eye area. That’s why a wider than .47 ES is often ideal. Same with O’ Pry and Barrett.

Maybe but in pitts case his es is still ideal but low and making it higher would look worse. Someone like Depp had 0.43-0.44 yet his eyes don’t look really close set

 

[MisterMercedes]

Maybe but in pitts case his es is still ideal but low and making it higher would look worse. Someone like Depp had 0.43-0.44 yet his eyes don’t look really close set

Pitt’s eyes aren’t nearly as long as Gandy’s. They’re just vertically compact, hooded, and have a down turned medial canthus. Plus color halo.

Depp’s eyes look a bit close set, but not bad. Minor variations from the ideal range aren’t a big deal, and, in many male model’s cases, serve to their benefit.

Above .47 ES is often the basis of slayer eyes though. Gandy, O’ Pry, and Barrett all have above .47 ES ratios, which allows them to have long PFLs and medial canthi.

 

[Deleted]

Above .47 ES is often the basis of slayer eyes though.

Well yes but only if the criteria with canthus and pfl is meet otherwise its just another dolphincel. Too wide eyes look feminine and will look even wider in selfies

 

[MisterMercedes]

Well yes but only if the criteria with canthus and pfl is meet otherwise its just another dolphincel. Too wide eyes look feminine and will look even wider in selfies View attachment 505638

Agreed. That’s why they’re the basis and not what makes them slayer. It merely allows you to have slayer eyes while not looking comically close set.

 

[MisterMercedes]

Well yes but only if the criteria with canthus and pfl is meet otherwise its just another dolphincel. Too wide eyes look feminine and will look even wider in selfies View attachment 505638

Also that eye area looks fine.

 

[MisterMercedes]

Keep in mind the closer you are to the camera, the wider your eyes will look, and vice verse.

 

[Deleted]

Also that eye area looks fine.

 

[Deleted member 2769]

Wide ipd and Long nose still makes u look like a horse.

 

[MisterMercedes]

Wide ipd and Long nose still makes u look like a horse.

I call bullshit on that.

https://encrypted-tbn0.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn:ANd9GcQZyYcGsfNrEUYWeUsiQ9crkVfR8PyVyMwerSVMjqow&s

 

[MisterMercedes]

View attachment 505649

Yeah? Hard to say from that angle though.

 

[Nisse]

Maybe but in pitts case his es is still ideal but low and making it higher would look worse. Someone like Depp had 0.43-0.44 yet his eyes don’t look really close set

Im pretty sure the hemsworth brothers have narrow ipds too but their eyes dont look close set at all

 

[Deleted member 2769]

I call bullshit on that.

https://encrypted-tbn0.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn:ANd9GcQZyYcGsfNrEUYWeUsiQ9crkVfR8PyVyMwerSVMjqow&s

gandy =

 

[Deleted]

Im pretty sure the hemsworth brothers have narrow ipds too but their eyes dont look close set at all

Yes bcuz they have low pfl so i guess pfl is bad if ur eyes aren’t far enough apart

 

[MisterMercedes]

gandy =

Then horse face is attractive.

 

[Nisse]

Can someone edit this guy wide set eyes

 

[MisterMercedes]

Yes bcuz they have low pfl so i guess pfl is bad if ur eyes aren’t far enough apart

^

 

[MisterMercedes]

Can someone edit this guy wide set eyes
View attachment 505662

 

[Nisse]

View attachment 505664

Looks a little weird, did you use airbrush?

 

[MisterMercedes]

Looks a little weird, did you use airbrush?

I didn’t change the eyebrows is why. It looks fine. His ES ratio in the morph is .48, so barely wide set.

 

[Deleted member 1751]

Im pretty sure the hemsworth brothers have narrow ipds too but their eyes dont look close set at all

Chris Hemsworth has not so ideal ipd and low pfl

 

[MisterMercedes]

Chris Hemsworth has not so ideal ipd and low pfl

.44 ES. He looks fine. If he had Gandy’s PFL/medial canthus he’d look shit.

 

[Deleted member 2769]

.44 ES. He looks fine. If he had Gandy’s PFL/medial canthus he’d look shit.

his skull isnt Big enough.

 

[MisterMercedes]

his skull isnt Big enough.

Skull size is one of the dumbest theories I’ve heard. Most everyday slayers (and many models like O’ Pry) have normal skulls and many have the “gay alien skull”, O’ Pry included.

 

[Deleted member 2769]

Skull size is one of the dumbest theories I’ve heard. Most everyday slayers (and many models like O’ Pry) have normal skulls and many have the “gay alien skull”, O’ Pry included.

Make a thread about this...

 

[MisterMercedes]

Make a thread about this...

Getting sleep then I will.

 

[kuroro]

His nose bridge isn’t wide. He looks good because he has a long PFL/medial canthus.

Here’s Jordan Barrett with his normal .49 ES:

View attachment 505418

Him with a .45:

View attachment 505419

Barretts es ratio is like 0.42 measured by @Fuk

 

[Mr.cope]

You say that like everyone here doesn’t know that already

 

[Chadlitecel]

Reminder that wide set eyes are dimorphic

you are literally talking shit. men usually have closer set eyes than women .

 

[MisterMercedes]

Barretts es ratio is like 0.42 measured by @Fuk

Definitely not .42. Also depends on how far way the picture was. He has a .49.

 

[MisterMercedes]

you are literally talking shit. men usually have closer set eyes than women .

By dimorphic I don’t mean what most men have. I mean what stands out as more attractive.

Most men also don’t have 21 inch shoulders. That doesn’t mean 21 inch shoulders aren’t attractive/masculine.

 

[Chadlitecel]

By dimorphic I don’t mean what most men have. I mean what stands out as more attractive.

Most men also don’t have 21 inch shoulders. That doesn’t mean 21 inch shoulders aren’t attractive/masculine.

Still ipd isnt something dimirphic. One digit iq

 

[MisterMercedes]

Still ipd isnt something dimirphic. One digit iq

If by dimorphism you mean “what most men have”, sure. Again, what most men have is not necessarily what’s attractive. Most men are not above 6’0, most men don’t have 21 inch shoulders, most men don’t have slayer eye areas, etc.

 

[Chadlitecel]

If by dimorphism you mean “what most men have”, sure. Again, what most men have is not necessarily what’s attractive. Most men are not above 6’0, most men don’t have 21 inch shoulders, most men don’t have slayer eye areas, etc.

do you even know what dimorphic means. Literally negativo iq

 

[MisterMercedes]

do you even know what dimorphic means. Literally negativo iq

I already agreed that dimorphic wasn’t the right word to use, as that just means “typical of one’s sex”. Again, slayer eyes, above 6’0, 21 inch shoulders, are not what the typical man has. They’re still attractive.