D
Deleted member 17430
Manlet
- Joined
- Jan 25, 2022
- Posts
- 2,317
- Reputation
- 4,400
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
voice aswell giga nasally and annoyingvery unfeminine and non neotenous splanchnocranium to neurocranium ratio
That's how a typical entitled bitch soundsvoice aswell giga nasally and annoying
It's not just a risk for womanlike how would this even be constitutional lmao feelings and paranoia doesn't trump the constitution.....I get it's a risk for woman, but if you're scared just don't go out at night. Why do you even want to go at night anyways? Night walks suck tbh imo
They would be protected if they dated their looksmatches and didnt stay out till 3 amOr maybe women should actually have to deal with men for protection
Doesn't even make sense, creeps and criminals don't care about a curfew laws the only people that would follow the curfew are regular law abiding citizens. In matter of fact women would be in more danger. This womens logic that all mean are violent creeps is stupid, she also believes men are the borg from star-trek and so if some other random man is violent or harms a women, some other random man should share some of the blame.yeah just go up to gang members and convince them to follow curfew laws
i agree to some degree if you wanna to out at 3 in the morning jogging you take that risk thats on you regardless if your a man or women.They would be protected if they dated their looksmatches and didnt stay out till 3 am
Most male criminals have some moral code where they for the most part don't target women or children. This women in the video thinks because she is physically weaker then men she is intitiled to put herself in dangerous situations, and criminal men should just giver her a pass because she is a women.It's not just a risk for woman
Its a risk for men too. Most crimes are men to men anyway (at night)
Not all of themMost male criminals have some moral code where they for the most part don't target women or children.
Or maybe women should actually have to deal with men for protection
That's what I was inferring. Women walking alone were always free game in history. Therefore, women had to be much nicer to men overall and trade their bodily access for provisioning and protection.That would never work, because most men would see no benefit unless their getting sexual access or money. And we know women are not gonna pay for no protection body guard let alone pay a random guy who helps her if she is attacked.