kurd
Apricot
- Joined
- Aug 7, 2023
- Posts
- 4,445
- Reputation
- 7,323
Honestly, I think people overcomplicate this stuff. To me, it’s clear: men are supposed to lead, and women are supposed to follow. That’s how it’s always been, and there’s a reason why.
If you look at history, men have always been the ones in kings, warriors, rulers, protectors. Women were the ones who held the home together, raised kids, and made sure things stayed peaceful. That balance made sense. Men had the strength and authority, and women had the nurturing side. It wasn’t competition it was teamwork.
Even religions back this up. In Islam, the Qur’an literally says in 4:34: “Men are the protectors and maintainers of women, because Allah has given the one more (strength) than the other…” That makes it super clear men were given the role of leaders. And there’s the Hadith where the Prophet said the majority of the people in Hell would be women. A lot of people see that as proof that women are more likely to go astray, so they need strong guidance.
Christianity says the same thing. In the Bible, Ephesians 5:22–24 straight up tells wives to submit to their husbands, because the husband is the head of the wife just like Christ is the head of the church. That’s not a small statement it’s showing a whole divine structure where the man leads, and the woman follows.
When families and societies stick to this order, things are stable. Everyone knows their role. But when people start flipping it around, it just causes confusion and problems. A body can’t have two heads, right? It doesn’t mean women aren’t important they are literally the heart of everything. But the head is still the head.
To me, it’s not about men being “better” than women. It’s about purpose. Men are given leadership for a reason, and women are given support and nurturing for a reason. That’s how balance works. Pretending those roles are the same doesn’t help anyone.
If you look at history, men have always been the ones in kings, warriors, rulers, protectors. Women were the ones who held the home together, raised kids, and made sure things stayed peaceful. That balance made sense. Men had the strength and authority, and women had the nurturing side. It wasn’t competition it was teamwork.
Even religions back this up. In Islam, the Qur’an literally says in 4:34: “Men are the protectors and maintainers of women, because Allah has given the one more (strength) than the other…” That makes it super clear men were given the role of leaders. And there’s the Hadith where the Prophet said the majority of the people in Hell would be women. A lot of people see that as proof that women are more likely to go astray, so they need strong guidance.
Christianity says the same thing. In the Bible, Ephesians 5:22–24 straight up tells wives to submit to their husbands, because the husband is the head of the wife just like Christ is the head of the church. That’s not a small statement it’s showing a whole divine structure where the man leads, and the woman follows.
When families and societies stick to this order, things are stable. Everyone knows their role. But when people start flipping it around, it just causes confusion and problems. A body can’t have two heads, right? It doesn’t mean women aren’t important they are literally the heart of everything. But the head is still the head.
To me, it’s not about men being “better” than women. It’s about purpose. Men are given leadership for a reason, and women are given support and nurturing for a reason. That’s how balance works. Pretending those roles are the same doesn’t help anyone.
