D
Deleted member 127905
FoidzW1llD13
- Joined
- Feb 15, 2025
- Posts
- 12
- Reputation
- 10
For centuries, men have enjoyed a brief, artificial golden age where we tricked ourselves into believing we had control over the dating market; thanks, of course, to little things like political dominance, economic monopolies, and the occasional arranged marriage. But now, in the age of "foid equality" and girl bossism, we’ve been thrown back into nature’s original intent: a never ending battle for relevance, affection, and if we’re lucky some sloppy toppy 9000. You see, women are not heartless by choice, it’s just simple biology. Studies in evolutionary psychology show that women have historically been more selective in choosing mates, a trait that makes sense given their higher parental investment (Trivers, 1972). Meanwhile, men evolved to compete for attention and status to prove themselves as viable partners. Historically, men offset this by creating societal structures that limited women's choices, but now that those barriers are gone, we're experiencing the raw reality of human mating dynamics. And the data backs this up. A 2018 study published in Psychological Science found that women tend to find only the top 20% (realistically 5%) of men on dating apps attractive, while men are far less selective and would likely fuck a sub3 NIGGER. Another study in Nature Human Behaviour (2020) confirmed that modern dating apps amplify pre existing mate selectiopn biases, meaning that the competition among men is fiercer than ever. Social media further widens the gap by giving status fags more exposure, it creates an environment where the majority of women pursue a small fraction of men, leaving the rest of us battling for some MID ASS PUSSY. Total foid death.
