Women are not programmed to get casual sex

Tá errado
Sexo casual n faz sentido pras mulheres de um ponto de vista biologico, seria literalmente suicídio evolutivo
Em um mundo onde todo sexo é feito desprotegido sim, mas com o tanto de métodos contraceptivos q existem hoje isso é imaginação sua.
 
Em um mundo onde todo sexo é feito desprotegido sim, mas com o tanto de métodos contraceptivos q existem hoje isso é imaginação sua.
Não importa pq a tua mente ainda funciona como na pré-história independente de qualquer coisa q exista na atualidade, é subconsciente
 
Hypergamy says you cant have sex with your looksmatch(unless you are chad)
But you can so hypergamy = false and goes against basic biology
Hypergamy= your female looksmatch has much higher smv than you
 
Hypergamy= your female looksmatch has much higher smv than you
Not really
Even tho she has lots of niggas wanting to fuck her that doesnt mean anything from a women point of view since the female smv is defined not by how many guys would fuck her but by how many guys would go into a long term relantionship with her
 
  • +1
Reactions: litaz
how the fuck does this thread make sense? the title has LITERALLY nothing to do with anything else you've written. truly a shit thread. why did this shit get so many reacts?
cuz retards here want to believe that hypergamy doesn't exist
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 6382
@personalityinkwell hypergamy isn’t real
 
  • JFL
  • +1
Reactions: TsarTsar444 and Deleted member 4612
Not really
Even tho she has lots of niggas wanting to fuck her that doesnt mean anything from a women point of view since the female smv is defined not by how many guys would fuck her but by how many guys would go into a long term relantionship with her
Smv is smv. Female smv is higher theres no debate about it. How they feel about it is irrelevant. And its still much much much easier for them to find a ltr than it is for their looksmatch lmao
 
Smv is smv. Higher smv is higher theres no debate about it. How she feels about is irrelevant.
Ok you can cope with this but there is indeed differences between men and women when it comes to sexual strategy

Applying the same rule for both is just wrong but again you have your right to be wrong so I dont mind
 
Ok you can cope with this but there is indeed differences between men and women when it comes to sexual strategy

Applying the same rule for both is just wrong but again you have your right to be wrong so I dont mind
You are the one coping by thinking you have the same smv as your female looksmatch lmao also jfl thinkig women dont like one night stands, not every woman wants a ltr, but even if all women wanted that its still much easier for them to get one them it is for their looksmatch, aka hypergamy
 
Last edited:
good thread, I agree with the principle. With dualistic mating strategy, women want both the alpha seed and beta need. They then realize, whether subconsciously or consciously, that they must compromise to do this-dating up too much can cause the man to cheat and thus commitment is not guaranteed. Thus, HT normies will often be seen in LTRs. In b4 the "chad only" myth. This website is somewhat deulsional regarding how females think.
 

Similar threads

Antinatalism
Replies
4
Views
131
BeanletMogger
BeanletMogger
asdvek
Replies
2
Views
98
ConfusedBolivian
ConfusedBolivian
choppedshyt
Replies
23
Views
161
axttt_
axttt_
nsk4ll
Replies
21
Views
152
nsk4ll
nsk4ll

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top