disillusioned
Kraken
- Joined
- Jan 2, 2019
- Posts
- 9,688
- Reputation
- 28,214
All meaningful social change is produced by males. Women always never shape the wider culture. Not even people like famous female writers.
Considering JK Rowling. Literally, she's the richest writer in history, and yet how much has her Harry Potter series changed the world? Her writing is average at best and her stories are literary junk food. Tbf most people are too dumb to read so it's now questionable if books are even still able to change anything but whatever.
The point is that it's very rare for the wider culture to be influenced by women. In those few instances in which they did, often there's some greater (((force))) that has an agenda to make it happen.
EDIT: I'll also add that women tend to simply latch unto whatever happens to be the 'in' thing at the time. Basically male culture becomes 'their' culture.
Considering JK Rowling. Literally, she's the richest writer in history, and yet how much has her Harry Potter series changed the world? Her writing is average at best and her stories are literary junk food. Tbf most people are too dumb to read so it's now questionable if books are even still able to change anything but whatever.
The point is that it's very rare for the wider culture to be influenced by women. In those few instances in which they did, often there's some greater (((force))) that has an agenda to make it happen.
EDIT: I'll also add that women tend to simply latch unto whatever happens to be the 'in' thing at the time. Basically male culture becomes 'their' culture.
Last edited: