Women Made Most Men Into Things They Are Not Attracted To By Taking Dominant Attributes (non looks) Away From Them

[Deleted member 16530]

Back in the day -at least 100 years ago- men had attributes that made them attractive to women OTHER THAN LOOKS.

You see these things actually established men dominant over the women.

1-Looks
2-Money(literally pretty much men held all the money)
3-Status(From jobs to status in the family as head of household)
4-Inherent male patriarchy over women(which is a good thing)This is huge.This in my opinion is why in old times women were more satisfied in their relationships.Man literally had some higher value in their eyes because simply they were a man

As much as women say they hate these things it actually makes them want “the man”


In current times 2,3 and 4 are gone

In 2021 the only politically correct way for a man to dominate a woman through a genuine way in a relationship is through LOOKS. “HYPERGAMY’s almost sole focus for young people”

No betabux isn’t actual actually placing men higher,modern day betabux vs old times full financial dependence are not the same.

What I’m trying to say is by removing 2-3-4 women made most men into beings that don’t sexually turn them on anymore,some of them raised the standards for everyone thinking it would make them happier not realizing(or maybe realizing) they are actively shrinking mating pool.

 

[Frank Jack]

Not one word.

Mirin Meeks avi.

 

[Deleted member 15099]

Im 5.25 PSL thank god

 

[AlexAP]

Women aren't attracted to betabuxxers though. Better that she likes you not only for the money.

 

[Deleted member 16530]

Women aren't attracted to betabuxxers though. Better that she likes you not only for the money.

@Ethereal

Come on man,I literally clarified this in the OP

 

[Deleted member 15099]

Women aren't attracted to betabuxxers though. Better that she likes you not only for the money.

Feminism has benefits. Back in the day you basically needed to betabuxx to get a gf/wife, now you only need looks.

 

[AlexAP]

Come on man,I literally clarified this in the OP

"modern day betabux vs old times full financial dependence are not the same."

Nah I don't think it's much different. In fact, husbands were cucked pretty often in the old times too.

 

[VenezuelansUSER]

"El betabux moderno frente a la dependencia financiera total de los viejos tiempos no es lo mismo".

No, no creo que sea muy diferente. De hecho, también en los viejos tiempos se engañaba a los maridos con bastante frecuencia.

The best for thew men is upgrade looks

 

[Deleted member 275]

"modern day betabux vs old times full financial dependence are not the same."

Nah I don't think it's much different. In fact, husbands were cucked pretty often in the old times too.

Unlikely.

Back then women would starve when abandoned by their men. That's a huge power-move that would've kept her in check.
Right now, you don't have any financial power in a relationship even as a betabux. You break-up with your unemployed wife? Government will save her and/or make you pay for her.

 

[datboijj]

Feminism has benefits. Back in the day you basically needed to betabuxx to get a gf/wife, now you only need looks.

yeh but back in the day any job was enough to do it
if you worked you got laid simple

 

[Callooh_Calais]

Back in the day -at least 100 years ago- men had attributes that made them attractive to women OTHER THAN LOOKS.

You see these things actually established men dominant over the women.

1-Looks
2-Money(literally pretty much men held all the money)
3-Status(From jobs to status in the family as head of household)
4-Inherent male patriarchy over women(which is a good thing)This is huge.This in my opinion is why in old times women were more satisfied in their relationships.Man literally had some higher value in their eyes because simply they were a man

As much as women say they hate these things it actually makes them want “the man”


In current times 2,3 and 4 are gone

In 2021 the only politically correct way for a man to dominate a woman through a genuine way in a relationship is through LOOKS. “HYPERGAMY’s almost sole focus for young people”

No betabux isn’t actual actually placing men higher,modern day betabux vs old times full financial dependence are not the same.

What I’m trying to say is by removing 2-3-4 women made most men into beings that don’t sexually turn them on anymore,some of them raised the standards for everyone thinking it would make them happier not realizing(or maybe realizing) they are actively shrinking mating pool.

There might be a bit of truth in this: When John Calhoun did a number of experiments on overpopulation involving rodents (the idea being, seeing what happens if you give rodents unlimited optimal conditions for maximum reproduction), a number of the male mice would begin grooming themselves and trying to compete in making themselves more prettier and prettier than the other male mice, until they'd pay attention to their own physical attributes more than the female mice even cared for, to the point that Calhoun called this group The Beautiful Ones for how they'd neglect any attempt at mating with the opposite sex in a fruitless quest towards personal vanity.

(Sound familiar?)

 

[Deleted member 15099]

yeh but back in the day any job was enough to do it
if you worked you got laid simple

Not really

 

[Deleted member 16552]

Women today are starting to not give a fuck and emasculate men. We don't have power anymore.

 

[mulattomaxxer]

Not one word.

Mirin Meeks avi.

 

[6ft4]

legit af