Women's "type" varies more than men's "type""

[Deleted member 9467]

For some reason, the consensus is that guys have more varied "types" than gals. We think that some guys like thicker girls, and some guys like skinnier girls, but we assume that all girls like tall, wide, and lean.

Rating Attractiveness: Consensus Among Men, Not Women, Study Finds

Hot or not? Men agree on the answer. Women don't. There is much more consensus among men about whom they find attractive than there is among women, according to a new study.

www.sciencedaily.com

Actually, it's the exact opposite. "Men agree a lot more about who they find attractive and unattractive than women agree about who they find attractive and unattractive,"

 

[Deleted member 3679]

For some reason, the consensus is that guys have more varied "types" than gals. We think that some guys like thicker girls, and some guys like skinnier girls, but we assume that all girls like tall, wide, and lean.

Rating Attractiveness: Consensus Among Men, Not Women, Study Finds

Hot or not? Men agree on the answer. Women don't. There is much more consensus among men about whom they find attractive than there is among women, according to a new study.

www.sciencedaily.com

Actually, it's the exact opposite. "Men agree a lot more about who they find attractive and unattractive than women agree about who they find attractive and unattractive,"

LOL just keep thinking that buddy! Tall, good bone structure, and dark feature is most women's type.

 

[volcelfatcel]

Disagree tbh, my marwari African brother from Kerala @africancel likes massive asses, I like thinnee petite women. There was an entire poll on this, men are far more forgiving with looks and are more varied than women

 

[Deleted member 756]

LOL just keep thinking that buddy! Tall, good bone structure, and dark feature is most women's type.

“Dark” features aren’t ethnic features but slightly darker light features

 

[khvirgin]

Women are just better at lying
"teehee heght isn't important to me, btw my bf is 6'7""

I mean men are literally taught to swipe right on anything on tinder, how can women have more types than men?

 

[mulattomaxxer]

 

[Deleted member 13367]

“Dark” features aren’t ethnic features but slightly darker light features

Wtf is that supposed to mean

 

[mulattomaxxer]

Everyone has their type, both male and female. This is a real phenomenon, its just that everyones ideal type will share simillar features. Nobodies type is the 5ft 2 balding indian janitor meme.

 

[Deleted member 756]

Wtf is that supposed to mean

Most “dark” guys are literally just tanned light guys

 

[Deleted member 6273]

Men have broader preferences like I prefer bigger tits and asses but a gl girl who's kinda flat will still be hot.

Women have very defined types and some only find men within that small category attractive.

But nevertheless Taller, broader, more muscular will make you more attractive to 99% of women.

 

[Deleted member 13367]

Most “dark” guys are literally just tanned light guys

I thought "dark" meant dark hair/eyebrows not tanned skin jfl

 

[Deleted member 756]

I thought "dark" meant dark hair/eyebrows not tanned skin jfl

Dark as in darker but not overly dark

 

[koalendo]

I thought "dark" meant dark hair/eyebrows not tanned skin jfl

Dark as in darker but not overly dark

"dark handsome and tall" is a white American saying, they mean dark compared to them, like a dark European, like Italians or Iberians and southern euros in general

 

[Effortless]

I already made a thread on this...

Type of guy that girls like...

The comic nerd: The mysterious type: The care free don't care hair: The CEO: The party guy: The conspiracy theorist: Guys in suits: The musician: The Vampire: Heavyweight Champion: The roman general: The confederate soldier: The drummer: The fuhrer: The ninja: The...

looksmax.org

 

[eduardkoopman]

Link to the actual study. Instead of quoting some article, which leaves more, imo to much, room for opinion adding.

link study: https://www.researchgate.net/public...al_Preference_Explanations_for_Mate_Selection

How Much difference between men-women on agreeing??
Participants of both genders showed substantial consensus in judgments of whom they found attractive and unattractive,
although men showed higher consensus than women.



Extra quotes:
Although the relationships between revealed preferences and
dispositional characteristics shown in Table 7 were very similar
across male and female participants, there were nonetheless indi-
cations that men and women differed in two important ways in the
nature of their preferences.

1. First, male participants tended togenerally rate targets as more attractive than did female participants
2. Second, male participants appeared to agree with one another more about who is attractive and unattractive than did female participants a gender difference that was observed for both heterosexual and homosexual participants.

 

[PURE ARYAN GENETICS]

jfl this is literally just one foid liking one niche chad while the other prefers the other niche like bad boy vs eboy vs classy or whatever

1. First, male participants tended togenerally rate targets as more attractive than did female

 

[eduardkoopman]

new post, because not allowed to edit old one anymore.
***********

Link to the actual study. Instead of quoting some article, which leaves more, imo to much, room for opinion adding.
It confirms the article title, but also shows some other interesting difference.

link study: https://www.researchgate.net/public...al_Preference_Explanations_for_Mate_Selection


*******tl;dr + MY conclusion, opinion from reading the actual study.

1. women rate dudes lower than men do women. So by default women find men more ugly. AKA, you are ugly by default as a normie

2. women disagree more among each other, than men. This Study shows.
I can see that imo, for example women like pretty boys and also domm men. While men only like feminine women and almost al dislike masculine tomboys.
This leaves imo more room for men to nichemaxx to have a bit of added odds to get A woman. [I always had this opinion for most average ranges men to go nichemaxxing, but most balckpillers seem to disagree and everyone should wear a white t-shirt with jeans because you should not stand out or something and look like every other generic male NPC. because if you nichemaxx you look try hard or something . Due to women lesser agreeing, it's not a bad idea to go for being EVEN MORE APPALLING looking to a good amount of women BUT GETTINg more APPEAL to the women whom somehow like that Niche],
Women can't niche maxx as much and still be attactive, because they need to look feminine.

3. men agreeing so much on whom of the women are attractive. imo, ALSO AGE (all men from 18 - 75, want a 20 year woman). This means, brutals competition for the women that are considered to be atractive. So you have to beat alot of dudes, to get with a top tier woman.
4. You should have better odds, when going for women whom have 1 of these unattractive traits: fat and/or masculine and/or female body LACKING curves.



**************************ACTUAL STUDY COPY PASTES *********************

How Much difference between men-women on agreeing??
Participants of both genders showed substantial consensus in judgments of whom they found attractive and unattractive,
although men showed higher consensus than women.



Extra quotes:
Although the relationships between revealed preferences and
dispositional characteristics shown in Table 7 were very similar
across male and female participants, there were nonetheless indi-
cations that men and women differed in two important ways in the
nature of their preferences.

1. First, male participants tended togenerally rate targets as more attractive than did female participants. 41/100 rating from men of women. versus 29/100 rating from women of men.

2. Second, male participants appeared to agree with one another more about who is attractive and unattractive than did female participants a gender difference that was observed for both heterosexual and homosexual participants.
r= 0.64 versus r = 0.46. Yeah is a difference for sure!

strategy dating adapting
The finding that men show more consensus than women in attractiveness judgments suggests important differences in the
constraints that men and women are likely to face in mating situations and the strategies they will tend to adopt in response.In

1. particular, as consensus increases regarding which people are found attractive, the level of competition between individuals for
mates is expected to increase (Buss & Barnes, 1986). Women, having less consensual preferences, and considered alongside their
tendency to generally judge people as less attractive than men do, should be expected to encounter less competition from other
women for the mates they find attractive.
2. On the other hand, as men have much more consensual preference, men may find it necessary to invest more time and energy in attracting and then guarding their mates from other potential suitors, given that the mates they judge attractive are likely to be found attractive by many other men (Haselton & Gangestad, 2006). (AKA: MASSIVE male competition for the attractive females)

Cross consequenc:
the preferences of one sex should affect the tactics that are adopted by the other.
1. The stronger consensus of male participants was largely defined by preference for certain physical character-
istics: women who appeared thin, feminine, and curvaceous were found to be considerably more attractive than those who did not for
most male participants. Given the strong general preferences for these characteristics among men, this implies that women who do not have these characteristics are likely to encounter many fewer interested suitors than women who do.
[so I gues they saying: you have a much better cahnce with: fat and/or masculine and/or female body LACKING CURVES.]

 

[eduardkoopman]

jfl this is literally just one foid liking one niche chad while the other prefers the other niche like bad boy vs eboy vs classy or whatever

Most men ARE UGLY, by default to most women.
Nichemaxxing is imo, the only small thing one can do as a normie to ESAPE being seen as plain ugly. Because SOME women int that niche will like it.

So yeah. as a man, you get the option A LITTLE BIT:
* badboy;
* emo guy
* skater dude
* surfer dude
* artist/hippy dude
* business man
* masculine jock
* pretty boy soy
* older dude (because daddy issues or something)
* etc........

A dude gott be objectively still average or better looking than average imo. to be able to pull off going FULL nicheMaxxing.

I DISAGREE, alot.
On blackpillers, here always suggesting guys. To go play it safe. And to basically NOT nichemaxx. But to try to look, as much generic NPC as possible.; because they wanna fit in or something.
better stand out, in a way that that niche also fitts your lifestyle and what you do. but niche.

Nichemaxxing, is lke a small adding to do. It's not a game changer. BUT, a thing a MAN should do when he is a non CHAD.

 

[eduardkoopman]

I already made a thread on this...

Type of guy that girls like...

The comic nerd: The mysterious type: The care free don't care hair: The CEO: The party guy: The conspiracy theorist: Guys in suits: The musician: The Vampire: Heavyweight Champion: The roman general: The confederate soldier: The drummer: The fuhrer: The ninja: The...

looksmax.org

to be a bit more fair. than what you posted in that thread

IT'S true.
THAT WOMEN have more variance in what they like for men. Than visa versa.

JUST TO GIVE 1 or 2 EXAMPLE!!!

1. Age.
"All" men, have appeal for women in the age group of 18-25 orso. Wether the man is 18 or 55.
Whereas most women have appeal for men in a wider age range. Which is thus shwoing, women have less consesnsus.

2. eduacation factor.
"all" men giev a ratts ass about w woman her educations.
Whereas most women, care a small/little bit about the education factor. Which is thus showing women have more variance than men.

 

[Lawton88]

Don't trust most women to be honest as some will tell you they aren't into some types and then they are swooning over them in reality. I think except for teenagers and real early 20s women the best looking guys are mostly the same masculine looking guys unless status is causing the attraction.

 

[Lawton88]

"The study helps explain why women experience stronger norms than men to obtain or maintain certain physical characteristics," he says. "Women who are trying to impress men are likely to be found much more attractive if they meet certain physical standards, and much less if they don't. Although men are rated as more attractive by women when they meet these physical appearance standards too, their overall judged attractiveness isn't as tightly linked to their physical features."
-----------------------------

lol at the conclusions they put in studies like this due to an agenda. Let these progressives do a real study on how sub-average looking men and women fare when it comes to having relationships.

 

[ifyouwannabemylover]

foids lie

/thread

 

[Deleted member 13945]

Everyone has their type, both male and female. This is a real phenomenon, its just that everyones ideal type will share simillar features. Nobodies type is the 5ft 2 balding indian janitor meme.

this.

yes types exist but not as in some like fat bald men.

more so some like alt guys, artsy guys, party frat boys, rtt fuckboys etc

 

[eduardkoopman]

Don't trust most women to be honest as some will tell you they aren't into some types and then they are swooning over them in reality.

action was tracked in this study. because they asked to give pics of dudes a rating. So that is action based research imo. NOT opinion questionaire.

women the best looking guys are mostly the same masculine looking guys unless status is causing the attraction.

it said in the study.
substantial consensus in judgments of whom they found attractive and unattractive!!!!

It's not WHEN, a women have less consensus than men. That they still not have very HIGH concensus.
It's just the difference that man have VERY high consensus. AND women have very high concensus ALSO, but less high than men.

Some dudes, here. are talking ASIF, the study said. That women have low concensus or some concensus.

BUT, NO. Women have also: substanyial consencus. Which inno science term means: High concensus.

 

[eduardkoopman]

foids lie

/thread

this study is imo correect. AND in this study they tracked behavior to counter the faults that happen when you ask opinion
, so no lies when tracking action.

 

[eduardkoopman]

this.

yes types exist but not as in some like fat bald men.

more so some like alt guys, artsy guys, party frat boys, rtt fuckboys etc

read the actual study. not the cope OP link post, which is more like an article.
These interview type of articles, always come with their own cope opinions, of explaining stuff in the study. Which is just opinion.

 

[Lawton88]

action was tracked in this study. because they asked to give pics of dudes a rating. So that is action based research imo. NOT opinion questionaire.


it said in the study.
substantial consensus in judgments of whom they found attractive and unattractive!!!!

It's not WHEN, a women have less consensus than men. That they still not have very HIGH concensus.
It's just the difference that man have VERY high consensus. AND women have very high concensus ALSO, but less high than men.

Some dudes, here. are talking ASIF, the study said. That women have low concensus or some concensus.

BUT, NO. Women have also: substanyial consencus. Which inno science term means: High concensus.

My opinion would be women are attracted to the certain looks just as strongly as men are and there isn't a lot of variance when they are 25+ except some exceptions are made for status/money. They also act on the looks thing more than men expecting a looksmatch or higher usually while 8/10 males will one night stand 6/10 females.

 

[eduardkoopman]

My opinion would be women are attracted to the certain looks just as strongly as men are and there isn't a lot of variance when they are 25+ except some exceptions are made for status/money.

it's overall, I think a tiny bit less concensus thus, as you mentioned.
Since status/money can have effect.
You forgot the age factor.
MEN have more consensus of what age a woman should be to be most attractive. Whereas women have that frame a bit wider than men, thus less consensus. Adding all these little factors up, I think as this study showed also, it's OVERALL cafe to say women have a LITTLE bit less consensus OVERALL than men.

They also act on the looks thing more than men expecting a looksmatch or higher usually while 8/10 males will one night stand 6/10 females.

to add.
Consensus, is something different than this quote: "They also act on the looks thing more than men expecting a looksmatch or higher usually while 8/10 males will one night stand 6/10 females."
Women can find looks more improtant than men, and still have a somewhat lower consensus about what is ideal looks
Consensus on looks IS NOT a measurement how important the looks factor is. it's JUST, how much agreeance there is among each other.

 

[Maxim]

For type and longevity relationships i'm actually picky AF but i'll smash anything that isnt fat or deformed for ONS or FWB
Tall young blonde nordic women with big bones and wide faces are my GOAT

 

[quakociaptockh]

Long ago there was an experiment on a rating site.

Foids' preferences were uncorrelated, when they weren't able to communicate. But when they had a private chat, suddenly they all agreed on 1 type and rejected every other guy who did not fit.

 

[AlwaysHaveQuestions]

View attachment 1217184

i am seething the sub went private last night

 

[Deleted member 3679]

Women are just better at lying
"teehee heght isn't important to me, btw my bf is 6'7""

I mean men are literally taught to swipe right on anything on tinder, how can women have more types than men?

This is true... women don't want to look shallow plus they still need unattractive guys to betabux and pay for their shit when they are old. Also... people settle and have to rationalize that the person they are with are what they really want.

 

[Deleted member 14262]

Long ago there was an experiment on a rating site.

Foids' preferences were uncorrelated, when they weren't able to communicate. But when they had a private chat, suddenly they all agreed on 1 type and rejected every other guy who did not fit.

Damn. Can I get a linkerino?

 

[Alibaba69]

no men have more types

 

[Foreverbrad]

Who's not going to pick short, slim/athletic, blonde white girls if they have the choice?

We just don't have the choice and we lie to ourselves that the trash that represents our options is what we're into to feel better.

 

[justadude]

yea womens type are just different types of chads. if ur average or under you're not anybody's type

 

[Deleted member 9467]

Who's not going to pick short, slim/athletic, blonde white girls if they have the choice?

We just don't have the choice and we lie to ourselves that the trash that represents our options is what we're into to feel better.

For starters I'm one data point against that 5'8-5'10 girls >>>>> short girls

 

[Deleted member 13710]

Nope

 

[Lawton88]

It varies alright - on the looks scale men will bang women 2 spots lower than them on a /10 scale and even 3 spots lower when really drunk while women under a 7/10 now generally are sleeping with men 1 - 3 spots (mostly 2-3) above their looks level.