yeeyeeass69
Solstice
- Joined
- Jun 1, 2025
- Posts
- 2,313
- Reputation
- 1,497
Title 

Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari

Bulbous nose isn't too badIdk they're all bad
Bulbous nose isn't too bad
Sadly adds appeal to girls and a unique feature instead of failo because he has everything else
This isn't bulbous nose this is a nigger with a goddamn yam on his faceSadly adds appeal to girls and a unique feature instead of failo because he has everything else
On the other hand
View attachment 4147821
JewThis isn't bulbous nose this is a nigger with a goddamn yam on his face
Depends if its too narrow or too widebad ipd you cant fix it
too narrow is a death sentence niggaDepends if its too narrow or too wide
Exactlytoo narrow is a death sentence nigga
yes luckily my esr is 0.47Exactly
If its a lil too wide u can alleviate it with more bizygo width
Mines like 0.48 i think in front camera, 0.485 ig if closer upyes luckily my esr is 0.47
Long midface is like below 0.9 mfr or what range?Idk but long midface is the worst falio ever, NOTHING can be worse than this
0.45-0.49 is the ideal range youre chillin but if you wanted it lowered yes thats an optionMines like 0.48 i think in front camera, 0.485 ig if closer up
Is it too bad or can i get a very little bit of zygo filler to lower it?
anything below 1Long midface is like below 0.9 mfr or what range?
fucking hate it broIdk but long midface is the worst falio ever, NOTHING can be worse than this
Idk I don’t understands much about fave ratios but this is what Google told me :Long midface is like below 0.9 mfr or what range?
Facial thirds % are pretty unimportant tbh bro, as long as its not something like 25 50 25. Its a normie beauty standard thing like "high cheekbones"Idk I don’t understands much about fave ratios but this is what Google told me :
“Midface height > ⅓, often creeping towards 38–40% or more of total face height.
Practically, when the glabella–subnasale distance looks longer than the subnasale–menton (chin) distance, it gives a “long midface” look.”
And also short FHWR is death tier :
“If height = 12 cm and width = 14 cm → FHWR = 0.85 → wide face. If FHWR = 1.1+ → long face”.
Theres billions of males on this planet im sure there isThere's a chadlite for each of these failos
Except narrow maxilla
I thought 0.95 to 1.05 was idealanything below 1
Idk, but long midface is death-tier, nothing can save that shitFacial thirds % are pretty unimportant tbh bro, as long as its not something like 25 50 25. Its a normie beauty standard thing like "high cheekbones"
no 1.05 is insaneI thought 0.95 to 1.05 was ideal
Weak under eye supportTitle![]()
Lorenzo zurzolo has one of the worst sceleral show I've ever seen but pulls it offTheres billions of males on this planet im sure there is
But its so much harder to be above hmtn with some these
Scleral show + droopy lower eyelids also entails bad undereyes and orbital vector. It created bad eye shape and makes u look like bug eyed freak
Wait till u see mine lolLorenzo zurzolo has one of the worst sceleral show I've ever seen but pulls it off
Yes by being a chad with an extremely striking eye area otherwiseIan somerhalder has cyclop tier ipd but pulls it off
His eye area has other flaws, assymetries, negative tilt on one eye, neutral on the otherWait till u see mine lol
Yes by being a chad with an extremely striking eye area otherwise
Robert pattison has narrow maxillaThere's a chadlite for each of these failos
Except narrow maxilla
Below 0.95 is longLong midface is like below 0.9 mfr or what range?
For guys*Below 0.95 is long
Below 0.90 is horse