Would u be happy with ur Looksmatch

Would u

  • Yes, with same level

  • Yes, even with less

  • No


Results are only viewable after voting.
D

Deleted member 22918

Fire
Joined
Oct 9, 2022
Posts
15,178
Reputation
22,724
I would be happy even with sub5 as long as shes my type (both looks and personality wise)
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 21796, forevermirin, Danish_Retard and 3 others
  • JFL
Reactions: Deleted member 22918
Absolutely not. I deserve a 8 PSL aryan stacy, nothing less.
 
  • +1
  • JFL
Reactions: molluskmuncher, 5OuttaTen, Deleted member 23772 and 2 others
I'd be fine with almost anything, 16-70 years old, 2/10 or higher, menal disabilities would be fine, poor etc.
 
  • JFL
  • So Sad
Reactions: molluskmuncher, Danish_Retard and Deleted member 22918
my looksmatxh is an obese 1/10 midget so no
 
  • +1
Reactions: molluskmuncher, Deleted member 14392, Deleted member 17578 and 1 other person
No, my wife needs to mog me. Ideally she's taller than me too.
 
  • +1
  • Ugh..
Reactions: molluskmuncher, Deleted member 17578 and Deleted member 22918
Idk depends how you determine your looksmatch
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 22918
If she is white and my age then yes
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 22918
I would be happy with a ginger Stacey
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 22918
I would be happy with a ginger Stacey
Same bro... same


aladdin-focus.gif
 
  • Love it
Reactions: SubSigma
yes. my looksmatch is a short skinny white cute girl with big boobs. basically my sister.
 
Idk depends how you determine your looksmatch
Your SMVmatch. Aka: Similar access to dates, social favors, social privileges, romantic encounters, sex, etc.

Which is an obese 1/10 midget for ~80% of men. Although probably even she SMVmogs most men.
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 14693
Your SMVmatch. Aka: Similar access to dates, social favors, social privileges, romantic encounters, sex, etc.

Which is an obese 1/10 midget for ~80% of men. Although probably even she SMVmogs most men.
No i mean same level on the looks scala. Not smv
 
No i mean same level on the looks scala. Not smv
Looks scale isn't the same for men and women.

1*iC0UjKDxFViE3XZuk6MMUw.jpeg


This graph explains it. It compared your male looks to female looks and who has the 'advantage' in life essentially tbh.

When you are exactly on the black line between male advantage and female advantage, you are essentialle 'equal'. Aka looksmatched.

A top 20% male according to this graph, is looksmatched to a bottom 20% female.
 
  • +1
Reactions: BongMog
Looks scale isn't the same for men and women.

1*iC0UjKDxFViE3XZuk6MMUw.jpeg


This graph explains it. It compared your male looks to female looks and who has the 'advantage' in life essentially tbh.

When you are exactly on the black line between male advantage and female advantage, you are essentialle 'equal'. Aka looksmatched.

A top 20% male according to this graph, is looksmatched to a bottom 20% female.
@Crestfallen95 Also explains it well in his topic:

 
  • Love it
Reactions: Deleted member 21735
Only a little less tho not too much
 
yea

its bella hadid or something like that
 
Your SMVmatch. Aka: Similar access to dates, social favors, social privileges, romantic encounters, sex, etc.

Which is an obese 1/10 midget for ~80% of men. Although probably even she SMVmogs most men.
Yeah then I wouldn't be happy.
 
  • So Sad
Reactions: Deleted member 17578
As long as there is attraction there. That's all that matters.
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 22918
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 17578
Yes as long as she is not black.
 
  • +1
Reactions: Eclipse prinz

Similar threads

Reformed
Replies
7
Views
42
milkshake_addict
milkshake_addict
TGUN.
Replies
9
Views
61
jkxdy
jkxdy
Matrix88
Replies
19
Views
51
Gudlifer
Gudlifer
yasuoh
Replies
7
Views
55
dhusc
dhusc

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top