"Would you let your son/daughter marry a black person"

[FlotPSL]

Thee word "Arya" comes from the Rig Veda(1500bc-1000) hardly has anything to do with being white. The "Aryans" you are referring to never mixed with whites but shared some ancestry with the EHG, but they were the ones that mixed with Iranians and North Indians the Sintahastha culture ones, the Ukraine ones mixed with the Europeans.

Huh?
Yeah the yamnaya came into europe(whites) and mixed with the natives there (whites)

 

[MiserableMan]

Huh?
Yeah the yamnaya came into europe(whites) and mixed with the natives there (whites)

The Aryans refers to the descendents of IVC and Sintahastha not yamanaya descendents. So no Europeans are not "Aryan" and never were, not a single historical text refer to them as such either.

 

[Swancel]

Turkey is in the Mediterranean you fool. Go and do some research. Were you educated in Alabama?

Turks aren't European though. They have central Asian origins & are closer to Uyghurs. The Turks who look White have Greek ancestry.

 

[FlotPSL]

The Aryans refers to the descendents of IVC and Sintahastha not yamanaya descendents.

No it doesnt refeer to descendents of IVC
Also dont forget that the aryans are connected to Sintashta and they are related to Yamnaya

So no Europeans are not "Aryan" and never were, not a single historical text refer to them as such either.

This is true but the aryans were indo european so it doesnt matter

 

[FlotPSL]

Turks aren't European though. They have central Asian origins & are closer to Uyghurs. The Turks who look White have Greek ancestry.

@TheStonerOne This is true you cant disagree

 

[TheStonerOne]

So you're telling me these "true Aryans" are from the middle east? Nah, bruv, I am not buying this pseudoscience. That's just jewish propaganda. You have no clue about real history.

This is how an Aryan looks:

This is how an Aryan doesn't look:

"Aryans" don't have a uniform look. You either speak Iranian languages or you don't. That is literally the only condition that makes one Aryan or not. There are "white" Iranians, but their "whiteness" doesn't make them Aryan; it is their LANGUAGE.

Hitler claimed to be "Aryan" but he slaughtered Romani. Roma actually speak Indo-Aryan languages and Germans/Austrians do not.

So no, a Swede is never an Aryan. If the bottom guy is from an Iranian speaking background, then yes, he is Aryan.

Also, even IF the Yamnaya WERE also Aryan, they weren't even "white". They had intermediate skin and brown hair. Neither are traits associated with "whiteness".

 

[Ghoulish]

What fucking beyta cucks. The West is cooked.
Soon Eastern Europe will have more Aryan DNA per capita than Western Europe.
The Slavs will be the true successors of the Aryans if this continues.
Hilarious and sad if you think about it.

 

[TheStonerOne]

Turks aren't European though. They have central Asian origins & are closer to Uyghurs. The Turks who look White have Greek ancestry.

You're a moron. Greeks have NEVER been pale skinned by and large.

They're not closer to Uyghurs you fool. They're closer to Europeans/Middle Easterners. Their Central Asian ancestry is SMALLER than their European/Middle Eastern ancestry. AMOUNTS determine genetic nearness, not merely having components.

Turks don't descend from Greeks or vice versa. They both largely descend from ANATOLIANS.

 

[TheStonerOne]

@TheStonerOne This is true you cant disagree

I can deny a factually incorrect statement. Uyghurs are predominantly Eastern Eurasian. Turks are predominantly Western Eurasian.

 

[FlotPSL]

I can deny a factually incorrect statement. Uyghurs are predominantly Eastern Eurasian. Turks are predominantly Western Eurasian.

Original turks were not white

 

[TheStonerOne]

There is?
Being 100% caucasoid


Mhm ok



They dont have pure white genes tho
Also south italians and iberians arent pure whites too

There's no such thing as "Caucasoid". That's an outdated racial term. Besides, that term included all Middle Eastern and most South Asian populations alongside Europeans.

Correct genetic terms include "Western Eurasian" or "Saharan African". These also aren't "racial categories".

 

[TheStonerOne]

Original turks were not white

Modern Turks are mostly of ANATOLIAN ancestry. Meaning they are mostly the descendants of ANATOLIANS WHO WENT THROUGH LANGUAGE SHIFT. That makes modern Turks overwhelmingly of indigenous ancestry. Modern Turks actually have more Anatolian ancestry than modern Greeks.

 

[FlotPSL]

Modern Turks are mostly of ANATOLIAN ancestry. Meaning they are mostly the descendants of ANATOLIANS WHO WENT THROUGH LANGUAGE SHIFT. That makes modern Turks overwhelmingly of indigenous ancestry. Modern Turks actually have more Anatolian ancestry than modern Greeks.

And what other ancestry?
Mongol

 

[TheStonerOne]

And what other ancestry?
Mongol

Which is a smaller proportion of their overall ancestry. Still closest to Western Eurasians overall. You don't seem to question similar ancestry in Finns or Saami. Only Turks. Wonder why.

 

[FlotPSL]

Which is a smaller proportion of their overall ancestry. Still closest to Western Eurasians overall. You don't seem to question similar ancestry in Finns or Saami. Only Turks. Wonder why.

I have stated multiple times that finns are not pure white like serbs or germans

 

[Swancel]

You're a moron. Greeks have NEVER been pale skinned by and large.

They're not closer to Uyghurs you fool. They're closer to Europeans/Middle Easterners. Their Central Asian ancestry is SMALLER than their European/Middle Eastern ancestry. AMOUNTS determine genetic nearness, not merely having components.

Turks don't descend from Greeks or vice versa. They both largely descend from ANATOLIANS.

Turks are mixed between west Asians, Central Asians, & Europeans while Greeks are mixed between Southern Europeans (50-70%) Balkan/Slavic (5-15%) & West Asians (20-30%) Turks west Asian ancestry is higher than their European ancestry. (West Asian 40-50%) (European 20-30) & central Asian (10-20%)

Greeks clearly have more European ancestry & DNA than Turks.

 

[MiserableMan]

No it doesnt refeer to descendents of IVC
Also dont forget that the aryans are connected to Sintashta and they are related to Yamnaya


This is true but the aryans were indo european so it doesnt matter

Being Indo-European means nothing and no Sintahastha weren't European they were a Eurasian group living around modern kazakhstan, most modern whites share little ancestry with them. Indo-Iranis are there direct descendents and the true "Arya"s".

 

[FlotPSL]

Being Indo-European means nothing

False

and no Sintahastha weren't European they were a Eurasian

They were genetically european
yamnaya + european farmer

most modern whites share little ancestry with them.

modern euros share 30-60% yamnaya/steppe dna

Indo-Iranis are there direct descendents and the true "Arya"s".

Ok but modern iranians arent pure aryans either

 

[TheStonerOne]

Turks are mixed between west Asians, Central Asians, & Europeans while Greeks are mixed between Southern Europeans (50-70%) Balkan/Slavic (5-15%) & West Asians (20-30%) Turks west Asian ancestry is higher than their European ancestry. (West Asian 40-50%) (European 20-30) & central Asian (10-20%)

Greeks clearly have more European ancestry & DNA than Turks.

Guess you're incapable of reading. Did you not see the "/" in my response? The reason I used that is because the Middle East and Europe are part of a GENETIC CONTINUUM. I.E, WESTERN EURASIAN. Regardless of whether your figures are correct or not (who knows and who cares), Turks are still predominantly WESTERN EURASIAN. It doesn't matter if "Greeks" are predominantly "European" or "West Asian" since they are also predominantly WESTERN EURASIAN. If you think "Europeans" are notably distinguished from "West Asians" you're factually, undeniably wrong and you're a science denier.

 

[TheStonerOne]

It also doesn't matter if one has "European" ancestry in arbitrary proportions since "European" is not a proxy for "whiteness". Sardinians have a unique "European ancestry" and yet they are amongst the most pigmented of "Europeans". They're also not some outlier either.

 

[TheStonerOne]

Only retards from the Anglosphere refer to themselves as "white".

Serbia doesn't take statistics on "race" or "skin colour" and neither does any "European country" outside of Ireland, UK or Malta (the latter doesn't make sense either).

 

[TheStonerOne]

Nobody in Italy, not even Northern Italy calls themselves "white". They call themselves either "Italian" or "Lombardi" (if from Lombardy specifically). Certainly, nobody from Apulia calls themselves "white" as that would be delusional.

 

[medialcanthus]

norway cant be 95%

its like the happiest country in the world, im not surprised scandinavia is so high, imagine comparing their cortisol levels and the cortisol levels on this forum

all the red countries are nonfunctioning and no one wants to live there, although honestly i wouldnt wanna live in spain or france either JFL

 

[MiserableMan]

False


They were genetically european
yamnaya + european farmer


modern euros share 30-60% yamnaya/steppe dna


Ok but modern iranians arent pure aryans either

T Europeans themselves have extremely diverse genes, Yamanaya literally lived from the southern region of Ukraine all the way to North Kazaksathan, you are literally trying hard to make them all 100% European when they were not.
Here is the what they were:
the Yamnaya people were not entirely European; they were a hybrid population from the Eurasian Steppe with origins in both Eastern European Hunter-Gatherers and Caucasus Hunter-Gatherers

 

[FlotPSL]

Sardinians have a unique "European ancestry"

they arent white

 

[FlotPSL]

the Yamnaya people were not entirely European; they were a hybrid population from the Eurasian Steppe with origins in both Eastern European Hunter-Gatherers and Caucasus Hunter-Gatherers

Same thing that modern euros have

 

[hopecel]

Shut up, nigger. I am a distinguished oxford historian and anthropologist, with multiple phds and shiieeetttt. I have researched this subject in great depth.

If westerners aren't Aryans, who the fuck is? The Africans and the Indians?

not Africans and Indians but Iranians and Indians

 

[staccato]

View attachment 4154741
Wtf goin on in africa lmao

I wouldn’t let my daughter marry a black guy.

 

[staccato]

funny thing is, Nafris already have Sub-Saharan blood in themselves

I wish every whiteboy married a black woman

what does Israel have to do with this, schizo?

true dat

nobody gives a shit about us

Five percent of sub Saharan and that’s in the south

 

[staccato]

caging at north africa. Theyre the mostb lack ones and most racist

Not even close buddy five percent ss dna on average

 

[looksmaxxed]

i consider it treason and they should be dealt with as traitors should

 

[Deleted member 235076]

Never, even if the nigga is rich

 

[ihatereddit]

this map is fake btw its bait from /int/

 

[InanimatePragmatist]

View attachment 4155024
why are they lying

Virtue signallers

 

[FiendFiend]

Not even close buddy five percent ss dna on average

the cope is insane

 

[LTNUser]

Unless you speak an Indo-Iranian language, you're not Aryan. A German is not an Aryan. Many Indians are Indo-Aryan and thus are Aryan. Aryan has nothing to do with skin colour or supposed race. Stop hijacking words you fool.

What Indians are Aryans?
The North Indians or West?

 

[staccato]

the cope is insane

Doesn’t mean there white just you said they’re the closest to black

 

[GenerationalAutism]

View attachment 4154741
Wtf goin on in africa lmao

only subsaharans are black lol

 

[TheStonerOne]

What Indians are Aryans?
The North Indians or West?

Any Indian who speaks an Indo-Iranian language is Aryan. Indians who speak languages like Tamil are not.