Would you rather be 5’8-5’9 with a 9/10 face or 6’2 with a 4/10 face?

E

ElloinmorninJ

Gold
Joined
Aug 22, 2021
Posts
851
Reputation
1,000
Which would you choose?
 
  • JFL
  • +1
Reactions: Anomaly, Xangsane, Mastermind and 2 others
Obviously 9/10 face

A 9/10 face is giga rare and has a lot of value, while 6'2 height is very common
 
  • +1
Reactions: closedplatecel, Toth's thot, weebcel and 15 others
first one ofc 5'9 aint even that bad of a eight lol
 
  • +1
Reactions: oldcell
wtf 5'9 is considered so manlet these days that someone on a blackpilled forum could suggest this comparison.
 
  • JFL
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 2403, Deleted member 15099, Lux and 4 others
Height only helps if you’re avg to above average
5’9 you can lift fraud or even LL if you wanted

no chance a 4/10 can get to 9/10

but 5’9 can get to 6’2

think practically
 
  • +1
Reactions: weebcel and GigaAscender
200 2
 
  • JFL
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 2403, Deleted member 15099, Xangsane and 4 others
lol this thread

MAke it 5"7 and 9/10 face, not average height like 5"9
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 16090
Alright 5’7 with a 9/10 then.
I still go with 5"7 and 9 face

5"6 is debatable imho and i would think for a whilebut 9+ face is gandy tier thats extreme powerful and rare
 
  • +1
Reactions: systvm and Aloejuice
I'm 5'5 and ugly so both options benefit me :love:
 
  • Love it
  • So Sad
Reactions: Anomaly and PURE ARYAN GENETICS
honestly could go as low as like 5'6 with a true psl 7 face.
 
  • +1
Reactions: oldcell, Deleted member 15099 and Xangsane
Would Be hard to go Back to being heightmogged but 9/10 face mogs so hard Id Have to take it
 
If your 9/10 you could slay at 5'5
 
  • +1
Reactions: Toth's thot, Anomaly and abeilletoimême
I'd rather be 6' and 7 face
 
wtf 5'9 is considered so manlet these days that someone on a blackpilled forum could suggest this comparison.
1 inch below average is considered short yet 3 inches above average isn't considered tall, just lol @ this forum
 
  • +1
Reactions: Toth's thot, Deleted member 8988 and Deleted member 2403
this thread had been made around a hundred times just in the past year :tiny:
 
Not a good comparison. Nobody in their right mind would choose the latter
 
  • +1
Reactions: 6ft4
Dumb question
 
Ill be 5'4 with 9/10 face
 
LL to fix the height will be cheaper than the surgeries to fix the face.
 
Except it’s actually accurate…

6’2 is a 9/10 (90%+) height

5’8 is the equivalent to a 4/10 height

Face is clearly more important when you make an equal comparison.

It's not. You're wrong. Completely absurd and not even accurate.

Nobody in their fucking right mind would turn down being a comfortable Chad at 5'8 for a below average looking man at 6'2

It's dumb and UNAWARE

You are a Chad and 1 inch below average height. A 4/10 height is irrelevant when your face is in the top 10% of the world's pop. With 9/10 we're talking top 5%

A better comparison would have been High Tier Normie 6'2 vs 5'8 Chad. Then you could say it was close. In this instance I would choose HTN 6'2 as the looks-threshold being met would mean my height could make a far GREATER impact with Staceys. Esp with my charisma.
 
Last edited:
Of course. Because face matters more. Way mo

You aren’t understanding me.

I completely agree with everything you said in this paragraph.

‘would you rather have a top 1% net worth or top 1% ability at playing checkers’

It is a valid comparison, and everyone would choose net worth.

Same for the OP. The comparison is ACCURATE and everyone would choose the top face and below average height

I know and I am disagreeing that it is a valid comparison. If everyone would choose the one with more net-worth it pretty much signal;s the one with more net value is obvious.

A much tougher choice would be:

High Tier Normie 6/10 at 6'2 vs Chad 8+/10 at 5'8.

Then you could say it was close. In this instance I would choose HTN 6'2 as the looks-threshold being meant would mean my height could make a far GREATER impact with Staceys. Esp with my charisma.
 
so 25th percentile height and 99.99 percentile face vs 85th percentile height and 30th percentile face

Cruise vs Adam Driver

I WONDER WHICH I’D CHOOSE :ROFLMAO:
 
  • Love it
Reactions: Toth's thot
But, if the goal was to compare whether or not net worth vs checkers is more important, its perfect.

Yes I totally agree. That would be a comparison where the choice would be more difficult. However, if the goal was to compare the importance between height and face, it is a bad comparison.

6’2 height= chad face

But, HTN face is 75%, while 5’8 is about 30% for whites.

So you are nerfing the chad with a 30% attribute while ‘nerfing’ the tallfag (chad height) with a 75% attribute

So, the fact that this is even a discussion, shows an equally good face is a much bigger halo than a equally good height.

However,^ If that wasn’t the goal of the post, then yeah, its an awful comparison.

 

Similar threads

WonkyChin186
Replies
2
Views
52
WonkyChin186
WonkyChin186
A
Replies
5
Views
68
vincentzygo
vincentzygo
𝖘𝖈𝖍𝖎𝖟𝖔 𝖕𝖘𝖑
Replies
1
Views
100
mogging2eternity
M
mortuary
Replies
6
Views
93
mortuary
mortuary
xevuxia
Replies
4
Views
79
MtnLord
MtnLord

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top