Would you rather be 6’2 with an average frame or…

Saint Casanova

Saint Casanova

Emerald
Joined
Apr 11, 2023
Posts
36,551
Reputation
48,371
5’10 with Jeff Seid’s frame and body.
 
  • +1
  • Hmm...
Reactions: inceI, Deleted member 99077, Deleted member 114975 and 7 others
6’2

my life would be pretty much set
 
  • +1
  • Hmm...
  • Woah
Reactions: Deleted member 99077, Deleted member 114975, TitusA and 1 other person
6’2

my life would be pretty much set
Really ? I’m 6’2 and would choose 5’10 if I can look like Seid. Legit perfect physique and 100 times more rare than 6’2.

 
  • +1
Reactions: inceI, Deleted member 114975 and superpsycho
6’2 EASY
 
  • +1
Reactions: anthony111553 and Deleted member 114975
Really ? I’m 6’2 and would choose 5’10 if I can look like Seid. Legit perfect physique and 100 times more rare than 6’2.


if i was 6’2 i wouldnt care about muhh physique as long as im in decent shape.
 
  • +1
Reactions: Zone7411 and Deleted member 114975
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 114975 and Saint Casanova
Really ? I’m 6’2 and would choose 5’10 if I can look like Seid. Legit perfect physique and 100 times more rare than 6’2.


Is Jeff seid the one in his tiktok pfp?
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 114975
I’ll take the second option but with 5’11 instead
 
  • +1
  • JFL
Reactions: Deleted member 114975 and Monarchy
Really ? I’m 6’2 and would choose 5’10 if I can look like Seid. Legit perfect physique and 100 times more rare than 6’2.


How big are ur clavicles
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 114975
5'10 with big frame.
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 114975 and Saint Casanova
  • JFL
  • +1
  • Love it
Reactions: mlbmogger252, Nectar, Deleted member 114975 and 2 others
I am pretty heightpilled but you can't deny the importance of frame and build. It's so much more imposing TBH.
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 114975 and Saint Casanova
How big are ur clavicles
I’m not sure but they’re big. He’s much wider than 6’4 roided Skywalker
IMG 9531
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 114975 and Deleted member 125888
Obviously 6'2
 
  • JFL
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 114975 and Saint Casanova
I am pretty heightpilled but you can't deny the importance of frame and build. It's so much more imposing TBH.
It’s extremely rare to have such a good frame and body though. I’ve never seen it.

Even at 13 he’s shoulders were very broad
IMG 9532
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 114975 and Deleted member 125888
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 114975 and Deleted member 125888
Seid easily
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 101934 and Saint Casanova
Second option 5'10", because wide shoulders induce lust irl
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 114975
  • JFL
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 52293, Saint Casanova and Deleted member 114975
Depends on face and race
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 114975
But jeff seid is 6'1 no?
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 114975
1000018680

5'10
6'2

Not that huge of a difference
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 101934, Deleted member 125888 and Saint Casanova
  • +1
  • Hmm...
Reactions: Deleted member 125888, Deleted member 114975 and averagenormie
  • +1
  • So Sad
Reactions: Deleted member 125888, averagenormie and Deleted member 114975
Wdym not huge litteraly 4 inches, David laid can fraud 6'4 easily and it will look even more brutal
David is 6’1 not a full 6’2. Looks like a 3 inch difference
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 125888 and Deleted member 114975
Wdym not huge litteraly 4 inches, David laid can fraud 6'4 easily and it will look even more brutal
It's not a huge difference look at the photo they both have the same smv actually seid might have more because of face
 
David is 6’1 not a full 6’2. Looks like a 3 inch difference
Well yeah the inch matters honestly 6'2 is def tall and it's brutal if you were to be shorter than 5'10
 
It's not a huge difference look at the photo they both have the same smv actually seid might have more because of face
In dating apps women won't give a damn to seid as his height starts with 5 but david laid has it easier as he is 6'1 or 6'2
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 114975
Regardless, in both cases it's still over without face. Your would decide based on the perceived marginal returns from either gaining slightly more height or slightly wider frame. 5'10" isn't enough of a failo to discount the massive halo that is Seid's frame. But anything lower you're going into manlet territory.
 
  • +1
  • Ugh..
Reactions: Deleted member 130748, anthony111553, Saint Casanova and 3 others
In dating apps women won't give a damn to seid as his height starts with 5 but david laid has it easier as he is 6'1 or 6'2
Not true seid had ideal frame and his face is cl
 
  • JFL
Reactions: Saint Casanova
5’10 with frame
 
  • +1
Reactions: Saint Casanova
  • +1
Reactions: averagenormie and Deleted member 125888
Regardless, in both cases it's still over without face. Your would decide based on the perceived marginal returns from either gaining slightly more height or slightly wider frame. 5'10" isn't enough of a failo to discount the massive halo that is Seid's frame. But anything lower you're going into manlet territory.
Of course. Seid has a chad face too.

Face is 80% of it
 
6'4 with average frame and i'd pick the 5'10 every single time.
 
  • Ugh..
Reactions: anthony111553
sure, seid has the most aesthetic physique in terms of bodybuilding, but is he more aesthetic than laid to normies and females? genuine question
 
Regardless, in both cases it's still over without face. Your would decide based on the perceived marginal returns from either gaining slightly more height or slightly wider frame. 5'10" isn't enough of a failo to discount the massive halo that is Seid's frame. But anything lower you're going into manlet territory.
cope
 
  • +1
Reactions: seanonigger

Similar threads

walrehxx
Replies
20
Views
196
looksovernt
looksovernt
william2605
Replies
26
Views
194
william2605
william2605
william2605
Replies
39
Views
155
gymcelld
gymcelld
surgerymaxxingsoon
Replies
8
Views
76
Daniel zacks
Daniel zacks

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top