Would you rather gook edition

They werent, majority of it was millions of whites vs 10k Chinese


I feel bad for you, how do you gooks even cope :lul: @Maxillular

I am talking about per capita, Whites were the majority by numbers.
 
I am talking about per capita, Whites were the majority by numbers.
Man, you really suck at this. Just like @YouDoYou said.

You're the weak link of the Asian-defenders on this forum.

Do better, actually respond to our points and refute them instead of writing one word responses with no justification.

You're making the gooks look like even more of lolcow JFL
 
Man, you really suck at this. Just like @YouDoYou said.

You're the weak link of the Asian-defenders on this forum.

Do better, actually respond to our points and refute them instead of writing one word responses with no justification.

You're making the gooks look like even more of lolcow JFL
Chinese migrants had the highest rates of manual labor in the 19th century PER CAPITA, White railroad builders were the majority simply because White people were the overwhelming majority in the US at the time.

Most millionaires in the US are White simply because they are the largest racial demographic, but Jews are more likely to be a millionaire PER CAPITA.
 
Chinese migrants had the highest rates of manual labor in the 19th century PER CAPITA, White railroad builders were the majority simply because White people were the overwhelming majority in the US at the time.

Most millionaires in the US are White simply because they are the largest racial demographic, but Jews are more likely to be a millionaire PER CAPITA.
That's a start.

Also, you only responded to Mogwarts' exaggerated joke claim that chinks can't do menial labor,

You didn't refute the main idea which is the fact that Asians are more cucked than Blacks despite not even being enslaved anywhere near the severity of the fashion that Blacks were.
 
  • JFL
Reactions: Mogwarts_Dropout
That's a start.

Also, you only responded to Mogwarts' exaggerated joke claim that chinks can't do menial labor,

You didn't refute the main idea which is the fact that Asians are more cucked than Blacks despite not even being enslaved anywhere near the severity of the fashion that Blacks were.
Historically blacks were more cucked than Asians, only in the last few decades are Asians, especially diaspora ones more cucked than Blacks.

Asians from Asian countries get treated better than Asian-Americans even if their political ideology is anti-western because they generally look better than Asian-Americans, Asian-American men are some of the nicest people you will ever meet, but they get bullied either because they are ugly or non-NT.

Looks>Politics
 
Historically blacks were more cucked than Asians, only in the last few decades are Asians, especially diaspora ones more cucked than Blacks.
Black slaves were forced to cuck, yes, or else they would've been shot or tortured as punishment. There's a difference between being forced to and voluntarily cucking yourself like the Asians do.

+ I would argue that Asians have still been more cucked than Blacks even since the 19th century.

Early 19th century: Black freed men in the North still fought for their rights and shit, while Chinamen railroad miners in california were getting lynched... by MEXICANS.

Early 20th century: Black American soldiers literally participated in the rape of the Japanese JFL

since 1950: It's a wrap.

Asians from Asian countries get treated better than Asian-Americans even if their political ideology is anti-western because they generally look better than Asian-Americans, Asian-American men are some of the nicest people you will ever meet, but they get bullied either because they are ugly or non-NT.

Looks>Politics
This is horrendous cope. Even you yourself admitted that Asians are capped at 7/10.

Asians in Asian countries are the exact same looks level adjusted for socioeconomic class.

Maybe, maybe if you take the upper echelon of rich Asians in Asia, then you have an argument.

But most rich Asians i've seen were only good in the height department, and had paler skin and slightly slimmer/more well-kempt appearance.
Their faces were still equally recessed: maxilla, frontonasial, sometimes mandible and chin as well. Also monolids/epicanthal fold and lack of dimorphism.
 
  • +1
Reactions: Mogwarts_Dropout
Black slaves were forced to cuck, yes, or else they would've been shot or tortured as punishment. There's a difference between being forced to and voluntarily cucking yourself like the Asians do.

+ I would argue that Asians have still been more cucked than Blacks even since the 19th century.

Early 19th century: Black freed men in the North still fought for their rights and shit, while Chinamen railroad miners in california were getting lynched... by MEXICANS.

Early 20th century: Black American soldiers literally participated in the rape of the Japanese JFL

since 1950: It's a wrap.


This is horrendous cope. Even you yourself admitted that Asians are capped at 7/10.

Asians in Asian countries are the exact same looks level adjusted for socioeconomic class.

Maybe, maybe if you take the upper echelon of rich Asians in Asia, then you have an argument.

But most rich Asians i've seen were only good in the height department, and had paler skin and slightly slimmer/more well-kempt appearance.
Their faces were still equally recessed: maxilla, frontonasial, sometimes mandible and chin as well. Also monolids/epicanthal fold and lack of dimorphism.
Most Asians are FACIALLY capped at 7/10, an Asian could still be above a 7/10 if they are tall and have a good physique or a very large dick.

Every Asian with a face above 7/10 has a tall nose bridge and deep-set eyes, which most full Asians don't have naturally.

Deep-set eyes with monolids mog recessed supraorbitals with double eyelids.
 
Every Asian with a face above 7/10 has a tall nose bridge and deep-set eyes, which most full Asians don't have naturally.

Deep-set eyes with monolids mog recessed supraorbitals with double eyelids.
Rich Asians don't have this either. So idk what your point is. This is maybe 0.1% of Asians that don't have a recessed frontonasial suture/lefort 2 region and don't have recessed orbitals.

Also cope, facial rating is your rating. Everything else is a halo at best. No one gives people ratings based on their height.
 
  • +1
Reactions: Mogwarts_Dropout
Rich Asians don't have this either. So idk what your point is. This is maybe 0.1% of Asians that don't have a recessed frontonasial suture/lefort 2 region and don't have recessed orbitals.

Also cope, facial rating is your rating. Everything else is a halo at best. No one gives people ratings based on their height.
Heightpill is real.

A guy with a 4/10 face could still slay and have mass appeal if he is tall and has a good physique as well as big dick.
 
Heightpill is real.

A guy with a 4/10 face could still slay and have mass appeal if he is tall and has a good physique as well as big dick.
He could.

But he's still a 4/10.

Just a tall one.

Your facial rating is your rating.
 
  • +1
Reactions: Mogwarts_Dropout

Similar threads

Scandicel
Discussion Would you rather
Replies
23
Views
97
Azie555
Azie555
swt
Replies
17
Views
130
EvilSatanArseRapist
EvilSatanArseRapist
MixedMAscendingToCL
Discussion WOULD YOU RATHER
Replies
8
Views
71
NoExit
NoExit
Banana.
Replies
18
Views
104
sdram4
sdram4
Beanermaxxer
Replies
6
Views
155
Panchitosbroncs
Panchitosbroncs

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top