Would you rather have a girl who's had 2 ONS or 1-2 LTRs?

D

Deleted member 3573

Neurotransmitter death
Joined
Oct 19, 2019
Posts
3,143
Reputation
4,108
I'd rather have the girl with 2 ONS
 
Depends. If she didnt had sex in ltr then the ltr one
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 3573 and Kingcel32
1–2 LTRs so long as she wasn’t super in love with them. she’s likely to be a much more developed person that way, and a better gf i would hope.
 
  • +1
Reactions: Gargantuan, Chadeep, FailedNormieManlet and 2 others
Depends. If she didnt had sex in ltr then the ltr one
But she likely did, many times. Unless it was a relationship where she was very young. So the LTR chick has a higher notch count
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 18840
2 ONS= 2 acts of sex max. You can assume her first time was awkward which means less damage. This is pretty much a virgin in 2022.

1-2 LTR= A chad or betabux boyfriend with an average of 10-20+ acts of sex per relationship, plus the variable and high chance of hypergamous branching or cheating in the LTR. Even worst if its 2 LTR as it raises the question of why things broke off, twice. Cultured men generally try to keep a thing if its a good thing.

2 ONS is better in every single way. One may say the LTR is better because of her principles. But logic tells me that its a higher chance the LTR chick is more stretched, as its a high chance she had sex with her dude more than twice.

And another main reason i say the ONS is better is because it would have to be something wrong with the LTR chick situation. Either its something wrong with him- and she's coming with all types of stockholm issues or alpha widow memories, or its something wrong with her that made the males call it quits. Your ONS chick wont have those psychological attachments with another guy or issues. With an equal, or less body count and sex frequency. Bonding and mating with her would pretty much make you her first love, if it were possible.
 
Last edited:
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 3573
Ons means somebody enjoyed her pussy with zero effort and commitment. So you are a cuck if you commit to a girl that has given up her pussy so easy to somebody else
 
Last edited:
  • +1
  • Hmm...
Reactions: Afrikancel, Deleted member 3573, Ken and 1 other person
I want the sluttiest one
 
  • JFL
Reactions: Fear
Ons means somebody enjoyed her pussy with zee effort and commitment. So you are a cuck if you commit to a girl that has given up her pussy so easy to somebody else
Yep. At least you know that you had to invest as well as her exes for the LTR option but for the ons option the guys that fucked her didnt have to invest shit lmao
 
  • +1
Reactions: Chadeep and Idontknowlol
Ons means somebody enjoyed her pussy with zero effort and commitment. So you are a cuck if you commit to a girl that has given up her pussy so easy to somebody else

This doesn't translate well into real life though. Principles only apply when you can apply them to a person currently. Either way your "having" a girl who is widowed twice and fucked multiple times by two lovers, or someone who was fucked twice. Who knows what those chicks principles would currently be. And who knows what they were thinking or what their principle was when they got into a LTR, or when they decided to lose their virginity to a ONS.

And im assuming that "having" a girl like how Op refers to, means her love pursuit ends rightfully with you in an ideal fashion. So we can ignore all the other variables coming from from both party's. And in this case, its better to gamble that your girl with only 2 sex encounters has less sexual usage than your girl in 1-2 LTRs that maybe had a significant amount of more sex.
 
Last edited:
Hmm daily sex for a year x2 or two mediocre drunk sexual encounters tough choice op.
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 3573
Your ONS chick wont have those psychological attachments with another guy or issues. With an equal, or less body count and sex frequency. Bonding and mating with her would pretty much make you her first love, if it were possible.
This is pretty much the biggest reason. It's just hard to find the 2 ONS type because those types of girls typically have a way higher count than 2. But there are so many dudes that somehow prefer the LTR type, it's kinda crazy to me
 
Ons means somebody enjoyed her pussy with zero effort and commitment. So you are a cuck if you commit to a girl that has given up her pussy so easy to somebody else
So what if she also gave it up easily to me the first time and I'm the one that retained her? It must mean I'm just as good and better than those guys
 
2 ONS and thats it probably means two thins unless the girl is very young

1) She has isnane standards

2) She has a very low sex drive

both pretty bad traits in a GF

give me 2 LTRs
 
2 ONS= 2 acts of sex max. You can assume her first time was awkward which means less damage. This is pretty much a virgin in 2022.

1-2 LTR= A chad or betabux boyfriend with an average of 10-20+ acts of sex per relationship, plus the variable and high chance of hypergamous branching or cheating in the LTR. Even worst if its 2 LTR as it raises the question of why things broke off, twice. Cultured men generally try to keep a thing if its a good thing.

2 ONS is better in every single way. One may say the LTR is better because of her principles. But logic tells me that its a higher chance the LTR chick is more stretched, as its a high chance she had sex with her dude more than twice.

And another main reason i say the ONS is better is because it would have to be something wrong with the LTR chick situation. Either its something wrong with him- and she's coming with all types of stockholm issues or alpha widow memories, or its something wrong with her that made the males call it quits. Your ONS chick wont have those psychological attachments with another guy or issues. With an equal, or less body count and sex frequency. Bonding and mating with her would pretty much make you her first love, if it were possible.
The pair bonding thing is huge too. If you're going by the research, pair bonding is the biggest reason why you wouldn't want a LTR girl. Pair bonding is obviously WAY more likely to happen in a relationship than one time sex. So going by that logic, the ons chick would have a higher chance of bonding with you. That's why I consider girls who've already had 1 good LTR to be used up, unlike most guys.

In terms of pure numbers, the ons chick wins.
If we're being honest with ourselves, using body count as a proxy for personality traits is pure cope smokescreen garbage because people are afraid to tell the majority of women the truth. No, I don't care that she loved her boyfriend and was with him for a while. More times she's had sex (even with 1-2 dudes) = more used up. I don't care if the LTR makes her seem more conservative. She's still more used up which is what matters.

The fact that a purely LTR chick is considered used up should be a huge redpill for dudes but they still somehow want someone who's fucked the same dude in every way and given her entire prime to him.
 
  • +1
Reactions: dreamcake1mo
Ltr. Shows she's not gonna have insane looks standards
 

Similar threads

Latinolooksmaxxer
Replies
21
Views
323
Ruthless
Ruthless
Vermilioncore
Replies
5
Views
62
Vermilioncore
Vermilioncore
Daddy's Home
Replies
16
Views
287
Alucard69
Alucard69

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top