Recessed Life
Silver
- Joined
- Apr 30, 2023
- Posts
- 589
- Reputation
- 1,076
Discuss
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
Laws of nature = made up bullshit.Anything that goes against the laws of nature = bad
If somebody has infinite options he/she will never ever be satisfied with one. That would make things even worse than now in terms of family violence and shit
Enforcing monogamy as in preventing a chad in sleeping with more women than an incel, or at most, just 1 woman more?Laws of nature = made up bullshit.
Humans are units in a macro-organism of humanity hat is creating it's own internal structures and own order out of chaos. Is it "unnatural" for a cell to develop mitochondria to produce ATP?
That's fucking retarded.
Enforcing monogamy would be of great benefit to society and would make everyone happier.
Resisting evolution is a good thing. Being able to adapt and respond to stressors is literally resistance against further evolution. Humans developing generalized intelligence is resistance against further evolution. Civilization as opposed to living in the forest like niggers bashing each other with stones is resistance against evolution. Man now is virtually the same as he was a million years ago. Because of that, we are now approaching a point in history where our genes can be chosen at will. You don't live by the laws of nature, you pathetic cuck living in your nice middle class home protected by police. If you had to go into the wilderness and fend for yourself you would be dead by morning. Lol at thinking it's good for people to fuck around like chimpanzee niggers. Monogamy is optimal for K selection in child rearing.Enforcing monogamy as in preventing a chad in sleeping with more women than an incel, or at most, just 1 woman more?
Thats going against evolution and as I said would just make society worse. Nature intended that those who can pass their genes should do it in bigger numbers
You do realize that following evolution means choosing the best genes for the enviornment necessary. That doesn't mean everyone would be a big huge ogre bc thats "optimal for survival" but rather only the best genes for this life would be selected, meaning good-looking people, tall people, intelligent ones etc.Resisting evolution is a good thing. Being able to adapt and respond to stressors is literally resistance against further evolution. Humans developing generalized intelligence is resistance against further evolution. Civilization as opposed to living in the forest like niggers bashing each other with stones is resistance against evolution. Man now is virtually the same as he was a million years ago. Because of that, we are now approaching a point in history where our genes can be chosen at will. You don't live by the laws of nature, you pathetic cuck living in your nice middle class home protected by police. If you had to go into the wilderness and fend for yourself you would be dead by morning. Lol at thinking it's good for people to fuck around like chimpanzee niggers. Monogamy is optimal for K selection in child rearing.
this is bullshit, women don't choose "good genetics" especially the ones in my country, they choose braindead alcoholic low iq thugs with garbage facial features, letting them pick those guys is doing nothing for the speciesYou do realize that following evolution means choosing the best genes for the enviornment necessary. That doesn't mean everyone would be a big huge ogre bc thats "optimal for survival" but rather only the best genes for this life would be selected, meaning good-looking people, tall people, intelligent ones etc.
If we truly did follow evolution, or rather allowed only the top people to reproduce, this forum wouldn't even exist since everyone would have the best genes from the previous generation. The fact people these days reproduce bc of their bank account size, is something going DIRECTLY against the evolution that got us in the trouble in the first place.
And you truly believe women (who have options) choose bad genes?this is bullshit, women don't choose "good genetics" especially the ones in my country, they choose braindead alcoholic low iq thugs with garbage facial features, letting them pick those guys is doing nothing for the species
I only support state mandated electrocution of ugly people and turning fat people into lamp fuelDiscuss
Yes. It is pointless.Monogamy is against modern female nature so they will find a way to escape it
yes they choose bad genes, seen it too many timesAnd you truly believe women (who have options) choose bad genes?
People always fail to mention that women can be ugly too. If she is then ofc she is going to pick an ugly dude lmao
Going against the laws of nature is the reason why civil society has not crumbledAnything that goes against the laws of nature = bad
If somebody has infinite options he/she will never ever be satisfied with one. That would make things even worse than now in terms of family violence and shit
So what do you recommend instead? Allowing incels to get into monogamous relationships with stacies?yes they choose bad genes, seen it too many times
Sure but you can't change how people feel. You can prevent psychos from killing by threatening them with prison, but you can't force 2 people to feel love for eachother forever. Thats why this is pointless.Going against the laws of nature is the reason why civil society has not crumbled
I don't care about any of that shit. I care about my line. The rest of humanity can die in a fire for all I care, and every sane man feels the same way. Every man should have a wife and one wife only to breed with and secure their line. No pussy no work. There is no reason to "follow evolution" because in the grand scheme of "nature" every other human is an enemy seeking to outcompete your genes. Why would anyone want to assist in eradicating their own line? Civilization is an outright rejection of "following evolution", and yes, that's a good thing for everyone who is alive today.You do realize that following evolution means choosing the best genes for the enviornment necessary. That doesn't mean everyone would be a big huge ogre bc thats "optimal for survival" but rather only the best genes for this life would be selected, meaning good-looking people, tall people, intelligent ones etc.
If we truly did follow evolution, or rather allowed only the top people to reproduce, this forum wouldn't even exist since everyone would have the best genes from the previous generation. The fact people these days reproduce bc of their bank account size, is something going DIRECTLY against the evolution that got us in the trouble in the first place.
yes and you fail to understand that it wouldnt result in a dead bedroom relationship or the woman hating him, this assumes it's done properly when both are virginsSo what do you recommend instead? Allowing incels to get into monogamous relationships with stacies?
There you go, you said it yourself. You want this for yourself even if it destroys the state. And then you wonder why I said no state would support that.I don't care about any of that shit. I care about my line. The rest of humanity can die in a fire for all I care, and every sane man feels the same way. Every man should have a wife and one wife only to breed with and secure their line. No pussy no work. There is no reason to "follow evolution" because in the grand scheme of "nature" every other human is an enemy seeking to outcompete your genes. Why would anyone want to assist in eradicating their own line? Civilization is an outright rejection of "following evolution", and yes, that's a good thing for everyone who is alive today.
And then they have children. And then those kids have kids. And then kids of their kids have kids. What happens in 4 generations?yes and you fail to understand that it wouldnt result in a dead bedroom relationship or the woman hating him, this assumes it's done properly when both are virgins
Your way is impossible. Nobody is going to collectively say "yeah I wanna die out and willingly let someone take my place"(except some white people ofc). Civilized society is required for what you ask, because the only reason we are even here to be able to make such a choice is because of that. There is literally no hope for what you are asking. It can't exist from the start, because clearly the winniing strategy was to assemble into tribes and to rely on each other to offset each others weaknesses. That aside, humanity is a macro-organism. it isn't even about trying to produce chads, that's just some narcy kids basement dream. It is far bigger than all of that. You, chad, an entire line of chads are just drops in an ocean.There you go, you said it yourself. You want this for yourself even if it destroys the state. And then you wonder why I said no state would support that.
Despite me not being particularly depressed, despite having been brought up nicely, and despite loving my parents a lot, if I had a choice, I wouldn't like to have been born. Now that I am I will live my l life fully from start to finish with a smile, but objectively speaking, I will never be a slayer like I would've been had I been born as a chad.
In your mind its right to increase the amount of people who would end up unhealthy and alone. I am just saying its unnatural and can't ever work.
No, I just want the state to fund my rhino and that’s itDiscuss
And let me ask you this, if a kid with 3 eyes, 5'1 with down's syndrome wants to reproduce, would you make the state give him a wife too?Your way is impossible. Nobody is going to collectively say "yeah I wanna die out and willingly let someone take my place"(except some white people ofc). Civilized society is required for what you ask, because the only reason we are even here to be able to make such a choice is because of that. There is literally no hope for what you are asking. It can't exist from the start, because clearly the winniing strategy was to assemble into tribes and to rely on each other to offset each others weaknesses. That aside, humanity is a macro-organism. it isn't even about trying to produce chads, that's just some narcy kids basement dream. It is far bigger than all of that. You, chad, an entire line of chads are just drops in an ocean.
Yeah sure he can date an indian girl or an asian idgafAnd let me ask you this, if a kid with 3 eyes, 5'1 with down's syndrome wants to reproduce, would you make state give him a wife too?
nothingAnd then they have children. And then those kids have kids. And then kids of their kids have kids. What happens in 4 generations?
So you admit there's a hierarchy? Why not a white, blonde, top 0.0001% female model?Yeah sure he can date an indian girl or an asian idgaf
Quite possibly the darkest thing I’ve read on this site…I only support state mandated electrocution of ugly people and turning fat people into lamp fuel
because I need one of those firstSo you admit there's a hierarchy? Why not a white, blonde, top 0.0001% female model?
Please be trollingbecause I need one of those first
neggedPlease be trolling
I absolutely IQ MOGGED you in this discussion its amazing. Just admit I got a point broskinegged
You absolutely do not you pathetic faggot lolI absolutely IQ MOGGED you in this discussion its amazing. Just admit I got a point broski
Bro is fighting a losing battle of convincing me we should have a government forcing poor women to date 5'1 men with down's syndrome and 3 eyesYou absolutely do not you pathetic faggot lol
Yes I am a narcissist. Every living being is a narcissist at their core. Yes we should force women to date 5'1 genetic freaks.Bro is fighting a losing battle of convincing me we should have a government forcing poor women to date 5'1 men with down's syndrome and 3 eyes
No way you are serious man. What you are fighting for is pure narcissism. Wanting to create ugly offsprings so you can enjoy with a stacy. Not calling you ugly, but by your logic ugly ppl should do so
Nope. We should let top few % reproduce until, in God's good time, everyone has an equal chance at birth; equal not bc of some empty words on a paper but bc they would all be born equally healthy and beautiful.Yes I am a narcissist. Every living being is a narcissist at their core. Yes we should force women to date 5'1 genetic freaks.
Nobody wants that besides cuck fetishists.Nope. We should let top few % reproduce until, in God's good time, everyone has an equal chance at birth; equal not bc of some empty words on a paper but bc they would all be born equally healthy and beautiful.
Let nature do its thing for a few thousand years, and combine it with a civilisation that looks for these traits, and you will get just that. Its 1000 times more humane, in fact
You are stupid if you think so. If you think a person with down's syndrome has an equally good chance at life as a tall chad you are mistaken.Nobody wants that besides cuck fetishists.
You are genetic shit therefore your opinion does not matter to me incel. I only respect the strongYou are stupid if you think so. If you think a person with down's syndrome has an equally good chance at life as a tall chad you are mistaken.
Being a cuck means saying "ohh yeah I wish to be born and get mogged by literally every single person passing by". Since you can't make this decision, a nature can and should
So you won't respect your own children that your little "ideal government" has to force a woman to give you? PatheticYou are genetic shit therefore your opinion does not matter to me incel. I only respect the strong
Monogamy is against modern female nature so they will find a way to escape it