Wallenberg
Kraken
- Joined
- Jan 9, 2021
- Posts
- 28,849
- Reputation
- 37,360
I'm referring to prehistoric times when food was scarce. Shouldn't lard make girls wet?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
Europeans were definitely shorter during prehistoric timesfood wasnt scarce lmao. europeans had the same height they have now. what changed was in agriculture which later changed again with industrial revolution
Europeans were definitely shorter during prehistoric times
Back in prehistoric times men were like 1.5 mno the genetic cap is at 6ft avg
Survives winters easilyplus fat bodies not suited for hunting or working from evolutionary standpoint
nope fatcels suffer 3x more if starvingSurvives winters easily
Elabnope fatcels suffer 3x more if starving
Not sure what you are saying but Europeans have become taller every centuryno the genetic cap is at 6ft avg
their body adapted to a certain kaloric intake. if they cut it drastically they burn the fat so they don't die but it doesn't mean they don't suffer. meanwhile fit chad was hunting comfy even in winter with his superior resistance to cold and painElab
Fat insulates i.e. keeps body warmtheir body adapted to a certain kaloric intake. if they cut it drastically they burn the fat so they don't die but it doesn't mean they don't suffer. meanwhile fit chad was hunting comfy even in winter with his superior resistance to cold and pain
No they weren't. Vikings, considered some of the tallest, were merely around 5'7. Romans were even shorter on average.food wasnt scarce lmao. europeans had the same height they have now. what changed was in agriculture which later changed again with industrial revolution
No they weren't. Vikings, considered some of the tallest, were merely around 5'7.
Nothat isn't even true dude, they were 5'9+
Idk where you got this info from but it's wrong. Roman texts used to exagerate vikings height since romans were way shorter than them, but they weren't even that close to 6 feet. "The examination of skeletons from different localities in Scandinavia reveals that the average height of the Vikings was a little less than that of today: men were about 5 ft 7-3/4 in. tall and women 5 ft 2-1/2 in."that isn't even true dude, they were 5'9+
A fat person can not eat anything for 3 months during winter losinf 20-22kg of the fat during the period ans surviving, a slim guy with 10-14% bf would survive max 1 month like this before dying assuming he loses 7-8kg of weight on average making him sub 8% bf in prehistoric wintertheir body adapted to a certain kaloric intake. if they cut it drastically they burn the fat so they don't die but it doesn't mean they don't suffer. meanwhile fit chad was hunting comfy even in winter with his superior resistance to cold and pain
One straightforward example of what paleopathologists have learned from skeletons concerns historical changes in height. Skeletons from Greece and Turkey show that the average height of hunger-gatherers toward the end of the ice ages was a generous 5’ 9" for men, 5’ 5" for women. With the adoption of agriculture, height crashed, and by 3000 B. C. had reached a low of only 5’ 3" for men, 5’ for women. By classical times heights were very slowly on the rise again, but modern Greeks and Turks have still not regained the average height of their distant ancestors.
Slim guy won't suffer from famine in the First place. Fatcels only started to become accepted when society was built and smarter ppl made other men work for themA fat person can not eat anything for 3 months during winter losinf 20-22kg of the fat during the period ans surviving, a slim guy with 10-14% bf would survive max 1 month like this before dying assuming he loses 7-8kg of weight on average making him sub 8% bf in prehistoric winter
Hunter gatherer males averaged 6'1".Back in prehistoric times men were like 1.5 m
Hunter gatherer males averaged 6'1".
Yeah pretty ridiculous tbh.shh, they don't know. they think humans started as gnomes and started getting increasingly taller because Women are magically altering our genome through the divine magic of 'evolution'
It's a well-known thing that people have been getting tallerwhere does this idea of progressive height 'addition' comes from? it's an illusion created by timeframes and respective affects they had, lmao
I'm referring to prehistoric times when food was scarce. Shouldn't lard make girls wet?
Yeah. That's the evolutionary reason as to why there's tons of volcel fatcels with Chad genes who haven't leanmaxxed and is why leanmaxxing works so well (better than almost all surgeries) for most people.I'm referring to prehistoric times when food was scarce. Shouldn't lard make girls wet?
Depends on environment if food is scarce then yesI'm referring to prehistoric times when food was scarce. Shouldn't lard make girls wet?
Johann Sebastian Bach bred like a psychopath.
View attachment 2085881
He had about 30 children and outlived many. He was overweight and probably autistic, but intelligence and status mattered a lot more than they do today. Bach would not be a sex machine if he was born in the 21st century, where even men who are more attractive than him struggle in the dating market because of the unrealistic standards of women.