D
Deleted member 6128
Pruhtty Women 🫶
- Joined
- Apr 2, 2020
- Posts
- 18,062
- Reputation
- 28,050
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
Blacks have largest ramus but shortest lower thirdthen imagine the mog they give to other races
tbh female black mogs male black too jflBlacks have largest ramus but shortest lower third
then imagine the mog they give to other races
They are skull models made by some company called 'BoneClones'.are these ancient skulls?
What?It's more common to see a male with poor development than a female. Females concentrate around the mean values in everything (be it size, intelligence looks, whatever), whereas males see a wider distribution across the bell curve.
Women are more likely reside in the center of the bell curve. Men in the extremes. Regardless of what trait or characteristic you are examining.What?
Legit women mog guys so hardYeah I’ve noticed women on average have a better facial bone structure than men. Most men I see are boneless potato faced subhumans even if they’re skinny
Sounds like a good thing honestly, women with prominent facial bones are much more attractive anyway.Yeah I’ve noticed women on average have a better facial bone structure than men. Most men I see are boneless potato faced subhumans even if they’re skinny
any pics? its actually very interesting ngl"The faces of men and women in the Viking Age were more alike than they are today. The women’s faces were more masculine than women’s today, with prominent brow ridges. On the other hand, the Viking man’s appearance was more feminine than that of men today, with a less prominent jaw and brow ridges.
These ambiguous facial features mean that it is difficult to decide upon a Viking skeleton’s sex based on the skull alone. Therefore, other traits need to be studied in order to identify the sex of skeletons. Pelvis width can be very useful in this respect."
.Appearance
What did the Vikings look like? Were they dirty? Research shows that many were red-haired and muscular, but somewhat shorter than we are today.en.natmus.dk
NO.jfl literally no difference in browridge and orbitals, the male one is probably some cuck's skull
over for them tbhNO.
The male one is literally the average person today these niggas don’t have a drip of androgen receptors or DHT
What? How is “WTF GTFIH WHITE MEN MOGGED BY WHITE WOMEN” related to Looksmaxing? You didn’t even mention whether someone could give you an explanation for the phenomena. Avoid doing this a second time.THIS IS PART OF LOOKSMAXXING I WAS HOPING SOMEONE COULD GIVE US AN EXPLANATION AS TO WHY WOMEN HAVE BIGGER AND BETTER JAWS THAN MEN
Says bc107NO.
The male one is literally the average person today these niggas don’t have a drip of androgen receptors or DHT
OOOH ITS NOT PART OF LOOKSMAXXINGWhat? How is “WTF GTFIH WHITE MEN MOGGED BY WHITE WOMEN” related to Looksmaxing? You didn’t even mention whether someone could give you an explanation for the phenomena. Avoid doing this a second time.
If anything related to physical appearance was allowed to be put in Looksmaxing, it would allow autisic mogging threads to be put in as well, solely because they’re related to face. While in actuality, they have nothing to do with self-improvement.OOOH ITS NOT PART OF LOOKSMAXXING
Is it part of off topic no because it’s actually related to the face it’s not part of rating I didn’t ask for a rating and not for success cause this is suifuel
No mogging threads go in rating like I saidIf anything related to physical appearance was allowed to be put in Looksmaxing, it would allow autisic mogging threads to be put in as well, solely because they’re related to face. While in actuality, they have nothing to do with self-improvement.
I am not talking about mogging battles where users are to decide a winner. I’m talking about threads like these which revolve around mogging but aren’t related looksmaxing or improving one‘s self.No mogging threads go in rating like I said
Skulls from OP's pic are supposedly from 2,100 years agoestrogen water & inactive lifestyle
BrutalSkulls from OP's pic are supposedly from 2,100 years ago
But I imagine it's become even worse
God I hate that faggot in ur avi I want to tear off his fucking scalpimportant thing is the size difference in literal skull size. are these two representative of IRL size?
he looks like me jfl its overGod I hate that faggot in ur avi I want to tear off his fucking scalp
This destroys the "vikings were high T bone mogging masculine men" cope that so many believe."The faces of men and women in the Viking Age were more alike than they are today. The women’s faces were more masculine than women’s today, with prominent brow ridges. On the other hand, the Viking man’s appearance was more feminine than that of men today, with a less prominent jaw and brow ridges.
These ambiguous facial features mean that it is difficult to decide upon a Viking skeleton’s sex based on the skull alone. Therefore, other traits need to be studied in order to identify the sex of skeletons. Pelvis width can be very useful in this respect."
.Appearance
What did the Vikings look like? Were they dirty? Research shows that many were red-haired and muscular, but somewhat shorter than we are today.en.natmus.dk
Movies are responsible for that tbhThis destroys the "vikings were high T bone mogging masculine men" cope that so many believe.
weve been subhuman ever since agriculture startedWhy do they have overjets when humans had edge to edge bites until only 300 years ago?
Something ain’t adding up here...