WTF IS THIS RAMUS AND WTAF IS THIS SKULL

[shahid khan]

That ramus is taller than most of you alls
dicks and his head is flatter than a new road.

But my main question is. Even tho his ramus is super tall and his gonions are super sharp then why tf is his jaw so narrow and most importantly ehy is jaw so short and not so tall like Tyler maher or cavill? It's as short as jordans or hernans jaw.

Like is it it his gonion eversion? Is it just bigonial width? Is it his narrow maxilla? Is it his small chin?

I remember me and @Orc agreed on how the ramus influences the bigonial eversion etc. and i even read the reasearch papers on how ramus effects your orthodontical structure and how it influences the width of the jaw etc but not her.


Anyways made the topic too long cause i haven't posted shit in months

 

[Orc]

aren't his ears not just abnormally high set.

 

[shahid khan]

aren't his ears not just abnormally high set.

Look at the first pic. They aren't actually. It lines up with his infras nearly

 

[Orc]

Look at the first pic. They aren't actually. It lines up with his infras nearly

you're not looking at bone by the way, this is a stereotypical case of idiopathic masseter hypertrophy

 

[Deleted member 65576]

no temples pill

 

[shahid khan]

you're not looking at bone by the way, this is a stereotypical case of idiopathic masseter hypertrophy

I am tho. Anyhow doesn't explain the fact that even with a long ramus or atleast not a short one. His jaw is still very narrow and pitched in if you know what i mean. Plus his jaw is short asf.

 

[shahid khan]

no temples pill

His frontal bone is still very wide

 

[Deleted member 65576]

His frontal bone is still very wide

No temples = death
The second I lose my temples I kill myself if no money for ht

 

[Orc]

I am tho. Anyhow doesn't explain the fact that even with a long ramus or atleast not a short one. His jaw is still very narrow and pitched in if you know what i mean. Plus his jaw is short asf.

that bulge isn't his gonion, that's the muscle.

 

[shahid khan]

that bulge isn't his gonion, that's the muscle.

Still doesn't make sense how small and narrow his jaw is. His gonions are still considerable huge

 

[shahid khan]

No temples = death
The second I lose my temples I kill myself if no money for ht

They are wide enough. Nearly 0.9 to his zygos

 

[Deleted member 65576]

They are wide enough. Nearly 0.9 to his zygos

do you even know what temples are

 

[shahid khan]

do you even know what temples are

I have been here longer than you have been so the answer is yes.

 

[Orc]

Still doesn't make sense how small and narrow his jaw is. His gonions are still considerable huge

why does it not make sense if you're looking at idiopathic masseter hypertrophy rather than a robust jaw bone, he doesn't have good development, he just has huge masseters.

 

[shahid khan]

why does it not make sense if you're looking at idiopathic masseter hypertrophy rather than a robust jaw bone, he doesn't have good development, he just has huge masseters.

All i am saying is. About 70-80% of that looks bone. Plus masseters as huge as your saying go out on the front. For example Pitts masseters. They are to the front not at the back and lastly i am saying that it isn't about the inversion aswell cause no way a eversion could be that far back like look at when he flexes his masseters in the first pic. They are literally at the front of the ramus

 

[Deleted member 65576]

I have been here longer than you have been so the answer is yes.

It doesn't prove nothing man. You clearly don't know nothing man.

Good temples

Nonexistent temples


Idk what point you're trying to make

 

[shahid khan]

It doesn't prove nothing man. You clearly don't know nothing man.

View attachment 2974371
Good temples

View attachment 2974372
Nonexistent temples


Idk what point you're trying to make

Respectfully. I don't think either one of us were wrong. I thought you meant these temples. Apologies anyways

 

[Deleted member 65576]

View attachment 2974388
Respectfully. I don't think either one of us were wrong. I thought you meant these temples. Apologies anyways

Oh alright. Sorry for being a bit angry then