WW rating scale is the best

View attachment 2014663

It’s the most realistic. PSL is aspie and just based on bones mostly. If I saw these faces in person I would also rate them like this.
Also PSL is unrealistic. Like what’s the point of an 8 existing if no one has it. I’ve seen complete autists here rate people something like 7.75 PSL. Like just round it up and call it jfl with that shit scale.
Im going by this scale from now on personally
Ok but does that scale reflect female gaze or male??
 
  • JFL
Reactions: Deleted member 19798
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 24444
Tinder and online dating is ur rating

end of thread
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 19798
View attachment 2014663

It’s the most realistic. PSL is aspie and just based on bones mostly. If I saw these faces in person I would also rate them like this.
Also PSL is unrealistic. Like what’s the point of an 8 existing if no one has it. I’ve seen complete autists here rate people something like 7.75 PSL. Like just round it up and call it jfl with that shit scale.
Im going by this scale from now on personally
you would rate the first 7 guy a 7? lol
 
  • JFL
Reactions: MoggerChad
I've realized all you care about is forehead lol.
1672159763432


the upper third is beyond subhuman levels
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 21044
Yeah it's shit. But it's not nearly enough to make him ltn. Easy mtn face-wise, he just needs to comb his hair down.
yes it is. a huge failo like that nerfs his other ok features infinitely. you're an mtn. this guy looks much worse.

me rating him an ltn is generous

1672160044927
 
This scale is for people who go outside
I go outside and some of the above average people on the chart are dead average or even below.
 

Similar threads

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top